What's your skylake overclocks at?
6600k here, with a Noctua NH-D15 at 4.7GHz with 1.4V, with temps spiking at 65 Celsius.
>>52204984
7GHz
6700k, 4.7 at like 1.41v, Highest ive seen it get is 65c with cryorig h7 on it.
have a 6600k coming in wednesday
>>52204984
6700k @ 4.8GHz , 1.3V
can't go any higher, my water cooling system seems to have some problems, since i'm already hitting 70°C
how high can you go without changing the voltage? 4.0?
>>52204984
6700k @ 7.3GHz, ~1.7v using quad rad liquid cooling
>>52206889
What CPU?
i3 6100 non-k @ 4.5MHZ
s...sugg muh digg
>>52206898
sounds like absolute bullshit, people on short liquid nitrogen tests dont even get that, you faggot.
>they bought skylake K processors
>>52207293
go away Pajeet, we already know you are poor
>>52207302
>paying an additional $50 for literally nothing except a microcode activated multiplier
wahahaha
well done, intel should be thanking you for the free money
>>52207158
I would assume this anon is speaking of 6600K
>>52207321
I bet you have green text bubbles too poorfag.
>>52207293
>>52207302
>>52207321
I think what this anon was trying to say is, you can overclock non-k skylake processors now, so he hopes (anon always has your best interests in mind) that you didn't waste money if you purchased recently!
>>52207321
Aren't K processors higher binned CPUs?
>>52205113
Wow mine maxed at 4.1, had oc to 4.7 before but peaks at 70 with d14...
Here's mine
>>52207435
Not sure there's any way to prove they are. They're just processors with unlocked multipliers.
I've got a 6700k and got it up to 4.6 with idle temps under 30c most of the time.
>>52207368
Bought mine a few months ago haha saw someone bought a non k version at the price that i bought the k one
>kek
6700k vs 6700
ark.intel.com/compare/88196,88195
>>52207270
Wow, that's some serious underclock.
How long does it take to start the computer?
>>52207580
You're increasing the maximum multiplier.
If you have enabled the Intel Speed Step it won't make any difference to the idle temps.
>>52207464
>ark.intel.com/compare/88196,88195
This is running cpuZ stress, voltage is lower than I thought. Heat seems to be abnormally low? Speccy giving my about the same temp readings.
>>52207321
>implying I paid close to full price.
Seems like my system is glitching at 4,8GHz.
It can pass stress tests for a long period of time, but i'm having graphical artifacts. Increasing voltage doesn't help. Interesting.
i dont browse /g/ very often but shit. i still have a 2600k and im OC'd @ 4.4ghz lol.
is intel even trying? my shit is like 4 years old
>>52208949
