Are you a special snowflake?
>>51761535
>hey hacker known as 4chan, plz put your fingerprint here
>uh...no reason...just want to see if your a special snowflake or not...that's it.
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 6,187,513 tested so far.
Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 22.56 bits of identifying information.
shit
Yes. Maybe I should change stuff.
>>51761535
How do you store .43 bits?
>>51761535
yes :3
All you special snowflakes should check this out:
https://github.com/CrisBRM/user.js/
>>51761808
you just don't use a whole byte
>>51762127
just using fucking uBlock origin, NoScript and Privacy Settings
>>51762167
You do realise that does nothing to change your HTTP_ACCEPT headers, right? Also, NoScript is shit compared to uMatrix.
>>51762183
get out
>>51762221
Tech illiterate retard.
No, luckily.
// ==UserScript==
// @name Block plugin enum
// @namespace https://rms.sexy
// @include *
// @version 1
// @run-at document-start
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
Object.defineProperty(navigator, "plugins", {value: []});
Firefox users
>>51762343
Completely useless. You can go to about config and set plugins.enumerable_names to an empty string, instead of wasting extra CPU cycles intercepting scripts.
>>51761732
you're retarded
nah
"Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 6,187,656 tested so far.
Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 22.56 bits of identifying information.
The measurements we used to obtain this result are listed below. You can read more about our methodology, statistical results, and some defenses against fingerprinting in this article."
damn, it's probably even worser in gentoo ganoo/linux. ran it in Windows.
>>51762127
all the special snowflakes are probably already using that, which is why they're so easy to identify
>Trusting some bullshit made by a bunch of NGO faggots that only want to cash in on people's fear
Literally worse than kuck kuck go
I call bullshit on the whole site
>>51763097
>WOW64
>>51762775
You realize it can't get more unique than "unique", right?
Nope
>>51763243
The whole site is a scam.
Look at mine >>51763097
The only shit identifying me is that I am running the 32bit version of FF45 in a 64bit win8.1 while using noscript. How the fuck am I the only one doing that?
>>51763300
The reason you are unique is that you apparently have a random "br" in your accept headers. Might be a bug in the site, or your browser settings.
>>51763322
It must be an error with the site. I just checked my about:config accept settings and there is no br in sight.
>>51763408
I googled it and apparently it's for some compression algorithm called "brotili". So maybe you have an addon or proxy that modifies your accept header or something? You could check your request headers at http://headers.cloxy.net/request.php
check this faggots
Does this thing matter if it constantly changes every three minutes and cookies and history are deleted when ff closes?
also can people track me through shit that i have bookmarked?
>screen resolution
>as far as I know, no addon can spoof this to 1920x1080
fugg DDD:D:
k
>>51762414
Which about config setting will go away in version 44 or 45.
the most common profile is probably windows 7 32bit running at 1366x768
>>51761535
>fractions of a bit
lol
>>51765289
Yes
Does anyone have that other privacy site that was posted, with way more tests? It could tell your OS even with user agent spoofed.
>>51765644
You're retarded
>don't know how to calculate log2
>>51765644
It's lower, senpai. HIGHER numbers (1 of 50000 with same results) is WORSE than LOWER numbers (1 of 250 with same results)
Oh?
