Chrome and RAM
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Does it bother you that Chrome eats so much RAM or do you consider this a just price to pay for fast performance and good stability?
Chrome uses up to 1.5GB of RAM when I browse the web but it's never been something I really cared about since my laptop has 6GB of RAM.
>>51851829
I used to love Firefox but recently they started to add shit I didn't care about and the performance/RAM usage got way worse than it used to be.
I use Chrome even though I know Google steals my private information.
Just download one tab, but desu I don't really mind, it's snappy
It doesn't bother me because I use Firefox that has never gone above 500 MB of RAM with my normal browsing activity with the record being 850 when watching HD YT videos.
chrome does not use incredible amounts of ram, just close all tabs and restart chrome to free ram
>>51851854
>Google steals my private information.
You mean voluntarily use a product that reports everything you do to Google?
>>51851829
>1.5 GB
Jesus christ how many tabs are you running? How many extensions? I've got two windows with six tabs between the two - one of which is streaming audio- as well as a separate window for an extension and I'm only at ~900 MB of RAM.
>>51851829
I don't do other shit other than browse the web. It doesn't bother me at all.
I've tried really hard but giving a fuck is nearly impossible if you have 16GB of RAM like me.
>>51851898
Multiple 4chin tabs, a few youtube tabs, a bunch of wiki tabs, and an amazon tab. More than 20 tabs in total. I also have the ABP, youtube quality, and the click and clean extensions turned on too.
I don't like web pages reloading so I just leave the tabs idling until I'm sure I don't need them anymore.
>>51851995
Right now chrome is using ~1.4GB of RAM. meh
>>51851995
Oh, so you're a dumbass. Carry on.
>>51851916
Same here senpai. God it must be horrible having less than 16GB of RAM.
>>51852051
Lazy to be honest. Though yeah, more than 20 tabs open is pretty excessive. I'll close them... eventually.
>tfw recently switched to chrome from firekuck
It feels like I just overclocked my cpu to 6GHz.
It's worth it. Pages load fast as fuck and nothing has to reload.
>>51851829
shift + esc, see which tabs/extensions use the most memory, either close/disable them, or, for sites, go to about:blank, then press back when you need to use that specific website...
but yeah, the memory usage in chromium is a PITA.
>>51852333
Can you disable the cache on Chrome yet?
Which extensions are essential for chrome?
>>51852483
I'm not sure. Why would you need to though?
>>51852496
ABP and click&clean. That's about it, for me at least.
>>51852496
Https Everywhere, uBlock Origin, uMatrix.
>>51852513
Last time I used Chrome, the cache was using up 36GB of my SSD. Why would you leave it enabled?
With Firefox I have it set so my RAM is there cache.
![aesthetic_zyzz[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/l94RKP1.jpg "aesthetic_zyzz[1].jpg")
>tfw having 300 chrome tabs open with no lag
Download more RAM faggots
>>51851829
I could understand CPU usage bothering someone since that has a cost associated with it, such as increased power consumption, heat, noise, etc. However RAM doesn't have a cost like that, an ideally optimised system would potentially use 100% of your RAM all the time.
>>51852168
Did you have smooth scrolling on in FF? I find that’s what makes it seem slower to me.
>>51852590
>You wouldn't download a car, would you?
Fuuuuck if only I could.
>>51852655
Yeah but ff just sucks at dealing with multiple tabs. I browse a ton of websites and easily make ff crash on me. I got tired of checking for updates daily and now just use chrome.
>>51851829
Really? I'm a poorfag with a dual core cpu and 4 gb ram and I can go up to 50 tabs open with no lag at all with ram usage at 1.2gb
>>51852765
Some sites can use more ram than others. Youtube uses like 150mb per tab on chrome.
Not really I have 32GB so its whatever.
>>51851829
>Does it bother you that Chrome eats so much RAM
Not really, because I'm not a fucking idiot who uses chrome.
