What's the best version control system?
>>53548339
Git
>inb4 muh SVN
mercurial but it is irrelevant now
git
>>53548339
Not git
>>53548351
Mercurial was never as good as git. They fucked up tags and heads in mercurial, especially compared to the painfully simple git model of tags. Mercurial has been adopting the git model in extensions, but it's still shit.
>>53548339
git
Everything else is desperate shit posting
fossil-scm
>>53548339
Git
The more I've used various modern VCSen (git, darcs, mercurial, bazaar), the more I come to the conclusion that the only people who prefer X over git is people who don't really understand use git and want something simpler.
dropbox has version history, you can restore files for up to 30 days. If you want better control, they have an option that lasts for a year
>>53548424
CVS
anoncvs
Code: git
Assets: If you're gamedev or have fucktons of binaries that need versioning, you have to know Perforce. Use git as frontend though.
I like Perforce more than git, personally.
I would say in practice it's git. Most developers know it and it's much better than SVN.
In theory I would say that Darcs is the most interesting.
>>53548339
Github because it has a code of conduct and encourages women, trans, and colored people to be coders
>>53548339
svn
>>53550169
syntax error: expected a version control system
>>53550169
>trolling this weakly
>>53550444
why masayoshi son send his dog to space?
