Video games are for children edition
Old thread: >>51348442
Not sure what private trackers are all about?
Check out the wiki and update it yourself if you want more instead of complaining like a fucking faggot. https://wiki.installgentoo.com/index.php/Private_trackers
How to get into private trackers (and survive): http://pastebin.com/ecGRiQhk
Paths to get into trackers: http://pastebin.com/X7zTdhis
What.CD Interview Notes: http://pastebin.com/Wgz6T7ta
https://www.whatinterviewprep.com/
Use >>>/g/ptg as a link to find the /ptg/ thread.
Remember the following:
>staff occasionally read these generals and have posted here before.
>staff may pretend to be normal users asking for invites and when you invite them, they ban you for inviting strangers
>people may report emails and other personal info posted here to staff to get you banned.
>most of the invite offers here are people trolling you with false hope.
>begging for invites is a waste of time and you should just interview
first for ipt
second for desi.cd
So how good quality are those internal encodes from btn/ahd/ptp etc really? Anyone got comparison screenshots?
Fifth for mtv is best tv
first for being comfy
>tfw no btn
>Want to get into private trackers
>People I know said to apply to ptf (said it's easy)
>Applied last night
>Got a email this morning saying that I was rejected
Where do I go next?
>>51359885
Check what trackers are open. /r/trackers might help with that.
Otherwise wcd is probably easiest.
first for annoying derpta
>>51359884
>that face when you're only 7GB away from BTN
>>51359885
Read the goddamn pastebin.
>>51359919
7GB and two months waiting for the invite*
>>51359932
Does it really take that long to get through them?
Surely it's just a matter of checking if that person has what you asked and sending them an email.
>>51359967
I'm thinking his account isn't old enough.
How accurate is this image?
>>51359967
correct
they just like to browse ptg and laugh at all the desperate kucks waiting for their invites
>>51359967
>>51359994
1000%
>>51360007
>he does it for free
What kind of content can I expect to find on oppaitime?
>>51360121
anime tits
>>51359994
1000000000000000000/10
>>51360130
Hentai only?
I saw some 3D-tits as well in a screenshot, so I figured there might be other stuff.
>>51360162
jav too, yeah
>>51360162
There's 3D stuff too.
>>51359994
bretty accurate desu
>>51354227
nah we're still dev-begging
So I downloaded a 34gb copy of a film for shits and giggles for comparison purposes. Honestly extremely hard to see the difference between that and the 720p SPARKS copy, in fact I'm not sure I saw any. Perhaps I would see more of a difference on a TV than this monitor but damn dude.
>>51360497
Yeah, after a certain point it is mostly placebo. I usually never go in much higher than 7-9GB for a 1080p movie, just starts to feel like a waste much beyond that.
>>51360497
if you don't see the difference between 720p scene encode and what i assume is the untouched/remuxed BD, then yeah, either you're half-blind, your monitor shit, or you sit far away from it.
>>51360528
Was looking pretty close. I honestly expected to see some difference, like I assumed even the 720 vs 1080 of the SPARKS release would have been different. But nope. Perhaps the scenes I chose to compare were poor I don't know, sure looked the same though. Face detail is generally the most obvious and it was as close to identical as you can get.
Could be my monitor is shit, unfortunately no way to tell. Not sitting too far away.
>>51360528
Well it also depends on what scenes he was comparing. You're not going to notice any difference when characters are talking in on the street in daylight. It's usually the darker and action scenes where the difference lies.
>>51360575
On what kind of screen because if you say a laptop I'm not going to care about your blindness.
>>51360575
what movie are you watching? and post the name of the 34gb copy.
>>51360577
sure. it also depends on what he's watching, but generally i would say just 1080p -> 720p should be noticeable when you're looking closely.
>>51360677
Sometimes a high quality 720p source with a good upscaling filter will look better than a shitty 1080p though. Still a bit odd if he's downloading such a huge one and it still looks bad.