>>51852892
That's right, you use firekuck and have a fetish for kuckoldry.
>>51852168
Yeah, those tab animations are designed specifically to fool mongoloids like you.
>>51852496
uninstall.exe
or
sudo apt-get remove google-chrome-stable
>>51852925
At least I don't have a fetish for terrible software and being tracked online. What a dumb piece of shit.
>>51852940
Then why does chrome take like 2 seconds to load youtube but firekuck takes like 10 seconds to load the same fucking website on a 50mbps connection?
>>51852992
Prove that firekuck doesn't track you as well.
>>51853011
/g/ said they dont
>>51852994
>10 seconds to load youtube
I have a POS computer with 5mbps download and youtube takes 1 sec to load.
get the extension called "the great suspender"
thank me later
>>51853031
He's probably using an outdated version of firefox. On that same note fuck firefox for not updating easily.
>>51853011
>makes the claim
>expects you to prove a negative
Start by looking at the source.
>>51853011
It's free software.
Dumbfuck.
>>51853035
This, that shit is so useful when you have a shitton of tabs open at the same time.
>>51853069
It's also now run by SJWs and fat feminists.
>>51853092
It's open source, anon. You can easily check whether or not it's tracking you.
>>51853092
>SJW
18 or over to use 4chan, kid.
>>51853052
What in the fuck? It can update automatically, notify you or you can check manually. How can they possibly make updating any easier?
>>51853092
So is google. Bigotry is no longer tolerated in modern society.
>>51853189
Eat shit niger. At least google has the landwhales on a leash and doesn't let them peg them like kuckzilla does.
>>51851829
I have 16 GB RAM and never noticed any lag.
>>51853215
>on a leash
Did you forget the time (a few months ago) google let them spam homosexual propaganda to billions of people on their homepage?
>>51853261
>tfw only 2gb of ram on my laptop
>>51853339
Holy shit really? Got source?
All these fucking feminists and sjws makes me realize how much the baby boomers failed to raise kids properly.
>newfags creating threads recommending the chrome botnet
Welcome to new /g/.
If only memory consumption still looked like this.
What happened, /g/? Why did everything turn into a nuclear explosion of resource consumption?
>>51853413
Technology advanced grandpa. Now browsers have to load web pages with video, javascript, and assloads of high res images and ads.
>>51853429
>kucked by kuckzilla
What the fuck does that even mean you fucking kid? Holy shit, this entire place has been taken over by 12 year old /pol/tards.
>>51853450
I don't think the videos and images is what's to blame. Image-heavy sites could be found back then and they were fairly managable given that a decent internet connection.
I think shitloads of JS is the main culprit, and I think that it's proof that we need to move on from HTML+CSS+JS to something better. Something that's *actually designed* to do the things that the web does instead of hacking a research paper platform into oblivion.
>>51853397
>thinking RMS reaction images makes us believe you are not a newfag. He's in the fucking sticky you faggo
>>51853505
not him but stuff like pic related has been happening. FF is dead to me.
>>51851995
Ublock uses a tenth the ram of ABP
>>51853513
You can definitely see the effects of javascript on the Raspberry Pi 1. It shits the floor trying to auto complete on Google.
>>51852051
>vomit chan
>a dumbass
As if this is anything we didn't already know
>>51853513
Even if you got rid of that, you are still left with ads. Now like 75% of a webpage is just ads. And when you use an ad blocker sites cry out in pain and either beg for money or block access to their sites until you disable your ad blocker.
Can't really blame the sites though, something has to pay those server bills.
>>51853523
Why are you so obsessed about the word slave?
>>51853571
I'm not but kuckzilla is. It's proof FF is against free speech.
>>51853593
Nah they are just making the workplace more comfortable for people who had slave ancestors.
>>51853593
>free speech
It's the name of a goddamn variable. Do you also care if a variable is calledcounterinstead of count?
>>51853565
H-hey I actually like vomit chan. Stop bullying my favorite tripfag.
