http://www.opus-codec.org/
Version 1.1.1 released
26 November, 2015
Why have you not joined the Opus master race, /g/?
But I havefind . -name "*.flac" | parallel --bar opusenc --bitrate 192 {} {.}.flac
>>51631600
Ogg vorbis has more compatibility right now.
Nice. opus-tools 0.2.0 when? flac 1.3.2 when?
>>51631693
What is the transparency bitrate for OGG? -q8 is what I use most of the time.
>>51631600
Why would I when FLAC is better?
>>51631600
FLAC master race
>>51631600
Because
qaac 2.47, CoreAudioToolbox 7.9.8.5, AAC-LC Encoder, TVBR q63, Quality 96
>>51631766
OGG vorbis is absolutely fine at -q5/160kbps. You might be able to even go to q4/130kbps.
>>51632915
MP3 V0 is all you need, no compat problems, and no patent bullshit either in civilized jurisdictions.
But but but, OP, I already do, and have been using Opus for over a year now with 2,000+ albums transcoded from FLAC rips of the original CDs in my collection.
Not like I'm gonna re-encode every god damned song of the 31,000+ I've already done just because a new encoder is released, they even state the audio quality should remain relatively unchanged.
Already part of the Opus master race. All music on my phone is 128 vbr Opus.
>>51633043
>mp3
>2016
>>51631600
>encoder optimizations
Not like it was slow before, or audio encoding is ever something that needs to be rushed. I'll wait a year or so to make sure they didn't introduce any bugs.
>>51631693
/thread
>>51631600
because stupid poweramp doesn't support it yet and i don't feel like buying another player
>>51631600
i did though, i converted all my music to 128kbps opus and it is noice
Because it's a waste of time to convert all my lossless files. So I just move my flacs to my phone and I'm done. No point in memepus
>>51636513
>just move my flacs to my phone
I bet you're one of those faggots who insists on having an SD card slot so you can carry around 128GB worth of fucking FLAC.
>>51637092
And why shouldn't I? 128 gb sd cards can be had for $25-$40. I can just move what I want to one of those in the time it takes to piss. Compressing audio for playback is a waste of time.
>>51637092
Not him but I need an SD card slot so I can carry around 128GB worth of 128kbps opus.
>>51637458
Because you eliminate almost all of the good phones on the market -- one whole OS, even -- by insisting on a legacy storage feature that even OSes that do support it don't support well. And all so you don't have to maintain a 70MB V0 copy of your album in addition to the 600MB FLAC copy.
>>51631600
> Opus
D E A D O N A R R I V A L
>>51637532
And yet even when all phones no longer support sd and daps no longer exist I can still simply copy and paste a library of 32gb in the time it takes to go to the bathroom.
>>51637682
>2001
>MP3
>>51637688
And you'll waste a ton of space.
It's like renting a 30' moving truck, putting one couch in it, calling it full, and exclaiming, "Wow, that was fast!"
>>51637682
also the files, flac and mp3, before some retard comes saying that mp3 cuts anything above 16kHz
http://www73.zippyshare.com/v/is6cUpiV/file.html
>>51637711
> hurr something that actuially works and has no downsides. let's hate it
>>51637780
It has patents and shitty compression relative to alternatives; you'd have to be a retard to actually prefer it.
>>51637780
>>51637822
The file is four times smaller you mongoloid and still contains most audible data.
>>51637682
>mp3 vs flac
>>51637836
Are you the one who posted this? >>51637682
Nice job proving lossless codecs take more space, genius. It has nothing to do with this thread.
>>51637833
lol
>>51637881
Oh wow, you really got my point, retard
Because AAC-LC has compatibility comparable with mp3 and sounds good enough to me at 96kbps.
>>51637994
why not use AMR?
>>51637957
You're unintelligible and so far you're just spamming comparison of MP3 with codecs that aren't opus. No one's going to bother making your point for you since you can't communicate, so whatever you're trying to prove will probably remain a mystery to everyone. Good work, there.
>>51638031
That image wasn't for you, you imbecile. And I'm not comparing mp3 with other formats but to what it was capable of retaining from the uncompressed source. Eat shit and die faggot
>>51631600
computional complexity >5 times than AAC
>>51637957
0.22 vs 0.25 here.
Someday, I will make lossy compression irrelevant.
>>51631750
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a%3Dsummary
>>51638273
So? Higher compression format almost always take more work to encode and decode.
WAV is almost effort-free.
Because I am already part of the FLAC masterrace.
>fighting over which has the best compression to quality when you can just have perfect quality retention with some compression
>>51634732
Android supports native Opus playback from Lollipop onwards.
