b-b-b-bb-but WOMEN can't code!!
/g/ btfo and on suicide watch once again
>>53854930
Obviously a transwoman.
>not filled with idiotic comments
All women should code like that
Who is this jizz whiz?
Just look at her code its literally indented blocks of repeated commands with no logic or flow control.
Its basically markup language and therefore not code.
Clearly bullshit.
Well programming it's not just about importing libraries.
>coding....
>>53854930
>b-b-b-bb-but WOMEN can't code!!
literally no one said this
fuck off femanon, go where you belong
>>>/tumblr/
>>53854930
>literally all import statements and if conditions
kek
>>53854966
This.
With so many imports I don't consider a lots of conditionals programming in any way.
When the fuck did coding was accepted as a word?
>>53854930
what's her insta and does she have a nice dicc?
>>53854966
>>53854980
>>53854989
My sides! They are right.
>>53854930
Why do all Professional Software computer scientists use Macbook and OSX? /g/ told me it was for fags.
>>53855024
Because they have high paying jobs
Dogs can code too!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AIhx-NcAUo
>>53855024
It's actually pretty simple. Certain kinds of programmers tend to use certain kinds of systems. .NET and Java developers working on enterprise software tend to use Windows. Frontend web developers working with HTML5/CSS/JavaScript tend to use OS X. People who have programming as both their job and hobby tend to use Linux.
>>53855024
>/g/ told me it was for fags.
>/g/ is one person
it's mostly one person or herd mentality, they're actually really great
>>53854930
How cute is her feminine penis?
>>53854930
>>53855024
Because 80% of developers don't know shit on how to manage an OS properly.
>>53855092
>cd code
gets me everytime
b-b-b-bb-but chocolate chips bread slices can't code!!
/g/ btfo and on suicide watch once again
>>53855119
what the fuck there's no proof the tasty treat wrote that
>>53855125thats some good shit right there
Women CAN code
>>53855177
>skipping leg day to shave.
>>53855177
fuck off faggot
....post dicc?
>>53855142
Well, it's on the same picture as some code, so according to OP, I can claim the bread wrote the code.
>>53855177
But how cute is the feminine dick?
>>53855061
>only web devs use macs meme
OS X is UNIX though, many people use it instead of a Linux system because it does exactly the same thing but with better support.
>>53855125
Why do people use vim? What can it offer that Sublime Text or a fucking full-fledged IDE can't?
Fucking hipster sunhumans
>>53855016
plzno
>>53855125
someone doesn't know how if statements work
>>53855024
4 words: first-party Unix implementation
4 more words: native Bash without bullshit
>>53855016
>The multiplier is too large
I'd like to stick my large multiplier in her addendum iykwim
>>53855016
You can put this "kode" in the CS grad meme pic
>>53855232
4 more words: pretty good resale price
>>53854955
>>53854999
>>53855085
>>53855177
she's a 6/10 at best, calm down
>>53855302
Nigger, am I speaking ching chong chinese with you? I don't care about the face, the important thing is how cute is her feminine penis.
>>53855177
I'd code his chode if you catch my drift.
>>53854930
>ruby
that's not programming, that's scripting
>>53855327
Can you be a little more specific?
>>53855232
4 words 4u:
>you are a faggot
>four hundred percent markup
>cannot fix hardware failures
>cucked by forced ecosystem
>>53855322
>the important thing is how cute is her feminine penis.
>unironically liking traps
>>53855203
>exactly the same thing with better support
It's definitely a nice compromise between Windows and Linux, but there's some obvious shortcomings. No native package management is something that any programmer will feel the sting of, and Homebrew is a poor substitute for apt/yum/pacman. And it's weird you would say OS X has "better support", when a cursory glance at a site like GitHub would show that to be false.
More specifically, In my field (3D graphics), OS X's 6 year old OpenGL stack is a non-starter. And unlike Linux or Windows, a user cannot simply upgrade their drivers or libraries for better support.
>>53855342
It's not gay if my I'm the one active.
/g/ taught me this.
>>53855337
I'd let him slip his feminine dick in my ass (or mouth if he's shy)
Not clear enough for you yet?
I want sex for the sole purpose of procreation!
>>53854930
>/g/ says that only men can code
>/dpg/ says wearing a skirt makes you code better
>mfw I realize that means the Scottish and traps should be naturally good programmers
>>53855203
>only web devs use macs meme
That's true. iOS developers also use Macs. But that's pretty much it. iOS and webdevs.
>>53855367
>It's not gay if I'm the one active.
many more disgusting people like you are active
>/g/ taught me this.
>listening to /g/
>EVER
>>53855367
Fair enough.
I'd kill to fuck a passable trap.
>a-anyone?
>>53855373
But why aren't you the one fucking >her boipucci instead? If you just want to get your ass fucked then any shemale would do.
>>53855222
Vim gives you autism. Once you get used to it, it's painful to switch to anything else.
Female Engineer
>>53855427
>Interaction Engineer
Triggered
>>53855420
I like being a sub sometimes.
After she's done with me, I'll dominate her ass when she's tired after cumming inside me.
