Any better hexa-core processors other than this one?
fx6300
you don't need single threaded performance unless you're a gaymer
Thank you, just looking for a good enough cpu to do some 4k video editing
>>53486528
The FX 6300 is literally 2008 tier. If you don't want to spend a lot of money, just get an i5.
>>53486428
This
>>53486575
The FX-6300 has ages amazingly well and is best bang for buck.
>>53486575
>FX
>2008
kys
>>53486528
wait, so devs responsible for video processing software are still not utilizing gpus? or is basic "putting shit together" taking so much time even if everything that needs to be done on image itself is running on gpu?
>>53486396
xeon ones.
>>53486727
3D rendering is also CPU-bound the very vast majority of the time
>>53486396
6700k? im looking to upgrade from a FX-8350
>>53486764
the "non-server" mobos which support xeons are expensive as fuck tho
>>53486810
No they're not!
Get them as office clearance bits on ebay.
>>53486528
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Xeon-E5-2670-v3-ES-LGA2011-3-12C-Compatible-with-X99-i7-5820K-5930K-5960X/272162812504?_trksid=p2047675.c100011.m1850&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D35851%26meid%3D21acdcf619c04836a8cabe48f909e3ba%26pid%3D100011%26rk%3D5%26rkt%3D10%26sd%3D151917124981
Why not 12 cores 24 threads? Much better if you are doing actual work.
>>53486847
>2.6GHz
>Single core performance is worse then P4
>>53486858
are you retarded?
>>53486876
Benchmark urself
>>53486396
>McAfee offer inside
>>53486858
/v/ is leaking again
>>53486891
multithread is even higher with HT enabled
