When was the last time you made an improvement to your free software, /g?/
>>51722997
>When was the last time you made an improvement to your free software, /g?/
A couple of months ago
>your
Not mine though. All ours
>>51723030
I say "your" because you don't have to share your improvements with anyone else
I don't see what's changed, though, you still only have 2 doors, one of which could be a car and one of which could be a goat?
>stupid goat picture
>318 replies and 52 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>51722997
actually fuck you
>>51723133
You'd think so, but, the puzzle hinges on the fact that after picking a door, the host then opens one of the doors that has a goat behind it, and cannot open the door that has the car.
So what you get is:
1/3 chance of picking the door with the car initially
2/3 chance of picking a door with a goat initially
If you picked the door with the car (1/3), the door the host doesn't open will have a goat
If you picked a door with a goat (2/3), the door the host doesn't open will have the car
Therefore switching is to your advantage, as you were more likely to pick one of the doors with a goat initially, in which case the third door will have the car
>>51723155
This one's different though
The solution is still the same, I think
Stay, because the back of the goat of the third door will be on the second door ;) /s
Switch is the best way to win.
>>51723204
Read it again
It doesn't say there are 2 goats and 1 car, it says there might be cars behind the doors, or there might not be
So it could be 2 cars, 1 goat instead
Or no cars at all, or no goats to begin with
ITT: /g/ can't into probability
>>51723204
This one got it
>>51723242
Fuck off with your autism, it's clearly going to be the monty hall problem and not some semi-autistic troll/bait redefinition
>>51723285
>Each of these doors may or may not have a car behind them.
>The rest of the doors have goats behind them.
From the image
why, my peanus weanus of course :)
hahah! :D
it's my weeeeeenus peanus! :) hahah
ITT: whether I would switch doors or not - my answer is, of course, my peanus weenus :D
hahaha!
>>51723242
Oh you're right
If there's 0 cars, you lose regardless, 1 car and my explanation applies, 2 cars and the scenario's reversed (you shouldn't switch), 3 cars and he's going to be forced reveal a car nomatter what.
That said there's no right or wrong choice unless you know how likely it is there'll be 0, 1, 2 or 3 cars.
>>51723204
Mathematically correct but physically incorrect. It still comes down to a 50% chance.
>>51723369
>2 cars and the scenario's reversed (you shouldn't switch)
Why shouldn't you switch?
>>51723440
wait nvm u rite
>>51723480
So wouldn't you switch no matter what, anyway?
>>51723523
yeah, regardless of the number of cars/goats, you're still better-off switching
>>51723242
Still better to switch.
I can't program, but I've switchd to Trisquel and try to recommend open source and freedom respecting softwae and stay away from using Skype
I regularly fix/improve Node.js modules I use but I never pass the changes on the the community.
>>51723649
Why not?
Oh look the same faggot keeps coming back and posting slightly off topic generic posts with the bait monty hall image to try to pretend he matters.
>>51726758
Hi OP, nice save it almost left the board
>>51723204
Thanks anon, now I understand why to switch
>>51725474
Community is SJW cancer.
www.kernel dot org/doc/linux/MAINTAINERS
im on this list.
