![seiko-5-mens-automatic-checkered-black-face-gold-tone-bracelet-and-case-snkg16j1-104-p[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/yKbVwuy.jpg "seiko-5-mens-automatic-checkered-black-face-gold-tone-bracelet-and-case-snkg16j1-104-p[1].jpg")
/wt/ Watch Thread
Gold Seiko 5 Edition
![img56246094[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/LBH4eiA.jpg "img56246094[1].jpg")
>>52296098
I raise you a gold Orient
![$(KGrHqF,!okFJFwGUNFjBSTw6KwWH!~~60_57[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/sWLHz8p.jpg "$(KGrHqF,!okFJFwGUNFjBSTw6KwWH!~~60_57[1].jpg")
/Thread
>>52296121
odd that the seiko is much nicer no?
>>52296098
>>52296121
>>52296140
>capitalist bourgeois filth
![uc333-ae25-5goldcoin[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/3OGTU8S.jpg "uc333-ae25-5goldcoin[1].jpg")
>>52296206
fuck off commie
AMERICA
>>52296246
I bet it's made in China. You could have gotten one of these and it would be more American.
>>52296284
nah bro its made in america I googled it
>>52296301
America is part of Greater China, gwai lo!
Ayy guess what came in
>>52296098
>He spends thousands of a Japanese watch
>kek
You can buy an Omega for less and people won't think you paid $20 for a plated junk watch form asia.
>>52296443
>literally any seiko 5
>more than a few hundred dollars
What are you on about?
>>52296465
Well they are a few thousand yen
>>52296403
It came in way sooner than I expected
>>52296531
Sandwich dials are cool as fuck
>>52296531
Nice vintage Slava, anon.
>>52296465
A full gold one like OP posted ?
>>52296655
http://timemasteruk.co/seiko-5-mens-automatic-checkered-black-face-gold-tone-bracelet-and-case-snkg16j1-104-p.asp
yes
>>52296561
The movement is super pretty. I wonder if that swan neck regulator actually does anything.
Also, the crown action is smooth
>>52296690
thought about buying one of these
hows the quality?
>>52296655
>full gold
It's gold plated, not solid gold.
>>52296690
How much did you pay for a manual wind with no date, chronograph complication or center seconds hand in the year MMXVI?
>>52296710
Excellent so far. The case is very well built. The accuracy is pretty good so far, but I can't get the movement to hack by back winding; so I'll have to see about that. Screwed lugs are cool
what have I stumbled upon?
>>52296739
Without shipping? $120. Its more expensive though because it has a sapphire crystal.
>>52296690
Movement looks pretty nice and sandwich dials are pretty cool but that watch is absolutely disgusting and enormous. Funny how the movement looks better decorated than some actual Panerais.
>>52296850
I don't think you have enough nato straps
>>52296862
Its not as big as I thought it would be. Doesn't look too bad on my bitch wrists. I love how heavy it is though
>>52296912
plastic crystal?
>>52296873
I'm still waiting on like 6 more and another watch. Fucking chink shipping
>>52296925
Sapphire with no AR coating. It looks a lot better in person compared to the shitty camera on my xperia Z ultra
The buckle on this strap is hilariously built
>>52296994
Big*
>>52296994
>The buckle on this strap is hilariously built
I think it's a mens' size.
>>52296945
What does Daniel Wellington have against second hands?
For the strangest of reasons I've always put my watch on my right wrist instead of my left (which is how a watch should be worn so the crown can be wound more easily). Both my parents were left handed but i turned out right handed and have always done things like a left handed person such as using a knife and fork as a left handed person should even though my right hand is dominant since i write and do everything else with it. I've always found it easier to put my watch on with my left hand compared to my right. I want to start wearing it correctly (on the left) but i struggle to put it on and usually find it uncomfortable. Any advice on how to get out of this strange habit? Maybe if i force myself to always wear the watch on the left wrist I'll get use to it but i honestly can't say for sure.
>>52297133
Muh minimalism
>>52296754
>cant see the dial from an angle
Utter Dogshit
Goat Diver Style, dressy or diveish depending on strap and bracelet.
Did I get memed? 47mm on my 6.3" wrist is gonna look gud :^)
no srsly I got the 47mm but my wrist is 60mm wide and the watch is 57mm l2l
>>52297702
The fifty fathoms is the best watch ever made, that's a pretty shit mod though.
>>52297702
Why even bother reading the time from that angle?
