>>52394600
Nice source you got there, basketball American.

IT'S OVER
AMD IS FINISHED

>>52394600
Let the shitposting begin.

Who the fuck wants a dual card anyway, it just gives you worse temperatures than crossfire.

>>52395040
The thought of 4 way crossfire with two cards is a novelty at best but I like the idea.

>>52395197
I've done it with 2x 2x6870s
Quadfire is a huge mistake

Pretty sure when it was announced there were people here calling it a stupid idea.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

>>52394600
Maybe because their switch to 14nm is going so fast and smooth? They're already showing working samples and seem to have a quarter or more lead on nvida. Why waste resources on a solution you can best with better profit and performance?

>>52394600
Source?

But I assume it's due to the sales of the r9 295X2 were genuinely laughable?
Plus who wants to fork out $1400 for AMD and fuck knows what'd they price that at?

Personally i would not be surprised if it was cancelled, what with Polaris so close. I mean it would be better at this point to focus on something like a Polaris X2.

A dream i have, that in no way will actually happen, is if a Polaris X2 comes out and that its small enough and power efficient enough to work in an ITX build.

Just a dream though.

>>52394600
>4gb hbm memory troubles
>can only use 2gb total vram

Into le trash it goes

>>52395249
2 or more cards is retarded, always was ever since fucking voodoo.

If AMD's new 14/16nm cards are good, then this getting cancelled is not an issue.

>>52394600
>this thread is the only relevant thing that appears when searching "fury x2 cancelled"
wow