>>53855302
She's probably a 7 when she goes out, plus it looks like she's smuggling some meaty luv pups in that hoodie
>>53855341
>you are a faggot
neat
>four hundred percent markup
what is a warranty
>cannot fix hardware failures
why would I do this if I have a warranty that covers this?
>cucked by forced exosystem
iOS is the only forced ecosystem. I'm pretty sure I can write, compile, and run whatever the fuck I want on my Macbook. Not to mention I can run software from origins other than the app store,
>>53855177
Any pictures with /g/ open?
>>53855424
Literally anything else, it makes word processors and chinese imageboards a headache
>>53855427
Why isn't "Engineer" a protected title in Murica like it is in every other civilized country?
>>53854930
>using sublime text
Top kek
>>53855510
How else will there be women engineers?
>>53855513
Got a better alternative? I use sublime and I'm genuinely curious if you know of something better. If you're just being a may-maying faggot, that would be good to know also
>>53855510
Unions.
Not kidding. New York garbage men took up the title Sanitation Engineers to get more pay.
>>53855404
Passable traps are ephemeral. Once the teen and young adult years are over they are extremely disgusting. Also a huge part of them are literally insane because of all the the hormone fucking up their brains summed with their own mental instability and dysphoria.
>>53855510
It's state by state. I know in Ohio it's against the law to call yourself an engineer without being formally licensed.
http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4733.021
>No individual shall, in connection with the individual's name, assume, use, or advertise the title "engineer" in conjunction with another term that modifies the title "engineer" in a manner that conveys the impression that the individual is a graduate of an accredited engineering curriculum unless the individual is a graduate of an accredited engineering curriculum
>>53855477
>what is a warranty
A warranty which covers jack shit without spending more money on aksident planz.
>>53854930
That fucking monitor
>>53855016
I know that was made up to incite rage from basement dwellers but I got a chuckle anyway
>>53855510
>Live in USA
>Work at Subway
>Get promoted from Sandwich Artist to Sandwich Engineer
>>53855061
I'm a computational geophysicist and basically my whole department runs on a combo of OS X on laptops and some workstations, and linux for the clusters/supercomputers. Many, many scientific fields are like this.
So yeah I'm definitely not some faggy webdev I program pretty hardcore simulations and it all runs on my mac before being moved over to a cluster.
>>53854930
>b-b-b-bb-but WOMEN can't code!!
Is this a meme?
Who was Ada Lovelace?
>>53855093
I'd say that software devs use linux more because they like to think they are speshul snowflakes who can't use the same tools as the rest of the people. They need to feel they are in control of everything on their computer, even though most of them use software built by other people. But hey, "I compiled my own kernel" is the same for them as "I built my own kernel". Gives them an extra illusion of control and competence, when they're basically playing with lego pieces made by others.
>>53855634
cute name
was her dick cute too?
>>53855024
It looks pretty and is unixy enough that linux can claim a better dev experience. The hardware is nice and you don't have to dick with config for hours because the UI was designed by committee... and a retarded committee at that.
>>53855492
>Not using pentadactyl
>>53854930
Must've taken a lot of courage to type "women" instead of "womyn"
>>53855016
she could've used recursion and actually done what she wanted to do
>>53855510
It basically is... Like, you can come up with whatever bullshit title you want, but unless you've passed the PE exam and gotten officially licensed by the state you are not an engineer, nor my you sign off on any kind of engineering shit or anything of that sort. You can do engineering work but not independently and you will have to have all of your worked signed off on by an actual licensed engineer.
>>53855634
Even though there's more women being given scholarships and affirmative action'd into university, the number going into tech fields is lower each year. Women make up 60% of the college student population, they only account for 20% of the STEM graduate population.
>>53855262
>>53855736
heartily kek
>>53855576
>back pedaling
Sure I'll bite: what do hardware failures from defects have to do with me dropping my laptop in the tub when I'm masturbating in the shower?
>>53855695
That's possibly an even more retarded approach. At least that's obvious, recursion is going to fail depending on how deep your call stack is when you first invoke it which is probably more dangerous than just flatly refusing to operate on numbers above a certain size.
>>53855754
>what is TCO
>>53855695for(int i = 1; i < b; i++){
a+=a
}
>>53855775
The code's in java you moron
>>53855113
she has a directory called code
that's not crazy
>>53855793
>no such file or directory
>>53855736
>>53855754
I'm not very experienced, but couldn't you just... create a variable, have them input the value, and use said variable in a for / while / do while for sum += a that occurs the amount of times for the value of b?
>>53855736
>>53855799
the structure is /home/heruser/code/labs
yeah, she's just moving into the same directory she's already in, but it's not like she's running "cd code" expecting code to execute
>>53855754
no, it's not more retarded than something that only works when one of the numbers is 10 or less. though if she was allowed to use division she should've just divided it by 1 over b
>>53855781
But... thats wrong, you're adding the value of a to a every time, eventually thats multiplying wrong numbers without using an extra variable, you're changing the value of 'a' every time, and then adding the changed value to itself, which gets exponentially bigger.
For example. 10+=10, 20+=20, 40+=40, and you miss values like say, 10x3.
