WATCH THREAD
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
/wt/ - watch thread
Post about wrist fedoras here
>>52017245
Total watch noob here. I'm looking for a cheap retro looking casio like the one in pic related. The problem is most come with a rubber wrap, something I would like to change, again like pic related. Which are the best options?
Let's see those old, worn out, scratched up, 20 cent watches you NEETs are so proud of! Hahahaha!!
>>52017245
I really like bracelets with angular links.
>>52017269
You can change the strap on (almost) any watch.
On any of those "retro" casios, you can just use a tool and push the bars out, take the bracelet off, and put a nato strap (the style of strap in your picture) in its place.
>>52017293
I'm pretty sure he's asking for strap suggestions.
>>52017269
You can use a nato like the one in that pic, I use one on my Casio Jog & Walk and it works pretty good.
Looking for a good ~$300 no date, casual-dress watch. What's good these days?
>>52017366
>I'm pretty sure he's asking for strap suggestions.
well maybe i'm a fucking retard and i didn't undertsand his post. how about that uh, i bet you didn't think of that
>>52017245
That piece of shit hideous entry level Seiko 6R15 base grade literally assembled only as much in Japan to scam a "Japan Made" kuckolding leverage onto the dial for over $100 USD?!?!
Hahahahahahahhaha hahaha. You are mountain Nip cock sucking brand whore who cares only about the artificial marketing driven "status" represented by marketing driven brands owned by faceless luxury brand conglomerates who literally laugh at the status seeking behaviour of their customers.
Your watch is massively overpriced garbage bought by clueless horological peasants intended only to drive your aspirations for higher tier brands.
Enjoy getting unremittingly kucked by Seiko, you horological peasant.
>tfw your dial is kill
>>52017407
Well I'm not one of the obnoxious Seiko dickriders sperging out over Swatch, but th-thanks you t-too.
>>52017481
How much these go for? I pretty much like everything about it.
>>52017501
~$450 from Seiya
>>52017245
Was thinking about getting a nice watch at some point, are there any nice Russian or Victorinox watches for less than £100, £150 at a push?
Reminder that bitches love the terrorist.
>>52017569
>fake Casio
>belly button ring scars
>dry wrinkly hands
0/10, why are there no pornstars with good taste in watches? I can't jerk off to this.
>>52017556
Could step up a couple hundred and get the sunburst dial in the SDGM Brightz
>>52017659
>>52017556
Thanks. I will look into that. I like the simplicity and the subtlety of its style. $450 seems like a fair price. I don't want Dollar Store garbage in my watch collection.
>>52017659
AUTOMATIC
>>52017670
>>52017659
>AUTOMATIC
>>52017272
>>52017407
>waiting for that one whorology autist in the thread and posting my newest watch
So do you think Archie would give this a good review? I think he would.
>>52017692
>>52017694
Why yes it is, how astute of you
>>52017659
I think the SDGMs are ugly but I do like that they have diashield and I think also AR coating, I wish the SARX had that.
>>52017688
It's a pretty good deal for the price, I think. Not a bargain like the sub-$300 SARBs, but you're not getting ripped off either and the watch is a bit nicer overall than the SARBs.
>>52017407
You, you sure are anally cratered at how much you paid for your mountain Jew social status signifier :^)
I hate the flimsy stock jubilee bracelet on my skx007.
Thinking of getting a super oyster from strapcode. Anyone has that? Hows the quality?
>>52017659
>>52017670
Black dial is a lot more subtle and suits the 40mm case size better to be quite honest family.
>>52017838
Breddy gud, sits almost flush against the ends of the lugs.
>>52017838
We all have one, they're pretty gud and way better than that shit folded link old man bracelet that comes with the watch.
>>52017721
damn, that looks good
>>52017897
>>52017929
Thanks family. I just ordered one.
What watch/strap combo are you /g/ents wearing this holiday?
>>52017838
The first thing I did as soon as I got it was remove that awful bracelet. You can order the oyster bracelet for it if you want something better.
>>52017407
>1/10 you tried too hard
Trolling needs to be subtile, you know?
>>52017407
Tip top kek. Feel free to compare the movements and case/dial/bracelet finishing between a SARB/SARX and any Swiss watch available for twice its price :^)
Sorry you got kekolded by the mountain Jew :^)
My daily beater
I'm not sure if I want invest any money on military watch but what do you lads recommend?
