We have oled phones, oled tvs and oled lighting but where the fuck are the oled monitors? I just want a 21:9 3440x1440 oled monitor. just saying
I though OLED was more for a cinematic experience?
>>51579752
Probably too expensive still.
>>51579916
OLED is a display technology like LCD.
my oled vita has ridiculous ghosting. mostly noticable in persona 4. did I just get a lemon or are they all like this
>>51579752
Burn in is still a big problem. Your OS task bar would probably burn in pretty fast.
Right here
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1015238-REG/sony_pvma250_25_professional_oled.html
>>51579752
Even the newest OLED panel tech suffers burn-in problems. On computer monitors the screen is on for a lot longer and has static UI components that will get burnt in. Some professional level Sony OLED TVs sell for about $10k so don't expect affordable OLED monitors for a while.
>>51579752
LCD ips became god tier making all the years of oled development a total waste.
>>51580434
>backlight bleed
>god tier
OLED technology needs to hurry the fuck up. I'm sick of shitty TN, IPS and VA panels.
>>51580122
>>51580400
But isn't this why screensavers exist? Also couldn't you just set the task bar to hide? How did the monitors of yore do it?
>>51580453
They're closer now than ever. Prices on the TVs are coming down fast: http://www.oled-info.com/lgs-curved-55-fhd-eg9100-oled-tv-now-down-1885
And new plants for TV-sized displays are being built: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/27/us-lg-display-investment-idUSKBN0TF2JY20151127
>>51580511
They didn't.
>>51580453
OLED is still too latent but at least the colors don't look like you're looking at them through a filter.
I didn't notice any difference between black levels vs the now deceased zt60 but their white levels were clearly superior.
>>51580632
Also hopefully the curved meme is dead soon. Believe it or not more than one person is typically watching a tv.
>>51580982
Not if its a curved monitor. Though the jury is still out on that one.
>using a galaxy note 2
>it has an oled screen
>after a few years of use, whites are now more like yellows
I dont think oled is a good long-term choice until they solve the burn in/whites turning into yellows issues
For a phone its great, people usually get new phones within a few years.
But TV's arw supposed to last many years.
>>51580511
Burn-in may be pretty easy to avoid but oled panels suffer from uneven wear (like plasmas), that makes them inadequate for computer monitors.
Apparently Quantum Dot is all hype now.
>>51580453
what's wrong with IPS, and VA?
>>51582514
So many things.
IPS: glow, poor contrast and black levels
VA: color shift, black crush
Both: pixel response times, backlight bleed
>>51581078
>But TV's arw supposed to last many years.
you're stuck in the 80s, gramps
>>51582606
but /g/ told me IPS was the best there ever was
>>51582693
CRT is the best display technology we have
OLED will get there someday but it's still too early for it, an OLED monitor right now costs like $17k last I checked, and don't link a TV in response you plebs
>>51582693
It's the best type of LCD (unless you value speed or black levels over color accuracy and viewing angles), it's just that all LCDs suck, and there's nothing better readily available.
>>51582693
>mfw
>backlight bleed
>dead or stuck pixels
>uneven oled decay
>>51579752
But oled is shit
>>51580122
I welcome the new age of the screensaver.
>>51582693
it's not perfect but it's the best we've got for modern displays
I've got three monitors, a IPS, VA and a TN. If I could rebuy all my monitors again I would have gone purely IPS, dem colours are worth it.
>>51579752
enjoy your yellow ass screen in a year.
>>51582931
>hurr everything sucks why aren't my toys better?
- Millennials.
>>51579752
oh boy I can't wait for shit like this to happen again
love me some burn in
>>51583381
>What is calibration?
LCD screens also need to be re-calibrated every 2-3 months.
Your screen probably has fucked up colors, you've just grown used to it.
>>51579752
until they fix the fucked up backlight problems, no. Every OLED device I've owned always has weird blotches in the backlight.
>>51583411
>OLED
>backlight.
Wow, /g/ really knows nothing, huh?
>>51583392
Events that have occurred:
- This
Bring back plasma.
