Mathew Moore is done with linux, LIN KEKS BTFO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x72CANa6X6k
>>53560855
literally who
>>53560855
Good, so I am, but who cares?
Who?
>virtualbox has changed how they done things
>now they use DKMS and need the kernel headers
Changed? What? From memory it's been this way for over 3 years, at least.
This guy seems to be full of shit and frankly if he's "going to start working on the new version of manjaro spin" (?? manjaro = arch, spin = fedora??) I'd stay away from it.
>>53560855
who?
>>53561013
>>53561063
he mek linoueax bery xbert
>Arch
He got what he deserved for using a hobby meme hipster distro
Why is this guy such an idiot?
I was searching for his retarded mythbusting linux video and found this gem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oncwnuMPQlQ
>Arch
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>53561143
Because Microsoft pays their shills good money.
>>53560855
Why use Vbox when you have KVM readily available?
>To many things are getting broken lately.
>To many things
>To many
>>53560855
>TOO COMPLICATED
>ME WINDUMMY ME NO KNOW HOW DIS WORK
>IT BROKE
>>53560855
>Mathew Moore
You mean that retard normie who doesn't know how to refresh pacman keyrings? The one that thinks Architect installer being broken is Arch's fault?
Wonder why this dipshit doesn't try Fedora.
>>53561395
Also, not Carl's fault if you don't install base-devel to get linux-headers
that architect dev abandoned the project and deleted the g+ community, kek
>Arch community
>users give feedback to devs
>users get banned
AURTISM SPEAKS
>>53561546
>Casual Archniggers BTFO
>"A good operating system is supposed to just move out of your way and let you run your software"
This triggers the Arch-autists
>>53560855
So he basically threw a tantrum and backflipped into being a full Windows cuck. Topkek, Matty Mo. Protip: the world doesn't revolve around you.
And the Architect dev threw his own tantrum and went full kill on the whole thing.
Arch is so dramatic.
>>53560855
He fucked up. Gave up before Debian.
>>53562140
Top most kek
>>53561152
Thanks for that. I don't know why anyone cares about this guy.
Pause the video to read his comments on the now deleted Architect exchange. Made me kek a couple of times.
>I'm a colorful personality.
Matty is also a former Macfag and is planning a comeback.
ARCH LITERALLY BTFO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>53560855
LITERALLY who
not figuratively
literally
i've never heard that name in my life
>>53561152
fucking kek anon, thanks for this magnificent gem
>>53561152
Oh god I saw the original video. He brings up the myth that you can't get a virus on linux. Then he says I'm not running wine or any windows components and I will prove to you I have a virus. Then he runs a virus scanner which finds a virus in a FUCKING DLL FILE. He's all OMG HAHHAHA U CAN GET VIRUS ON LINUX OLOLOLOLOL
>>53563077
>Oh god I saw the original video. He brings up the myth that you can't get a virus on linux. Then he says I'm not running wine or any windows components and I will prove to you I have a virus. Then he runs a virus scanner which finds a virus in a FUCKING DLL FILE. He's all OMG HAHHAHA U CAN GET VIRUS ON LINUX OLOLOLOLOL
Look. I'm pretty fuckin' stupid, so can you explain all that in laymen's terms?
>>53563111
DLLs are windows files, so they can't run on Linux. Matthew is trying to "stage" a point in order to make viewers think that "OH SHIT I GOTTA GET AN ANTIVIRUS!!!"
>>53560855
Who's Mattew Moore? that nigga? Wasn't he the one that laughs at chinise cartoons?
>>53563180
And where was dll file, and why was it on his computer? Was it part of a Windows application on his computer THAT WAS INTENDED TO BE RUN ON WINE?
Wait! So this Linux-based anti-virus scans for WINDOWS viruses?
These are interesting facts to me.
>>53563203
>Was it part of a Windows application on his computer THAT WAS INTENDED TO BE RUN ON WINE?
You pretty much said it yourself.
>Wait! So this Linux-based anti-virus scans for WINDOWS viruses?
Yep.
>>53563203
>Wait! So this Linux-based anti-virus scans for WINDOWS viruses?
What else would it scan for? The only reason you'd need a malware scanner on Linux is if you're running, say, a Linux-based mail server and want to scan attachments for malware before delivering them to user's mail boxes.
>>53563237
>What else would it scan for?
Okay, so I accept Linux viruses must be ultra-rare, but are you telling me there are ZERO linux viruses?
>>53562670
retard
>>53563270
There are, but only if you let the program take root position. They are pretty fuckin' rare, and the viruses that Linux has can't even compare to Windows.
>>53563270
>Okay, so I accept Linux viruses must be ultra-rare, but are you telling me there are ZERO linux viruses?
They exist, but mostly in theory - not so much in practice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_malware
>There has not yet been a single widespread Linux virus or malware infection of the type that is common on Microsoft Windows; this is attributable generally to the malware's lack of root access and fast updates to most Linux vulnerabilities.[2]
>>53563270
>>53563297
Expect that to change as more and more Red Hat software infects the Linux desktop.
If we ever get a widespread Linux infection, I am willing to bet money it's going to be through systemd, kdbus, PulseAudio or some other crap that Red Hat is trying to push.
>>53563380
>systemd
YUCK! Glad I don't use that piece of shit.
>>53563356
Also, the big difference between Windows and Linux in terms of security is that Windows security has been mostly reactionary - Microsoft sees security vulnerabilities as a marketing problem, they only care about losing sales.
Linux security is mostly precautionary - and even now many distros are switching to hardened toolchains, enabling grsecurity kernel patches or even using MACs like AppArmor or SELinux.
Linux security is a few decades ahead of Windows purely on theoretical concepts alone, which means that even legitimate security bugs in programs like Adobe Flash are virtually impossible to exploit on a properly hardened Linux environment.
>>53561013
/thread
THE MEMES ARE TRUE
ARCH IS A SHIT DISTRO
I swear he's quit Linux before, or something close.
omfg so toxic community
attention slut
>>53560855
This guy seems like a dullard.
>>53561395
You forgot to add that he created his own "distro"
>>53560855
You are BAKA!
MM always gets mad and quits everything forever.
And then, few months or one year later, he comes back. His ass got red spots where the door hit him countless times.
>>53563380
all you need to do is hand over root access to binaries you have no means of verifying. Once you run "sudo" on a binary blob you downloaded off the internet, your system might be irredeemably compromised as the malware would make the necessary changes to attach itself to the host operating system.
Security is better than Windows I'm sure, but the potential hazards of user error can't be fixed.
>>53569466
>Once you run "sudo" on a binary blob you downloaded off the internet
who does this?
>>53569466
The funny thing is that even if Isudo malwareit probably won't be able to do anything particularly bad unless it was _specifically_ coded to target my particular distro, version and configuration.
>using an installer
FUCK OFF
>>53566825
wasn't he related to or using manjaro
>>53560855
>cant install arch without a script
>has a manjaro respin
all my fucking keks
>>53569893
>if it doesn't work don't fix it
Linux users lmao
>>53570132
>everything just twerkz on weenblows ;^)
lol ok
>>53570191