>>51360599
24" monitor, Samsung BX2440
Which looks worse, /ptg/, Youtube or YIFY?
>>51360677
>what movie are you watching? and post the name of the 34gb copy.
Mission.Impossible.Rogue.Nation.2015.720p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS.mkv
vs
Mission.Impossible.Rogue.Nation.2015.1080p.BluRay.REMUX.AVC.DTS-HD.MA.TrueHD.7.1.Atmos-RARBG.mkv
Maybe it's a shit group that made the 34gb copy, hard to fuck that up though.
>>51361086
>Maybe it's a shit group that made the 34gb copy, hard to fuck that up though.
It's a remux. It should look perfectly identical to the bluray.
>>51361086
RARBG
all said bruh, close this shit
>>51361086
>RARBG
Found your problem. Also, that remux should be 27GB.
>>51361189
How could they fuck up so bad that it's worse when it's even bigger than it should be from source?
>>51361107
>>51361189
Name of a 'good' version I can use to compare with?
>>51361189
>should be 27GB
no
>>51361227
it's fine to compare with. you're either blind, or have a shit monitor.
>>51361256
Reckon if I uploaded snapshots you could see the difference or a single frame won't work?
>>51361294
that's fine, just make sure you actually compare the same frame. and use png.
>>51361294
As long as you capture the same frame from both sources, and avoid compressing the image in any way (use .png and it should be fine)
Though upscaling is also a factor and would be a bit harder to represent in good screencaps since most software I know will capture the original frame rather than the upscaled one
Someone got those files ready and is able to upload screenshot comparisons? Now i'm curious.
>>51361256
The remux, yes.
>>51361385
Yes.
>>51361471
Maaaaaaybeeeeee
>>51361324
Well. Got two shots that are seemingly 1 frame apart. I know, fuck, but it wouldn't play nice and it was the best I could do. Doesn't really matter since the frames are practically identical.
I can see a difference now I'm looking at two still frames but it's extremely minor. Face is ever so slightly more detailed, but not worth almost 30gb more data. Might be worth it on a TV or something I guess.
Second image in a sec.
>>51361672
Annoyingly this copy actually had black bars on the left and right built into the video. Had to use something to remove them during playback, honestly that's fucking retarded.
>>51361672
>>51361702
check if your player can frame step, makes it easier.
>Annoyingly this copy actually had black bars on the left and right built into the video
welcome to BDs?
but anyway, yeah, the difference is very noticeable here, even if it's not the same frame. sparks is much softer. grain is pretty much blurred and has obvious compression artifacts. you don't see this? http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/150663
>>51361824
Yeah I can see it I just don't think it's super significant especially in motion. Obviously it's a bit clearer but it doesn't seem to really add anything. I can still see all the details of his face just as well in either, one is just grainier and SLIGHTLY sharper. Can't decide if I like it being grainier or not to be honest. Obviously though the remux is better quality, I can see that.
>welcome to BDs?
Well I don't like it.
>check if your player can frame step, makes it easier.
I used goto frame# in the player but I think the software I used to remove the black bars on the go took 1 frame to kick in so it ended up with the difference.
>>51361824
>>51361904
Looking at the comparison yeah there's definitely differences. But I think it would actually depend on whether you'd notice this while watching the movie. I guess you easily would on a 4k tv or something, but not everyone has that.
whats the point in allowing the same album from both a vinyl and cd source?
>>51361966
>Looking at the comparison yeah there's definitely differences. But I think it would actually depend on whether you'd notice this while watching the movie. I guess you easily would on a 4k tv or something, but not everyone has that.
This was pretty much my conclusion too. It took me taking single frames to really notice. While watching the film, at least on this monitor, I don't think the difference matters.
>>51361975
vinyl sometimes has different mastering and also allows for a 24bit source if there's no web release of such. There's also the preference for the "warmer" sound vinyl produces. Finally, some vinyl releases are remasters, or contain bonus tracks.
>>51361975
They sound different.
