http://www.anandtech.com/show/9136/the-2015-macbook-review
>charging $150 for 0.1 GHz higher clock
Literally jewish
>>47518520
I don't know anything about anything but is Core M that much better than the i5 on the air?
Does it bend on keystroke?
>you don't know what a netbook is
>Apple doesn’t specifically address the logo, but with the tight constraints on both thickness and battery life – Apple needs to get 9+ hours off of a 39.7Wh battery driving a 12” Retina display – I suspect Apple finally sacrificed the logo to further save on power.
This is bullshit, the logo on the other laptops is lit up by the same LEDs that light up the display backlight.
how is that fucking bezel acceptable
>>47519244
Seconding this point
>>47518999
Did you seriously just screenshot a comment that you disagreed with and then post it here for validation?
>>47519267
>>47519244
That's surely was a "bright" idea
>>47518689
You also get double the ssd space
Useless shit. That space gray though.
>>47521208
Apple should stick to white, grey/black is for windows
>>47519297
To be fair I also have a four year old MBA and literally only noticed this two days ago.
>>47519244
People who want glowing manufacturer logos on their devices should seriously be euthanized.
>>47519297
I've used Apple laptops with that type of lid for years and didn't notice it until someone pointed it out a few months ago.
>>47519259
the one on the air is far worse
silver abomination ruining any semblance of design
Dell XPS 13 is better than this fad in any perceivable way. Now that there is an official Linux version available, too, there is literally not a single argument you have for picking the Air over the XPS 13.
>>47522344
What if I'm a girl?
>>47522325
Looks like a Chromebook
>>47522242
I never said I wanted it, I just pointed out a factual error in the review.
Since battery life wasn't the reason for Apple to remove the glowing, perhaps it means they're getting a bit of sense.
>>47522351
>/g/
>women
pick one
>>47522369
The main selling point is the Apple™ logo
>>47522351
I don't understand.
>>47522325
I think it's the website on the screen
>>47522351
You kill yourself.
>>47522369
The MacBook is their general notebook, the Air is their ultraportable
>>47522374
/g/ has to be filled with women because so many people here shill macs
>>47522358
I never said you wanted it either.
It's just that the bit you quoted shows there's apparently a considerable number of people upset that their new device is not made to be an advertisement billboard.
>>47522404
le does everyone hate macs and love pc master race!!!!!!!
LET OUR FRAMERATES BE HIGH AND OUR LATENCY BE LOW!!!!!!! preach!
let people have their own opinion fucking autist.
btw I use windows
>>47522412
>mediocre
what's mediocre about it?
>>47518520
>>47522325
Where is the trackpoint?
>>47522402
Well not this generation it isn't.
>>47522478
That's not your decision.
>>47522503
That's not a decision at all.
That's an observation.
The macbook is lighter and thinner at the expense of performance and connectivity.
This makes it the ultraportable.
>>47522541
No, the MacBook Air is their ultraportable, it just hasn't been updated yet.
I must be the only person that misses the old plastic Macbook and prefers plastic over muh aluminium unibody and glass.
>>47522632
It was updated a month ago.
>>47522674
You're not alone. A lot of people miss the old MacBook, and the older apple products, from before everything was sterile milled aluminum. Back when there was some joy in their world, and not just obscene profits.
>>47522632
How would they make it significantly thinner than the macbook anyway?
They'd have to ditch the physical keyboard and ports altogether at which point they might as well put an Atom chip in an ipad and ship it with OS X.
>>47522344
>being an autobrightness cuck
An iPhone colour computer with the same number of ports as a iPhone is genius. It's an iPhone computer!
>>47523096
>at which point they might as well put an Atom chip in an ipad and ship it with OS X.
That would be the answer to the Surface, and sell obscenely well.
>>47518520
>>47523590
Not good enough. It needs to be ARM iOS with an OS X interface or an ARM port of OS X with an X86 emulator. Intel requires too much energy for portable devices.
>>47522674
I've seen a few white plastic macbooks, and all had two things in common. And that was that the plastic broke and they turned yellow. The black only has one of those problems.
>>47523382
>being a cuck cuck
>>47523854
>being an autobrightness cuck
>>47523858
>being cucked by being cucked by the cuck meme
>>47523850
>Intel requires too much energy for portable devices.
Plenty of Atom powered Windows 8.1 tablets have come out recently.
Yeah they're still not as efficient as ARM, but one more architecture iteration and maybe one more process shrink and the difference will be negligible.
>>47519297
>only has one song from "London Calling"
get out
>>47522344
Doesn't run OS X.
>>47524437
What software can OSX run that Windows can't?
>inb4 some basic default utility
>>47524580
Who said anything about exclusive software?
It's all about the trackpad gestures, *nix base and overall nice to use system.
Far less issues than Linux and Windows while being far more flexible than Windows.
>>47518951
It's far worse, actually.
>>47518520
>>47522344
>broadlel
>ever
>>47522344
the xps13 de is more expensive than the macbook. i guess you get more too. but if you don't need it, then why bother?