>>52297786
Shit? Its the goat dial and not the bland submariner one with dots.
Also the sailcloth is goat band for it.
>>52296098
>Gold Seiko 5
mfw I own one...
>>52298001
needs more gold
gold-face seiko
why Seiko?
>>52298681
Good value for money ratio basically. This extends even to the multi kilobuck tier.
>>52298767
high value watches are only worth it when they confer status like omega and rolex
nobody cares if you spent $5000 on a shitty watch unless it says rolex on it
>>52297225
I do this too, my advice to you is don't bother.
I once went a whole week trying to wear my watch on the "correct" wrist and all I managed to do is bang it everywhere because i was so used to having my watch on the other wrist.
It's really difficult to unlearn that. I also wear my belt the wrong way.
>>52297225
>(which is how a watch should be worn so the crown can be wound more easily).
nah, avoid using the crown while wearing the watch
puts unnecessary pressure on the poor crown and while not necessarily likely, it might break if you did that all the time
only really a problem with chronographs where you do want to use the pushers
>>52299250
That's really only true for normies. However a number of watchfags will agree that something like a grand seiko is on par with, or better, than a given rolex or whatever other watch in the same price bracket.
>>52299340
Even then you just use your thumb instead, it isn't any harder at all.
>>52299250
its a bit hard to say to be fair
who do you even want to impress? sure, the average joe will only know rolex, but if you're sort of above that, something else might be more interesting
>>52299400
>i want to impress watchfags
>>52299430
lets say that you're not a middle class dude saving up for a watch but rather a person for whom it is totally normal/expected to have a luxury watch
do you seriously believe that in such social circles, its all rolex? that something else can't be more interesing
>spending thousands of dollars on something not because you like it but because you want to make sure that people around you notice it and know how much you spent on it.
:-DDD
>>52299480
As long as we're being trite, there's a saying that goes along the lines of "you buy a rolex to impress others, but you buy a grand seiko to impress yourself".
Sup?
Also looking to add a traditional timepiece here pretty soon for special occasions. Looking to spend less than €2,000.
Any suggestions?
>>52299526
fuck that strap suits that sarb so well
>mfw waiting for my new watch in the mail
>>52299742
Thanks anon, how do you like the Delfin?
>>52299999
Thank you Akari.
>>52299999
Ayyyyyyyy Akari with the quints.
>>52300061
great watch well worth what i paid however i really didnt like the brown strap it shipped with and cant make up my mind on what strap to buy
>>52299999
God bless
How does /wt/ feel about two-tone watches?
>>52299708
>>52300118
Get out, you have no place here.
>>52300209
Disgusting, they almost always look incredibly tacky.
>>52300166
Wow, that's the first day-date I've ever liked.
>>52300209
The only acceptable two tones are blue dial divers.
>>52300209
IMO either go hard or go home, stainless steel or yellow gold case (not plated)
>>52300229
a lot of old man love this kind of gold though...I've seen two old man wearing a completely gold watch, not sure if they are real gold or just the color. Kinda guessing they are real since those old people tend to be rich
>>52299999
So glad one of my watches came in today
Waiting sucks
>>52300282
This checks out, the watch I posted was my grandfather's.
>>52300305
Is that one of those panerai mock ups? The quality on those is surprisingly good.
>>52296531
"hey cool watch man, is that a paner....oh. nevermind."
>>52300329
Other than, you know, looking like a fucking panerai
>>52300329
Yep
Scroll up for more pics.
>>52300344
>>52300346
>Homages are bad
>>52300359
Homages aren't that bad, Panerai's disgusting designs are.
>>52300209
I actually prefer them over full gold in some cases. I mostly like it on Rolex though, paricularly Datejusts, but any similar-ish dressy sporty design works.
Two-tone blue-faced submariner also works better than a full gold sub.
>>52300371
are you sure you're not just hating on panerai in general and letting your hatred affect how you perceive the designs?
I just can't see any other explanations for this overly strong madness about the designs; they're not that bad on those basic ones. some look ridiculous with those shitty date magnifiers and blah blah
>>52300378
>>52300255
Having a colored dial is not two toned.
>>52300371
PAMs are the only >42mm watch I'd wear, but fuck paying like 9 grand for an ETA.
That excludes divers by the way. The SKX and the Turtle are nice looking watches
is anyone qualified to give valuations here, maybe watchmaker?