>>51361975
Ohoho trying to start a shitstorm are we? :^)
Well, there are some people that like the "Vinyl" feel [they say it's warmer, more livelier or something]
It really depends, if you don't like it, don't mind it
>>51361904
his face is also affected, just didn't include it because of the different positions. obviously i don't have the video here to judge for sure, but artifacts like that just doesn't disappear from frame to frame, so it should be noticeable in motion too.
to be clear, i'm not saying you should download anything else than sparks, if you don't see any particular difference between those, sparks is of course the way to go.
SCC on the path to full BitSoup.
>>51362020
Well I'm also thinking that was a 34gb rip. Now I never intended to ever make a collection of 34gb rips but wanted to see how far up in quality it could go. If that's the difference in quality between a 6gb and 34gb rip then I'm struggling to even want to grab 1080p scene versions. Surely the difference between 6 and ~9-10 is almost nothing if that's the difference between 28gb.
>>51362067
that was a remux, so of course it's gonna be huge. proper encodes (i.e. those that aim to not introduce any more compression artifacts) of that are around 16-18GB.
>>51362067
Though good encoders can decrease file size without losing any noticeable quality. So there often is a so called sweet spot of quality/size.
>>51361997
>24bit source
Literally placebo.
>>51362107
>>51362112
Ah that is a good point I suppose. 16gb isn't unreasonable. I have another 8TB free space on my NAS after all.
>>51362146
he's right tho
>>51362121
>>51362174
>millennials
>>51362121
I'm literally ignorant on the matter, what's the difference between 24 bit and standard flac?
>>51362203
8 bit
>>51362203
FLAC is a container that has nothing to do with bitrate
>>51362256
oy vey..
>>51362265
>FLAC is a container that has nothing to do with bitrate
Yeah yeah yeah I know, and you know what I meant. I just couldn't remember the bitrate that is standard.
So what's the difference between the two?
>>51362273
One is bitrate and the other is a container.
Maximum Users: 35,000
Enabled Users: 34,297
>>51362337
Oh just fuck off then.
>>51362273
most FLACs are 16 bits per sample.
>>51362370
No fucking shit. Just forget I even tried to learn something and go back to memeing.
Can we just call PTP and what public trackers now? They're seriously not "private" in any sense of the word anymore
>>51362273
Between 16 and 24bit? 24 bit has more information at a given sample rate. So we take a measurement every 44kHz (the sample rate) and store it. If you use 24 bit you store a more accurate representation of what that analog form looked like. It's sort of like having a gradient and having 256color, versus having 512 colors, the 512 one will be smoother and more accurate to represent that gradient.
However, at a certain point we can't hear the difference.
>>51362379
You're a faggot. I was actually trying to be helpful. And no, I am not >>51362337
or >>51362265
>>51362390
do you feel clever and intelligent stating this?
>>51362390
here is your reply
>>51362273
>>51362396
Also my color analogie is kind of shit. It would be more accurate to say that the color in each step would be more accurate, given the same amount of steps, in the gradient... hope that makes sense.
>>51362396
>>51362416
I see. If people say 16bit lossless is placebo how much so is 24bit? Or is it actually more different?
>>51362390
Private does not mean secret retard.
Anyone know if the BaconBits invite offer on BTN is still valid? I asked for one a bit over 2 months ago and haven't seen much sign of a reply yet, also the thread hasn't been edited or updated in years at the time I did so so I was never really sure if it was still open.
(Not complaining or anything, I don't mind waiting and am not in THAT big of a hurry to get in, but I am just curious if it will eventually get a reply.)
So what actually is preventing the MPAA or RIAA ffrom getting into private trackers and fucking everyone's shit up?
>>51362390
Bet you're not even on PTP.
>>51362479
It's a waste of time. It's so much easier to fuck with public tracker plebs.
>>51362477
?action=viewthread&threadid=7627 is the specific thread I responded to, he did say
>I've had a few PMs recently asking if this offer is still open. The answer is YES, it is definitely still open! I may not get to you right away, but fear not I will.
but this was 3 years 6 months ago so...