>>51583408
how do i do this.
anytime i try playing videos the colours auto adjust themselves.
this monitor is such shit.
>>51583537
even if you did you'd have to remove the issue that killed plasma in the first place.
sack of shits at bestbuy/radioshack etc practically forcing customers to only buy LCDs
>>51581078
>but TV's are* supposed to last many years
let me fix that for you
>we want TV's to last many years but most don't
>>51579974
they all get like that over time. probably wasnt that bad when you got it.
Enjoy your burned display after 18 months
>>51583386
Eh, I'm 37, and have been using computer displays of one type or another for most of my life. LCDs are really a step backward in some ways from good CRTs, and the downward pressure on LCD market prices has forced companies to cut corners on newer displays, further worsening the situation. LCD tech is basically tapped out at this point, with only incremental improvements going forward, and with CRTs and plasma dead, SED/FED dead before it even had a chance, OLED is the only bright spot on the horizon.
Butbutbut LG is the only Oled with wrgb
Samsung using normal rgb crap = colors get facket asap.
>>51584029
Shit man, I bought a POS "Digital Lifestyles" brand 1080p 42" LCD TV from Newegg like 7 years ago and it still works great. I even used it as my computer monitor for about 3 years until I finally came to terms with the fact that sitting 3 feet away from a 42" screen for hours at a time was retarded.
>>51579974
p4g actually applies a ghosting affect to the entire game to simulate being inside a shitty tv. i have a vita too and that's the only game i noticed. there's no way to turn it off.
>>51584497
Also, my parents bought a 42" Samsung Plasma TV in 2006 that gets used several hours a day and it's still going strong as well.
>>51584497
Why is it retarded?
>>51579916
Nah. It's because they have perfect blacks and amazing viewing angles.
>>51584787
Because my neck got tired of constantly turning so I could see what was going on when gaming or reading shit and it seemed to strain my eyes a lot more than just using a regular monitor. It also made my tiny ass room get up to like 85F when I closed the door. I have a 27" IPS monitor now and I feel like even that's a little too big, I would've been better off with a 24" monitor I think.
Desktop UIs have lots of static elements. OLEDs burn in. OLEDs also aren't going to last you more than a few years before the panel itself is worn out. That's the main reason you don't see OLED outside of phones which people will only use for a year or two.
>>51582693
To catch them is my real test
To train them is my cause
>>51582777
>>Crt best display tech
Oh man this is like hall of fame hipster retard thinking. Watching something that is literally emitting alpha beta and gamma radiation and can't have a screen size larger than 36" and isn't portable while consuming a shit load of power. just wow
>>51583411
Are you actuality retarded or just pretending
>>51585211
Pros
High contrast ratio (over 15,000:1),[63] excellent color, fairly wide color gamut and low black level.
No native resolution; the only current display technology capable of true multisyncing (displaying many different resolutions and refresh rates without the need for scaling).
No input lag.
No ghosting and smearing artifacts during fast motion due to sub-millisecond response time, and impulse-based operation.
Near zero color, saturation, contrast, or brightness distortion.
Excellent viewing angle.
Allows the use of light guns/pens.
Can be used or stored in both extreme hot and cold temperature conditions without harm to the system.[64]
Only negatives really are size/weight/power usage which doesn't matter much for a stationary display
>>51584210
>OLED is the only bright spot on the horizon.
QDLED Soon™, friend.
>>51585256
You've responded well, but im still holding firm that they are much better because: no set naive resolution - even sony wouldn't nail down how many pixels their monitors had because they new knew couldn't even get enough dots to display 1600 * 1200 and even that resolution was limited to 85hz so crts having zero response times still miss out on high refresh 2k lcds. Their colour reproduction was accurate but the gamut incredibly limited. Ccfl lcd had better colour spectrum in 2011 than the best crt.
Physical size of the monitor absolutely does matter, it's literally why lcd won.
60hz / 50hz headaches - you can have a high resolution or a high refresh rate but not both.
