>144hz
>freesync 30-144 fps
>1 ms response time
>24" 1080p
>365 maple bucks
What's your excuse for not buying the Nixeus NX-VUE24B? It's literally the best gaming monitor you can get for the price.
>1080p
kekd n checkd
>>51836350
>implying going on any higher on 24" is a good idea
>implying there's any point going above 24"
>>51836365
>plebeian 16:9 resolution
kek
29UM67
>freesync
>IPS
>glorious 21:9
>250 ameridollaz
>>51836550
>freesync range 48-75Hz
completely useless. may as well not be there.
I've had this monitor since August.
Best one I've ever owned. Freesync is legit as fuck.
>>51836303
is there anything besides freesync that makes this monitor better than similar offerings from BenQ or Asus?
>>51836757
Why would you ever get a 144hz monitor without freesync/g-sync?
Without it you may as well settle for a 60hz piece of shit.
>>51836757
If you're buying a new monitor you'd be dumb not to get g-sync or freesync.
Unless you're strapped for cash but then you wouldn't be buying a high end monitor
Personally never had any problems with tearing so i dont give a fuck about g sync /freesync.. Honestly its probably a massive meme lol. Recently got a BenQ XL2430T and it's perfect.
>>51836303
>>24" 1080p
Becuase I just placed an order for a second Dell 2716DG
>144hz
>1MS
>27 inches
>Gsync
>1440P
I already own one of these monitors and in the near future I'll be ordering a 3rd.
>24 inches
>1080p
Already deprecated Topkek
>>51836789
well 144hz is already a huge step up from just 60hz, and my current card doesn't support freesync (280x)
>>51836800
You think so? I only have around $250 to spend on a monitor.
I wanted to upgrade to a 144hz. Are you saying there is no point?
I just bought this, what do you think?
>>51836365
At 24", you should still be able to discern individual pixels on a 2560x1440 pixel display at arms length, unless your eyes are totally fucked.
27" spans the perfect area at arms length. Why do you think they're the most popular choice?
>>51836800
Freesync doesn't cost extra. Just get a good display that support it for a future GPU upgrade.
>>51836303
Check out the Eizo Foris FS2735, if you want the ultimate monitor.
>WQHD
>144 Hz
>35-144 Hz Freesync range
>IPS
>1 ms response time
>and a god tier warranty to round off the deal
>24" IPS 60hz 5ms 1080p by LG for $110
At least it has HDMI 1.3 so it can push 1440p
>>51836844
But then you either have to set your graphics to get a constant 144 (thus having lower detail compared to 60) or have microstuttering.
>>51836789
>Why would you ever get a 144hz monitor without freesync/g-sync?
Literally the only point of free/g-sync is compensating for weak CPU/GPU.
>>51838362
That's bullshit. You obviously never used a 120/144Hz display before.
No CPU is powerful enough to get a contant 144 FPS in at least 90% of all games released in the past 5 years, or 80% in the past 10 years.
>>51836303
Where can I buy this in eu?
>>51838142
their product page says 56-144Hz or 35-90Hz freesync range ):
>>51837904
there's nvidia's benq xl2730z equivalent
>>51836303
>24"
>1080p"
> TN
yeah no nigga.
im getting this.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_sacat=0&LH_BIN=1&_nkw=Crossover+2795&_sop=15
>IPS
>cheap as shit
>1440p
>overclocks to 120hz
only drawback is lack of freesync.
>>51838416
I use a 120Hz LCD with no freesync. If I can't hit 120Hz minimum I turn the detail down.
>>51838912
so freesync has no benefit if you can keep the fps and the hz at a constant right?
>>51836811
>I've never noticed it so its probably a meme
Look, I don't use it either but at least I know its pretty legit
>>51836303
Is it IPS?
If not
>into the trash
>>51838941
Correct
>>51836811
it's not a meme. even if you miss the tearing artifacts as they happen, the frames still won't be delivered as smoothly as they would be with some form of syncing.
As an owner of 3 benq xl2430t TN panels, I would never touch TN again.
IPS or don't bother, even if it means going down in refresh rate, it's not worth the tradeoffs.
>>51836303
Thats a pretty sick deal. Simmiliar monitors from Benq cost the same, but without the Freesync..
>>51836303
>1080p
this should be illegal in 2015
>>51836365
>>implying going on any higher on 24" is a good idea
get your eyesight checked
>>51839006
If your minimum framerate is at least as high as your refresh rate then freesync is identical to vsync.