>>51362445
So in some double blind tests, long time listeners, listening to very familiar tracks, on studio monitors and all the right conditions, can get some statistically significant results in being able to tell the difference. That's with everything perfect and a really well known soundtrack, critically listening. Let's say a small proportion of the population can if they really try.
When it comes to 16bit to 24bit, I haven't seen any results that show that. Our ears and brains just don't benefit from that extra accuracy.
Part of the reason, I suppose, might be because increasing the bit depth just makes the sounds more accurate in tone, versus when you compress you can get more changes in the time-domain. A lot of what you hear if you really train when listening to a FLAC versus v0 comparison is things like weaker bass resolution or the falloff of snares being not as fine, which are side effects of problems in the time domain.
bB could easily be the memeist tracker
>>51362479
Very small benefit for a large amount of effort. They can literally find more users on a single public tracker torrent than they would in an entire database of most private trackers, and many of those wouldn't even be within their jurisdiction.
Also I imagine it's a lot harder to get in through the same channels we would when you're not allowed to pirate like a motherfucker all day. Yeah, they can get permission from specific copyright holders to do it, but that only goes so far, and considering the effort where they'd be banned and have to start over immediately once they start to look suspicious it just doesn't seem worth it to me.
>>51362545
Maybe, I just wanted to join it because a "general" tracker for various things that don't fall under one of the many specialized trackers I'm already in is pretty much the only thing I find myself going to pub trackers for these days. For example random Windows apps or whatever.
>>51362547
I think you're overestimating the difficulty. Some private trackers may be somewhat difficult to get into but things like wcd. Any of them could join that no problem.
>>51362591
Yeah, they can get into wcd through the interview, but getting PU and branching out from there would be hard.
Anyway I'm not in wcd so if they get data mined by copyright cops I'm not too worried.
>>51362479
some IPT users have received copyright notices. That's the extent of it though.
The MPAA and RIAA are interested in a large number of people sharing a small amount of content. Private trackers are small numbers of people sharing large amounts of content. It's a waste of their time to bust them.
>>51362591
That's not the true difficulty. They actually have to get something out of it. Getting on what and spying on IPs in the swarm isn't really going to do anything. They'll be banned almost instantly when they try to send DMCA letters and overall nothing will change.
If they do some sort of sting operation with the police then only PT staff, if they can identify them, are screwed. Going after users, even uploaders, would be way too expensive for even the U.S. government to consider, especially since an email account, a snatch list, and some IP addresses won't hold up in court for shit.
And futhermore, even if what goes down, a new what.cd will be up after it.
>>51362649
I would have thought that private trackers would be way more appealing. They could grab tons of people on many many offenses and send a 'message'. Better than trying to fine random teenagers and middle aged dad's on public torrents.
>>51362670
>And futhermore, even if what goes down, a new what.cd will be up after it.
Like bitGAMER?
>>51362670
>tfw you're retarded and made all your private tracker accounts have the same name and email
If I could go back and do it smarter I would...
>>51362721
No, like Oink.
>>51362697
It's a shitty message though considering 99% of pirates know nothing of private trackers or can't get in or won't put in the effort.
>>51362731
I meant a more public message like 'DMCA fines 100,000 film pirates' in the news or some shit.
>>51362749
Yeah even add in some stuff like that they're underground and secret or whatever make some shit up and the public would get an even stronger message i feel.
>>51362775
It just feels that would do a lot, it might not stop everyone but your average torrenter might get intimidated that if they can take down an 'underground' piracy community what chance do they have.
>>51362749
>>51362775
But they already tried that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oink%27s_Pink_Palace
TL;DR a bunch of slaps on the wrist and a huge embarrassment for police. Plus it did fuck all because it just facilitated the creation of what.
