![technology_017a_1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/LnmgSrv.jpg "technology_017a_1[1].jpg")
Remember when AMD was good?
>>52522634
Yeah, wasn't too long ago.
Yeah, I remember yesterday.
Hahahaha well let's hear it
>>52522634
>oldfag here
remember when /b/ was good?
>>52523267
>>52523267
I remember when it was fun at least. Now it's just a porn dump board.
>>52523320
It's been for a good while. I haven't been on /b/ since 2009 or something.
;_;
ah yes, I remember the olden days. I went to the store with one penny, got myself an amd gaming pc, a bottle of milk and your moms pussy and I still got some change back.
good times.
Never, even during 'their' era, Intel had Pentium D
>>52523422
Way after Intel had to rush out P4 "Extreme Edition" to make up for the damage caused by the original Athlon64 release.
>>52523301
Haven't seen this since I last posted it two years ago. Thanks for the nostalgia anon.
I remember.
>>52523483
That massively overclocked housefire being competitive with a stock Core i7 in a few modern games isn't very good desu.
>>52523483
come on man, everybody knows that's bullshit...
AMDs clocked to 4.5/5 ghz vs stock, with over the double almost triple the consumption, and at most the same performance.
Come on
>>52523506
The only reason it's a housefire is because TSMC/GloFo didn't have Intel's fabs, now they're very close and Intel can't leverage their dieshrinks every few years anymore.
>>52523506
>>52523536
The 8350 costs less than an i5 and matches it for performance. You shills are always saying that an i5 is the best choice for gay men, so that must mean the 8350 is even better, right?
>>52523483
>again this meme pic
>>52523556
doesn't even matter, bro. my 5 year old i5 2500k still runs things fine. nobody sane cares about CPU performance in video games atm.
>>52523572
>asscreeed unity
>Blue AMD
>Red Intel
>>52523556
Good luck running any emulators, heavy web apps and badly threaded enterprise crap with that thing having like 60-70% of Intel per-thread performance.
>>52523506
>FX 8350 is AMDs i5 competitor
>performs competitively against an i7
AMD MASTER RACE
Lol an Phenom X4 955 have almost the same performance (5-10fps difference in games, or less), so that means that FX 8350 is worst than Phenom 2 of 2008?
Phenom X4 955 user here. Using it since 2010
>>52523651
You do realise the fx 4300 will outperform your cpu and overclock better too.
You're pathetic.
>>52523671
You don't need to offend bro.
I was just asking. I'm with this processor for a long time and I'm very satisfied with it. Running all games I want since 2010 without problems.(30-60fps)
I'll change to FX 8350 in the future, or wait for the Zenline, I never liked Intel to be honest.
>just recently introduced worlds first cpu with good integrated gpu and room-heating
Amd is doing fine
AMD cpus are good.
the chipset and motherboards are the problem.
the last AMD processor I owned was an Athlon 64 3000+, back in 2005 when they were still competitive
>>52523814
Good times. Too bad they've been completely dominated by Intel in every single segment since then.
>>52523707
I'd say just see if you can find an fx 6300 or 8320 for cheap on the used market. Your motherboard should be compatible but make sure first. It'll be a decent upgrade considering how cheap the fx processors should be once zen drops.
>>52523814
>implying they're not still competitive
You do know an fx 8350 can outperform an i5 4460, right?
>>52523831
Gigabyte GA 970A DS3P
I'm Brazilian, everything here is fucking expensive and unfair.
>>52523831
>an fx 8350 can outperform an i5 4460
not even close in single core, which is all that matters to 90% of home users
that said, I'm more excited for Zen/Polaris than I have been for any new tech in a long, long while.
Might be selling my 390 if Polaris is worth it.
so what are people thoughts on the earnings report just released by AMD?
>>52523638
Why do and faggots use 2year old Intel cards against amds newest? Come on guys the cherry picking is real.
>>52524016
Soon it'll all be over.
>>52523373
>implying current AMD cards aren't good
they can't beat Nvidia in the highest end segment but below 250 bucks AMD cards destroy Nvidia's unless you find a good deal in the used market
AMD was never good.
>>52523422
>Pentium D
>good
What? It was a super housefire with low performance due to not being a true dual core, but two completely independent cores on one chip. A lot of motherboards literally detected Pentium D as 2 CPU(s).
AMD...............
Press F to pay respects.......
>>52524462
>Being this butthurt a decade later
AMD couldn't even do 3.6GHz
>>52524077
Cause they are the same age.
>>52524077
Do you wonder why they're showing a 2 year old game and 2 year old GPU too?
You realize it's a 2 year old chart, right?
>>52523966
>which is all that matters to 90% of home users
So spend more for Facebook and Twitter?
A smartphone has that group covered.
>>52522634
Hard to forget something that still applies.
AMD mustard race
