>>51991768
Arch, pacman, less bloat.
Mint is fine but apt

ChromeOS, it came on my chromebook, it does all i need it to do.

Its easy and tinkering with it is fun.

Im currently trying to learn how to delete one partition and expand another with fdisk.

I use arch for pacman, AUR and other than that it just works fine for me. Never had a reason to switch back to Ubuntu or Mint.

I havent tried a redhat distro before though

Elementary, is like Ubutu but already tweaked visually. It's like using Clementine instead of Foobar.

Back on Ubuntu for similar reasons of wide support. I also am not a big fan of apt, that's my only real issue with it.

What is wrong with apt?

>>51991850
Dependency problems. It really hates correctly managing versions and has really shitty configs. Also

>front end to dkpg, even though dkpg also needs to be configured in a lot of situations

>>51991850
Try installing numix theme with an AUR helper:
$ yaourt numix
>Searches for numix in the AUR
>Gives you a list of options
>Enter the number of option
>Automated package build and install
Using apt
>Manually search for ppa
>copy and paste PPA link into terminal
>Add PPA
>Update
>Install
>optional dependencies? kek
Never going back to Ubuntu/mint/debian

>>>>51991768
Not everyone likes a cookie-cutter bloated OS :/

>>51992201
>>51991788
implying bloat matters on any hardware from this decade

>>51992255
Just because you have resources, doesn't mean the os should use them. A great example is that my laptop has 2gb ram, but I don't use any software that takes up more than a gigabyte.

>>51991768
I use Arch because I like the rolling release (don't have to upgrade to a new release every 6-8 months), vanilla software, and the latest stable software.

debian jessie, because i don't give a fug.

>>51992255
DUDE ITS THE CURRENT YEAR

HOW CAN YOU NOT DO [what i do]

i'd rather have more free disk space than less, and less ram/cpu usage than more if I'm given the choice, even if it's a small bit.