Don't really like the look of terrorist.
For the everyday use what do you think Omega De ville or Zenith Captain series?
I was thinking under 100€ for the military watch and about 2k for the mechanical, both Zenith and Omega are over 2000€ but I can rise my budget a bit.
Under 40mm with back window, hinged dust cover prefered.
To my knowledge Omega doesn't have window and Zenith doesn't have hinged dust cover.
>all the old businessmen with their Seiko watches
>no one with skeletal watches
for which purpose
>>52018329
Because they look like crap and don't allow you to see the fucking time because of the noise in the fucking background. Only retards buy skeletals.
I M B A C K
>>52018329
What's so appealing about seeing your watch's ugly roughly finished movement and your own arm hairs in the background when you look at your watch?
What about skeletal wrists?
>>52018329
Skeleton watches are a fucking shit meme. Nobody wants to see a trash chink movement besides literally reddit
>>52018399
Did someone say skeletal wrists?
>tfw this is Hamilton is 34mm
>>52018399
>What about skeletal wrists?
sup
>>52018384
bought pic related for christmas, did I fuck up?
Fell for the meme and got myself an SNKK93 as my first watch. Waiting for delivery now, hope I get it tomorrow, before the couriers have their Christmas break. Did I do good for my first watch?
>>52018679
You probably overpaid for a swiss quartz movement but it could be worse.
As long as you like it who cares
>>52018756
€130, could be worse, never heard of the company, so I have no idea about the quality, but it looks really nice
Muh Landeron 51 Chronograph <3
>>52018679
quartz and 100m wr for $200 with "muh swiss".
at least the design is not terrible (although some aspects are weird, like the 13-24 markers with no 1-12).
>>52018741
Get a new strap or bracelet. Apart from that, it's a Seiko 5, they're never bad
Still waiting for my SKX, for now SNZG15 on leather zulu.
>>52018741
For a first watch? Pretty good.
>>52018679
>>52018779
Could be worse, movement is meh, but it's a good looking watch at least.
Just remember to get a nice leather strap for it.
>>52018869
Strap suggestion was meant to >>52018741
Too much beer for today.
>>52018869
>diver on leather
pls no
Muh Longines Legend Diver <3
>>52018923
It's a DeskDiver, so no harm done ;-)
>>52018926
Fucking TOP watch anon 10/10
I have a watch for every occasion
>>52019008
except for when you want a good watch
>>52019008
What about occasions when you need to wear a watch that isn't ugly?
>>52019029
badum tish
>>52019029
I lolled
>>52019002
thx anon
>>52019045
Only a complete twat would not like the Rotary
It’s a beautiful watch
>>52019083
If by beautiful you mean JC penny-tier fashion brand quartz watch then sure
>>52019008
from left to right:
occasion1: feeling autistic
occasion2: at home enjoying the movement of the watch
occasion3: wanting to show off because it says rolex and now you can pretend you have money
occasion4: feeling sad
>>52019110
1: Graduation gift from my sister and a good watch for socialising outside work
2: My favourite only gets used for weddings and other formal occasions where I wear a black belt
3: Rolex doesn’t get used to much; you can come across as a cunt just for having one.
4: Just my standard work watch that matches my Armani glasses and belt
Please don't bully.
>>52019251
Rolex Cellini line is supposed to be Rolex's attempt to make classy dress watches instead of the more tool watch stuff they typically make. A lot of them are ass ugly but some are pretty neat I guess. They're fucking expensive too.
I also don't know enough about the Cellinis to judge whether that one is fake but based on the watches it's surrounded by it sure doesn't seem convincing.
>>52019251
It's a Rolex cellini duel time
Rose gold is very shiny
>>52019282
Top kek how's the meme anon?
>>52019323
What could it be?
>>52019323
Well I'm guessing it's not a flieger, at least.
>>52017382
Bump
>>52019353
a watch?
>>52019353
A bomb, judging from the address
>>52019339
>>52019350
It's Glock tier watch.
>>52019359
Buy a SARB and pretend there's no date window. It fits all the other requirements perfectly. It's pretty hard to find a watch without a date window these days because every standard movement has a date complication anyway so manufacturers feel a need to just cram in a date window even if it looks like shit.
