Worlds first x99 Mini ITX Mobo. Dont pretend that you are not impressed.
Full length DDR4, LGA2011v3, Dual NIC, 4 Lane msata, mini PCIe, Full 16 lanes for the x16 pcie, Sata fucking express, USB 3.1.
I want to see a monster rig in an ITX case.
Asrock is bad quality yo.
>>47096969
>intel
enjoy your literal botnet
>>47097013
What's not a botnet?
>>47096969
>Quad channel memory controller
>Two memory slots
Other than that, pretty impressive.
>>47097004
They haven't been bad for quite some time now.
>internet goes in
>internet goes out
>Assrock
>Highest failure rates
Considering I had 2 of their X58 boards blow their VRMs on me, I wouldn't trust them to make a reliable X99 board.
>>47097040
OpenSPARC
>>47096969
>assrock.
>>47097053
T H I S
why the fuck spend moar for an X99 if you aren't gonna load it up with 64GB RAM?
>>47097062
X58 was how many years ago?
You still runnin a BFG video card?
Asrock is better than most brands these days.
It's cool but it makes no sense since 2 of the 3 big draws of X99 are quad channel memory and extra PCI-e bandwidth.
Who wants to put a 140W processor into a ITX platform?
A mITX x99 motherboard is kind of ruining the point of x99, but I do see the market. You do lose out on a lot of features such as quad channel ram and SLI/Crossfire x2-4, etc, though.
I still think mATX is the way to go for most small builds, as many cases meant for mITX, often take the same space an mATX build would, with the exception of silly super compact cases like the ncase m1.
I do wish there were clever super compact cases for mATX. ;ยจ; For my next build I'm probably going to end up making my own case.
>>47097004
Not really anymore. They make pretty great motherboards this time around, although they don't have a lot of overpriced high end models like Asus, Gigabyte or MSI.
>>47097071
That doesn't seem like a reasonable answer but I don't know enough about it to contradict you.
>>47097103
Wrong, Assrock still has above average failure rates.
>DON'T BUY ASROCK IT'S SHIT AND BREAKS IF YOU OVERCLOCK IT
I've been running i5 3570k overclocked to 4,3 ghz on z77 pro3 for three years and it hasn't exploded yet.
Haters. Fuck quad channel memory. DDR4 will offer 32GB modules. no shits given.
I want to see a water cooled i7-5960X + 32GB ram + Titan X inside an Elite 130 Case.
>>47097134
What Vcore?
>x99 Mini ITX Mobo
I have my silverstone rvz01 empty, waiting for this and a cpu
What the FUCK, we have DDR4 now?
When did this happen?
>>47097071
Wow, I have two comps that have that shit and didint even realize it.
>>47097172
Since the X99 motherboards and haswell-e came out, still wa too pricey for most users.
![snapshot_14.36_[2014.12.24_00.04.00].png](https://4chanarchives.com/image/image-404.png "snapshot_14.36_[2014.12.24_00.04.00].png")
>>47097129
mine never failed on me
>>47097013
The driver installer that came with my Assrock practically forced me to install Google Chrome.
Only way to avoid it was to install each driver separately.
>caring about computer parts
>2000+15
>>47097272
Please get off my /g/ you don't belong here.
lol all these assrock users coming in here with their stories of how their motherboards lasted 2 years. yeah great, you were the lucky 1 in 3 who didn't get a faulty motherboard. enjoy your thin pcb and inferior longevity, it was worth it for the few dollars you saved.
>>47097263
Fuck dude...
>>47096969
want.
>>47097334
I bought an Assrock becasue it had the best features, not becasue it was cheaper.
The OP is also about features.
Other brands need to innovate more, instead of selling gaymen bullshit.
>>47097062
>assrock
>assus
>gigashite
>msickly
>hurr im a moron that bought an overpriced mobo and now i hate on asrock because they deliver the best mid range boards there is
>>47097403
>Other brands need to innovate more, instead of selling gaymen bullshit.
>>47097258
Not them, but my Z77 Extreme 6 from Assrock stopped working on its own after a year. Not making the mistake of Assrock again.
>>47097062
>>47097129
Failure rates:
Gigabyte 2,02%
MSI 2,60%
ASUS 2,31%
ASRock 2,27%
>>47097473
>Source: Anon's ass
http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/108284-huge-list-of-failure-rates-on-pc-components-french-but-i-translated-nearly-everything/
Not sure if there's a more recent one.