>>53855807
Yes, essentially what >>53855781 did. This is one of those questions you ask in a "Intro to Programming" course in the first week when teaching students how to use loops.
>>53855754
Or you could just cache the return values
>>53854930
>Implying opening a file with text editor and posing for a selfie is programming
>>53855807
Yeah, that would be the obvious way to do it if you really couldn't use direct multiplication for some reason. It's just funny that a guy suggested a better way to write a joke piece of code and ended up suggesting a stupid approach.
>>53855826
Instead it's something that only works on numbers less than... well who knows? Depends where you are in the call stack. There's still some limit after which it's going to fail, you just don't know what it is until runtime and it actually blows stack.
>>53855222
youre so fucking stupid. What does vi provide? an interface and wrapper for regular expressions primarily, but also very low overhead for command line editing.
You primarily use a gui and dont see the point of quick editing? go ask your dad for a unix shell, fucking fag. Its where real work gets done.
The hipsters are the ones using sublime or atom, which is a fucking webbrowser.
FUCK YOU.
god this made me angey. FUCK YOU FUCK UOU FUCK YOU. I am not joking and dont care that this makes me look autistic. YOU DONT KNOW WHAT YOURE TALKING ABOUT AND PROBABLY CANT FUCKING DO SHIT WITH COMPUTERS.
>>53855842
If you're gonna nitpick it then how's this:int sum = 0;
for(int i = 1; i < b; i++){
sum+=a
}
>>53855860
w/e pussy, you probably just don't 'get' recursion anyways
>>53855850
That fixes things like recursive fibonacci but it doesn't help in this case, you're still going to need to add b stack frames since Product(a, n-1) won't be know at the time you're Product(a, n) is called.
>>53855866
and OP, girls can code. Not many. But I have met girls in their 20's that are better coders than me. Im still worth more because i spend my entire waking life on this shit.
>>53855889
it'd probably be compiled into a for loop anyways
>>53855889
Oh I thought that was fibonacci at first glance. It definitely doesn't make sense to use recursion for a multiplier function.
>>53855016
>not just useng a loop
kill your self.
>>53855510
It sort of is in some sense. like this,
>what are you doing?
>drawing
>oh so your a graphite engineer I guess?
unimportant and unprotected
>what are you doing?
>working on the blueprints that will make the building for hundreds of people to go into.
>oh good day engineer, have my children please.
protected and important.
>>53854930
are you one of those hogrammers op?
>>53855910
It wouldn't, javac simply doesn't do that. In general it would be a pretty hard thing to do outside of static calls, since a member function's behavior changes depending on its member properties you can only treat static tail calling and situations where the object a member function is being called on is compile-time know to be the same as `this`
>>53854930
Who said women can't code?
Why do you need validation from a bunch of anons on /g/?
You wanna code, just learn. Stop using your vagina as an argument.
>>53856008
angry internet virgins
>>53856008
>Who said women can't code?
Is this the first time visiting /g/ or something?
>>53855177
havnt seen this is in a /bst/ thread since last year.
how you doing girly legs
Most women can't be effective programmers for the same reason they can't be effective leaders or comedians. From birth they're coddled by society and sheltered in a bubble that separates them from the realities of the average person. Most women never have to learn to work hard because they get everything handed to them. They never learn to stand on their own two feet because there's always someone willing to protect and care for them.
Of course, when the woman is ugly or fat most of that privilege goes away - which is why you only see fat or ugly women programming or in positions of power.
>>53856114
Man, I'm a guy and I don't know where you're living, you're delusional.
>>53855302
6 points higher than anything you can land.
>>53856020
Nice derailment. My point remains valid.
>>53856050
No, but a lot of men can't code either. The tech industry is predominately male, but you're not getting a coal miner to set up a sql database, even though he has a penis.
If it interests you and you wanna do, just do it. Stop using your genitals as an argument.
>>53856153
how is answering your question a "derailment"? I never said your point was invalid either
>>53855985
>It wouldn't, javac simply doesn't do that. In general it would be a pretty hard thing to do outside of static calls, since a member function's behavior changes depending on its member properties you can only treat static tail calling and situations where the object a member function is being called on is compile-time know to be the same as `this`
Javac doesn't do any kind of heavy optimization, no shit it wouldn't.
Java is JITted, and while I fucking hate JITs, you have to give them credit where due. Oracle jvm would probably optimize this out, not just to a for loop, but to imul. Seriously.
>>53856179
>argument: stop using your vagina as an argument
>retort: angry internet virgins
That's how I read it.
>>53855868
your loop should either start from i = 0 or have the end condition i <= b
>>53856147
And?
You're literally basing your worldview over what women think about their vaginas
Grow your own opinion
>>53856153
>No, but a lot of men can't code either. The tech industry is predominately male, but you're not getting a coal miner to set up a sql database, even though he has a penis.
Sure, I agree with you, but why are you acting like no one has claimed women are incapable of programming? That's obviously the prevailing sentiment here.
