Why are RAR files still a thing? I can't see any reason

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-03-23 11:18:31 Post No. 53640276
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1286814844205.jpg (75 KB, 800x600) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:18:31 Post No. 53640276 [Report]

Why are RAR files still a thing? I can't see any reason to use it over zip, 7z or tarball depending on what you need.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:20:10 Post No.53640285
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:20:10 Post No.53640285 [Report]

Because of retards who think that splitting a file into 20 parts to distribute is a good idea.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:31:59 Post No.53640385
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:31:59 Post No.53640385 [Report]

The same reason ARJ files are not a thing any more

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:46:02 Post No.53640502
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:46:02 Post No.53640502 [Report]

File: 10gb.png (54 KB, 651x396) Image search: [Google]

Why is LZMA still a thing?

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:49:59 Post No.53640545
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:49:59 Post No.53640545 [Report]

>>53640276
Because sheeple.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:51:05 Post No.53640555
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:51:05 Post No.53640555 [Report]

>>53640276
I like this pic.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:59:55 Post No.53640635
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 11:59:55 Post No.53640635 [Report]

>>53640276
Is it me or is this picture confusing to look at

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-23 12:01:28 Post No.53640649
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 12:01:28 Post No.53640649 [Report]

>>53640635
No shit, Sherlock.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-23 12:01:50 Post No.53640653
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-23 12:01:50 Post No.53640653 [Report]

>>53640635
It is very confusing, because the anatomy seems a little bit off

I still want to find the source.