Back in the 1950s, communist software would have been outlawed. Now open sores SJWs are ruining everything.
>>52014258
> open source SJWs
... What? Linux users are incredibly bigoted.
Open source/free software is plagued by autists, weaboos, Virgins and mentally damaged people. Avoid at all costs.
I'd rather use software written by someone who earns a salary and cares about their work.
>he does it for free
>>52014786
>He does it for free
Read "The Cathedral & The Bazaar".
>>52014765
Okay even if all Linux users are bigots, open source software is developed either by freewill through ideals of communism or through licensing.
>>52015125
By that logic, proprietary software is developed by pathetic, money-slave wagecucks. Which is better?
>>52015165
Depends on the piece of software in question and for what purpose does it serve?
Ad hominems serve no place for what quality software is, that being said neither she be a factor?
BTW communism isn't inherently harmful only when it is forced upon others rather than a volunteer basis.
>>52015125
See that phrase you used, free will? That means FOSS software is created through voluntaryism, not communism.
open source software exists so you can showcase your development to proprietary software companies
>open source
>>52014258
Back in the 1950s you bought the hardware, the software was free because without it the hardware would have been useless.
>>52014258
Back in the 1950s hardware was considered the most important and software was that unimportant bit that our masterpiece of a machine processed.
>>52014258
>I don't know the difference between libertarianism and communism, not do I see how politics is different from business models.
Go back to school.
0/10
>>52014786
why did you capitalize Virgins?