>>52019373
A time bomb.
>>52019375
So plastic and sub par?
>>52019389
>mechanicrap
Sorry m8, I use a watch to tell the time, not to feel good about an invisible difference in looks.
>>52019356
>>52019369
>>52019373
$10 shipped
Non-working condition.
Even if I'm unable to repair it, it's 10 fucking dollars. Less than a terror watch.
Appears to have the original Japanese battery.
>>52019415
Well then why didn't you mention that to begin with if you feel so strongly about it, retard.
>>52019392
Well kek'd
I have more than a few watch related items to open today :^)
>>52018399
>giving aesthetic advice whilst wearing awful fabric straps
surely this is bait?
>>52019417
Did you even look into what a digi-quartz needs to be fixed? You're going to have to buy a whole new watch, rip the guts out and drop it into the POS you just bought
>>52019432
Did this fucking show ever kick off?
>>52019519
Like I said, it doesn't matter if I jewed myself here.
If I can't fix it, I can't fix it.
>>52019519
It might just need a new battery, some sellers won't even bother trying a fresh one and sell it as broken/as is.
>>52018923
It's a field watch on leather, no harm done.
And for the SKX i got a proper solid link bracelet.
Thoughts on this?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-SEIKO-MENS-PREMIER-PERPETUAL-CHRONOGRAPH-WHITE-DIAL-WR100M-WATCH-SPC159P1-/131676103802?hash=item1ea881e47a:g:9-cAAOSwAKxWbvyg
Damn, I got the Sarb CocKtail time, I have really mixed feelings though. The leather strap was utter trash so I switched it for my croc one. It looks grown up though, and I guess I got what I wanted, an extravagant dress/business watch.
Cons: Hard to tell time, nothing pops irl like in pics.
Pros: good looking, no other dress watch comes close imo in price range, maybe sarb035.
>>52019429
o-ok
>>52019595
>>52019602
Why is it so big god damn. 40mm with that shiny deep guilloche is maybe suited to a flamboyant homosexual but if you're just a bitchwristed pasty nerd it's going to look ridiculous.
>>52019595
Or
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SEIKO-MEN-PERPETUAL-CALENDAR-SAPPHIRE-WIDE-COLUMN-100M-WATCH-SNQ129P1-/371138676544?hash=item566996c740:g:P90AAOxylpNTTT2f
?
>>52019602
Buy a Hirsch Rivetta, you won't regret it.
Lot's of pics on google with a cocktail on it.
>>52019595
pic related.
>>52019637
Honestly it wears pretty small on me at least, I'm a pretty big guy but my wrist is a little small so it might look weird in a wrist shot.
>>52019644
>Hirsch Rivetta
Imo the croc looks better, gives it a hint of more class
>>52019726
Was thinking more along the lines of a brown Rivetta, but your watch your call.
>>52019640
Somewhat better, but still not that great.
>>52019640
Much less ugly then the first one, overall i like it.
Consider the SRP701 and SRP713 though.
Thoughts on Longines master?
Yet to see it live, bit concerned about the background design but other than that very smart looking watch.
>>52019877
That looks really snaz, although the cut-off 6 would annoy me no end
>>52019877
I don't like the cut off "6", but damn, the watch looks great otherwise.
>>52017269
That's my watch. You could do what I did but you'd need to know how to cut the strap correctly
>>52019807
>>52019809
The last two watches I was considering:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/CITIZEN-MENS-ECO-DRIVE-BL1230-52A-WHITE-FACE-PERPETUAL-CALENDAR-FREE-SHIPPING-/141146657332?hash=item20dcff1234:m:mUnSVbb4LXXa9Df0rVDiqIQ
http://www.ebay.com/itm/CITIZEN-ECO-DRIVE-PERPETUAL-CALENDAR-SAPPHIRE-100M-WATCH-BL0080-59E-/371138678042?hash=item566996cd1a:m:m90RF1_FL93xlpF4c9mNIxA
>>52019877
Boring and overpriced. Get a Bambino or Sarb 065
>>52019897
The second is dogshit but the first is easily the best of all of them
>>52019897
>http://www.ebay.com/itm/CITIZEN-MENS-ECO-DRIVE-BL1230-52A-WHITE-FACE-PERPETUAL-CALENDAR-FREE-SHIPPING-/141146657332?hash=item20dcff1234:m:mUnSVbb4LXXa9Df0rVDiqIQ
Either this or the clean Seiko calendar, the other two look like shit.
