>"AMD has shit drivers"
>"You should Try Nvidia again"
Meanwhile my 290x has been flawless since I got it on release day. And my Nvidia card is a paperweight right now. Go ahead and support the PC gaming holocaust that is Nvidia. Just don't pretend like you didn't blatantly defend a company that single handedly killed it.
Literally both have shit drivers because every company makes shit games with shit optimization.
Nvidia just pay companies to make games slightly less shitty for their video cards.
>>51514491
I've never used AMD desktop cards before, but just about every other WHQL driver from Nvidia has had some major problem with either BIOS, BSOD, artifacts, or lowered performance. I'm probably switching over to the red camp if Zen is at the level of my current i5-3570K. AMD's GPUs have already convinced me with their new driver suite. This is my second card after my first got RMA'ed for artifacting.
>>51514545
It's not just the drivers.
It's the drivers, the prices, lying about specs, terrible naming schemes, gameworks, and just other scumbaggery.
>>51514615
Whats bad about their naming scheme? Other than prefix mania with Ti's and SE's everywhere.
>>51514491
>that one driver that bricked cards
Oh, my Nvidia friends.
>>51514491
AMD shill force in FULL damage control.
No problems here, haven't had any problems beside that hardware acceleration bug that affected both Nvidia and AMD which Nvidia fixed in weeks unlike AMD who took months just to stop Firefox/Chrome from crashing on windows 10.
>mobile graphics card
>>51514491
I can tell you are an AMD shill because you have to make a thread talking shit about nvidia. Just use what werks 4U and compare benchmarks or post in battlestation threads like a regular fa/g/
>>51514491
>muh gameworks
>muh way it's meant to be played