>>53856209
that's your fault for being so defensive
>>53855016
>>53855736
>>53855781
>>53855842
>>53855868
>not doing it the right way (^:(defun stupid-mult (a b) (eval (cons '+ (make-list a :initial-element b))))
Literally just got on and this is what I see. What the fuck man.
>>53855868
two problems:
you will get a *(b-1) because your loop only has b-1 iterations
also, what if b < 1?
>>53855092
Muh sides
>>53856239
Or yours for not being specific. This is 4chan. Everything is picked apart.
>>53856232
Because the sentiment is from a small minority within the larger community.
>>53856200[lanny:~]$ javac FuckThisJit.java
[lanny:~]$ cat FuckThisJit.java
public class FuckThisJit {
static int mult(int a, int b) {
if (b == 0) {
return 0;
}
return mult(a, b-1) + a;
}
public static void main(String[] argv) {
mult(1, 99999999);
}
}
[lanny:~]$ javac FuckThisJit.java
[lanny:~]$ java Fuck
[lanny:~]$ java FuckThisJit
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.StackOverflowError
at FuckThisJit.mult(FuckThisJit.java:7)
at FuckThisJit.mult(FuckThisJit.java:7)
... fuckton of frames omitted ...
at FuckThisJit.mult(FuckThisJit.java:7)
[lanny:~]$
You're wrong
>>53856272
>within the larger community
Almost everyone I have had to interact with in my professional career has treated me as incompetent solely on the basis of my gender. My personal anecdote might not count for much, but many other women share the same experience. The sentiment definitely extends to the larger community.
>>53855230
What? It's fine.
>>53856306
If it's Friday, the code prints "yah baby, we made it!".
If it's not Friday, but input is "nah", it prints "your coffee is not strong enough!"
If it's not Friday, and input wasn't "nah", it prints "drink harder, and happy friday!".
So it wishes you a happy Friday even when it's not Friday.
>>53855781
Pig disgustingfor (; b--; ) {
a+=a;
}
>>53856339
>for instead of while
>>53856339
>for (;<EXPR>;) {}
>not while
why do people do this?
>>53854930
That is literally html she's working on.
m-muh optimizationint mul(int a, int b) {
int s = 0;
for (; b--; ) {
s += a;
}
return s;
}
Best way, prove me wrong.
>>53856305
blame equal outcome policies for that.
that wouldnt happen if women were held to the same standards as men were,
even though it would result in much fewer women in tech.
>>53856361
>>53856372
while master raceint sum = 0;
while (b --> 0) // b goes to 0
{
sum += a;
}
>>53854946
First post best post
>>53856384
You can't hold women to the same standards because of the patriarchy. The system is inherently sexist and so you have to give women help to counter the patriarchy.
However, all these bonus programs and help for women are a result of internalised sexism. The admission that women cannot compete in the same arena as men and need a handicap to compete is the admission that women are inherently worse at activities than men are.
This is intolerable for feminists so they take this internalised sexism and translate it into 'The Patriarchy'.
I believe that women can compete on the same playing field.
>>53855016
The proper way is to use shift operation.
>>53856305
Was going to answer with something similar to >>53856384
>>53856404
heh, at first I was like "what the fuck?" and then I was like "oh". This is the programming equivalent to a bad pun
>>53856384
Women are being held to a high standard, higher than men in fact, solely for being women. They are expected to be expert programmers from day 1, otherwise they are dismissed as being idiots, despite men making just as many mistakes when starting out.
>>53856433
>You can't hold women to the same standards because of the patriarchy
This argument uses the same logic as a junkie saying he can't quit drugs because of Satan.
But I'll say that women can not compete on the same playing field as men. But a woman can compete on the same playing field as some men. And vice versa.
My original argument of "a coal miner can't code because of his penis" stands. Most men can not compete on the same playing field of other men either. I will never be a solider, I can never compete as a cage fighter, but the soldier and cage fighter will never be able to do some of the things I do.
It is the individuals responsibility to go after what they want in life, not the society around them to give it to them.
>>53856433
Agreed wholeheartedly. There is no logic behind the idea that women cannot be as good of programmers as men, but every time you see a woman programmer in the media or fiction it's pointed out how it's a big accomplishment.
How is a normal woman being able to do the same thing as any other person an accomplishment? When you see a person who's missing a leg finish a marathon run, that's an accomplishment. Because they're handicappped. When you see a woman programming and treat it the same way, you're reinforcing the idea that women are mentally handicapped and we need to handle them with kid gloves and give undue praise just for participation.
>>53856477
It's easier for women to get a scholarship, more women are going to university now because of that... Despite that many women are wasting those specialized scholarships on gender studies and other such nonsense. Some of those women with specially subsidized degrees are then getting positions in tech companies where their free ticket is at least somewhat frowned upon by others who didn't get that kind of support.
And you're saying that women are held to a HIGHER standard? You're joking, right? I can tell you that the patriarchy didn't give me a free university education and then help me find a job. Say what you like, but the patriarchy is more than compensated for and any backlash felt by women at work is making up for how easy it was for them to get there. If you can't handle people being dicks to you after you get your free education and easy job, I'll gladly take it off your hands, because people have been dicks to me all my life-- yep, that's with my penis and everything.
