Post 'em
Benchmarks are a meme
>>51950232
CPUZ is a meme
>>51950202
calling things a meme is a meme
Pure meme
>>51950276
pointing that out is a meme
>>51950244
Windows is a meme
>>51950315
Atrocious font scaling.
Stock, of course
>>51950331
Thanks for pointing that out. Fixed it now.
4790K at 4.4GHz.
i7 3770 at 3.4 GHz
Hyperthreading disabled
memes
h-how am I doing
this bench surely inaccurate, on geekbench my single core score are higher than fx8150, yet here is marked about 20% slower
>>51950501
benchmarks like these are never 'accurate'
>>51950315
3770K @ 4.8
>>51950624
I didn't bother upping any further, the temp gets too hot.
What cooler are you using? watercooling?
just ran the bench mark thing 5 times, was getting score difference leaping 400-500 points.
FX 8320 @ 4.2Ghz
>>51950274
>HQ
>probably shiggy diggy ultra/elite/pro/whateverthefuckbook or gaymen laptop
>>51950501
Take poo to loo. Poo is for loo, not for street.
>>51950644
NH-D14 + Lapped base and IHS + Coollaboratory Liquid Pro on the die
fans are still running super slow on CPU-Z's bench
also my chip is pretty golden
Breddy gud for an AMD laptop.
>>51951509
>>51951799
Noice. How much do you downclock it to get decent battery life? I have to downclock my cpu to 1.6 GHz to get 2-3 hours on battery.
>>51952216
No need downclock
check C7 state
when CPU is free
(Core in literally 0 volts state)
>>51952401
Interesting. How many hours of battery life do you get web browsing on battery?
Notebook
get on my 2011 level fags
>>51952957
x5687 running at 4.5
>>51952957
Post cpu info too fagit
>>51950202
meme
e
m
e
>>51951117
Lets see single thread
>>51953493
hello again, 2011
>>51953365
see
↓
>>51950624
Mine
I was already aware
Fuck you
Quite happy with it.
>>51954447
Good to know my lowend xeon is i7 tier.
>>51954506
Low end i7 tier.
Also turned out I had something eating an entire core's usage, oops.
>>51954550
That's more like it. I don't even need most of the power to be honest. Just sits in a tiny microserver with a passive heatsink transcoding shit.
>>51954700
How many threads do you have? 20?
>single-core performance
lmao who needs it anyways
>>51954716
Nope. 16. 5960X @4.5GHz
Yay, Xeon.
>>51954749
Your single core performance is disturbingly low.
>>51951035
It's one of these.
I need the dGPU for CUDA prototyping.
i7-4770k @ 4.3GHZ
>>51954716
>How many threads do you have?
Looks like he has all of the threads.
AMD A10 5800k @4.4GHz
5 year old laptop. These numbers are good, right? (Also, does CPU-Z really not support HiDPI?)
Semi related, but do you guys have any overclocking tips? I can't get my FX8350 to run above 4.5ghz without going over 1.5v and I think it's an issue with my motherboard.
I've been sticking at 4.5ghz 1.5v but I want to push it higher.
>>51956504
>1.5v
Jesus what are your temps?
You might just have a mediocre chip, welcome to the silicon lottery
>>51956468
You beat me in multi-core performance with only 2 physical cores. You're good. I hope Zen CPUs won't have such shitty single core performance.
Gay ass ultrabook i7
>>51956524
My temps are actually not bad. Idles at around 20c and never gets above 60c. Every guide I've read says I should be able to hit 4.4 on stock voltage but I was at like 1.4 before I got a stable 4.4.
I'm using the MSI 970 gaming mobo that logical increments recommended but I think I kinda screwed up not getting a better one.
>>51950501
>geekbench
Yeah, OK.
This benchmark is definitely inaccurate, but Geekbench is no better.
>>51956504
Yeah youre VRMs are getting too hot, and you need a better power phase delivery for the CPU. Your almost certainly heat constrained, not ghz constrained per se (silicon lottery)
>tfw beaten by a 6700K stock in single thread performance
Do I win the slowest result?
Virtual PC 6.1 on a PowerPC G4 933MHz.
>c2d
>penryn
>socket 478
>45nm
>2.6ghz
>tfw it has the same single thread performance than a fx8150
4.4Ghz single core,
4Ghz on all cores
HT was on but I did not test the same speed with it off.
Running at 24/7 clock (4.084Ghz single core, 3.9Ghz all cores with HT off) got 1450/7650.
This bench appears to utilize hyperthreading with roughly a 15-18% gain.
There is a 20% performance difference between 4Ghz HT on and 3.916 HT off, which is only a 2ish% difference in clock rate
My CPU from 2008
>>51957570
how come you do have such a high multi score, you dont even have whole instructions set enabled
>>51958132
dual cpu
get on my level
pretty happy with the results tbgq fà m
>>51958412
>4.1ghz
>1.3v
Damn
>>51956712
I really hate myself when I see that you can run yours at 4.2 with 1.08V core
>>51958456
I really got fucked over by the silicon lottery
It's okay I guess
>>51958132
SSE4 is useless
But yeah, mostly because the two cpus providing 8 very angry cores.
>>51956820
post geekbench score
>>51956712
>>51958412
Wonder why my multi thread is so much lower though
I'd be happy with this if it weren't for the subpar gaming performance.
One of these days I'll pick up an 8320.
>>51958667
Might as well wait for Zen at this point. Two more of the same cores won't do much
>>51958684
Yeah but its gonna require a whole new PC which won't be happening for a while. Plus I'm poor.
>>51958714
So start saving now
You'll need a new mobo and processor, and DDR4 is already cheap and will probably be cheaper by then anyway
>>51958725
I don't plan to be poor for a while, only while I'm in school. Once I'm done next year then I've got my jobs planned out and everything.
At least for the time being this PC does well enough when it comes to games.
Is this normal?
main pc
>>51958876
laptop
>>51958892
and, shitty 15w a8 6410 laptop that throttles everytime something intensive runs.
Is this good?
>>51959072
Pretty good voltage for that clock speed
>>51951070
You seem to have made a mistake in your post.
>>51950202
skylake meme
>>51950770
The fuck. My 8320 was 864 for single thread and 2253 for multi thread.
how the fuck.
>>51954728
>FX-8320
>1406 MHz
>>51959143
On the lowest multiplier of 7, yeah. It goes up to 22.5, aka 4.5GHz.
I won the CPU lottery.
It supports practically any frequency at relatively low voltages.
>>51955650
>
>>51959125
It's not an accurate benchmark. I've ran it multiple times and gotten very different results.
>>51950202
Not super great. I gotta get me an 8350. Them sweet 8 cores for when games are all optimized for it because consoles.