>>51362789
The RIAA tried that shit years ago, and didn't it just wind up causing a lot of bad press and resentment in the population as stories kept coming out about some 12 year old girl or 80 year old grandma getting six figure fines for downloading a new song. It just came off as the big mean corporation picking on the little guy. I don't think they have much interest in actually suing individual pirates for that reason, it always just reflects back on them badly.
>>51362801
TIL. Damn they even had 180000 users.
>>51362816
Well that's good news for us then.
>>51362545
>not being o****t***
>>51362886
>not being h4h
They do know though IPT is blocked in the UK after all, although its secure site is not, I have no idea why.
IPT should not have leaked those GoT episodes though, that brought them far more attention than they wanted kek they tried to mark those as "internal". An IPT internal what a fucking joke.
>>51362914
IPT is a joke.
>>51362816
This, they still do settlement offers but judges have made it explicitly clear that 1 download is not 1 lost sale, so they're not allowed to charge huge sums, only a few hundred or so dollars, maybe more depending on the content.
In fact, most of the reason that hearing about those stories now doesn't happen is because state/federal judges have made it precedent that Media companies are not allowed to be greedy assholes about piracy. They have a right to protect their copyright and sue people share files, but that's about where it stops.
>>51359866
Most are good, some are very good and some are mediocre in terms of x264's potential.
>>51362342
>>51363014
Have you even asked for an invite yet?
How long until x265 is mainstream guys? My body is ready.
Anyone need a PTP invite? I was gonna invite my friend but he said he didn't want it, so I don't need the invite anymore.
>>51363082
Sent ;)
>>51363045
>implying I'll get an invite just by asking
If only it actually worked like that, if only.
>>51363098
well, you are *the* drizzy wap
some people on #ptg have their invites left, perhaps they will donate to the cause
>>51363120
yeah but that doesn't mean *jack shit*, I mean if someone offered one I'd take it but expecting people to give me one would make me just as bad as the curries 2bh familia. besides I thought btn invites were R A R E now?
>>51363164
Kind of a pain to get for most people but maybe someone has one
>>51363164
BTN gave out a shitload of invites to random users.
if there was a safe way I'd give drizzy BTN & HDB. srs.
upload upload upload for that fuckin buffer
>>51362560
what has a surprising number of programs, look under the apps.windows tag for example
>>51363082
Sure, E-Mail is [email protected] :^)
Anyone here ever traded upload with someone on another tracker?
I swapped a few hundred gigs with someone before when I was first getting started on a different tracker.
>>51363175
yeah you might be right.
>>51363186
actually you're right they did just give out a bunch of invites. I thought they only gave them to high ranking members.
>>51363209
hit that bandcamp email family. wait...this isn't mcadams is it?
>>51362560
>>51363219
>/g/
>pirating proprietary software for a proprietary OS
>>51363209
Doesn't Drizzy hang out in #ptg? Can't you just message him there?
>>51362203
https://xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
>>51363219
I've considered joining what, just never been sure if it was really worth having to establish ratio in a tracker that seemed like it'd be a mild pain to do so in, when I don't download that much music in general.
>>51363266
So meh.
what would cause an upload of a transcode to create an identical album torrent page with the same name instead of falling under the existing album torrent page?
>>51363502
what are you talking about
do you have a link?
>I keep being reminded I've never watched all these shows
That BTN invite is so close, yet so far.
>>51363563
just get an IPT invite from the oppaitime #ptg, it will tide you over senpai
>>51363563
>>51363638
This. Also Freshon is basically open now, you should join that anyways. Go on their IRC and say you had an account you made in June. They had to install an old backup and don't know who was on there after.
What is a better alternative to iPT for movies/TV that isn't pay for account and isn't necessarily impossible to get in?
>>51363251
I'd invite you too, Drizzy; if I could. I'm actually close to having HDB invites but I don't really think that the staff would let that slide either way.
You'll make it though senpai, we all will.
>>51363638
Don't ask for invites on #ptg pls
>>51363502
did you use the "add format" page? or are you talking about different editions?