>>52019909
Overly curved glass. Take a sit, granpa.
>>52019964
Flat glass is for the poor and boring
>>52019964
>Not liking domed crystal
U some kind of fag?
What does /g/ think about the looks of this watch?
>>52020057
Worse than dogshit.
>>52020057
>Flying Race Timer Much Fast Red Black and White Fast Chronograph 10$ shipped from Guang Hzu, Mainland China
>>52019984
Nah, I am just not 80 years old. 50's are long gone, gramps.
>>52020109
Actually for your information the case and movement were made in China but were shipped to Switzerland for final assembly so it's SWISS MADE and therefore good.
I've worn this every day for the last 6 Years. 100m waterproof titanium.
Beat the shit out of it, still looks good and keeps time. Taken it scuba diving to 135 ft, and bashed it into all sorts of stuff.
Looking for a new watch since I just got my degree, gonna treat my self.
>>52020138
That red circle going through everything is an absolutely eyesore.
>>52020119
I hope you're not that little 19 year old shit from the last thread
>>52020099
>>52020109
What's so bad about functional watches? I know you guys like simple watches and cyclejerk over Seiko, but what's so bad about this watch, if you guys are serious?
>>52020171
There's a difference between functional and crammed full of intersecting dials and features that don't complement one another, with a garbage colorscheme, poor readability, low-quality timekeeping and poor material.
>>52020171
It's one thing to be functional and have complications; it's another thing to cluttered and ugly, which that watch is.
>>52019909
065 listed at SeikoJapan 380$, local dealer 609€...
Might actually order it, looks very sharp.
>>52020138
>>52020171
>Dat plebeian rage
Its a shit, boring, overpriced SWISS SCAM tier watch, sit down consumer, before mountain jew takes all your moneys
>>52020195
>>52020202
I get what you mean, it's a bit overloaded.
>>52020205
Im this guy>>52019602
I would argue it's too expensive for 600€, I paid almost 500€ with shipping which I think is too much, but competetion on my wrist is fierce I'm a real watch snob at any price level so I might even return it.
The hype for this watch is unreal, but yes it is an exceptional watch to a certain price like 300 $, a lot better looking than other sarbs. But for that 600€ get a BRIGHTZ Seiko instead from seya japan. They have polished onyx and all that jazz, next leve watch imo
Got me a nice radio room dial for the soviet clock!
![IMG_20151219_215913[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nQ2N6Oh.jpg "IMG_20151219_215913[1].jpg")
>Their watches can't even browse /g/
>>52020341
>his watch will litteraly give him cancer, can spontanially combust, and needs to be recharged twice a day
>>52020341
>he PLUGS his "watch" in erry night
Hahaha! Oh wow, laddy.
>>52020284
Interesting, can you tell me your wrist size?
I have not really looked into Seikos but Sarx019 is one beautiful timepiece, better than Brightz imo.
At 380$ 065 is hard to beat though.
>>52020138
but the assembly is the actual craftmanship
>>52020341
>his watch is dead inside, with no mechanical parts
>he doesn't worship actual engineering
>he actually thinks it's superior
>>52019964
A C R Y L I C
C
R
Y
L
I
C
>>52020479
Jesus Christ... how embarrassingly vomit-inducing...
>>52020322
9/10 I like it
>>52017569
More terrorist wearing women
>>52020909
>Thailand
>woman
>>52019535
Pebbles and oney are working on it currently and a new episode will be released soon
>>52020479
That piece of shit hideous entry level Swatch Group ETA ebauche 6497 base grade literally assembled onlybas much in Switzerland to scam a "Swiss Made" kuckolding leverage onto the dial for over $1,000 USD?!?!
Hahahahahahahhaha hahaha. You are mountain Jew cock sucking brand whore who cares only about the artificial marketing driven "status" represented by marketing driven brands owned by faceless luxury brand conglomerates who literally laugh at the status seeking behaviour of their customers.
Your watch is massively overpriced garbage bought by clueless horological peasants intended only to drive your aspirations for higher tier brands.
Enjoy getting unremittingly kucked by the Swatch Group or the LVMH group, you horological peasant.