>>51853567
We had animated gif ads everywhere for xcams, and later Flash ads from Macromedia. It wasn't until Adobe bought out Macromedia and turned Flash into Adobe branded MPEG4 that everything slowed down.
>>51853620
There's nothing offensive about the term slave.
>>51853627
I'm mostly just disappointed that he calls himself vomit_chan instead of Madotsuki.
>>51853633
Not to you obviously, but to these people racial memory reminds them of their suffering.
>>51853626
This isn't north korea, any modifications as small as they may be put in place because a few feminist got butthurt is a violation of our freedom of speech. Today variables will be changed, tomorrow users will be forced to view a censored version of the internet through ff.
>>51853627
put your trip back on so I can filter you
>>51853668
Nice slippery slope. Do you mind if I ignore it because of the utter lack of proof you have?
>>51853626
I care that they 1) waste resources 2) language police, it's totalitarian as fuck.
>>51853663
>racial memory
>>51853567
That could be taken care of by mandating that any cross-site domains be defined at load time in the HTML (or whatever markup is being used). After the initial page load, cross site requests are entirely off-limits to scripts unless explicitly allowed by the user.
>>51853668
>North Korea
Hate speech isn't tolerated in most of Europe.
>>51853681
What? Anyways leave him alone, I like him. Thank you for filtering him so he doesn't have to deal with cunts like you.
>>51853713
>using a "bad word" is hate-speech regardless of context.
>>51853646
The name suits him, he's repulsive.
>>51853762
so are you.
Nah, I'm not a poorfag so I have 16 gigs of ram on my desktop.
>>51853807
>>51853730
>trying to save face on an anonymous image board
Why don't you just stay in your desktop thread?
>>51853847
You can literally get that for like $70. Not even poorfags have an excuse to NOT have 16gb of ram on their desktops.
lulz
>>51853886
Are intentionally retarded? Chrome is multi-process. Every tab and extension gets its own process. You are using way more memory than that.
>>51853886
What about all the other processes?
>>51853885
Poorfags would rather use that money on things like food, water and electricity.
>>51853646
What ever happened to that tripfag with the chink scribbles in his name?
>>51851829
Unless your mom is charging you for each byte of RAM you use, it's not an issue. At least it isn't until it affects performance.
Safari and Chrome are always fast for me, only Firefox manages to be a turd - consuming the most RAM, CPU, and battery life. Pages are slow to load even when using a caching proxy, why anyone would use that garbage is beyond me.
>>51853668
>This isn't north korea
no, it's the US, a place that still had slavery in the 60s
still, I don't see anything wrong with using these terms in a technical context...
>>51851829
Chrome in the most recent versions has been getting better about this, it would gobble up 20Gb or more of RAM before and now it hovers around 7Gb.
>>51851995
>ABP
>>51853922
More than that, there's really no reason why any machine with a Pentium 4 or PowerPC G4 or newer shouldn't be able to surf the modern web. Computing power overall has plateaued, but storage and memory sizes have skyrocketed, leaving older machines old in the cold with little no good reason... machines that are sufficiently capable that they should see their deaths during service, not in a junkyard crusher.
Bloated web applications are cancerous.
>>51854020
>20gb of ram
If you have 300 tabs open yeah.
>>51851829
I don't care about RAM usage, I care about CPU usage and Chromium does alright, it's fast as shit. I used to use Palemoon, which is similar in resource consumption, but Chromium is shitload faster.
>>51854026
Does it really affect performance that much? I used to have it but switched to ublock. I haven't really noticed a difference to be honest.
>>51851829
Unused RAM is RAM that you might as well not even have anyway. If you start running other applications at the same time and running low on free memory, your operating system will allocate less RAM to chrome.
>>51853886
>incognit mode
you dont want to show your senpai that you surf 4channarian?
