http://www.anandtech.com/show/10140/amd-announces-radeon-pro-duo
Nvidia BTFO
>>53496959
It's 6 months too late, new shit is coming in a few short months, and dual fury cards is going to be faster
>>53496959
>525W TDP
Jesus Fuck.
>>53497571
it's 2 full GPUs
263W per GPU is actually pretty good for AMD
>>53497571
>>53497608
>>53497571
The nano only has a 175W TDP, i have no clue why they didn't aim for a lower TDP with this card
>>53496959
I can't wait to bridge them. With a price tag of 3k for both I'm expecting a lot. But may as well try
>>53497622
for 16 googleflips, of course
>>53497608
Yeah, I've been out of the desktop game for a while. I'm used to seeing 2W-48W TDP.
>>53497522
new shit is just more energy efficient, it's not going to perform much faster
>>53497639
GDDR5X should help, but HBM2 cards won't be out for a year now I guess
>>53497667
it'll be a stretch assuming it's GDDR5X or HBM1, more likely it will still be GDDR5. after all they need to keep the HBM shtick for the Fury until Vega comes out.
>>53497667
I thought AMD moved to HBM1 from GDDR5, or are the lower end cards going to move to GDDR5X?
$1499 USD = $2250.92NZD
Ouch
who could afford that in my country?
welp i bet KimDotCom is going to get one.
>>53497712
you'd be better off importing with a lower declared price and hoping customs don't catch it
i managed to get $2100 headphones and a $2000 amp/dac in like that
>>53497702
HBM is still in very low production, the 480/490 will probably be using GDDR5X
I'd rather buy a Titan X..
>>53497744
Literally one of the most pointless cards to exist
>>53497729
>spending $4000 on audio equipment
unless you produce music, what the fuck are you doing
>>53497774
being employed and funding a hobby.
>>53497780
cool
>>53497729
I doubt that would do much as its amd's stock price
I don't even want to add New zelands tax of 15%
I just can't anon seeing the numbers is huge
I know for a fact more then 20,000 of my countrymen will buy one
energy companies are gonna lose their shit over this lel.
Brown outs here we come.
>>53497522
This isn't dual fury? What GPU are they using then?
>>53497805
>I doubt that would do much as its amd's stock price
depending on where you buy it from they could declare it as lower.
>I don't even want to add New zelands tax of 15%
that's what you'd be paying if it gets caught by customs, we don't pay customs fees on electronics import, just GST if it's over the value of $400NZD (declared or discovered as being)
>>53497805
>not buying 2kw of solar panels to run your quad fury desktop
>>53496959
Underwhelming as fuck. They needed this shit as soon as Fiji released. It's way too late now with Polaris and Pascal on the same year. Buying high end 28nm right now is retarded, buying this would be like buying a Titan.
>>53497752
Whatever you say, hotshot
>>53497819
cheaper* is what I meant to say
>>53497844
he's right though. the titan line used to actually be worth something because they had pro capabilities like DP.
then they decided to scrap that with the titan x and just make it an overpriced consumer card.
>>53497830
>Implying they ever see the sun in Mordor
>>53497838
>It's way too late now with Polaris and Pascal on the same year.
except polaris isn't going to have anything more powerful, it's just about efficiency and perf/watt
>>53497853
Oh, I understand now.
The only reason I could see dual fury X being a hard thing to swallow is because of the two separate radiators.
Seriously though, anyone looking for top perf/dollar should just buy 2 nanos and water cool them. The cost of 2 nanos+ blocks should put them close to x2 fury X and they get to keep them under water with one rad.
I'm sure there's a custom bios too that could give them more power draw as well.
>>53497859
>>53497844
12gbs of VRAM is pointless, and the 980ti is faster with an OC
>>53497875
You can increase the power draw through software without anything special
>>53497882
Then why does the Titan X even exist aside from being a status symbol and a money grab due to oil shieks that just buy whatever GPU is the most expensive?
>>53496959
>ACTUALLY 500w+ TDP
Even as an Nvidia fan I was concerned they might put some top bin chips in there. But nope, just regular shit ass housefire fiji. I was guessing $1200 too, now it's $1500.
Jesus fuck amd
>>53496959
>$1500
What the actual fuck? Why not get separate cards instead? They better come bundled with virgin pussy juice, fuck.
>>53497928
Titan X is it not even that expensive.
Non ref 980 ti cost $700.
