>>52230739
In what terms? How fast or slow the operating system runs is mostly dependent on hardware.

if linux is so fast why can't it play battlefield 4

>>52230739
Windows beats it in AES Nice Speed though. More proof that Linux users are cunts.

>>52230762
On the same hardware you idiot

>>52230812
No one with half a brain would even consider using AES.

>>52230774
Checkmate Linux

>>52230841
>I know nothing about cryptography

>>52230856
>I know nothing about cryptography

>>52230856
Sure, go ahead and use a fundamentally flawed, backdoored algorithm.

>>52230739
Benchmarks mean nothing

>>52230884
Explain the flaws

>>52230893
They fucking do though.

Maybe not when all you care about is how fluid animations look on your iPhone, but they certainly matters if you do grown-up computing.

Wouldn't the filesystem play a role in that benchmark ?

>>52230923
>grown-up computing
So, transactions per second?

>>52230832
Depends on application and how implementation was done.

>>52230884
>i'm dumb

>>52230923
Synthetic benchmark doesn't matter, tho.
There are a lot of variables that are not considered, you sure can compare a single one but in practice the result can and will be different. That doesn't imply that will keep or change the expected.

linux is not OS

>>52231138
Do many and average the results.

Actually, if your run the benchmark long enough it should be good because of the central limit theorem

>>52231484
Then why does my book called "Modern Operating Systems" only discuss kernels?

RMS is confused about basic CS terminology. Pretty sad actually.