Fwiw I miss paying battlefield 2141 1280*1024 @ 100hz and light gun games were some of my fondest childhood memories but there's still no way I'd go back to crt. Also crts need to be de gaussed so I'm not sure why people think they'll always look good or last forever. Led lcd have far more potential for longevity and oled is just plain gorgeous and most of the reason why people keep buying samsung phones exclusively
>>51585256
>Can be used or stored in both extreme hot and cold temperature conditions without harm to the system.[64]
not true
the majority of crts will fuck up at low temps till they warm up, you need special ones to do so otherwise, you find people doing it to the ones in old arcade cabinets and ruining pretty often.
>>51583440
>>51585242
just using backlight as a general term for the distribution of light
but fine
>the distribution of lighting on oled screens is shit
there, you happy autist? This shit doesn't happen to other display types
What about plasma?
>>51585599
Noticed this on my OLED devices too, its really noticeable if you turn the brightness all the way down and use it in a completely dark room.
>>51585599
Baha sure I suppose you call a computer a cpu too huh. The distribution of light from oled is shit?? The pixels determine exactly what is lit, it's literally worse on every other lcd where the back light bleeds through our simply doesn't produce the correct wave length of light anyway. So I've b arrowed it down to either you can't describe the issue correctly or you don't know what you are taking about.
>>51585500
degaussing is only for after you get a magnet near it
LCD won because we didn't get slim flat CRTs fast enough, and also due to laptops and such, but still for gaming use a used 1600x1200 75Hz CRT can't be beat unless you drop a ton of money on a 144hz IPS display
>>51585767
My sony 21" trinitron did 85hz at 1600*1200. Still preferred 100hz 1280 1024 though, less headaches and smoother. You'll have to de gauss the monitor often after two years or so though, colours will look wrong and fine text is smudged. My 27" 2k 120hz screen is glorious. It was expensive but not more than the crt when it was new.fits in the desk a while lot better though, and watching dvds on the crt did of course result in losing 30% of the screen so not much use at a distance
>>51585670
I've noticed the same blotchiness shown in the pic on OLEDs displaying black or very dark screens as well. No idea what the cause is, but it's a little troubling to see it.
>>51579752
Wait for 2018 when LG starts using their new billion dollar OLED plant. No go until then unless you don't mind a 55" 4K OLED TV for $2500
>>51585954
Writiing this on a galaxy note 3 right now and testing this. It's normal for oled screens to wear out after heavy use over time. Phone shops always set phone screens to maximum brightness to get the wow factor and as a result the oleds whites are off colour. Defo an issue for monitors but phones not so much
>>51585599
Those are like C Grade AMOLED panels that Samsung offloaded to other OEMs. Any modern Samsung device has perfect AMOLED panels with not blotchiness. If you're going to buy a phone with OLED, either stick with Samsung for AMOLED or LG for P-OLED.
>>51585900
I've never had an issue with headaches from my CRTs
>>51579974
Corpse party shows ghosting like a motherfucker
>>51580434
>horrible blacks
>god tier
I can't believe LG is selling that shit on televisions now
>>51582606
but VA has the best blacks on any panel apart from OLEDs senpai
>>51586125
The black *level* on VA is good, but they suffer from "black crush," which is where near-black shades are indistinguishable from black, i.e., shadow details get lost in dark scenes in games or movies.
>>51586044
My note 3 has those spots.
>>51586262
>Note 3
>Modern
>>51586307
It's only 2 years old faggot.
>>51586157
Not a problem if you actually calibrate, senpai.
>>51586307
Youd think something that costs hundreds of dollars new would last more than a few years.
>>51585500
FLED could have fixed most of those issues. The other big issue with CRT that you did not mention is blooming (Expansion/shrinkage of the display area according to brightness/power fluctuations.). I had a Toshiba widescreen TV that had this issue in spades.
>>51583537
twf I revived my pioneer kuro 50" plasma TV after having to replace the mainboard. It still works, but I fear the day it dies.
>>51588608
have a look at the the voltage adjustments people are making to achieve a picture that on the whole beats OLED
avsforum.com/forum/167-plasma-flat-panel-displays/1510500-pioneer-8g-9g-kuro-reset-guide.html
at the minimum you should be running your pioneer kuro in its pure mode