+ 5% tax
Thats $750.
Add a $120 waterblock.
Thats $870, or $30~$50 away from a Titan X with 6gb more ram and 5% better performance.
>>53497968
>needing waterblock for maxwell
Until you go for crazy bios mods with enormous voltage overhead maxwell under water is a waste of time.
>>53497985
Noise is still noise. I went the waterblock route.
Thinking back now I *might* have paid an extra $50 to get the Titan X and run that shit with the ref cooler and trick myself into buying a waterblock down the road.
>>53497968
What's a water block? Liquid cooling for GPU?
525 TDP
>>53497871
>>53497830
>>53497825
Then there's hope yet.
But GST is a kick in the pants then though we'll get that back at the end of the tax year
>>53498015
Yes
High end cards always have a water block as optional.
>>53498015
How do you not know what a fucking water block is? Further more, why can't you figure it out? Obviously its a water cooling component. Why not google it instead of posting your dumb ass questions on here.
Fuck wit..
>>53498139
looking now it's more expensive to ship stuff from amazon and newegg anyway.
>>53498182
I just wanna make friends..
>>53498239
Ignore him. Probably some fat no life.
>>53498239
If this is true, you can't make friends on 4chan.
And not because people are hostile
Any indication on what radiator size it comes with? I'd be surprised if its 120mm given the 295x2 would saturate its rad.
>>53497622
If your aim is performance who the fuck cares? It's not like 1200w PSUs are hard to find. The Nano's perf/watt was just to fill a niche. The Polaris dual gpu will probably have a lower TDP since it looks like the aim is for low TDP to begin with.
>>53497932
>>53497967
295x2 was $1500 at launch. Why are you surprised it's $1500? It'll go down once Polaris is launched anyway.
>>53498336
the point is to avoid the claims that their cards draw a lot of power when in reality with voltage optimization they can be just as efficient as nvidia cards while still out performing them
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/msi-afterburner-undervolt-radeon-r9-fury,4425.html
>>53498364
I'd rather they release the card with decent clocks than bother with meme wars to be honest
>>53498364
GCN just doesn't like going over 1ghz with sane voltage, but AMD had to do it to maintain performance.
>>53498385
Power draw was irrelevant when Nvidia cards were nuclear reactors. Now Nvidia hascurbed their power draw for maxwell its suddenly the only important factor. Funny that.
>>53498407
It might not matter when it's 15% or 25%.
It matters when the competition is 125% better.
Isn't Polaris going to be 2.25x better pref/watt? That'll put it on Maxwell level.
>>53498455
>Isn't Polaris going to be 2.25x better pref/watt? That'll put it on Maxwell level.
polaris is already more efficient than maxwell, nvidia will most likely take the house fire crown back for this upcoming gen of cards.
https://youtu.be/kuT-bnGcrUM?t=69
the polaris preview is at 1:09.
>>53498455
Wattage is pretty negligible though. Like maybe a few more dollars a year on your power bill. Do cards that pull more power have a shorter life span? Maybe like 10 years down the line but no one even keeps cards for that long.
To be fair at least AMD can produce a dual GPU which isn't garbage, which Nvidia isn't capable of.
>>53498559
that's because they have poorer dual GPU scaling, so it wouldn't make sense for them to make one
>>53498559
Oh they could. They just couldn't drive the Maxwell is so much cooler and quieter meme if they added the needed CLC cooling.
>>53498514
I'll take with a grain of salt. Hiding all the settings and doing all sorts of optimizations in ccc to beat the competition is nothing impressive. Anyone can restrict the power limit and undervolt to achieve favorable results. It's not like amd has ever been truthful about their products actual performance either, understandably so.
>>53497571
Read the article you fuck.
350w tdp.
They just don't want another 295x2 with the card drawing more than it should from the psu 8pins.
>>53498584
>air cooling a dual GPU
Retards
>>53498597
uWotM8
>>53498597
clc on dual gpus only happened within these two generations. dual gpus with even a higher tdp before it has always been air cooled.
>>53498623
AMD didn't design that card. Powercolor did.
If you wanted to give an example you could've used a 7990
>>53498587
look at all that FUD even w hen proof is provided. i'm so glad i won't be associated with nvidiots anymore once polaris is out.
>>53498636
>air cooling a dual gpu card
Yeah that's the image I sent why
>>53498629
Also this.
