> almost 2016
> he's still using dedicated graphics meme
> not using the high end Iris graphics by Intel
> not playing GTA IV with all settings on normal for 0.0000001% of the energy spent by dedicated meme graphics
If you pay for dedicated graphics, you should literally get perma banned from /g/ and stay on /v/.
Give me a reason on why should I care about anything you just said.
> video related:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG9mYnvU_yI
Skylake HD530 runs my meme blizzard games at 60fps, not really feeling a need to add the GPU I intended to buy next year.
>>52126866
>75x increase of fucking nothing
>4rth
>using multipliers instead of actual units of CPU performance
>>52126895
>Resolution is at 1280x720. Other graphics settings are all kept at Normal, except that AAs are disabled.
Kek
>>52126866
>power graphics card is only for gaymen
>implying shittel graphics can upscale to 4k with NNEDI3 with 32 neurons
Get good cück
>>52126972
>4k with NNEDI3 with 32 neurons
that's full autism
>not playing GTA IV with all settings on normal
Why not just play it on a console then?
With DX12 you can mix different GPUs, so you can just combine your integrated GPU with a discrete card.
>>52127000
Because I already have a PC for work stuff. So don't need to shell out for a console or graphics card if I just want to play the game.
>>52127009
No m8, using the igpu slows the cpu down, which would likely make it bottleneck the dgpu.
>75x increase
>Its barely catching up to some low end AMD APU
>>52128080
Skylake IGP outperforms all AMD APUs in the majority of games.
>>52129744
Its due to the edram they added isnt it?
The same tech is used in conjunction with amd's gpu in xbox one I think.
>>52129744
>Skylake IGP outperforms all AMD APUs in the majority of games.
You mean that one single SKU that costs twice as any AMD APU and has dedicated edram in it?
>>52129800
Nah even the standard HD530 beats them now, the edram models are much better than APUs.
>>52126866
>> not playing GTA IV with all settings on normal
It's fucking nothing.
>>52129834
That cost is so totally worth the 3fps increase
Thanks, Intel
>>52129950
>i3 6100 costs less than A10 7870
>annihilates it in CPU performance
>matches GPU performance
APUs are officially dead.
>>52126866
HD530 will do well in most of the shit /v/ actually plays, no need to get a dedicated GPU. It's one way to save loads of money.
>>52126895
>>52126866
wow, so basically it has the performance of a graphics card from 2010, impressive!
