>32 inches
>1366x768
Well I guess I should've known it'd be this bad. You can count the pixels. But why do that when you can just multiply xdddd
But seriously guys would you tolerate a tv like this ?
Oh fuck I forgot to say inb4 >Family Guy
>>51886938
>32 inches
>1366x768
I can barely tolerate that pixel density on an 8-inch device
>1366x768
but that resolution I can't tolerate whatsoever
>buying unnecessarily big screens
Your own fault. My 19 inch screen looks great even with DVDs.
>>51887037
>being a poorfag and trying to pass it off as a good thing
How in denial are you c.uck?
I had a 720p 32" screen for a long while and it never bothered me.
You can count the pixels on any screen if you get close enough.
>>51887057
You can neither afford a 4k screen nor come up with a somewhat clever way to evade the wordfilter?
I wouldn't tolerate that. I don't tolerate that resolution ever.
My 32" screen is 1920x1080, but will move to either 1440p or 4k soonish.
>>51887080
This. It's perfectly adequate if you sit a normal distance away from a television. This isn't a computer monitor, there's no reason you should be close enough to see individual pixels or artifacts.
>>51887090
>4k TV
Nice meme.
>>51887139
Then buy a 1080p one, but don't go over like 40".
>>51887194
50'' 1080p smart tv here. Looks perfect. So glad I'm not poor.
>>51887237
I am literally lmao'ing at your poor life, you don't even have a smart curved 4k screen?
>>51887405
It's cute that you have to make yourself feel better and poverty by insulting people. There is no excuse not to own an Apple iMax projector with port and starboard attachments.
>>51887639
That image is why I loved old SpongeBob animation. It's so shit now.