>>51363684
You don't have to lie, just ask for an invite code
>>51363695
sir pls
>>51363695
>we all will
stop invoking feelings of hope in me pls senpai
Do you think it's worth turning my music collection FLAC only?
>>51364004
If you have the HDD space and buffer for it sure, won't hurt. Really lame when it comes to syncing to a phone though.
What is a better alternative to iPT for movies/TV that isn't pay for account and isn't necessarily impossible to get in?
MoreThanTV, and AwesomeHD are a good middleground I suppose.
>>51364035
>Really lame when it comes to syncing to a phone though.
Nice pun.
>>51364191
Thanks man.
>>51364189
Can I get an invite to awesome HD on torrent-invites?
>>51364125
Freshon
>tfw I thought the easiest way to get BP on AHD was the TV contest
>tfw the easiest way is to just set up autodl and get 100GB+ of buffer each day and convert it into BP
This shit is too easy
>>51364205
senpai...
>>51364229
Um what??
>>51364205
sure whats you're username
>>51364004
Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.
I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange...well don't get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren't stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you'll be glad you did.
>>51364250
Explains why some of my MP3s from 07 sound like shit now. Is there any way I can recover them? Maybe if I freeze my ipod?? I dont have a what account, so I cant rebuild my library.
>>51364205
It is generally a very bad idea to get invites from torrent invite sites.
(Most respectable trackers will ban your accounts if they find out)
Take the interview, upload five torrents, seed 25 gb. boom. PU on what, AwesomeHD recruit from there.
Has anyone on here found some nice series with the Random Series button on BTN? Share them.
I've never heard of PTF
how is it and what is it for?
>>51364318
I don't think you can interview to get into awesomeHD though.
I do have a pretty good ratio on iPT tho
>>51364318
got my 5 uploads, still another 10gb to go :/
So is Freshon worth getting into? Is it any good?
>>51364357
Interview to what, not AHD.
(then get AHD invite from invites section of what)
>>51364410
Na MTV is better and BTN in second place
whats the point in allowing V2? noone downloads them
>>51364411
I'd rather kill myself than get a What.CD account.
>>51364519
Then you're not getting on to AHD. Your only other option is AB, and that requires a 3 month old account and the recruiter is apparently flaky. Good luck.
>>51364357
There's an AHD recruitment on AB too (PU). AHD is one of the easier trackers to get into.
>>51364528
How the fuck am I supposed to upload 25GB worth of music? A single song is like 6MB
>>51364519
its not too bad, just dont browse the forums or read the comments sections, you can do it anon
>>51364541
What has literally pages and pages of ways to do this, go read.
>>51364541
by not being retarded? lmao
>>51364541
For most people yes but wcd are autists who like to store pointlessly large flacs so you are looking at albums that can be in the GBs
>>51364541
Doesn't have to be music. Software, manga, japanese music, elearning videos, dramas, computer programs of which there are tons lacking from the sites, books all count
Then you have FL and staff free leech to buffer you further.
>>51364541
Fill requests, upload shit, seed lots of FL.
Many, many things are possible. I uploaded manga and people snatched that. 10 GB packs, auto snatched. You're just being a fucking retard and whining about how hard it is without even trying.
>>51364541
Are you confusing upload from seeding with uploading new torrents?
All you need to do is wait for the next round of staff picks, and grab all of them. It really isn't that hard.
>>51364560
Hmm maybe I will, I'm a little busy with school atm to get heavily involved in another tracker.
Can I ditch What.cd after I get an AwesomeHD account?
>>51364541
>A single song
>>51364589
Yes, but if you want back later you are kinda fucked.
>>51364589
You are likely to find that you want to join up to many other trackers via What's invite forum lmao.
if your upload doesnt get snatched does that still count?
>>51364589
WCD will get you into literally every tracker worth getting on that isn't PTP. Why would you want to ditch your account?
>>51364644
Assuming you mean "if you upload a torrent but no one snatches it does it count towards the total number of uploaded torrents" to which the answer is yes.
>>51364649
Oh well idk I'm not really that into music I guess.