>>51838656
Yeah, you can switch between modes with a button press.
I expect to see a firmware update some time that enables it to work full range.
Regardless, both modes have a big enough range that they cover your needs perfectly.
>>51838912
Yeah. That works for the most part, but almost all DX9/10/11 games hit CPU bottlenecks that make FPS drop below 100.
>>51839064
Cry more
LG 55EG960T
>OLED
>4K
>0.002ms response time
Paid $AU4000 for it, wasn't exactly going for best bang-for-buck. If you have the money I really do recommend it, I have never seen a better picture (can't wait for the footy season to start, either!).
Still rocking a 770 GTX 4(3.5)GB but will upgrade when Pascal comes out next year, going to 4K has forced me to dial a few settings back on some of my newer games (not Fallout 4, doesn't miss a beat at max settings@4K).
>>51839192
>55EG960T
Beautiful my friend. How are the blacks on the panel? Are they blotchy or have the sorted that OLED problem out now?
>>51839192
How's the OLED banding issues?
Have LG fixed it?
>>51839192
>60Hz
>sample and hold
>worse motion quality than a TV from the 50s
>>51839208
The blacks are perfect even when there is a lot of contrasting light on the screen.
>>51839219
Seems like they have, never noticed anything wrong with the picture at all.
The main issue I have to worry about is burn-in, for the first time this century I have had to use a screensaver (the ribbons one on Win 10 is actually quite pleasant).
MilkDrop on Winamp looks brilliant!
>>51838142
>Check out the Eizo
kek
all eizo monitors are trash
>>51838416
I can get easily 144fps in csgo which is all that matters desu senpai
>>51839192
>curved
You should have waited mate, the proper ones should be here early next year, and for the same price the dud curved ones are now.
FPS fags caring about 1 ms response time who gives a fuck get an ips its better
>>51839602
Cheap IPS with 144hz where?
>>51839192
>4000 SHEKELS for sample and hold garbage
into the trash
>>51836303
>1080p
>That bezel
>Also looks like ass
>Putting more than $200 on a monitor
>>51838976
well then i see no reason to get a freesync monitor if the korean 120hz monitors have just as good panels for half the price, and since i have 290x crossfire i can heat up my home and the fps is always good.
thanks for the reply Anon
>>51839564
Explain further
>>51840119
You'll never maintain a stable 120Hz in most games other than stuff like LoL and CSGO.
Also, it still does not sync frames with the display, and feels a little less smooth.
>>51840198
battlefront
starcraft
basicly those two games are the only ones i play lol, and i can tell that i sure as shit can keep a constant 120fps on those games with double 290x oh the cards are flashed to 390x, so they perform even better now.
battlefront gets me about 170fps with everything cranked to ultra, and about 150ish if i use sweetfx
what about 3:2 screens?
>>51840198
>Also, it still does not sync frames with the display, and feels a little less smooth.
vsync + high minimum fps == freesync + high minimum fps
None of this shit matters unless you're a gaymer. And if you're a gaymer it only nets you some imaginary internet points for throwing away huge amounts of your life.
Buy a $99 monitor and reflect on your life decisions more.
>>51842245
>And if you're a gaymer it only nets you some imaginary internet points for throwing away huge amounts of your life.
I'm a gamer and I bought it because screen tearing is the bane of my existence. I couldn't stand the input lag that came with v-sync, so normally I turned it off even if I had to suffer through the tearing. But not having to deal with input lag or tearing at all? that's a dream come true.
>>51836303
>1080p
>144hz
>TN panel
Perhaps because it's shit?
>literally the best gaming monitor
My primary occupation is not video games.
>>51843000
I hope you realise that freesync and gsync also cause input lag
>>51840339
Whether or not you can maintain 120 FPS stable in a game or not NEVER depends on your GPU.
You can always lower graphics settings, but at the point where your render thread gets faster than your game thread, there is nothing you can do any more to get more FPS. And there are plenty of titles out there where the game thread can't maintain a stable 120 FPS.
>>51841564
No, still not the same. Way higher display lag. You never want to use vsync ever for that very reason.
>>51843204
No they don't. Look at the reviews of decent displays. There are displays on both fronts with less than 5ms total display lag.
>>51838142
>god tier warranties
Only in america, outside of dell.
