>falling for the multiple core jew
very funny picture op, but actually having at least 2 cores has a huge impact on performance
>>52520070
http://discourse-cdn.codinghorror.com/uploads/default/original/3X/1/0/1049b1846f0cfa65ed0a9b4ab970d57d6dc0bd5a.mp4
>>52520070
>11 cores
Come on.
>>52520113
AMD is capable of this.
>>52520070
that's not how cores work. don't be a retard, senpai.
>>52520070
If you're only using one core, you're doing it wrong...
>>52520113
>2020-4
>not having hendeca-core cpu
>>52521631
>Charlie work.jpg
Op's analogy is bad, his post is bad and he should feel bad.
>>52521631
Sure just let me rewrite all the software I use to use multithreading
Why would core 3 be doing all the work instead of core 0?
>>52522356
>the current year
>using single threaded software
>>52522336
I wonder if this has ever been posted before.
>>52522361
>what is a scheduler
>>52520410
That picture is making my brain hurt
>>52522356
Yes let me just not run more than one thing at a time.
>>52520070
>He doesn't know that kernels can and do schedule processes on each core to run simultaneously.
It's like you don't even know how computers even work. What makes you think you have the right to judge multi core if you don't know how computers even computer?
Sometimes I wonder what would happen if you lock all but one core and use only that one core for 5 years.
The benchmarks comparisons for the cores would be great.
>>52522629
Are you high or something?
>>52522492
>What is TempleOS
>>52522650
>What is coupdequillesdanstamere
>>52522356
What kind of Legacy system do you use? Are you a COBOL programmer or something?
>>52522545
>That picture is making my brain hurt
Me too...
Ecpecilly that lamp)
>>52523550
Yep, i hope he touches one of those big capacitors and discharges it on his own body.
>>52520410
>lightbulb in the psu
well fuck me in the pussy.
>>52520070
2 or 4 cores is OK
More than 4 cores is almost useless except in some specific cases. For most users you're just gonna be having idle cores all the time.
AMD shills will deny this.
>>52524959
Useful for compiling
>>52524959
>AMD shills will deny this
anyone knowledgeable about processors will deny this.
>>52524959
encoding
archiving
extraction
rendering
these aren't really 'specific cases'. millions of people need this.
its incredibly useful.
just because you only browse 4chan and rice your desktop, doesn't mean others won't have a use for it.
>>52520113
They missed one, there is a "CPU 11" there (guy wearing a black hat on right, next to CPU 0).
>>52527516
Nah, that's the core they disabled due to yields.
>>52527516
nope its 11 cores
brand new top-notch 2016 coars incoming!
>>52520070
>not cpu 0 working
>>52527700
If they were trying to build 2 houses at the same time though in some kind of assembly line fashion. Then they would get shit done.
The problem is that things aren't programmed to utilize the capability of multiple cores.
>>52520070
yes multiple cores are super useless
>>52527842
>forgot file
>>52525656
Can you please not post coherent, accurate replies? It makes it hard for me to get my shilling shekels from Intel.
>>52520070
more like
>falling for the CISC jew
VLIW on Desktop when?
>it's not a meme
Please refrain from posting flamewar-inducing threads on /g/.
They're not funny, they're an edgy grab for replies that floods the board with shit.
Do you like talking about technology? If so, then do so civilly. It isn't that hard to start a thread asking a question like "What are the pros/cons of NVidia vs. AMD?" or "What are the pros/cons of Apple devices vs. other computer manufacturers?"
Your thread is just cluttering /g/ with filth, and should probably be pruned/deleted
>>52520160
Le triple core. Is good value, strong like bull.
>>52530033
>showing kernel times
>thinks its cool
>doesnt even know fuk is that
btfo faggot
>>52523842
are you a boy or a girl?
>>52532596
i do that too. i think it looks cool :^)
>>52528302
3 YEARS AGO
Y
E
A
R
S
A
G
O
>>52520070
>tfw still dual core on all my machines.
Thanks Apple, I guess..
>>52523161
You made me laugh you silly motherfucker
Speaking of cores: Is Core unparking a meme? Or does it legitimately improve performance for any task?
>be CE
>done a lot of asynchronous code lately
>actually tend to agree with OP
Still needs 4 cores though
>>52535291
It's not a meme if you use a deprecated OS like Windows 7
>>52535291
Set to High performance if you want maximum performance don't forget to set the same for your Nvidia GPU in the Nvidia Control Panel "Prefer Maximum performance" in Power management mode.
Frankly I use Balanced because I didn't noticed any difference between Balanced and High Performance, in the Balanced preset the CPU cores will down clock to save power and go up when it needs more power, stuff like "but what if it down clocks wouldn't that cause bad performance" don't apply anymore as windows is pretty smart about it now,pretty much any 3D application will keep the CPU high clocked.
Using the High Performance will keep the CPU cores clock at it maximum value at all times.
Don't forget to update your Intel MEI drivers too!
Also using the Power Saving preset is good too, thats what I use when I leave my PC downloading at nights, just disable the PC going to sleep and HDs shutting down, it really does saves ALOT of power.
