>it be the year of the lord 2016-1
>he still has not upgraded to a square
Why aren't you using a square, /g/?
>>52145275
because i don't want?
>>52145275
ur a square
>>52145289
Hue hue hue hue
>>52145275
my home computing is for media consumption with light creating, not the other way around.
What's the benefit?
>>52145932
It's great for looking at globes
I don't need it tbqh
>>52145940
Welp, I'm convinced. I'll go out and buy one right now.
I'm on a square.
>>52145940
needs more vertical space for the menus and taskbar
>>52145990
go away from this thread, Rajesh
>>52145275
You literally have that one setup with namami-tan
>>52145940
>he doesn't have a circular monitor he only uses for globes
>>52146080
>2015
>not using a spherical monitor
>>52145275
oh fuck off
Triangle
I have thick eyebrows I wouldn't be able to see the top of the screen
4:3 >
aaaand rip thred
>>52146004
Earth is an ellipsoid, not a sphere so it's actually perfect
Square confirmed for objectively best aspect ratio
>>52146080
>>52146120
But I do
>>52146052
>re incarcerate things
I don't recall any square monitors in the 1980s or 1990s
They were all 4:3 or 5:4, some 16:9
No 1:1
>>52149128
Pleb
>>52149128
welcome to the jerk'n dome
>>52145902
media creation with light consumption?
>>52145275
Squares are for squares. Call me when they make one that's a circle
