>7-Zip 15.12 FINAL
The first stable release of 7-zip in 5 years
http://www.7-zip.org/history.txt
I read it also supports Winrar5.0 now, can somebody test it? cause I don't have any rar5 files
http://www.7-zip.org/
IT'S HAPPENING
The last release version was on 2010-11-18 so it's (almost) been exactly five years
aand it seems to fully work on normal and encrypted rar5 files now
Who cares.
Everyone uses Winrar with pirated key anyway.
Your a pleb if you don't
>>51423841
>using inferior shareware
7-zip is the best.
>>51423841
0/10
>>51423841
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/winrar-winzip-7-zip-magicrar,3436.html
>7-Zip is the clear performance winner of our file archiving and compression tools round-up. It sets the standard for both compression ratio and time with its very own 7z compression format. It manages to beat MagicRAR, WinRAR, and WinZip for the best compression ratio, even with its Fastest Compression setting enabled. 7-Zip is also a lot faster than the competition if the LZMA2 algorithm is used. It took 7-Zip only 25 seconds to compress our benchmark files and folders with Hyper-Threading enabled. Meanwhile, WinRAR took 44 seconds, WinZip 51 seconds, and MagicRAR an arduous 159 seconds.
>Using SHITRAR
>any year
rar5 support was present from late summer, but final release is nice.
>>51423841
2008 has called
>>51423583
holy shit it's real
Why have you not joined the 7-zip master race, /g/?
>>51424233
B-but anon, i am.
>>51423867
Are those tests using the older RAR format, or RAR5? Because the last time I cross-checked RAR, RAR5 and 7z, RAR5 was slightly better in compression but significantly faster (2x or more).
Although they removed the pcm compression from it, so on console game images, the old RAR format is still king.
>>51423583
finally!
blocked by smartscreen wtf
>Windows Smartscreen prevented an unrecognized app from starting
Thanks Microsoft
>>51424391
BOTNET
O
T
N
E
T
>>51423841
I bet you use WinAmp as well.
>>51423841
>Everyone uses Winrar
Is it 1995 still.
>>51423583
Need to restart to complete installation.
reeeeeeeeeee
>>51426405
You're doing it wrong anon.
>>51423583
Does it finally fucking have an "extract automatically" option? Auto extract: top level archive content = 1 file -> extract here, > 1 -> extract to subfolder
>>51423583
use PeaZip senpai.
http://www.peazip.org
>>51426634
bandizip > peazip > 7zip last time I used it (a year ago)
Repeating: >>51426448
"Extract automatically" is the thing keeping me from using 7zip because I'm tired of having to open an archive first to check if it'll make a mess or not instead of just extracting it right away
![snapshot_19.57_[2015.07.28_23.06.49].png](https://i.imgur.com/8ligToC.jpg "snapshot_19.57_[2015.07.28_23.06.49].png")
>>51425034
not that guy, i use winamp to listen my anime music
>>51426448
Wat
>>51423860
>>51423867
>>51423906
>>51424233
> no rev support
> no recovery record
Still torrenting and not joining the bitlocker master race
http://www.e7z.org/
>>51426886
Ffs why do people always look at me like I'm speaking chinese when I bring that up?
Last time I checked, 7zip's context menu had (among others) "extract here" and "extract to <auto named subfolder>".
What I want (and found in bandizip) is "extract automatically": it extracts the archive contents directly if the root of the archive contains 1 item, and extracts to the automatic subfolder if the root of the archive contains more than 1 file.
It's stupidly simple and trivial as fuck to program, but for some reason it's taken the fucking dev years to do it (if he's done it yet, that's what I wanna know) and yes it is an important feature to me: I wanna just extract an archive and get its contents cleanly, automatically. If I have to check the root contents myself, I either lose time checking it, create a useless subfolder in the middle, or extract a clusterfuck of files into my currect directory.
>>51426948
Even this fucking thing doesn't add what I described in >>51426948
>>51423583
>context menu CRC SHA check sum access
Holy crap that's nice.
>>51423583
Demmmt
>>51426948
This look great, why isn't that guy trying to include his code into the main 7zip code ??
Or did he try and that didn't succeed ?
>>51427201
Apparently Igor Pavlov is a fucking cunt that doesn't want anyone messing up with his code.
No wonder it took 5 fucking years to push out a new version
>>51423841
I'm serious, why do you pirate winrar? Unless you consider not paying and keep using their illimited trial pirating...
>>51426720
>>51427000
You could write your own bash or dos script to do this you know
>tfw no gui 7 zip on OS X
>>51425034
Fuck you, winamp is best
>2015
>not using command-line RAR like a boss.
>>51428982
this
>>51429123
>like a boss
How's middle school treating you?
>>51426720
>bandizip
> peazip
Any reason to use them over 7z/wrar?
Finally they released a final version after five years. Now it's wait another 5 years to release the next version.
>>51429873
>peazip
>Any reason to use them over 7z/winrar?
There is no one reason it's just GUI in pascal for 7zip/PAQ etc.
But PAQ itself the best archivers.
>>51423867
2013...
fucking FINALLY.
Only thing I need to know: did they change the icons?
>>51428834
>wasting time and effort writing your own programs to externally fill holes in other programs, resulting in having ugly dependencies like the exe path and having separate programs, instead of getting the dev to implement it himself or looking for a program that has the functionality