>>52300403
Pretty sure, they're fucking hideous watches. The obscene pricing and lazy movements are only the icing on the shit cake
>>52300422
Watchmakeranon is ded
>>52300440
oh noes, rip in pieces
>>52300359
I'm fine with homages but Panerai and anything that tries to look like a Panerai is absolutely fucking disgusting.
>>52300405
uh, I'm pretty sure two tone refer specifically to watches with their case/bracelet in two tones (nearly always these would be steel and gold)
nothing about dial or even bezel
>>52300534
Right, that's what I was saying to the anon I replied to?
>>52300489
Again, I'm with you on hating Panerai but the basic 1950 design is really nice.
>>52300551
yeah and I believe we meant these specific blue dial watches...which are two tone
>>52300225
huhuhu
>>52300584
Oh that's what you meant, sorry I misunderstood. That one is almost over the line into acceptable territory but it's so flashy it comes off as ostentatious.
>>52299742
I can feel that strap torturing my arm hair.
>mfw shipping for my Nomos got delayed a week
>>52300630
Not him but I have a similar one and it's very comfortable, no pulled hairs at all.
>>52300440
what happened to him?
>>52300608
Seriously smart watches have absolutely no place in the /wt/
>>52300630
I had the same fear for pic related but in the week I've had the strap I haven't snagged a single hair and it's mad comfy.
>>52300913
>watch thread
>on /g/
>a board for technology
>watch combined with modern tech
>has no place in the /g/ watch thread
Gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8 we should d8 m8
Found my dad's old timex he wore in the 70s, or maybe 80s I don't know. He said it's mechanical, maybe at some point I'll get it serviced, at the least I'll just put it in a box when I buy one. Said it was cheap but I guess that goes without saying. Shitty tablet camera trying to get it so the dial is actually visible.
>>52301173
>>52301173
Unless you look like a hell's angel, get a different band if you plan on wearing it sometime.
>>52300567
Somewhat inspired.
>>52299999OH MY GOD THOSE QUINTS
>>52301173
Did people actually wear straps like that? Fuck
>>52301212
The missing 55 on the bezel is really annoying
>>52300312
damn you are lucky! Wish I can inherit a watch...my grandfather use to have a rolex, but he lost it while working. Pic related is the only watches he have left
>>52301190
I don't, the strap is beat to hell and was kind of falling apart some taking it off the watch, ton of green shit melted to it. The actual watch looks ok, no numbers on it or anything though. I have never gotten a watch serviced though and have no clue what it would cost.
>>52301468
Depends on who you take it to, and how much work is required. I'd say don't be surprised if a full service of the movement costs a few hundred. Might be less, who knows.
Is there anywhere I can purchase the reverse panda Seagull 1963 cheaper than $300?
>>52301751
probably not
Post SARBs.
>>52301024
fattie detected
>>52301844
nigger do you gotta post 20 times in these threads?!?!?!?! WE NEED NEW MATERIAL TBQH FAMAS
>>52302117
Thanks for contributing, faggot.
It's a decent watch and they're good pictures, I don't have an issue with him being a faggot all over the place.
>>52302117
Well i finally woke up after a 13 hour workday.
Welp, 30 minutes to get myself in gear and take a shit and i have another 5 hours~.
I wanted a gold Casio but now fags wear them all the time.
Any alternatives that are same price?
>>52300913
>>52301072 is right, >>>/fa/
>>52302213
/fa/ hates them too
>>52302222
I'm not sending smartwatch anon to /fa/, I'm saying /wt/ has no place on /g/ if it doesn't allow for smart watches, and should keep to the watch general on /fa/.
>>52302236
Hell, i'm one of the regular shitposters in /wt/ for more then a year and i'm okay with smartwatches.
At least until they start the "hurr durr Smartwatches are superior to regular watches". Otherwise let them stay, except iwatches of course.
Is there a decent camera I can buy for 20 bucks or sub 50? I don't want a smartphone, I just want quality thats better than my shitty tablet, only going to really be using it for 4chan.
>>52302152
You should replace the crystal sokibro
>>52302359
I keep going back and forth on that.
I like that it's original, but I'd also like it crack/scratch free.
I think I'll have watchmakeranon do that when he fixes the chrono clutch.
>>52302152
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I NEED NEW WATCH PICTURES
>>52302385
I'm guessing the soki is your daily wear?
>>52302441
I wear pic related as my daily, and the Wakmann if I know I'm going to be able to be careful with it all day.
