>Apple now use robots to recycle the iPhone
>The only manufacturer to care about its ecological footprint and total lifecycle of its products
>webm related
How can other manufacturers even compete?
>>53675869
They get their own robots
so they burn fossil fuels to power the robots thats reaaaaaaally green of them
>>53675908
The robot is located in the US.
>Apple runs 100 percent of its U.S. offices, data centers, and retail stores with renewable energy.
>>53675869
Technological waste is a something I really hate. Everyone is guilty of it, pushing out a new phone every year is terrible. If they really cared they'd move to a more modular platform.
>>53675869
>Builds robot to disassemble phones
The real reason they're doing this is proof of concept to have robots build the phones. They can test methods on old phone disassembly and not have to worry about breaking anything.
>>53675966
>offices
>data centers
>retail stores
None of them sounds like recycling capable to me.
>>53676100
>The robot is located in the US.
If it was built here chances are they don't plan on moving it.
>>53676124
I mean the locations the quoted anon enumerated arent capable of recycling, so the "renewable energy" statement can't be taken in consideration.
>>53675869
>producing parts for iphone SE.webm
But how will chinese kids be able to afford food when apple robots put them out of their jobs?
>>53676218
noice
>>53676218
>>53675869
>every screen, camera module, and screw is saved from ishit 4/5
>applel rereleases iphone se in the same announcement
Hah. Apple is perhaps the company that makes it the very hardest for people to repair their phones or laptops. And repairing when something is broken is orders of magnitude more eco-friendly than throwing it away, even if you recycle the parts (which by the way other manufacturers obviously also do). Apple is certainly not a friend of the environment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVAmnV65_zw
>>53676489
You say that, but have you seen the teardown video of the Nexus 6?
>>53676271
what is exactly the problem with this?
>>53676218
topkek