Some anon on /g/ invited me to What.CD a year ago but I forgot my account log in and lost interest. Maybe this time will be different.
>>51364541
mass download every version of every freeleech album and seed them forever
>>51364511
Not sure desu, anyone so tight on space they would consider V2 can go for V0 instead, the size difference is tiny.
>>51364674
What's the point of seeding them if no one ever downloads them? If no one is downloading, then you aren't uploading and therefore not contributing to your upload.
>>51364649
Why is PTP so exclusive?
>>51364674
I grabbed all the FLAC and V0 versions of the freeleech but that took me a fucking hour of clicking so yeah, I'd love to grab the rest but no.
>>51364675
yea i see a lot of people will upload a 320 and V0 but not bother with a V2
>>51364644
Anon there are literal threads in the forum that snatch shit if they haven't been snatched.
>>51364690
Because they the best senpai.
>>51364692
i used to use a python script from somewhere on the forums that auto-downloads every freeleech torrent. not sure if it's still around though.
>>51364690
it isn't. it is just that they aren't recruiting at the moment, it could change anytime.
>>51364671
>Some anon on /g/ invited me to What.CD a year ago but I forgot my account log in and lost interest. Maybe this time will be different.
If you already have a fucking what account get it reactivated you colossal moron.
>>51364701
i try to avoid the forums desu senpai
>>51364721
I FORGOT MY LOG ON INFORMATION
I think I used a throw away email or something, but I don't remember the email or password anymore.
>ex gf keep trying to get back with you
>all you want to do is be alone and play the private tracker RPG
>>51364740
It doesn't matter, you can't get a second account. Don't do the god damn interview again you'll only get permabanned.
>>51364756
why would he get banned? they could not possibly link him to the old account
>>51364772
so you think
>>51364756
What lol why would I get banned? I obviously wouldn't use the same email address.
>>51364787
just like you can "know" if someone is looking at the prep site while taking the interview huh?
>>51364807
it's not hard at all. I thought someone from /g/ would know this. Pathetic.
>>51364816
My IP address isn't the same so it doesn't matter
>>51364816
different IP
different email address
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM you even telepathy bro?
>>51364789
If you use a different email and name, and have a new IP there's probably not much chance they'll catch it.
>>51364825
>it doesn't matter
whatever helps you feel more at ease. We will know the truth eventually.
>>51364835
This was all like a year and a half ago too btw
>>51364846
let me quote you: it doesn't matter.
>>51364833
They can literally backtrace the connection and see the exact room he's connecting from down to the centimeter, moron. Unless he's moved somewhere else since then
>>51364876
What garbage are you fucking talking about.
>>51364754
>private tracker RPG
How do I find the BTN boss? I've been walking around AHD for ages now.
>>51364876
>backtrace
Kek, thanks for the callback anon.
>>51364903
Let me spell it out for you:
WCD is a subsidiary of Monkey House.
A lot of people don't scrub their data from itunes files smdhtbqh
>>51364789
>they could not possibly link him to the old account
>I obviously wouldn't use the same email address.
Oh god
>>51365008
Oh ok.
So what piece of identifiable information would they use on me?
>>51364876
I have moved somewhere else since then.
>>51365024
If I told you where would the fun be?
>>51365047
Oh so you don't know? Okay.
>>51365045
they would still know
if another member of your family however took the interview that would be fine as they would know they specifically have not had an account before
>>51365024
Well maybe they record the browser footprint (font cache, screen size, OS etc.), have impregnated your browser with flash cookies, know who your ISP is and your relative location, the way you type and answer things, clear your history in case, your torrent client, any last.fm details or post history you left behind previously, your taste in music and downloading, simlarity of passwords/passwords attempted, username similarity, MAC address.