I bought a basic Pebble smartwatch. Is it capable of much, or did I waste my money?
>>52299526
What's this strap style called?
>>52302563
I 'borrowed' one from a retailer with a good returns policy. Controlling music / the Uber app / alerts were decently useful, but the basic models are so fucking ugly it's embarrassing.
If they had something like the old B/W Steel model's styling with a color screen and thinner I'd think about it.
>>52302683
>may i help the next customer
>hi, what is your reason of returning this item?
Sound familiar?
>>52302788
"I just didn't like it"
It's something you have to ask, normally the POS will have options regarding the reason.
>>52302871
its horrible when those customers return the package in a horrible condition. wish I can deny those retards, but the manager will always approve it. Glad tomorrow will be my last day
>>52302650
It's made by Hadley-Roma, I think called a "Swiss Army" strap or something like that.
>>52302788
I have a feeling they just tape packages back up and resell them sometimes, but that's their problem.
I'm really liking this thing. Its big but very wieldy and the dial is super legible.
Currently testing the accuracy and power reserve. Its been running for about 12 hours now and is still accurate to the minute (didn't bother syncing seconds yet). Hopefully good signs so far
>>52303116
Yup, mostly, they tape them up. Some just throw everything in and close the package. In the only one who care enough to put it close to the original as possible, even the ones that they will return it to the vendors.
>>52303129
>>52303087
Really glad my new store doesn't stick me at the register anymore.
I can finally screw around behind the tech counter in peace.
>>52303098
Thank you my friend
>Approximate Case Diameter: 33mm
>Approximate Case Thickness: 11mm
would this work on small mens wrist? it's a women watch.
>>52303901
Eh.. that's pretty small. That size would be fine for a dress watch but on a diver it's going to look a bit anaemic.
For example the SKX013 is 38mm vs the more regular 42
>>52303901
Yeah, that's only 1mm less diameter than a Rolex airking. Generally around 31 has been considered "boys size" for young or small-wristed men. Women's watches are generally under 30mm
Needs more minute sweeps (a seiko hi-beat would be nice).
>>52304268
Too lazy
>>52304283
Do it when you're not lazy then. It only takes a minute.
>>52304060
42mm looks xboxhuge.
I've got 6.25" wrists ;_;
>>52304352
That first minute will be needed just to find the camera.
>>52304060
>>52304375
found a comparison
33 vs 41
>>52299250
>nobody cares if you spent $5000 on a shitty watch unless it says rolex on it
But I care. And I don't care about people's opinion on my watch.
>>52299250
>high value watches are only worth it when they confer status like omega and rolex
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIiGRKbEHIE
>>52304597
Small divers look weird. The bigger ones seem to wear smaller because of the small face.
>>52304946
Comment got cut off...
I was saying they look smaller than they are because the bezel and small face create a bit of an allusion.
>>52300874
Blood borne bacterial infection.
He accidentally cut himself working on a HMT.
If only poo had been taken to the loo.
>>52296714
Oh, that is really gay.
How does this make you feel /wt/?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNyidq8iWD4
>>52306036
I couldn't leave the bezel in a random position either unless I was specifically timing something.
Also, I wish I had May's collection. Especially that JLC memovox.
>>52306105
>dat perfect length hour hand
Why is JLC so based every year of every century?
>>52306105
I've got a similar one, some old rich guy croaked and gave it to my gramps who gave it to me.
But, I can't tell if its a fake or not. The JL logo is placed instead of the index for 9 o'clock, automatic is written below the 6 o'clock index and the hands are sqaure, not pointy like that.
I just ordered a GW-M5610-1ER it should be here tomorrow. I plan on wearing it for work so my SKX doesn't get banged about too much.
>pic related
>>52306036
So true. Too bad the bezel of my piece of shit orient ray doesn't work anymore. Couldn't move it from the 12 o'clock even if I wanted too
>>52306566
A great option if you work in construction
>>52304985
Every time I see a Breitling the overall dogshit design and wing logo makes me think it's an Invicta until I read the name on the dial. People actually pay thousands for this kind of garbage?
>>52306164
what is the source of this "sneeeeze"?
>>52307083
The Internet.
>>52307083
Looks like ShindoL but I'm not sure.
>>52303148
Nice reflections on your shitty homage to a shitty brand, faggot. A fucking mirror is less reflexive than that piece of shit.