I'll give two shits if /g/ laughs/mocks me for using ReadyBoost but I use a 16GB SanDisk USB dedicated to ReadyBoost and using the whole 16GB for it. Seems to work. Even if /g/ will tell me it's a placebo or something. My laptop has 4GB RAM but it's still not enough. How Windows 10 and Chrome gobble up RAM usage quickly is beyond me.
>>51853567
Fuck man.... Its an endless cycle
This is depressing you know
>>51854135
>16gb dedicated to ready boost
>4gb ram
Are you me?
>>51851829
Doesn't bother me in the slightest. I have 12 gigabytes of RAM and usually use less than half of it even when I'm being "productive".
>>51854160
Probably. Do you have/use an hp laptop too? This one's not too bad my old HP/Compaq constantly shat the the bed, at least it my "new" HP laptop easily blows laptop out of the water, even if this "new" one goes a few years back. inb4 HP. I don't care. I'm poor and it was $170 out the door from a local a pawn shop. At least it's something unlike my old heap of shit Compaq/HP.
>>51853513
>I don't think the videos and images is what's to blame. Image-heavy sites could be found back then and they were fairly managable given that a decent internet connection.
Yeah, but websites were optimized for 800x600 back then, and used a 128x128 mosaic for background and tables or frames for layout.
Now they are optimized for 1080p while having stylesheets for four different responsive designs also loaded, and all the shit ton of grafixxx that make up of all those views, including full 1920x1080 background images because they are so pretty. That one background already uses over 6 megs of RAM when decoded for display, despite only being a 300kbyte jpeg.
And you have CSS doing transforms and building gradients and shadows on the fly, all of those need to be rendered into bitmaps and kept in memory for display as well.
Then you have tons of JavaScript manipulating HUGE portions of data and re-imagining the DOM on-the-fly, on top of all of that.
>I think that it's proof that we need to move on from HTML+CSS+JS to something better
Even if you disable JS, you'll still have websites taking up hundreds of MB of RAM, simply because of how powerful CSS has become.
And JS will not go away as long as websites are making their money out of tracking everything you do, down to where you move the mouse (look up mouse heat tracking).
I think the correct way to go would be changing HTML and CSS in a way so it can do more stuff that people use Javascript to do today, then build a site completely out of that, and then making some kind of hashtag banner about "this site proudly works without JavaScript", and hoping that it will go viral. That would also fuck up tracking a lot, and for sites you own you can still add your own server-side tracking.
Unfortunately building a modern site like that would be difficult as fuck, due to how many features we now expect for sites to have, which are impossible without JS. You can't do ajax calls without them for example...
>>51853663
>racial memory
ahahah
we need to make this into some kind of sjw term.
>>51852655
>Did you have smooth scrolling on in FF? I find that’s what makes it seem slower to me.
Holy fuck. Thank you.
I was wondering why Firefox was so fucking laggy scrolling.
>>51854221
Yea, its HP. Its my shitty "school" laptop. I think I paid 2something. Should have dropped another $50 at least for something else.
I think you can find them at Walmart, the ECO friendly ones or someshit. Runs like crap for some reason. Might just throw some linux distro on it and be done with it...
>>51854035
I usually do.
>>51854350
Why?
>>51854357
Why not?
>>51854380
Because you wouldn't be using 290 of them. You could have bookmarks instead to achieve the same result.
Plus, your cache will be massive and you'll never be able to restart your computer.
>>51854404
I haven't had a single issue in how I use Chrome. 32Gb of RAM and clearing tab cache on close of tab keeps cache under control. It restarts just fine.
>>51851829
>has 16 gigs of memory
>has 6 extensions going
>chrome doesn't even take a full 1 gig
i'm feelin' alright here :)
>>51852655
>an ideally optimised system would potentially use 100% of your RAM all the time.
Which is why linux has filesystem cache. Every time you load a file, it stores it in ram so the next time you load it it is super fast. It will also automatically get rid of cached files as it needs when a program allocates more ram.
