What is a trusted free text editor similar to pic related?
Anything but Libre Office.
Or just use office.live.com.
It's free.
>>51931412
Abiword.
There's also LibreOffice Writer, but that's a bit slow.
>>51931412
Google Documents
I am saying this unironically
>>51931412
vim + XeLaTeX
[note|word]pad
>>51931412
NANO
>>51931550
Calligra words, if you want to try something new.
>>51931321
Microsoft Word is not a text editor, it's a word processor.
>>51931412
Gedit works for me really well.
>>51931423
NO!! I MEAN FREE AS IN "FREE" CAUSE STALL MAN SAID MICRO$OFT (I USED A DOLLAR SIGN TO SHOW THEY'RE CORPORATE XDDD) WAS EVIL AND THEY WILL STEAL PICTURES OF MY UNDERAGED WAIFU XDDD DDDDD
>>51931959
I sense sarcasm in your post.
>>51931412
chinese botnet is bretty gud
>>51932038
No shit.
>>51932055
Wanna talk about it, sport?
>>51931423
>office.live.com.
The biggest shit Microsoft ever created. Slow, breaks formatting, crashes and destroys my progress while doing so.
>>51932050
forgot pic
>>51931423
>LibreOffice is a text editor
>Office live is too!
>>51931412
I like ee and Nano. Prefer Nano slightly more. Lillypad is good if you are used to Notepad, and want something very similar.
>>51931525
>>51932131
what are some great fonts?
>>51931412
i bought a suit license for $25 online.
>>51931412
Text editor ≠ word processor
>>51931412
>Microsoft Word
>text editor
>>51931412
Abiword for WYSIWYG
vim+latex if you actually want a text editor
>>51931412
Nothing. It's actually the best you can get.
>>51934175
Same here too
WPS office has a free version that works fine and feels/looks a lot like word
>>51935049
>Using chink software ever
yeah, sure, i was looking for a slow, painful death too.
>>51931525
maybe if you're writing journal articles. otherwise that's just stupid and everyone will hate you for using a format they can't use.
>>51935186
you mean pdf?
>>51933713
>MS Truetype Fonts
Just don't let Richard Stallman find out. He wouldn't approve. You wouldn't want him to disapprove of you for not using your freedom correctly, would you? Of course you wouldn't, and that's why you just do it in private and keep your mouth shut.
Emacs of course!
>>51931412
lyx ftw
>>51934320
>Text editor ≠ word processor
text editor ≈ word processor