>>52299250
>Omega
>wondering status
If you mean the status of being caught by a pleb catcher brand and looked down upon condescendingly by Rolex owners, then yes, your expensive mall watch confers status :^)
>>52307063
Yeah they are riding the heritage train.
I wonder how much longer it will last.
That being said I would love to own vintage navitimer or cosmonaute.
I want an accutron 214. Does /g/ approve? I'm not 100% sure if I wanna buy it.
>>52307601
Even if it isn't a spaceview they're still cool as hell. Fascinating movement.
>>52298516
a CUTE
>>52296098
Have this same watch in white and black face
Best
Reminder that an otherwise classy looking old HMT is still better than a 14 year-old tier brand new TAG. Literally no one but you see the logo anyway (unless you purposefully shove it in their face like some sperg), and literally no one cares anyway.
>>52304597
>>52303901
>more like eco-dive
Why haven't you jumped on the Penis /g/?
>>52305151
ayyyyy lmao
>>52303901
wtf how small are you? Are you like 5'3 or something? Otherwise get a fucking 38mm diver or its gonna look too small
>>52309757
Waiting for a nice seller to find me a twinpenis or a Cosmotron instead.
>>52307352
>reflexive
I already explained that my camera sux. Stay mad faggot
>>52309757
Are these meant to be cheap, if so then where are the people reccomending them buying them? Because ebay has them really high, they are just quartz right?
>>52309757
But I have 4 already
>>52310082
>they are just quartz right?
No, they're vintage luxury watches from a time when quartz was brand new and crushing the mechanical competition. The fact that they're less than $200 now just shows the ridiculous stigma plebs put on quartz, the finishing and overall quality of them are outstanding.
>>52309987
>blaming his camera for capturing reflections off the giant shitty crystal
Yup. Totally the camera's fault :^)
>>52310387
Hnnnnnnnnnnnggggggggg
>>52310387
what do you guys think about this tissot t-complication squelette?
>>52310670
>>52310670
mmmm so sexy
I really want MGSV Seiko watch but this is the closest I can get in my pebble.
Also who pebble here? 15 life without apps and Bluetooth, 7 days otherwise.
>>52310670
It's one large, ugly, dogshit of a watch
>>52310387
sexy
>>52310734
>watch reference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsXHQNU5JYY
>>52310670
I think it'll look pretty neat once they finish it up and put the dial on.
>>52310774
>games radar
holy fuck i thought they were going to die when they changed from cheat code planet
>>52310921
non which do you prefer, the previous one or this one?
Is there any good automatic/mechanical watches with a separate seconds face similar to this Tissot? I think it looks pretty interesting.
>pic related
What does /g/ think of Tokyoflash? Them seem to make some pretty neat looking watches.
>>52311241
Forgot the picture.
>>52311245
https://youtu.be/N-sGUnj1P3c
>>52311241
Take your pick.
Credor probably also makes watches with small seconds.
>>52311245
Gimmicky shit that looks cool but isn't practical
>>52311294
I lost it at the fire test
>>52311429
You just described all watches basically
>>52311241
There should be a variant of the K35 Komandirskie with a seconds hand and dial at 10 o'clock.
It's automatic and without date, and since it's 2415 movement you also get handwinding.
>>52311473
Some are cheap and functional.
>>52311473
watches are not practical huh?
I guess theres no use in telling time
Anyone here got an opinion of the Avenger II Chrono? Thinking about picking one up for an all purpose watch.
>>52311241
Sub-seconds:
If you like the Bauhaus look, there's Stowa and Nomos.
>>52302117
Fresh new meme for you friend
>>52311595
Breitling is shit that looks like shit. Have you considered Fortis or Sinn? They make kinda similar aerospace-themed chronos.
Pic not mine.
>>52311674
Eh
As much as i started the meme ( or restarted it), it felt like it died off rather quickly when compared to the Penis Quartzs.
>>52311708
sup family
>>52311687
Looks nice but I kinda like the bulky look of the breitling. Do you just not like cause of personal preference? If so that's cool everyone has their own tastes. Thanks for your thoughts though I'll take a look.
>>52311708
You can't kill an idea
>>52311746
How comfy is the 13's bracelet?
>>52311783
>undersized nato strap
>>52311834
i like it. used to wear it on a leather nato, but this bracelet is just fine as well. Feels very well made, solid, and the clasp is solid. Ive had this thing for like 5 years
>>52311746
>tfw shitty phone camera
>>52311834
Yep. I ordered the wrong size.