I have a 5970 at home and it's using the good old AMD blower
>>53498646
Well a 3rd party doing stupid wacky designs isn't really surprising. It's when it comes from Nvidia themselves trying to do a blower style cooler with the Titan Z and then charging $3k for it.
>>53498638
I'm apologize my doubt is causing you so much frustration. I prefer independent reviews over the controlled and unknown claims made by the manufacturer itself, as any claims or statement after all have a direct on the value of the company.
>>53496959
>that price
Hello 2017
>>53497621
>four 8-pin PCI-E power
is it like as much as an oven and stove both running at the same time
>>53498668
they have been showing off as more efficient since keppler and the 750 ti.
I guess it was just a marketing attempt
so did they talk about anything that people do not know about yet? like any actual polaris facts?
>>53497571
Wow, that'll cost you a full 35 cents a month to run.
>>53498780
no they just showed Polaris 10 running Hitman at 1440p at 60 fps for like 30 seconds. No mention of detail settings but if it's on max that should make it equivalent to about 390X performance.
I managed to get a watercooled Titan X from a close friend of mine. The only problem I have with it is that I don't really want to use it over my R7 360 which I have never even put stress on.
Should I sell it or should I keep it in a box until something happens with my current one?
>>53498853
First of all, what cpu are you using?
>>53498831
polaris 10 is mid range?(i hope)
we can speculate: i'd say it makes it normal fury level which is not bad at all
damn, i still want to know about how it handles previous generation trade war faults with nvidia in,like witcher 3 hairworks bullshit
they added additional stuff to counter it
>>53498853
I'll trade you a backup r7 360 for it. The Titan X is awful Nvidia shit and I'll properly dispose of it for you.
>4GB HBM1
>Polaris will also use inferior HBM1
LOL ENJOY YOUR BOTTLENECKS
>>53498898
and still somehow runs 4k better than nvidia
>>53497968
You say that as if you don't have to pay tax on a titan X...
>>53498916
>4GB
>4k
Pick one.
>>53498940
No tax on eBay.
>>53498879
Without looking I think it's an i5-4460 and I got the Titan X for free
NVIDIA FIRST TO HBM2
>>53498962
Then buy the 980ti stuff on eBay too
>>53498965
Sell it and get a second 360 for crossfire
>>53499050
Why would I get two 360s if I don't even really use one?
>>53499090
don't you use hardware acceleration for video playback?
>>53499122
A single 360 does more than fine with video play back.
>>53498945
>goyworks game
wew
>>53498853
it's only going to lose value so idk. if you have no use for it either give it back to your friend or sell it.
>>53499131
2 could do it better!
>>53499090
You are correct. If you aren't playing demanding games, rendering, or any other GPU intensive tasks, you don't need a 980ti. Upgrading to it will have little to no effect on your PC experience. You're best off selling it and sticking with your current card.
>>53499166
The only problem is that I don't have another PCIE lane to put it in. My motherboard only has one and it's currently occupied.
>>53496959
Is this the fury X2? Or something else?
>>53499201
You can see that it has HBM, did you mean the PCB there or the card in the OP?
>>53499225
OPs card looks slimmer than the fury X2 is my point
Starting to get really disappointed with this CLC cuckery going on. This goes for any brand/manufacturer/component.
>>53499244
They probably just redid the resign, the other one was only an engineering sample
>>53499267
why
shit works
>>53499267
Would you rather there be a massive air cooler?
>>53498965
You really don't need a Titan X but just know you're set for a good couple of years with that card when it comes to gaming.
>>53499278
Yes. Nothing wrong with that, they can even handle a fan failure.
>>53499272
Barely.
>HALF the cost of a FirePro W9100
>People still complain
I don't get this.
>>53499351
you're going to get severely worse performance, this is a 500+w card, you're not going to be able to cool it properly while getting the most amount of performance out of it
>>53496959
>>53499365
>Severely worse
Got anything to back that up?
You're not cooling that load very well with a shitty thin rad, either.
We've done vapour chamber cooling with similar loads and die sizes 5 years ago. This CLC thing is only a fad that has gone too far while retaining it's bottom-bid OEM.
I'd be far happier if they TRIED a modular approach, let alone competent pumps, rads and cooling beyond the die.
>>53499363
Doesn't have the driver support of that though
>>53499351
>barely
working on my 7970 just bretty gud.
barely hits 60C in most games on 1440p
then again, i'm using a 140mm CLC
>>53499478
>140mm
If I didn't know that 90% of CLC's use 1mm thick rads with a massive FPI count, I wouldn't know what that meant.