>>51854432
My point was that you would lose all 300 tabs if you restart. What's even the point of having them open if you have to reopen them every time then don't even use them before the next shutdown?
>>51854225
Why dont browsers just throw away the 6mb decompressed image data when you tab away from it for more than 30 seconds? Uncompressing a 1080p jpeg is very fast, even on shitware computers, and the gain in free ram would be tremendous.
>>51851995
>attentionfag tripfriend
>ABP
>Botnet browser
>>51854586
Chrome resumes whatever you did last so all tabs that were open reopen. I don't restart often though as there is no need to on most linux based OS's.
>>51854610
You just leave you computer running 24/7, despite not using it the majority of that time? I guess if you enjoy wasting electricity, that's your decision to make.
>>51853627
>>51854621
I put it to sleep when I'm not using it.
>>51854626
>posting le reddit brony
>>51854626
>everybody must cater to my just perception of the world
Do you work for mozilla?
>>51854728
>actually defending tripfags
Are you fucking serious?
>>51852333
Show sites source code, somewhere in the third tab disable caching.
Not sure if that's what you're asking for and I'm on mobile so I can't look it up, but that should work, I think.
>>51854745
I'm not but you have to accept others don't share the same world view as you do. Instead of censoring and attacking them like an autist you learn to live with them or go fuck off somewhere else.
>>51854755
Sorry, 'Inspect Element' is what I meant.
>>51854788
Basically this world doesn't exist to accommodate only you.
>>51854788
Maybe you should fuck off to somewhere else if you're okay with them. Tripfags take 4chan, an anonymous imageboard, and attempt to assert their identity because they can't handle the anonymity. They literally look at this website and go "If only this was more like Reddit, though"
>>51854536
>PSU with Lightbulb sitting inside
>Cutting cable for no good reason
>Has case off PSU as if he were going to service it
>Random cable wrapped shittly on top of case
>Faceplate has headers for audio and what appears to be a MIDI port, but aren't populated
I raged.
>>51854817
I'm neutral about them. But 4chan mods allow tripfags, 4chan in generally likes tripfags because you can now filter specific people you don't like (which is a bitch move).
Seems like 4chan might not be the best place to spend your free time if tripfags bother you this much. Either filter them or fuck off. Just don't sperg out like some morbidly obese autist. Sperging out won't make the tripfags go away you know.
>>51854877
>4chan in generally likes tripfags
What's your home board? Mine is /a/, where literally no one likes tripfags. /a/ tolerates them at best.
Plus, your entire post exudes the tumblr attitude of "If you don't like these new people showing up and shitposting just go somewhere else because this is a hugbox!"
The entire point of this website is anonymity. Tripfags don't understand that, so they need to be consistently shit on until they fuck off or stop using one. This is a very /a/ concept, but /a/ also doesn't have /g/'s problem of 90% of threads being terrible shitposting that shouldn't exist.
By ignoring something you are implicitly allowing it. You don't just ignore a tumor, hoping it will go away.
>>51851891
why would a program need to restart to free up some memory? I don't get it
>>51854921
>What's your home board? Mine is /a/, where literally no one likes tripfags. /a/ tolerates them at best.
/g/ and /a/ but mostly /g/.
>Plus, your entire post exudes the tumblr attitude of "If you don't like these new people showing up and shitposting just go somewhere else because this is a hugbox!"
I'm not saying that. However leaving 4chan or finding a way to cope with existing tripfags are the only effective solutions against tripfags.
>The entire point of this website is anonymity. Tripfags don't understand that, so they need to be consistently shit on until they fuck off or stop using one. This is a very /a/ concept, but /a/ also doesn't have /g/'s problem of 90% of threads being terrible shitposting that shouldn't exist.
Anons shitpost too. The mods are in charge of baning shitposters, tripfags and anons alike. Also the point of this website is to share content without a forced public id. 4chan can still relay ip adresses you posted with if you do anything illegal here even if you don't use a tripcode. Freenet is designed for true anonymity not 4chan.
