Hey guys, I'm poor. Should I replace my AMD HD 7750 with a 260x, a 750 ti or a 670?
>>53666764
>replace
>7750
Gtx 670 is the most powerful of those 3, but is old as fuck, get a GTX 950, same power but newer generation.
>>53666880
lmao no the 670 is still much faster. The only advantage with the 950 is wattage and thermals.
>>53666764
Just get a 760 for 1080p if you are really that poor. The cuda cores help a ton
Get a used 7950 or 7970
>>53666923
GTX 670: 5385
GTX 950: 5236
2.8% Slower using less power and heating less.
And the 670 doesn't have DX12 support, only a moron would get that on this day and age.
>>53666880
>>53666983
>Synthetic benchmarks
Literally /v/-tier. At least use something substantional:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/R9_380X_Strix/23.html
The 670 lies between the 760 and a 770, they all use GK104 - the 760 with 1152, the 670 with 1344 and the 770 with 1536 Shaders. Reference clocks are different, but at least the boost clocks between a 760 and 670 are quite close.
The only reason a 950 would be preferable is power consumption, and with its unclear situation around async compute right now, I wouldn't bet on Maxwell either. Not to mention the ditched memory bus.
Also
>>53666970
This would be a better choice than either of them.
Get one of the best cards from the 7k series. Either the HD 7990 or the HD 7970Ghz
>>53666764
Get a gtx 970, it's best bang for your buck. Don't listen to the hurr durr 3.5 they are just poor and can't afford a superior card.
>>53668186
>best bang for your buck
>970
>>53666983
>DX 12
Still waiting for those killer games since early 2015 that utilize it, it is still not a selling point.