>>53856556
I didn't get that kind of support and I don't agree with equal outcome. I don't even agree with equality in most cases since equity is more important.
But yes, in my experience as a professional having worked in several different programming positions, women are held to a higher standard. I'm not talking about what the media says, or what universities do, I'm talking about the professional working environment.
It's not even about people being dicks, that's just how people are and I'm well used to it, it's about my work being given less worth because of my gender.
>>53854930
>Ruby On Rails
>That moment when your application gets more dependencies than Ubuntu.
>40 imports of boilerplate code just to get "Hello World" on /hello
>Eats more ram than Firefox
>Runs slower than javascript
>When you want to deploy you end up cloning your entire computer to a VM.
>>53856595
You can always just marry a nice guy who will support you if you don't feel like working.
>>53856249
Oh come on I thought my shitty solution was worth at least a kek or a wew or even a lowly lel.
>>53856638
I don't know enough about LISP or LISP-like languages to know if it's funny or not.
>>53855177
>>53856637
What does that have to do with my post? I like working and I'm good at what I do. What I don't like is being treated as incompetent just for being a woman.
Your reply demonstrates exactly what I'm talking about because, apparently, solely because I'm a woman, I don't want to work and must have mistakenly worked my way up to where I am now, most likely by getting help from a big strong man.
Excuse me while I go throw up.
>>53855868
>nitpick
>original solution wasn't even close to correct
You should work in healthcare tech.
>HOLY SHIT YOU FLOODED THE PATIENT WITH RADIATION AND HE DIED!
>Oh, fucking fine, if you want to NITPICK
>JESUS CHRIST LOOK AT HIS SKIN BLISTER! WE'RE GONNA GET SUED OUT OF EXISTENCE.
>Oh, *fine* I'll go check in a change. God, you people are such whiners.
>>53856739
Need me to hold your hair? jk <3
>>53856595
It might have something to do with more women being whiny babies than men. I dunno. You can tell men to march toward cannon fire and most of them will do it. My wife cries for no reason sometimes. I know first hand that men are expected to do things without complaint that are never asked of women. Don't think for a second that women always have it worse just because men don't complain about it, which isn't to say that you, specifically, haven't been treated unfairly, it is to say that men are also treated unfairly, but are less likely to complain about it. I can tell you that, as a man who calls just about everyone on their bullshit, I have been passed up for promotion in favour of others who are incompetent by every measure of the word, and this being no secret.
Possibly it's different in programming, as I doubt the same situations I've been in would arise. But the first job I ever had, women weren't expected to go anywhere near the garbage if a male was around, and if they were asked to, they would actually whine about it. (I never saw a single male whine about changing/taking out garbage at work)
>this thread
>>53856512
Quit your fucking whining.
When I was in high school, I spent hours every day honing my assembly language graphics routines. I was recognized by my CS teacher as top of my class.
You know who got recognition for his computer "accomplishments"? The fucking weird guy with glaucoma who kept his head literally two inches from the screen in order to see. He didn't accomplish anything interesting. But every little thing he did was met with beaming approval and accolades. Why? Because he's a fucking retarded looking mutant.
Same thing with all the "whiz kids" articles. The average age of a successful tech entrepreneur is something like 38 years old. But that never gets reported on. Meanwhile, the local 14 year old shithead who fixed a virus-riddled computer at a local accounting firm gets a whole article written about him. Remember those Diaspora fucks? The "whiz kids" who were going to upturn Facebook's world? They didn't accomplish jack shit.
People just looove to root for the perceived underdog. If you want accolades and approval, fake some kind of severe disability and roll around in a wheelchair. Talk like a retard and make some mediocre software. You'll get societal approval soon enough.
>>53856756
Calm down Rajeesh this is /g/ not stackoverflow.
>>53856739
I don't know the exact details of your life and experiences, but in my professional experience women simply can't handle criticism like men. If you treat them like you'd treat every other person on the project, they act like you are now and throw a conniption. What you perceive as "higher standards" might actually just be "standards".
>>53856795
"What kind of disabled are you?"
"... ... ... Leg disabled!"
>>53856651
It basically does what the original does only it writes its own code for given values of a and b.
I made it so it also prints out the function it evaluates:defun stupid-mult (x y)
(setq derp (cons '+ (make-list x :initial-element y)))
(princ derp)
(eval derp))CL-USER> (stupid-mult 5 3)
(+ 3 3 3 3 3)
15
CL-USER>
>>53854955
>>53854966
>>53854999
>promising start to a thread
>>53856595
>in my experience as a professional having worked in several different programming positions, women are held to a higher standard
Bullshit. They're held to the exact same standard as anyone else.
Source: professional software engineer for 20 years. Worked with several women. Most of them great. A few of them completely incompetent. Nobody cared that they were women.
The one thing I've noticed about several women is that they're god-awful bosses. They freak the fuck out when there's any push-back. Push-back against a man and he'll listen to the technical argument and either agree or lay down the law and we go with his decision. Push back against a woman and it's HOLY FUCKING SHIT MUTINY YOU HATE ME BECAUSE I'M A WOMAN. They won't even listen to any objective argument, it's her way or the highway.