>By ignoring something you are implicitly allowing it. You don't just ignore a tumor, hoping it will go away.
That is only the cause if the tumour is on you. tripfagging cannot be described as a tumour because where someone "likes" it or not is subjective.
Anyway if you feel that strongly about banning tripfags then talk to the 4chin admins and present your case and bring them a solution to the massive lashback 4chan will have when they can't filter people anynore.
-process-per-site
>>51854943
maybe chrome keeps some data in ram to quickly reopen or reload pages
>>51854943
Because Chromium is a mess. It almost never lets go of files once they're stored in the RAM, so restarting it alleviates that problem.
>>51852590
I downloaded 64gig ram. Now what? do I need to download linux and a cpu?
How do cpu download?
>I'm serious my brother told me the internet never lies
>>51855167
So does firefox yet it has management to let files go past esprit or visit time.
>>51855470
i personally do not see chrome occupying more than 300 MB of ram
>>51855498
I have 32gig ram and 3 tabs of youtube opened. Ended up eating 12gigs worth. It even froze the computer.
It is a funky browser when it comes to stability and ram. It will run perfect but then suddenly go to shit.
I actually upgraded my Firefox to the early Windows 64bit version so that it could eat more RAM.
May as well utilize that memory when all I do is shitpost on 4chan all day.
>>51853663
>of their suffering
i remember being a slave when i was 12, so much suffering, oh wait i wasnt one nor were you you little nigger
>>51854602
>Why dont browsers just throw away the 6mb decompressed image data when you tab away from it for more than 30 seconds?
Because then you'd have the browser lag a lot when you switch from tab to tab.
>have 16gb of ram
>sometimes I open various (20+) chrome pages and run at the same time an OSX VM while playing a game
>no slowdown
INFINITE
RAM
>>51854788
>dickriding tripfags this hard
i shiggy
>>51851829
free ram is wasted ram
>>51851829
It's not as bad as Firefox, and I'm sure as shit not moving to Ow The Edge or Opera
>good laptop dies
>have to use shitty 6 year old netbook
>1 gig of RAM (894 mb usable), soldered to the mobo or some shit
>virtually impossible to use chrome, it devours RAM
>add 4 gigs of RAM from my dead laptop
>everything runs faster, Chrome doesn't go AW SNAP on me every 30 seconds
>>51851854
Just use palemoon for fucks sake.
>>51851916
>just buy more RAM xD
Nice input bro, really helpful
>>51854225
>And JS will not go away as long as websites are making their money out of tracking everything you do, down to where you move the mouse (look up mouse heat tracking).
>I think the correct way to go would be changing HTML and CSS in a way so it can do more stuff that people use Javascript to do today, then build a site completely out of that, and then making some kind of hashtag banner about "this site proudly works without JavaScript", and hoping that it will go viral. That would also fuck up tracking a lot, and for sites you own you can still add your own server-side tracking.
>Unfortunately building a modern site like that would be difficult as fuck, due to how many features we now expect for sites to have, which are impossible without JS. You can't do ajax calls without them for example...
Websites needs some sort of programming language, JS/Flash/whatever if you want the web to be something more than hyperlinked documents. Removing JS just means that something else has to pickup the slack and do the exact same thing.
The only built in feature of html that I can think of is form post, tags like <video> and <audio> are just javascript in disguise.
I hear lynx is the hip new browser for those who hate JS
>>51852483
--disk-cache-dir=/dev/null or nul. You have been able to do this since day one.
>>51851829
Everyone knows its indexing system and personal files to get better search predictions.
>>51851898
>only 1.5GB
Do you even web browse?
My chrome uses over 5 gigs because i cant bear to close tabs ever
>>51851829
>but it's never been something I really cared about since my laptop has 6GB of RAM
and you shouldn't. it doesn't make any difference.