>>47097473
Gigabyte .042%
MSI .060%
ASUS .031%
ASSrock 6 million jews.
>>47096969
>Narrow ILM
Into the trash it goes. How am I supposed to fit a NH-D15 on there with that useless socket? I hate when companies put useless stuff on there that I won't use.
>>47097488
>>47097495
Source: hardware.fr
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/920-1/taux-retour-composants-10.html
And yes, I'm sure there's more recent data, but mine's from late April 2014 as opposed to your forum post citing data from May 2013.
>>47097137
>Elite 130 Case
Why not a Dan A4?
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1799326
>>47097510
There isn't even a 5% performance difference between a 70$ and a 500$ mobo, you should always buy the cheapest that has all the features you know you'll use, from the manufacturer you trust.
This is one of the two parts you can save on when building a pc.
The other one is memory, however I'm not going to start talking about that because my whole post would lose it's credibility for most faggots who doesn't even hardware.
>>47097108
>I do wish there were clever super compact cases for mATX
Do you know why that is? It's because mATX is big compared to mini-ITX, and you can't make a case smaller than what already exists without serious compromises. So pick your poison:
-Limit the PSU to SFX only
-ATX PSU over the motherboard, which limits CPU cooler height
-Block off some expansion slots
Those are the options, and if you're not willing to make any of those, the SG09/SG10 is absolutely as small as you can go. They look ugly as shit, but that comes with the territory since every side needs to be covered in vents due to the layout which enables it be so compact.
>>47097555
>>47097510
They likely did it because they had to. LGA 2011 is a bigger socket than 1150, and going with the narrow ILM version may be the only way they could get it to fit at all on a mini-ITX board.
At least asrock is innovating. Didnt they recently also release an Extended mini ITX with 4 full sized Dimms, LGA1150 and 12 Sata ports.
>>47096969
>x99 Mini ITX Mobo
Does it support ECC ram? I got the Asrock E3C226D2I because it does.
>>47097172
Check out them DDR3 prices.
so asrock is bad? i was gonna buy their z97 anniversary
>>47098927
save your shekels goyim.
>>47097200
what u have?
>>47097109
>128 threads
>completely open source and free hardware
>>47096969
Doesnt habe dc-in, would be perfect with it
>>47097595
>There isn't even a 5% performance difference between a 70$ and a 500$ mobo, you should always buy the cheapest that has all the features you know you'll use, from the manufacturer you trust.
Not if you want a reliable system. Yes you can afford to cheap out on motherboards if you do not want extra features like RAID support and SLI, but you absolutely do not want to go for bottom of the barrel shit either. You don't want your ports to stop working one by one or have the motherboard suddenly die on you one day (or arrive DOA)
>>47097625
i've been obsessing over mini ITX for a while, but im still not sure i would prefer it over mATX. Thermaltake Core v1 seems more or less perfect, apart from the fact the front fan sits beside the gpu, not in front of it. Rosewill Neutron seems great too, but seems impossible to find in the UK. annoying.
>>47100725
>hideous cubeshit
>>47096969
>dual INTEL nics
>based asrock
>linux compatibility confirmed
Is there a general user purpose for dual NICs?
>>47100823
One entirely dedicated to virtual machines :'3
>>47097979
Player
>>47100725
>huge fan that completely bypasses the hottest part of the machine
I blame 30+ year old industry standards as much as the chassis designers. No one could've foreseen that we'd be using 250W+ graphics processors on an expansion card back when ISA was drafted, and yet here we are. I can only hope some new hardware standards emerge in the next 5-10 years.
I used to work at asus and the boards that didnt pass all the power tests got rebranded as adrock.
thats true.
buy the way
>>47096969
I thought DDR4 required quad channel. I only see 2 RAM slots on that.
>28 pcie lanes minimum, 40 maximum, can only use 16
>supports quad channel memory, can only have dual channel
Fucktarded horseshit for stupid faggot nerds.
>>47100943
>required
nothing REQUIRES more than 1 channel, it's an option for enhanced performance you fucking retard.
>>47100926
i'd gladly have a longer case, just so the fan wouldn't bypass the GPU. likewise, a CM Elite 130, with psu placement that WOULDNT FUCKING BLOCK THE HEATSINK
>2 ram slots
why would anyone get this?
>>47097134
i have the same mobo
3570k oc'd to 4.5 @ 1.264v
You give me confidence.
>>47101061
SG08? Node 304?