>>51365075
But they don't so it doesn't matter
LOL
IM GONNA TAKE THE INTERVIEW AND PASS AND GET AN ACCOUTN AHAHAHAHAHHA
FUCK THA WORLD LMAO FUCK WHAT CD AND FUCK ALL OF YOU HAHAH
>>51365075
>MAC address
kek
>>51364919
https://*wesome-**.net/forums.php?action=viewthread&threadid=13013
I've used a popular invite forum to buy an account (not trade invites/accounts) for a popular tracker, if I say it in what.cd would they forgive me? I didn't know how to get into any good tracker when I searched on Google that's what came up
>>51365108
if I say it in what.cd interview*
>>51365108
yea come clean, it will also help later on to get you into heaven
>>51365108
Depends on the tracker you're part of I guess. If I was the staff I'd probably say no. Perhaps you could have them disable your invites forever as a compromise.
>>51365108
You have a better chance of being forgiven then a seller. Also if you don't report your seller there is a chance that someone else might and then you would be fucked over. I don't know anyone either on these threads or anyone who has actually tried something like that though
>>51364224
What software/filters do you use for autodl?
>>51364250
What you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
>>51365108
Report your seller on that tracker. Send them all the proof you have and beg for a second chance. Best case scenario, they disable your invites, worst case scenario it's a ban. But if you get caught before confessing there is 0 hope if getting your account back.
I know that HDB allows you to keep your account but have it permawarned. Which isn't a bad deal.
Anyone with /pyramid/ tips for wcd right now?
>>51365142
I don't have any problem reporting the seller, I would do it if they asked me. The tracker I bought was CHD, it's dead now if that matters and the seller was banned there before CHD died
>>51365140
>Perhaps you could have them disable your invites forever as a compromise
I don't have a problem with that
>>51365194
>The tracker I bought was CHD, it's dead now if that matters and the seller was banned there before CHD died
Oh who the fuck cares if it's CHD.
I would still tell them about it I guess if it's brought up, but just say you were a noob and had no idea what you were doing.
>>51365194
If the seller got banned but you didn't then I think you would count as /pure/. If you bought on CHD and that tracker has now died but you used CHD recruitment to get into another tracker then I think you can also be counted as pure because there is no one to tell the other site that you bought in the first place.
And like the other anon said, who the hell cares if it's some obscure tracker. The ones you should fear are the ones which have fingers in every pie like What and BTN where getting banned on one means getting banned on all.
Just as long as you've learned that buying is actually more work then earning it.
>>51365251
>but you used CHD recruitment to get into another tracker
No, I stayed there, no invites for another tracker.
Care to elaborate about pure/non-pure?
>>51365280
But if it's dead, I am confused why it's an issue.
>>51365280
pure means you got into the tracker through recruitment or open sign ups
impure is when someone invites you or you invite someone and risk being banned from the top down if someone misbehaves
>>51365186
mother fucker you dont know who the fuck i am, you are a fag who likes sticking it in guys asses and you best believe that you'd be the one getting crammed in your fuckin rear by my Ukranian Fort-500 shotgun before i blow your fucking guts out your chest you faggit little bitch your fucking pathetic you best hope i never head to your town, i'll find yeah and shank you in your sleep, you wanna die motherfucker? faggit little cracker, hahaha I betyou aint ever even gotten and coochie, huh? ever got any pussy? i dont even keep count anymore, but it is definately past 35 cuz thats where i lost count bout a year or two ago, added a few since then, so ask yourseld, should your faggit no coochie gettin bitch ass maybe try to shut the fuck up, or do you want to hear more about how fuckin gay and lame you are? you cocksucking homo bastard go kill yourself you worthless chunk of shit, your useless and lame as fuck, and i cant wait to show your gay ass faggit no roastin abilities, you couldn't talk shit even if you ate shit, go slit your wrists you aint cool at all give up on your gay ass life
>>51365280
Don't worry about pure/impure, it's just a meme
. Bottomline is, as long as they don't ask in the interview don't bring it up. If they do, tell them you did not know what you were doing when you bought it. If CHD is gone there is no proof you bought the invite so you got lucky.
Just never do it again and it'll be fine.