>>52020983
except she's Korean, you mong
>>52020434
>what is radiation hurr durr
>>52021056
Just going to point this out but that watch is pre-swatch group I believe.
>>52020587
>>52020468
Its about 6inches I think, pretty small. Sarx019 is okay, but it will be very dull irl imo, since it is just a plain jane white dial. Brightz is just much prettier, but each their own etc.
>>52017659
Tbqh, brigthz are a highly different style than the SARX. I find the SARX to be pretty unique and very beautiful, while I wouldn't find an ocassion to wear any brightz
>>52021056
>Swatch Group
>ETA ebauche
Read a book, nigger. It would be pretty goddamn remarkable to have a day-date center second automatic watch with an ETA 6497 movement in it. That watch was made before Swatch existed and it has an Omega Cal. 752 movement.
>>52017569
man I love this bitch. Her legs. Her voice. Just describing her and thinking about her vids gives me a boner. She's such a stereotype of the stupid blonde that I can't help to like her even tho I prefer brunettes. The very few vids of her as a brunette make my dick diamonds.
Shit watch tho.
>>52019353
Judging from your retarded computer choice it'll have to be something heavily shilled dogshit, Invicta most likely.
one day
Fucking flash.. too lazy to take another pic
Muh everyday Seiko 7526 02f0
It has everything I need
>Good quality
>Water resistant
>Automatic
>Can tell time in the dark
>Day of the week/month
>Looks good w/o being too showy
>Under 100 USD
>>52019356
Nice
>>52021692
better pic from the interwebz
What do you thing of this pairing?
>>52021808
Can't go wrong with a bond nato but the watch is awful
>>52021845
>the watch is awful
Why?
>>52021808
If you want to create literally the ugliest watch in the history of mankind.. you got it.
>>52021860
Eaten numeral, strange sub dial placement, dive watch looks with only 30m WR
>>52021894
Oh my mistake, it's 100m I just assumed because of Kommandirskie it was 30.
>>52018926
Nice. Was thinking of getting one too.
Here's my Speedy
>>52021894
14 or 15 then? I'd like a black dial but eh.
>>52021508
>surface pro 4
>retarded
poorfag detected
>>52020434
It has to be charged once a day.
>>52020447
Wireless charging. It cannot even be plugged in.
>>52020475
Dead inside? Do you know how much more complex even a basic microprocessor is compared to some swiss clock engineering? Then there's software engineering, all the transfer protocol engineering, engineering of the battery. The whole thing is an engineering showcase.
Just because some fat drunk swiss guy didn't build it in his shed doesn't mean it's less of an ode to engineering.
So whats the best sub homage for under $300?
I used to really hate how the submariner looked but after getting that soki sub its really grown on me.
Its a shame no one makes a fifty fathoms homage
>>52022138
get a seiko fifty five fathoms mod then. The tisell, despite the keming, is probably the best option.
>>52021974
Why not 710/420 scuba dude?
>>52022138
Basically Invicta or some shitty microbrands
Obris Morgan isn't really submariner lookalike, but fits your budget
Steinhart is more expensive, but pretty good
>>52022369
Thanks for the suggestion. I don't like the 710 case design but I dig the 420. And I really like the article in pic, it's soviet as fuck
>>52022445
710 is the kind of case that gets more and more attractive the more you see it
420 is basically the standart one
Blue scuba dude is also the most popular choice, zissou is also interesting
Don't really like numerals on dial, so can't comment on your choice
>>52019983
This watch is a personal grail
>>52022189
My autism couldn't stand the kerning
It's worse than the AUTOMATIC honestly
>>52022445
watch looks sweet but that crown looks terrible
>>52022546
Afaik, they're plated and can be stripped down to a better, yet shitty finish crown
What are chicom watches like the Seagull 1963?
I bought an Armani AR2434 but had to return it cause I'm pretty sure it was a fake.
Give me some alternatives to that, since I know you autists hate fashion watches.
I want a steel bracelet, budget is $250 and NO SEIKOS!
>>52022937
Ok literally fuck off
People have been giving you recommendations for the past two threads.
Just fuck off to r/watches or something
Are NATO straps over done?
I just bought pic related the other day and I'm not a fan of the rubber strap. Any suggestions on what would look good with it?