That's not to say all women in leadership positions are that way, but every damn woman I've worked for (three so far) has been that way.
Oh, and my first job in college was at a deli in a grocery store. Everyone else was a woman. Most sexist bunch of fucking assholes I've ever worked with. Two of them were great. The rest were horrid, sexist asshole bitches.
>>53856739
Or maybe your problem is that you don't know of when someone is taking the piss?
>>53856805
Fuck you, you cunt. Rajeesh is exactly the sort of half-assed fuckwit who would write some barely capable bullshit.
I'm a fucking American and I write correct code. Eat a bag of dicks if you have a problem with that.
Incorrect code is WORTHLESS code.
>>53855548
Not the maymay faggot, but did you try atom?
>>53856382
Gladly.
int mul(int a,int b){
int res=0;
if(b>a){
int c=b;
b=a;
a=c;
}
while(b){
if(b&1)
res+=a;
a <<= 1;
b >>= 1;
}
return res;
}
>>53856849
Fuging phone.int mul(int a,int b){
int res=0;
if(b>a){
int c=b;
b=a;
a=c;
}
while(b){
if(b&1)
res+=a;
a <<= 1;
b >>= 1;
}
return res;
}
>>53856839
Kind regards sirs, I will gladly be doing the needful. I hope this satisfactories you.// the sums
int sum = 0;
// the loops
for(int i = b;
i >= 0;
i--)
{
int temporary = sum
temporary = temporary + a
sum = temporary
}
>>53856795
Oh, and here's some career advice for everyone:
You will ALWAYS be treated like some kind of aspie fuckwith. HR will ALWAYS be condescending toward you, like you're some temperamental child. Your bosses will ALWAYS be condescending cunts who act like you're just making up reasons not to do things because you're lazy (not because of obvious, objective, technical reasons their ideas are doomed to failure).
So, what's the solution? Be a complete aspie retard. Show no humor. Show no social grace. Be a blunt, over-confident asshole.
You'll have jerk-off coworkers who interrupt your day all the time to ask retarded, bullshit, irrelevant questions. "What happens when [obscure feature X is selected] and [unlikely scenario Y occurs]?" They'll actually expect you to know completely arbitrary things about the some shitty 200k line, decade old product you inherited. You know how many times they'll come back when they find out you were wrong? None. They'll never come back, because they were just wasting time in the first place. They didn't want to sit at their desk, so they came over to waste your fucking time. They won't even remember the answer.
So, make shit up. Be confident. Be an assertive asshole. Don't just offer your most objective reasoning and allow your superiors to make the call. Decimate your political opponent. Make a mockery of his stupid idea. Talk around the issue enough and everyone will stop listening, but they won't remember enough to make a reasoned counter-argument.
Embrace the aspie.
>>53856739
>sounding this much like a TV feminist
Come on sis. Stop taking yourself so seriously.
>>53856874
You're incompetent. We'd fire you, Rajeesh, but we're saving oh so much on our discount H1B salaries.
>>53856382
How will you handle negatives mr. Codeur
>>53856760
I'm not acting like men aren't expected to do thinks that aren't asked of women and I don't agree with the macho bullshit stereotype men have to deal with. I don't agree with daddy's little princess who's afraid to do anything in case it messes up her manicure either, but thankfully they aren't the majority, at least not where I live.
I'm glad you call people out on their bullshit and I'm sorry you have been passed up for promotions, that's something I can heavily relate to. But yes, from my experience of part time jobs when I was a teen it's much different in programming.
>>53856805
It's definitely not just "standards". I have seen far worse code than mine sneak past reviews without anyone batting an eyelid. What happens when I point it out? Nobody listens because why would a woman know what she's talking about.
>>53856828
I envy your workplace(s) in that case. Most of the places I've been have been exactly as I described.
Not entirely relevant, but even outside the workplace whenever I tell someone I work at company X they always assume it's some management role. Even when I do explain I'm a programmer they act like I don't know what I'm talking about.
>>53856836
On the internet? It can be pretty difficult sometimes.
If only you young whippersnappers knew.
>>53856867
Lil fix.int mul(int a,int b){
int res=0,sign=0;
if(((a>0)&&(b<0))||((b>0)&&(a<0)))
sign=1;
a=abs(a);
b=abs(b);
if(b>a){
int c=b;
b=a;
a=c;
}
while(b){
if(b&1)
res+=a;
a <<= 1;
b >>= 1;
if(sign)
res=-res;
return res;
}
b-b-b-bb-but highschool dropout criminals can't code!!!
/g/ btfo and on suicide watch one again.
enjoy your future minimum wage developer job.
>>53856957
>>53856971
You just btfo'd yourself. Post value=0.
>>53856821
are you autistic?
>>53856905
>I'm not acting like men aren't expected to do thinks that aren't asked of women and I don't agree with
Well then there's your answer. That type of thing isn't going anywhere any time soon, because the dimorphic differences between the sexes are substantial enough that jobs will have gender preference probably forever.
