Do you like it?
What for?
>>51993975
ArcGIS map design and rendering, and obviously gaming
>>51993965
No. This is beyond dumb. You're paying out the ass for extra PCIE lanes on the 5930k and then you're not using them. You're paying out the ass for a giant wattage PSU and you're not using it. There's tons more I'd change, but it sounds like you're just guessing and have more money than knowledge.
>>51993965
>You monitor is more expensive then my entire build including peripherals
>your CPU cooler costs more than my cpu
>>51994011
Don't flatter yourself, you can't predict the future or what I will be using it for.
I do plan on getting another Zotac 980 Ti when the time comes for it
>>51994027
>1000W PSU for a single GPU
Man, are you retarded?
>>51994030
>when the time comes for it
When? By next year, 14/16nm cards will be out.
>>51993965
The 5930K is shit. Either get a 5820K or a 5960X, not some dumb, overpriced halfway house.
>>51994030
You don't need the extra PCIe lanes for two-way SLI you dumb nigger. Unless you're planning on picking up another two or three 980 Tis, there's literally no reason to buy the 5930K other than to spend more money so that you can say you did.
>>51994057
damn, you're right.
SLI Zotac 980 TI's wont be able to do anything impressive this time next year
>>51994058
this is why I love 4chan, just gotta find the right angle of attack
>>51994030
You do realize that 16 PCIE lanes is sufficient for dual 980ti GPUs right? The 5820k has 24 lanes, sufficient for 3x 980ti GPUs or 2x 980ti GPUs and plenty of other things. The extra PCIE lanes in the 5930k are definitely going unused in your build.
It's beyond dumb. Don't flatter yourself.
>>51994073
>>51994066
Well I'm sorry that you didn't read what I was using it for
>>51994095
>Well I'm sorry that you didn't read what I was using it for
A single card?
>>51994112
Jesus Tapdancing Christ, do I have to hold all of your fucking hands?
see>>51994112
>>51994112
see>>51994000 instead
>>51994122
I am reading the post to you linked to, and it says:
>A single card?
>>51994122
Rofl, you just keep digging and digging. I don't think you even understand the concept and just want to buy the most expensive shiny thing you can afford now. You keep trying to justify it but are failing miserably. We haven't even reached the point where you're throwing good money after bad yet since you haven't spent anything, so quit trying to sail that sinking ship before it's too late.
I mean hell, if you have that much cash to throw around, you might as well invest it in something that'll actually do something for you like better storage. An NVMe SSD and enterprise quality HDDs might not go amiss.
>>51993965
>brand new computer
>DDR4 RAM
>only 16GB
Come on.
>>51994133
How is the intended software related to the PCIE lanes the hardware is going to use? Unless there's some magical piece of hardware you failed to mention in your build that takes up 10 PCIE lanes or more, you're just spewing shit out of your ass.
>>51994166
and that 10 PCIE lanes or more is factoring in a second 980ti down the road. Ignoring that, you'd have to add in another 17 or more PCIE lanes worth of hardware to exceed the 5820k's capabilities on top of that 980ti.
>>51993965
500gb isn't enough also get a TB hard drive
>>51994148
Actually no, I think it might be the reverse. Each piece was picked after 2 weeks of researching other components, they are there for a reason, not just "shiny things"
It is a brand new rig, a foundation to build on. That's why I have the 1k
As for the 6 core processor that you think I just blindly chose, it happens to be very good at doing ArcGIS calculations
>>51994166
I am reading, and it seems that ArcGIS can utilize 6-cores with hyperthreading.
>>51994122
You seem like a complete retard who's already decided on what he's going to buy and are now flailing wildly to swat away any criticism to validate your choices.
>>51994188
But a 5820K would be equally as good at that task. You are yet to provide a single reasonable explanation as to why you've picked the one bad deal amongst the Haswell-E lineup.
>>51994188
Holy shit, how are you still not understanding that the only difference between the 5820k and the 5930k is the PCIE lanes? They're literally the exact same die just differently binned (and not clock speed binned). How many times do I have to go over this?
>>51994215
actually the 5920k wouldn't be as good as the 5930K for those calculations and rendering, I do plan on adding cards in the future, and I also got the 5930K for $400 at microcenter, so there's that
>>51994274
>adding cards
how many? four? Otherwise, it makes no difference. Even TRIPLING your current PCIe lane demand wouldn't be enough to overfill a 5820k.
Quit trying to sail a sinking ship. Save that money, and save the money from the PSU and invest in legitimately decent storage. That'll make FAR more difference.
>>51994302
I'm sorry, are you not understanding the simplest concept that is the 5930k is a stronger processor than the 5820k?
You do know that head to head it's better, right?
Look, in all honesty and since we are trying to help you despite your stubbornness, here is a built. It's cheaper than yours. Equal on every way that matters including screen, CPU, and GPU, and better (WAY better) in storage. It's all upside, and it still has plenty of room for further expansion including SLI 980ti GPUs if you really feel like you must.
PCPartPicker part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ZXc2vK
Price breakdown by merchant: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ZXc2vK/by_merchant/
CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K 3.3GHz 6-Core Processor ($319.99 @ Micro Center)
CPU Cooler: CRYORIG R1 Ultimate 76.0 CFM CPU Cooler ($79.99 @ Newegg)
Motherboard: ASRock X99 Extreme4 ATX LGA2011-3 Motherboard ($184.98 @ Newegg)
Memory: PNY Anarchy 16GB (4 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory ($77.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Samsung 950 PRO 512GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive ($329.99 @ Amazon)
Storage: Hitachi Ultrastar 7K3000 2TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($119.95 @ Amazon)
Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB FTW ACX 2.0+ Video Card ($639.99 @ Amazon)
Case: Fractal Design Define R5 (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case ($89.99 @ Newegg)
Power Supply: EVGA SuperNOVA 1000G2 1000W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply ($145.98 @ Newegg)
Optical Drive: LG UH12NS30 Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($39.88 @ OutletPC)
Monitor: Asus MG279Q 144Hz 27.0" Monitor ($599.99 @ Micro Center)
Total: $2628.72
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-12-22 03:13 EST-0500
>>51994413
Uh, no. It's not. Not in any way. They're literally the same die. Get your head checked. The advantage of the 5930k is PCIE lanes. Other than that, they're identical.
>>51994455
False, it runs clock speeds higher than the 5820k
>>51994511
No, it doesn't It's stock speed is all of 0.1 GHz faster (2.7%), but both are unlocked and the silicone lottery is the one that determines the victor of the clock speed race. Quit grasping at straws. If you really want to pay $200 for 2.7% difference because you're afraid of overclocking, then by all means admit your ignorance.
>>51994529
Actually, (again you didn't read) I got the 5930k for $400, a whopping $10 average price difference from the 5820k for a processor that has shown higher and more stable clock speeds