>>51838416
>No CPU is powerful enough to get a contant 144 FPS in at least 90% of all games released in the past 5 years, or 80% in the past 10 years
I'm one of those patient gamers. Currently playing the First Bioshock on my GTX 780 at 144 FPS
>>51838892
Okay, enjoy your screen tearing and micro stutter BS like every other normal monitor senpai.
>>51839042
Good TN > shitty backlight bleeding IPS shitshow
Unless your'e getting a solid LG IPS panel (and let's face it, /g/ isn't, IPS is still a crap shoot for quality and backlight bleed.
>>51841564
lol no
still waiting for that 1440p/ips/gsync model.
>xb270hu, pg279q, xb271hu
crap with tonnes of blb, the latter to lesser extent.
hope dell announces something like that, s2716dg sounds great, but it isn't ips.
>>51836303
No excuse, I have one.
>>51843451
Eizo Germany:
5 years warranty with on-site replacement service
6 month from purchase free exchange if the panel has so much as a bright subpixel
I don't know how Dell still tops that, but it's pretty great already.
>144hz
love
this
meme
its __literally__ useless unless you're a manchild gaymer, and an easy way for manufacturers to jack up the price on shit components
>>51843378
>>51843561
Yes, it is literally identical. In both cases you are waiting for a vertical refresh with the exact same timing. At 144fps this is no big deal.
>>51843590
Dell basically has something similar, though from what I recall, the default period is 3 years with same day/one-two day replacement.
I'm fairly sure outside of dell australia gets shafted heavily on good warranty stuff, compared to other companies (especially asus).
>gaming monitor
It's already trash
>>51843627
It's an obvious improvement even for web browsing and office work. You're probably one of those idiots who thinks 24fps is acceptable.
>>51843481
Haven't played that game, but considering how well Bioshock Infinite ran on my old FX-6300, I'm willing to believe that it's one of those games.
>>51843627
Aren't you just butthurt because you can't afford it? If you don't need it, simply don't buy it. For gaming, it's great.
>1080p
>Not 4K
>>51836365
You're retard if you don't see a clear difference in going higher than 1080p on 24".
4K is the perfect resolution for 24".
>>51843657
In case of vsync, you're always at least one frame behind, because the card needs to keep a buffer. In case of Freesync, the display will always refresh at exactly the instant a frame is finished.
>>51843714
>4K is the perfect resolution
4K is 60Hz garbage at any size
>>51836657
you can edid mod it to 32-75hz freesync range and the crimson driver enables low framerate compensation which doubles the frame to the supported hertz count if possible so you will never tear again if you drop below 32 hz on this monitor
>>51843726
>implying you have anything capable of handling more than 60 Hz at 4K.
>>51843723
>In case of Freesync, the display will always refresh at exactly the instant a frame is finished.
You have the exact same buffering as with vsync. Freesync isn't some magical overclocking thing that runs your DisplayPort at infinity bps. In both cases you render to the back buffer, in both cases you wait for the sync signal, in both cases you swap buffers and begin the transfer, which happens in parallel with drawing the next frame and takes the entire frame time (minus blanking) when you're at maximum refresh rate. And when you're at maximum refresh rate the sync signal comes as early as possible regardless of whether it's freesync or vsync. You pay the exact same (minor) latency penalty.
>>51843204
it's the opposite anon..
freesync/gsync prompt the image directly to your display instead of cutting it because timing difficulties
>>51843790
Nobody does, that's why 4K is crap.
>>51836303
>1080p
>TN
Fuck off.
>>51843805
but anon, your rule only counts, if you are able to maintain a stable fps rate at let's say 60fps in all cases.
i am able to play gta 5 on max settings and with freesync i plays smoother than on the 144hz monitor i had
>>51839192
>OLED
>4K
>0.002ms response time
you forgot the best part
>80 miliseconds of input lag
>>51843837
>he doesn't know high quality TN is nearly the same as IPS
let us all point and laugh.
>>51843857
at 45 fps*
>>51843819
Free/gsync causes minor input lag just like vsync does. The difference is vsync hugely spikes latency when your framerate drops below refresh rate, whereas free/gsync increases it smoothly by the minimum amount needed. If you can keep the frame rate high enough there is no difference.
>>51843866
>all high quality smartphones prefer tn over ips
no.
>>51843952
>high quality smartphones
No such thing, they're all 60Hz
>>51843726
i found 75hz to be the best compensation of everything if you run a single card solution.
i owned a 144hz monitor but freesync killed this argument if you don't run your games at 144hz anyway