>>52311853
Didn't know it was a solid link.
Though i like mine on a lot of straps, right now on a spare black perlon.
Probably going to get another leather nato, since that strap belongs to the SKX007 now.
>>52311872
Lume is quite good.
>>52311923
just bought an skx007k2. Its shipping from japan tho, so itll take a while to get here :\
but the snzg13 is doing its job for now. I switch it out with a maratac SR-1 when im feelin frisky
>>52311954
>maratac SR-1
Looks nice, but i really like the Delphin that one anon was posting the last couple of weeks. Very very similar, but it looks a little better for some odd reason.
I also got one of the Cinturini nato straps from italy for testing, i'm expecting quite a bit out of them.
>>52312013
Not that guy but I like the sterile look of the maratacs. I'm looking at the SR-3 because 40mm cases are about perfect for me
>>52312013
Hell yea, the halios delfin is definitely on my list. But yes the bezel on that and the maratac sr-1 are very similar
>>52312049
Im that guy. I really like the maratac. I bought mine like two years ago, so the sr2 and sr3 didnt exist at the time.
I really like the change they made to the second had, but i dont like the new crown they have on them. To each their own
>>52311776
They make watches that look like shit with basic movements and charge out the ass for them. If you want to waste money on them fine, but expect to be made fun of by those who know anything about watches.
>>52312071
I just noticed they are only 10 ATM water resistant.
That's a little disappointing for a 400$is "diver"
>>52312107
got mine for $200 when they had a new years sale ( ≖‿≖)
but yea, im not going to go abalone diving with this thing on, i just wear it for the look
>>52312116
I'll have to keep an eye on that, maybe get another diver and wait to pick up an SR3 if they go on sale.
I do like the look and wouldn't mind wearing it for the look alone, but I don't know if I would pay full price now thst I see the WR.
I mean I could get an Orient or seiko that beats that for a fraction of the sticker price
>>52312157
Massdrop frequently has maratacs on their site for group buys (along with other neat watches). You can get a semi discount through them
here have an invite family
https://www.massdrop.com/r/3K8TPC
>>52304597
how do people wear a 33?
i have shitty small wrists at almost 19 cm and i wear a 50 one and it only looks big when i hold my arm up cause its thick,if i let it hang it looks small and its smaller than my wrist lenght by noticeable amount.
>>52312205
>wearing a 50mm watch
>any year
Are you black/hispanic?
>>52312205
>50
No, it always looks big and like shit
>>52312205
Well the citizen you mentioned is meant to be a matching ladies watch for the regular men's size for one, second unless your're Schwarzenegger a 50mm watch is going to look fucking stupid always.
>>52312236
>>52312243
mb in a month or so i'll get a seiko 5 or something like that,kinda new to this but i am just saying that if 33 cm looks big on you than you should fucking suicide.
The only thing i hate about this watch is that its something like a little over a cm thick. and square sized.
>>52312313
Who ever said they wear a 33, let alone that it was big on them?
>>52312474
Not him, but my accutron's case is about 34mm wide. Vintage watches in general are smaller than modern equivalents.
>>52312527
That's true, and there are plenty of 33-35mm watches that look fine but I don't know that anyone would consider them too large for them.
>>52299678
>but you buy a grand seiko to other autists on the internet".
ftfy
>>52310082
Literally a Grand Seiko, and with some of the finest quartz movements that have ever been made and which are more high tech than the vast majority of the ones being made today 40 years later. And they can be had for a couple hundred dollars and you think that's too high?
Greatest watch in the world
>>52312715
It was a little difficult to parse your grammar.
>tfw no qt japanese gf that's into watches
http://youtu.be/bywBWmJYfrA
>>52312789
>That thing
>qt
Pick one and only one.
>>52299999
>>52312810
Wow you have shit taste
>>52300166
That's a fucking tasty watch
>>52298001
Jesus fucking christ thats ugly
>>52302197
That watch on the right is really nice
Can you still get watches like that? I just had a google and it looks like they maybe don't make ones like that anymore (at least, with a rubber strap, but I guess I could get a metal bracelet one and swap on a rubber strap)
Okay,/g/ what watch shold i buy in 200 pounds budget from amazon.uk?
>>52313358
Literally on amazon, rubber strap and all. You must not have been looking very hard.
3 years ago i bought this shitwad. Sunday, Im going out to pick up my Audemars Piguet. Worked my way up in the automotive industry and now I had room to buy it.