You'd think they could spring to at least 30mm rads and alleviate CFM/static pressure requirements, but no, they just jump to 240/280.
It's all just so fucking cheaply assembled despite the high cost of purchase, it fucking boggles my mind.
>>53499478
Yeah my 590 barely hit 70c with a single fan and two tiny heatsinks.
>>53497780
Did not know being scammed is a hobby.
>>53499672
>It's all just so fucking cheaply assembled
and yet it still fucking works
>my 590 barely hit 70c with a single fan
at least mine isnt loud
>>53499709
>being an unemployed jealous poorfag
lol
>>53499834
Want some pebbles?
>>53496959
Wake me up when they make Radeon Fury MAXX.
>>53499851
>stuff you can't afford = placebo
lol, sperg out elsewhere, or get a job.
>>53499885
I knew it. It's funny to see a poorfag finally flip enough burgers to get $4000 and spend them on placebo.
>>53499909
why are you projecting your poverty onto others? it's really pathetic
>>53499919
>why are you projecting your poverty onto others
Look at your post >>53499834
>>53499919
>>53499909
>>53499885
>this projection loop again
>>53499939
you were the one who came here to talk about the amazing $150 gpu you had to save your pocket money for. settle your autism.
>>53499962
>you were the one who came here to talk about the amazing $150 gpu
Nice assumption there, bud :^)
But sure, each time you call someone a poorfag your 24/192 FLACs gain more quality.
>>53499991
keep spouting nonsense and projecting your proverty, welfarecuck. those shit-tier k812's won't buy themselves you know
>>53500004
>projecting
There he goes again.
>>53499991
> 24/192 FLACs gain more quality
Why is this even a thing? Is it a meme?
>mfw 24/192 vinyl rips
>>53500050
It's for archiving
>>53497621
Why are you posting a picture of a 7990?
>>53500125
Why did you quote a 3 hour old reply?
>>53500165
Why did you quote my reply when you have nothing to contribute.
>>53500165
He did not quote anything.
>>53500193
He did not quote anything.
>>53500193
why did you qoute a 5 min old reply?
>>53500193
Because faggots like you quote old shit and people on mobile click on it and the page jumps to the topish middle of the thread. Requires too much work to scroll up and click the bottom button and it takes forever to scroll down.
Why did you even bother asking a dumb question like that, chances are he's not even online anyone let alone in this thread.
>>53500273
Download Clover, faglord.
>>53500319
>using a dedicated app for a site
eat shit
>>53500326
the mobile version of 4chan is shit
>>53500326
Applecuck detected.
>>53500337
Then don't use it
>>53500347
Yeah I love my iPhone
>>53500356
Damn... Well, your loss.
>>53497729
Being a customs officer must be a real shit job sometimes, I've literally never received an item from china that didn't have the numbers fudged
>>53497621
L-lewd
>>53500356
>Complains about mobile site
>Told to use alternative that works better
>No fuck you I like my garbage
>>53500356
>using apple
its like you love eating shit
>>53496959
>350w tdp dual GPU
is this real life?
>>53502253
It's 525W
>>53498364
>AMD's Radeon R9 Fury has been called everything from a hot plate to a space heater
There must either be a load of shitty Fury's out in the wild, or people running them in garbage cases with nonexistent ventilation, because mine never broke 65° in Furmark after 10 minutes, and I unlocked mine to 3840 shaders too
Literally a red Titan Z
>>53502438
your a shitty lie
Brilliance of /g/ is really shining in this thread.
>>53497752
I'd say that would be the Titan Z. What the fuck is that can d?
>>53498816
The concern isn't cost, the concern is heat generated.
>>53499690
And now-a-days even my old (sold it) R9 280X beats the 590
>>53504259
without the shit-tier multi gpu scaling
>>53500356
>Not using Clover
KEK, fagot
>>53504898
You take that back! Hardocp have maxwell showing 65% scaling in far cry primal and thats amazing!
(ignoring of course AMD showing 83% scaling across hawaii and fiji)
~500W for GPU
~200W for rest of system
~150W overhead
An 850W would be enough.
I've ran an overclocked 290X on a 500W Bronze PSU and two overclocked 290X on 750W Gold PSU and had no problems.
>>53499377
kek
>>53499377
>magic dong