>>51851829
chrome doesn't use more ram that is reasonable you dumb cvcks, it loads common webpages into unused memory so you can access them faster. If you actually start using your ram chrome stops using as much. you retards are mad because the program is efficient.
I don't know how much this means it's actually using, but when I've got 24GB (will get back to 32GB eventually) available I don't really care. This is with about 70 tabs open, I sometimes get closer to 100.
What does bother me is it caching videos to the drive it is installed on and not deleting them without clearing my entire browsing history. At one point I had like 50-60GB wasted, now I go through the folder about once a month and free up a few gigs.
>>51852052
>>51851916
Fucking this. 16GB is a god send, I can't live without it, hell I might go to 32gb
>>51851854
palemoon / icecat / or gugle other "firefox forks"
be sure to use chrome and google for that search just so they can die a little inside knowing you're only using it to download canine/feline browsers
>>51853567
yeah those bills, of 10 cents per gigabyte, even though my monthly usage goes around 50gb, i guess i could put 5usd on my flattr account and let it be donated among some sites
>>51853620
your simplistic answer suggests you're implying something,
ive had slave ancestors, now guess my rgb skin tone, nose width and length.
or better yet, guess how many generations ago YOUR ancestors murdered whole villages, YOU MURDERER
>>51853886
>Apps
*facepalm*
>>51857398
the other anon(s) might be lacking some elaboration or were too simplistic in their examples, but i guess they were refering to web teachnologies layering abstraction over abstraction, resulting in a complete mess.
say before canvas you could already do many complex animations with JS alone, but with 10x more processing than in a SWF, nowadays i dont really know
...or perhaps that anon might be refering to JS/ ECMA being a messy concatenation of many abstraction models being kept somewhat retro-compatible.
also i think it all started with firefox, from the 1.x versions it was already using more RAM than IE6 (or7 as well) possibly because it layered an extra processing of the cross-platform XUL for instance?
>>51853035
Underrated post
caching is good so no it doesn't bother me.
i have a question about chrome bookmarklets, how do i stop the bookmarklet from running after i click on it?
>>51853152
>>51858784
It really is, it does nothing bad. It's better than having the RAM not being used. Plus the computer can use it as it needs.
>>51858199
This is precisely why I use Firefox. You can limit your cache size and set it so it uses your RAM as a cache.
>>51859061
How is that even relevant? The cache writes to your hard drive. Even without a cache it would be using the same amount of RAM.
>>51852168
this is nice board
>>51859833
But stupid little anon, there's also RAM cache. it's not the same as disk cache.
>>51851829
Any unused RAM is wasted RAM.
TL;DR Chrome does per tab sandboxing and /g/ is perpetually stuck in 1995.
>>51853368
Still better than /pol/ which shows everyone what it's like when you let your kids be raised by their racist molester uncle.
>>51852168
>>51860066
>[s4s] is behind umaruposting
I fucking knew it.
>>51860066
o shit, you actually got dubs. 2 sets of dubs to be specific. Noice.
>>51859887
This.
Too much RAM usage or just good?
>>51860456
good ram usage
garbage theme
shit os
2/8 would not bang
>>51855617
can I have your full of shit for 500
>>51860508
Isn't that just default Aurora theme? Or are you talking about his 4chan theme? If it's the latter, I agree. It looks terrible.
>>51852556
use cc cleaner it'll clean your catch and you can set up a weekly schedule
>>51851829
Dud system32 folder is making everything work slow as ssshhh.. FUCK!
Just delete it right way!
>>51860577
>>51860508
Give me a good minimal theme then
>>51851829
It's <current year>, dumbass. RAM is cheap. Buy some.
>>51860706
Tomorrow is a pretty good theme, but if you don't want that you could just edit the colours of your current theme to something similar. Also, change that font. Any sans serif font would fit the aesthetic much better.
>>51860766
Thanks family
>>51854569
You realize that every OS does this right?
It's alright, on my end, granted I'm not browsing anything too intensive.
