Why is it that linux preforms so bad compares to windows when it comes to gaming? If not for the fact, that I would lose so many frames, then I had switched right away.
Drivers
>>51413153
most contributions to the Linux ecosystem come from big businesses and governments that want to use it as a single-tasked server OS.
no wonder it sucks at everything else...
I'm not saying it's not true, but posting a benchmark for one game which most people would agree is optimized to shit is not the best representation, give us a spread.
>>51413179
>>51413153
>biased benchmarks
>using old hardware
>benchmarking shitty ports of DX games
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkDnbi0N7qM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pdEftFFG_I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eab2UI1Iq2w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nASDQCPjxOg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YM8qXbJqMvs
What surprise me is that most websites says steam OS is shit based on those benchmarks and doesn't even try it and see if it's true or not.
>>51413153
>pretending average FPS means anything
What's the minimum FPS?
Because idiots use shit resource-stealing desktops like Unity and Gnome. Performance is nearly on par with Windows without that garbage.
Wayland is going to make that much worse with forced compositing.
>they don't include the graphics card used in testing
Everyone who actually games on Linux knows that the current AMD drivers, both open and closed, are complete and utter fucking garbage. If the testing was done on an Nvidia card, they'd have a very valid complaint.
>>51413419
The test is done with a Zotac Geforce GTX660 (2GB)
>>51413411
So what would be a better desktop option in your opinion?
>>51413477
not him but xfce masterrace
