NeuG USB True Random Number Generator
>>53525439
>True Random Number Generator
>based on the sampling noise of ADCs
You wot mate? L2r to random
>>53525480
that pictures screams out "look how hip i am"
>>53526100
nope. pic related is not a iphone. FALSE
pic related, OP
>>53525439
Shill much?
>>53526901
super secret hacker cave?
>>53527455
yes, it's like the amusement park in mr. robot
no, it's free public wifi ; why would you do anything opsec-y with your own internet connection
>>53525439
>true random
Computer can't do random numbers, right?
Can humans? Has anyone ever tested to see if humans when saying a long list of random numbers use some sort of pattern like computers without realizing it? Seems easy to test.
>>53530088
random numbers is a meme.
There's no such thing.
>>53530167
If that's true then it may be the key to taking a look at the code that runs humans.
>>53530176
The problem is complexity not "random numbers"
>>53530167
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_number_generation#.22True.22_vs._pseudo-random_numbers
>>53530465
>wikipedia
>>53530493
eat your own feces until you get an infection and then slit your wrists you dumb fuck
Use all of your sensory input combined with your own brain's perception of it in the current moment as your encryption, That would be unethical to crack.
>>53525439
My CPU already has a “true” random number generator. (RDSEED)
>>53525758
It's indistinguishable from true random noise.
>>53530088
>Computer can't do random numbers, right?
Depends strongly on what you mean by ‘random’.
Deterministic computers are limited to deterministic randomness - so if you know the state of the computer, you can predict the random stream.
But generally, that's not really a meaningful result. What's important is what happens if you _don't_ know the state of the computer. And in this sense, computes are perfectly capable of randomness.
>Can humans? Has anyone ever tested to see if humans when saying a long list of random numbers use some sort of pattern like computers without realizing it? Seems easy to test.
[spoiler]Humans are absolutely shit at randomness. Like, ridiculously bad. Comparing them to computers is completely unfair - computers blow them the fuck out of the water[/spoiler]
>>53531498
Also, /dev/random is designed by idiots who have no fucking clue how cryptography works.
>>53531330
thanks i could help bro