>>52023349
Your options for a diver are:
Bracelet
Rubber
NATO/Zulu
Cordura
Basically anything not leather.
>roman numerals
>clean, not cluttered
>black numbers on white face
>leather strap
>~$100
What's the watch for me?
>>52023541
>>52023569
Looks perfect, What's the exact model? Trying to track it down on google but can't find anywhere selling this exact watch.
Sorry for needing to be spoonfed, I just can't find it
>>52023776
model is in the filename
>>52023789
Cheers m8
And it's a Seiko to boot!
Total investment: $13
INCANDESCANT
>>52024064
>the light doesnt even work
my sides
what a waste of 13 bucks
>>52024064
LITTLE
>>52024083
Works perfectly well.
What doesn't work is my camera in total darkness.
>all this jelly
Thank you greatest ally
>Bagels will never go back to being sub $30
Why even live?
>>52024347
>he still thinks it's butter
>>52021569
All numbers repeated twice. Who does this?
>>52024832
interesting. an hour bezel instead of a minute bezel.
>>52021692
>>52021768
Date and day of the week fonts are different. Dropped.
>>52024223
DESIGNATED
>>52024832
set a second time-zone with the outer bezel
>>52023569
The date display positioning ruins so many watched. This is a prime example. Cut off III, and the circle runs through it at a non-uniform location. Fugg.
>>52024945
I don't mind it. It's a useful feature and at that price point the general constraint is the dimensions of the drop-in movements.
>>52017245
Grandpa passed away last year, and dad found this watch in his stuff. Sentimental value aside (I'd never sell it), how rare are these compared to the calculator only faced casios?
>>52022138
I really want a bezel like that I can put on my Mako.
>>52025023
Looks ugly as fuck, but I love it. First time ever I see something like this. Neat.
>>52025023
holy shit that's cool
>>52025023
neat watch
>>52025058
>>52025060
>>52025095
Apparently can store 50 phone numbers in it as well, though I have no idea how to work that yet. Took it to a jeweler and had the battery replaced, works great. It might look a bit retarded, but it beats the f91w I've been wearing while being a cool reminder of my gramps.
>>52017676
What the hell is that? I like it
>>52025023
That's really fucking cool. I love databanks
What's the model # on that?
>>52025150
Casio ftp30
>>52017245
I have this one.
I'm a bit of a fan of dirt cheap Chinese movements. I've had my first experience with the tongji movement and its pretty damn impressive for the prices you can get it at. Especially at how it retains its accuracy after being regulated (if QC was in your favor, soki seems to be the best with this).
I remember an anon here having a tiger submariner. Does yours use a DG2813? If so, how is it and is it worth the $120 asking price? I'm particularly interested in the Tudor submariner homage. Pretty unique.
>>52025276
You probably mean me, it's an invicta not a tiger, just using tiger dial and hour+minute hands.
dg2813 is supposed to be decent and eaily replaced though.
>>52025223
There is nothing about it that I like. That's pretty rare.
>>52025121
It doesn't look retarded. I'd replace the strap and the dial that looks nasty as fuck.
>>52025329
Ah
I don't know about having TIGER on the dial, but other than that its a pretty damn good looking watch.
Although I should probably get a bagel before a more expensive chink watch, shouldn't I?
>>52025385
I hate bagels. they're worth around 20 dollars with the quality you get. dagaz does a tudor submariner dial with minimal text
>>52025397
I think the movement is quite good and the case is SS.
Definitely not worth the ~50 bucks they're going for though.
I'd buy one in a heartbeat if they would drop down to $30 or so. Hopefully when they stop being a meme
>>52025444
I dunno what they do to the movement but I recall it being much rougher than other watches which ostensibly use the same one. If I had known about tiger earlier I'd have bought one but one big caveat is its lack of water resistance - the invicta is actually divable.
Vostok amphibia with the 420 case is actually a really cool and interesting watch and priced around the bagel.
>>52023349
>NATO straps over done?
It's not a fashion trend, you fruity faggot. Natos are really comfy and nice. Worried that you won't look like a special snowflake, when so many people wear natos?
Well you still have your pony shirt and your fedora, so no worries.
>>52025595
Amphibias are excellent, I love mine.
I really wish that Invicta's branding wasn't so fucking disgusting, otherwise, the 8926OB would probably be the best cheap sub homage.
