What is your opinion on PicoTorrent?
www.picotorrent.org
looks nice, too bad it wouldn't be allowed on private trackers
and you can get essentially the same thing from utorrent 2.2.1
>>53449154
Pointless torrent client when something like rTorrent, Deluge, qBittorrent and μTorrent 2.2.1 exist.
>>53449179
Why it wouldn't be?
Looks really nice without having to use old software (utorrent) or ugly shit (qbit, deluge)
>>53450074
most private trackers have whitelists, so you can only use the ones they allow. A tiny project like this probably wouldn't be added for months.
>>53449179
>utorrent 2.2.1
No, that has plenty more unfixed bugs and vulnerabilities. You'd essentially have to be a fucking mongoloid to still use it.
>>53450801
Like what? Is there a PoC?
>>53449154
Literally after last month testing windows transmission porn, qbittorent, vuze, and deluge after close observation and close to 1 tb on download / pet total I came to the conclusion that qbittorent is absolute top for windows.
Extraordinarily shitty but decent transmission takes second place.
>>53449154
Looks good OP. Thanks for posting this.
how often is it updated?
>>53449154
>all torrent controls are hidden in context menus.
thanks i like to keep all my tools in the toolbox when i'm working
>>53449154
Boku no pico torrent
https://download.transmissionbt.com/files/transmission-2.92-x64.msi
https://download.transmissionbt.com/files/transmission-2.92-x86.msi
looks ugly. Sometimes people take this flat/simplicity thing TOO far. I think i will stick with deluge. Its simplistic but doesn't look like a piece of crap at the same time.
it's not rtorrent
>7mb
>""""""pico""""""
>>53449154
It is pico like the size of your dick.
#rekt