I wasn't asking for your sympathy, by the way. I concluded a long time ago that sympathy is useless to me. I was just using my own anecdote to better illustrate my larger point. That is, if your biggest problem in your working life is that you get treated like a girl, maybe it's not so bad, yeah? At the very least, you could start your own company if you don't like it. Anita Sarkeesian has no marketable skills and made half a million dollars, so surely you could get something going with the feminist safety net.
>>53856944
If there's an asymptotically faster algorithm, let me know.
>>53856971
>making them use ubuntu
I though burgerstan had rules against cruel and unusual punishment
>>53856905
>I envy your workplace(s) in that case. Most of the places I've been have been exactly as I described.
I don't buy it. I simply haven't met that many sexist programmer types. I know a few profoundly sexist people. They're generally not bright enough to be employed in any meaningful technical position (even the guy who makes $100k per year maintaining shitty VB).
>Not entirely relevant, but even outside the workplace whenever I tell someone I work at company X they always assume it's some management role. Even when I do explain I'm a programmer they act like I don't know what I'm talking about.
Uh.
1) I was coming back on a plane from interviews several years ago. I was wearing a suit. A rowdy bunch of bachelorette party-goers guessed that I was in sales. If you don't look like Mr. Robot, people will assume you're something else.
2) Men treat other men like shit all the time. Look at fucking /g/. If you aren't running Arch, using vim, and writing C (or some functional language, preferably doing ML) then you're a borderline retard. The entire industry is RIFE with tremendous disrespect for each other. Christ, it's like you've never just sat back during a meeting and watched the men interact. Programmers are insecure cunts who take every chance to put each other down.
3) People have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what programmers/software engineers/developers do. They literally don't even understand the phrase "software engineer", so I have to follow with, "uh, programmer..." At best, they'll parrot whatever they've heard/read in media most recently, "oh, you write mobile apps?" in some kind of weird attempt to impress.
Do you have any idea what it's like to date people (women) who NEVER HAVE A FUCKING CLUE what you do? They'll never realize how brilliant your solution was. Your boss doesn't care. You GF doesn't care. Nobody ever notices
So, pardon me if I don't give a shit about your complaints. Welcome to the club.
>>53857002
>If there's an asymptotically faster algorithm, let me know.
int product = a * b;
>>53855125
Can't see the ;
They're fundamental even in pseudocode imo
If it's pseudocode
>>53855866
>relying on a text editor to define your personality
>being *****this***** fucking butthurt
The only real reason to use a text editor in a terminal is if you are using SSH, and even then nano does the job better than vim. Get over it, you are not a better programmer because you use an outdated piece of software and refuse to embrace technology.
>>53857050
Guess what your CPU does internally.
>>53856971
>mfw the actually are better programmers than 70% of /g/ user base.
>>53855177
I see a web browser, a desktop, a file manager, and what appears to be steam.
There are no text editors or compilers depicted in this image, but there certainly is proprietary software.
Sorry, but shaving your legs doesn't count as programming. Nice gameboy though.
>>53855177
>traps can code
>>53856971
>prisoners have to use ubanto
Now that's justice.
>>53857086
It's ruby.
>>53857119
can confirm
t. trap
>>53857142
>t. trap
Prove it.
>>53857174
m8
everyone here is a trap
>>53856944
>literally the peasant's algorithm
/g/ - dumber than peasants
>>53857102
It executes microcode that's substantially faster than yours. Oh, and it's thoroughly proven.
>>53855016
>>53857211
Alright, I'll simplify that for you: what algorithm that microcode executes? Hint: it's shift-add algorithm.
>>53855866
>The hipsters are the ones using sublime or atom, which is a fucking webbrowser.
Nope.
The hipsters are undoubtably the ones using vim and emacs.
It's 20-fucking-16. And you're using a program created for fucking TELETYPES? Are you kidding me?
vim users will rant about how optimal it is to have the navigation keys on home row. What? So, you're using a TEXT EDITOR in some half-assed visual/edit dual mode all so you can compensate for the shittiness of traditional keyboard layouts?
Get yourself a Kinesis Advantage so you can access navigation keys without moving your hands from their home-row positions.
Then get yourself a real editor that has powerful editing features instead of some conglomeration of shitty scripts you hacked together and use out of nothing but habit and some misguided sense of superiority you get from making things hard on yourself.
You scumbags are the modern version of the shithead middle-ages priest who flails himself while chanting hail Mary for the nobility of suffering.
No. Fuck no.
Oh, and you whiny, hipster cunts are clueless about the rich history of text editors from around 1980 - 1995.
>>53857228
you forgot the half a dozen guns, bongs and gym paraphernalia strategically placed all over the 'males' picture
>>53857248
Vim was created for Amiga, the best multimedia machine of it's time. You would have to be literally retarded to think typing d%, d5j, d$, etc. is slower than slower than selecting text with the mouse and pressing delete.
>>53857248
>I tried to use vi but couldn't figure out how to close it - the post
i'm a girl and code for apple, may you should get a job nerds xD
>>53857303
9/11
>>53857237
You think I wasn't aware of that? My point stands:
>It executes microcode that's substantially faster than yours. Oh, and it's thoroughly proven.