Lets add some nicer watch...
>>52025940
That looks fucking awful
>>52025940
Who makes that dogshit?
>>52025940
Adding these in too
>>52025940
>>52025954
>>52025959
Learn to appreciate real Swiss timepieces.
>>52025940
webm unrelated?
>>52025963
>>52025988
The FP Journe and the GMT master are the only decent ones here.
>>52025988
>>52025963
Someone explain the appeal of really fat bezels such as this, please? Some of the watch faces are really nice, but then the big jock off bezel ruins it; >>52025940 would be an excellent watch if it weren't for the overly large bezel - what, you think the watch doesn't draw enough attention to it as-is? Fuck me.
>>52026252
"Its a racing machine on your wrist"
It doesn't draw attention like a Lambo or Ferrari
You've to have a understanding of the brand to know the value of it.
Richard Milles love the fat bezel because it protects the movement.
>>52026252
It's Richard Mille, the epitome of ultra expensive pig disgusting dogshit. What more reason is needed?
>>52026337
>>52026314
But... it just doesn't look good? No matter the brand, eg >>52021974 & >>52019983
Just a poor look.
>>52026392
Dive bezels are fucking awesome, maybe you just have shit taste.
>>52019110
kek
>>52019282
>yo anon, what time is it senpai?
>I CAN'T SEE SHIT
>>52017937
The black one is even better.
>>52026402
Dive bezels serve a purpose, but the majority of people with such a bezel won't go anywhere near water. Plus, the bezel doesn't have to necessarily be that big - pic related, I don't like the design myself but the bezel does look better
Large bezels still look like shit though, see >>52018741, for which the bezel serves strictly no purpose but to negatively affect aesthetics.
>>52026493
>Dive bezels serve a purpose, but the majority of people with such a bezel won't go anywhere near water.
Ummm their purpose is to time things which is absolutely useful no matter if you're on land or in water.
>>52026512
The reason why dive bezels are so fat is because it's better when you're underwater and potentially are low on oxygen.
Any old watch can have a tachymeter or chronograph complications which can serve as a time-keep. The bezels on these watches absolutely do not need to be ten inches thick, which is what the watches in some of my examples look like.
>>52026493
Thoughts about the inner dive bezels?
>>52026603
They're usually less obnoxious which I like, but unfortunately impede on the watch face itself, and imo the cut off space isn't worth it
just bought myself this bad boy for christmas.
>>52026662
>Right Click
>Search Google for image
>kek'd at newfag.
Just got this bad boy in a few days ago. Mini GSAR is 36mm in diameter because the full size was too much watch for my frail wrists. Feels good to finally have a worthy diver though. 30ATM is pretty good, my only other "diver" is 10ATM.
>>52026830
Is that distortion from the crystal or is the dial really sunk down that far below the bezel?
>>52022138
Steinhart is like $350 maybe but you still have to get fucked with shipping fees and probably customs on top of that because they use FUCKING Fedex. I'd say it's worth it though, it's a very good watch and I think the next closest sub-$300 options are gookshit Tissell and chinkshit Parnis. Personally I'd rather save my money and get a Casio Sub or even an Invicta instead at that point.
>>52026830
I was looking at some Of those marathon watches the other day. But 700 for the Quartz TSAR or even more for the automatic when it's just an eta 2824 movement.
>>52026857
The tritium tubes are pretty thick and there has to be room for the tubes in the hands to clear the crystal and the tubes on the dial so it adds up to a pretty thick watch. I don't like how it looks, especially since for some reason every manufacturer always spends so much effort finishing up the steel on the outside of the case but they never seem to bother making that inside rim around the dial look decent.
>>52026691
>Getting bated by obvious bait and showing who is really the newfag
Guys I need some advice. I'm about to fall for the meme watch, but I don't know if the gold version is too much. I think it looks kinda tacky especially on a guy but at the same time I like it more than the silver.
Should I go for the silver or gold? And if gold should the face be black or gold colored?
Merry Christmas.
>>52026880
I think I'll either save up for a Steinhart or cheap out and get an invicta. I feel like with the latter option I'll constantly have to justify the dogshit branding to myself though. Being a poor college student sucks
>>52017897
How big is your watch because I juat recieved my skx and it seems way smaller than I thought it would be. I have large hands but my wrist isn't that big at all.
