There have been threads about this before, but I'd never encountered it using uBlock.
Any other sites currently doing this? I am going to blacklist them in my local DNS server.
>>52138101
some guy (reeker) made a greasemonkey script to turn that shit off (its on github)
I usually just use ublock to hide these elements
What distro/DE/theme is that?
GQ just started blocking people using adblockers too
i think it will backfire. i think people will be just less likely to click on links from these sites if they require adblock to be disabled.
>>52138418
>Target is going to stop letting shoplifters go to their stores.
>I think it will backfire. Shoplifters will just not go to the store if they're expected not to shoplift.
>>52138306
Looks like default Chrome or FF.
>>52138143
They're in the 3rd party options for adblock too, it's as simple as checking a box to add the anti-adblock killer scripts
>>52138439
watch out the memeing begins
>stealing
>>52138439
>comparing it to stealing
my computer is my domain. when they send content to my computer, it is my choice as far as what portions of the markup I want to display and how I want to display them.
as trolly as your comparison is (comparing adblocking to theft), it is apt. if they make it hard to block ads on a site, people who hate ads are less likely to visit that site. for news sites, blocking people with ad blockers is not a zero sum game where you're only blocking leeches. people share and link articles with one another. people contribute to comments on articles.
>>52138101
>quote of the day
hipster shit galore
>>52138439
>we are days from 2016
>people are still using this floored analogy
>>52138418
Everytime I see an annoying anti-adblocker I leave the site
>>52138439
