A user enters the term "Apple" into an image search.
What is the likelihood of them looking for the company, or the fruit?
Depends who they are. Which is why we maintain extensive surveillance records.
To Bring You a Better Experience.
It solely depends on the search history of the person who's logged in.
Now that it's settled, please leave this board, you dense faggot.
Apple inc, apple corp, apple.
Seems to be about 50/50
>>53606287
>50/50
It's 2:1 in favor of fruit going by that image.
>>53606328
Yea, I should have captured more. A bit beyond that image there are tons more apple company pictures.
I have a word filter that changes apple to 'faggot shiteaters'
the results are the same either way.
>>53606204
assuming 2/3'ds og english searches are looking for the fruit (bullshit ballpark figure) and there are about 350 million english speakers in the world, that would mean only 119 million english searches are looking for it. Add to that the other ~6.8 billion people who dont speak english as their first language, thus would not search for the fruit in english, but only for the company in english, theres a (0.119+6.8)/7.15 or 96.7% chance that a random search for "apple" anywhere in the world is for the company, rather than the fruit.
nigga what the fuck is this thread for? I refuse to believe that you didn't think about actually searching on Google about this fucking question. you are literally on a computer. Jesus fuck why is everybody on this website so fucking stupid
>>53606328
4:1 in favor of the company
