[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>there are people from /g/ fell for the meme os Just install
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 37
Thread images: 6
File: Archlinux-icon-crystal-64.svg.png (59 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]
Archlinux-icon-crystal-64.svg.png
59 KB, 1000x1000
>there are people from /g/ fell for the meme os

Just install Debian and get your work done

>inb4 "muh shinny new stuff syndrome" autists complaining about stable packages and calling it outdated
>>
>>52121757
>he fell for the he fell for the meme meme meme
>>
>>52121757
install gentoo
>>
Arch is not a meme
It's just shit
>>
>>52121757

>there are people that actually listen to /g/

Retards, all of them.
>>
>>52121757
>Falling for the meme about the supposed meme os
>Implying Debian isn't a meme os using the same logic
>>
i happen to be installing arch right now

i don't wanna fall for the he fell for the meme meme
>>
>arch unknown
>/g/ loves arch
>arch becomes popular
>/g/ hates arch
You'll eventually outgrow your edgy teen contrarian phase OP.
>>
>>52121757
>too dumb to install an os without a hand holding installer
not my fault
nothing wrong with arch, the only time it might break is because you're being a retard
>>
>not installing /g/entoo, tiling WM and posting anime desktop thread
>>
File: 1436804040643.jpg (179 KB, 1214x926) Image search: [Google]
1436804040643.jpg
179 KB, 1214x926
>>52121757
>using linux
>>
File: rage-arch.png (119 KB, 1083x621) Image search: [Google]
rage-arch.png
119 KB, 1083x621
>>
>>52121757
Arch has a better, more accessible packaging system than Debian (and thus a more lively third-party package system)

Pacman is faster than apt

Debian is great, but why do you feel the need to make angry cryposts about Arch?
>>
>>52121925
>too dumb to install the OS without a hand holding CLI
>>
>>52122017
>pacman is faster than apt

/thread
>>
>>52121991
If you're going to meme at least use a better image. That pic is just plain retarded.
>>
>>52121991
What are you implying? That you're a fucking moron who doesn't realize that you require an internet connection to download packages?
>>
>>52121905
When was arch popular?
When did /g/ ever like arch?
>>
If you hate Windows for being so outdated, why use a shitty "LTS" distro which is also outdated by up to 2 or 3 years?
>>
Archfags is so autistic that they drew pony version of it.
>>
>>52122224
you're autistic enough to have saved it
>>
>>52122196
>/g/ uses gentoo
?
>>
>>52121757
Debian is a clusterfuck of old and bad design.
>apt/dpkg/aptitude
>layers of layers over layers
>user unfriendly complicated build system
>lots of poorly maintained packages
>unneeded/broken dependencies
>patches over patches everywhere

No, Thanks. If Arch goes to total shit, I'll move to Gentoo or Fedora.
>>
>>52122224
That guy also drew debian horse.
>>52122241
Huh?
>>
>>52121757
I use arch daily in corporate production. All other people are used by windows, but I shill them for freedom daily.
>>
>>52121991
You shouldn't even be using linux, redditfag
>>52121757
Debian is fine. But can never be as user-centric as Arch. Debian/ubuntu minimal is promising though.
>>
>>52122017
>Better, more accessible
That's all very subjective, and I'm not buying it.
>>
File: Debian.png (784 KB, 2267x1763) Image search: [Google]
Debian.png
784 KB, 2267x1763
>>
>Not using openSUSE
Its like you want to work harder and not smarter.
>>
>>52121757
>not using debian AND arch
>>
When does Debian move testing to beta? I've never really followed the development before so I don't know
>>
>>52125957
Use Stable with backports instead if you want more updated packages.
https://wiki.debian.org/Backports
http://backports.debian.org/
>>
whats so bad about arch? Ive used both arch and debian and other than pacman/apt-get I cant tell the difference?

Can someone tell me whats so bad?

Thinkpad: arch
Desktop: arch
Rented server: Debian
RPi: raspbian

and still I see no difference
>>
>>52125957
Release (Jessie) = Stable
Testing (Stretch) = Beta
Unstable (Sid) = Alpha

Stick with release and backports if you need updated software, testing is literally meme and there are better options for unstable

>>52126345
Nothing bad with Arch, is that hating on Arch is the new cool maymay, made up by kids who couldn't install it.
>>
>>52121775

This is one meme too many.
>>
>>52122070
>Ubuntu/Debian developer Julian Andres Klode has made some improvements this week to significantly increase the speed of incremental updates with APT. His optimizations have yielded apt-get being around 10x faster than the older code. These improvements also make APT with PDiff now faster than the default, non-incremental behavior.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Debian-APT-PDiff-Speed
>>
>>52122207
Who said anyone here does that? Debian testing is the way to go.
Thread replies: 37
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.