>>53857296
Nope. I've used vim for years.
I've also used Eclipse. And Visual Studio. And editors the names of which I don't even remember now.
You know what? Eclipse/VS's refactoring tools alone make vim a retarded exercise in self-flagellation.
>>53857487
You're wrong because asymptotically it is exactly same.
>>53857303
ehehehehehhheheehehee
>>53857514
You're wrong because you appear to have no idea how much more efficient actual opcodes are. Also, you don't seem to grasp the concept of "proven".
>>53855302
not at 2 am
>>53854930
That nose, she looks like a jew
>>53855092
>cd code
>Ruby On Rails
>retard
Heartly kek
>>53854930
Obvious femwhale is obvious
>>53857571
I understand, you have no idea what complexity is. Let's put this argument to rest, call me when you get some education.
>>53857303
bad bait anon
>>53857108
It's either that or rape.
Sadly, 4chan's user base is more accustomed to rape.
>still haven't posted source.
Way to fuck my shit up, senpaitachi.
Also, my ex-gf introduced me to Linux. She had mad skills and did all her crap via command line. She mixed releases of Debian because she "didn't mind" fixing it when things broke down. She would have gone with arch if it wasn't for... I forgot.
The second most romantic thing was when she gave me her root password 'just in case' when I loaned her Eee pc to make an English assignment during the week.
tl;dr
1. Post source on the pic, damn.
2. Women can do anything a man can, because there's no inherent limitation due to having a womb.
>>53857727
>tfw deleting your ex's user account from your box
>>53856663
>>53857795
Why would anyone do that? Besides, I bet she changed the same day I left her.
Perl 6 master racesub mult(Int $a, Int $b --> Int) {
when $b == 0 {
return 0;
}
when $b < 0 {
return -mult( $a, -$b );
}
default {
my $x += $a for ^$b;
return $x;
}
}
>>53855775
>compilers might fix the shitty code into something that works
nice argument
>>53857727
>women can do anything a man can
That's empirically untrue, and I guarantee you're embellishing her accomplishments due to wubwub hormones and your Reddit karma conditioning.
Installing Linux because "I'm such a nerd! xD" is not impressive.
>>53858086
TCO works flawlessly in some languages.
>>53858086
>not using a compiler that guarantees the generated code is optimized properly
>>53858138
I only care for negative karma, my man. It´s the true reddit currency. Bans are the actual reddit gold.
You´re just talking out of your ass. You should have met her. It would blow away many of your prejudices.
>That's empirically untrue
Ok. There are genetic limitations (e.g. Weigh lifting), but such barriers are so far away from the average human that are not relevant for regular cases.
>>53858180
Not every recursive function is TCO-able. In fact most aren't. Even in this case the most logical way of implementing it recursively cannot be optimized that way.
>>53854930
i am womyn heer me rorrr
>>53856210
and why is that?
>>53858275
>Even in this case the most logical way of implementing it recursively cannot be optimized that way
Are you retarded? Of course it can.product a b = f a b
where f acc 1 = acc
f acc b = f (acc + a) (b - 1)
>>53858310
Because your code outputs wrong answer for every input except b = 0.
>>53858324
I had different code in mind. Yours is wrong anyway, for b<=0.
>>53858231
It's meaningless because however women are "good" at computers, it never translates into real world accomplishment or success, and it's not because of some vast male conspiracy, it's because women lack some intrinsic characteristic that prevents them from doing anything truly grand or novel.
We've had computers for 30 years, now. Anyone could visit a computer store and buy a computer and documentation. And still--no major technical accomplishments by women.
I assure you, if there were, males would just nod and say "that's nice.'
Where the friction comes is in women using the state to bully there way into and shit up male enterprises and male achievements, and in their bullshitting their pathetic and mediocre "successes" as exemplars.
If this women and other women are so great, let them just get together and make their own company. I absolutely GUARANTEE you that no men will bang on the door and demand to be hired. No one would care, and it would fail, because women are fundamentally defective.
>>53858504
The original code didn't take <=0 into account, for all we know it could be a function on natural numbers only, so bite me.
this shit has been going on for ages, you poor fuckers don't even have an instagram
>facebook filename
>le b8tfo meme
>le suicide watch meme
>239 posts and 32 image replies omitted
go fucking kill yourselves already.
>>53854960
Underrated post.
Come on guys.
>>53858505
>what is COBOL
>>53858599
An obsolete language designed by a team of 100% MALE engineers.
The team was "led" by Grace "computers are too hard they should be ez ;(" Hopper.
>>53858505
>tfw stealth tranny
>tfw go to these sorts of things and listen to them talk about women's only spaces being invaded by trannies
>tfw nobody suspects a thing
tits or gtfo
>>53855092
But how did she take the picture?
>>53858794
cat/dev/webcam>/tmp/screenshot.bmp
cat/dev/webcam> /tmp/screenshot.bmp
cat/dev/webcam > /tmp/screenshot.bmp
cat /dev/webcam > /tmp/screenshot.bmp
She's still a filthy whore, like all the women in the world.
