What BitTorrent client do you use, /g/?
https://strawpoll.me/6066656
>>51460025
>6 utorrent votes.
>>51460025
>bittorrent
>2015
>not superior ipfs
P L E B S
L
E
B
S
>>51460025
>2010+5
>still falling for the qbittorrent may may
I shiggity diggity do
>>51460025
rtorrent
>>51460681
wait, since when is qbittorrent bad?
>>51460908
this desu
I am the single user of ktorrent.
Hear me roar.
uTorrent 2.2.1
>>51461367
it's not
But I fucking hate how it manages unwanted files. At least uTorrent packed them in a .dat file.
>>51460025
rTorrent is such garbage for seedboxing.
>protip: if you're ever running screen on a server, you're doing it wrong.
>>51460025
Used to use transmission-qt but I switched to qbit and it's better. They fixed the issue where qbit wouldn't detect already existing data even when you pointed straight at it... now I have no reason to use transmission
Used to use BT, years ago.
Then I found Deluge, and I used it for a short while.
Now I've been using Transmission QT for quite some time. Pretty happy with it.
Just wondering; I remember BT having a feature that'd let me create a small floating strip of torrent info, much like one line from the OP picture, that I could move wherever on my screen, and it'd stay on top of any windows. Really handy, and I liked it.
Do any other clients have that? Preferably something as light as possible.
>>51461563
All of our servers at the company i'm working at has a screen running and we have a "policy" to always ssh with a screen session.
QT Transmission
>>51460681
>not using qbittorrent
The RSS support is GOAT
>>51461563
Deluge is much better for seedboxing. It's got well separated daemon, CLI/curses client, and web client, and runs well even on a tiny ARMv5te potato from 2009, a 15 year old PC, or a cheap VPS.
