real holograms
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
why we aren't hyping this?
http://www.burton-jp.com/aerial3d.wmv
>>46720363
>wmv
why
>>46720523
>-jp.com
they're still using XP, faxes and their websites look like they were made 15 years ago
>>46720543
This
this
this
ffs OP's a jap who's linking us to a .wmv file instead of a webm
i'll make a webm gimme a minute
>>46720363
because its fucking 90s level shit
DO NOT DOWNLOAD THIS TRASH
>>46720543
>websites look like they were made 15 years ago
What's wrong about it?
>>46720583
kek thx, I just copy-pasted the link from the official site, it works in my browser though.
>>46720363
such tekku-norogy
srs tho, japan has some amazing tech but cant into design for some reason
>>46720543
There is absolutely nothing wrong with faxing.
Much easier than the pleb way we are forced to use today.
>1995
>Oh, you need a hard-copy?
>Here, I'll fax it to you.
>Right click
>Send to fax
>Enter telephone number
>Send
>Other end.
>Fax machine recieves message.
>Sends it to printer service.
>Prints document.
Hands-free.
>20 years later
>2015
>Oh, you need a hard-copy?
>Here, I'll email it to you.
>Right click file
>"Send as email attachment"
>Log into email
>Think of a subject
>Type the reciever's address
>Send
>Other end
>Reciever has to manually open email.
>Reciever has to manually download attachment.
>Reciever has to right-click file and select "print"
>Reciever has to manually configure the page via print dialog.
>Reciever has to hit "print".
What the fuck happened?
>>46720590
Do you mean there're better 3d holograms than this?
>>46720593
Where did Isay it's bad? XP and faxes are but lightweight websites aren't.
But only reason they still do that is probably because they also use IE6.
>>46720583
>>46720661
>lightweight
You mean normal? It's just standard HTML.
>Mfw playing yugioh with holograms will soon become real
>>46720640
You forgot the part where printing out the fax takes ages while an email is sent immediately and everyone uses Outlook anyway so you only need to log in once.
>>46720654
>wanting 3D when you only have 2 eyes
>>46720705
>printing out the fax takes ages
>Using a fax machine.
You use a fax modem and a modern printer.
Much quicker.
Anyone can make a fax machine, today.
>>46720711
Well, we have two eyes to get a sense of depth, one eye would give no depth sense, that would be 2d.
>>46720711
Literally what
wait
Is this a new ebin maymay?
Are there any similar projects? All I've seen so far from other techs are projections of HD images on flat translucent surfaces, like the Vocaloid concerts, they're still very detailed though.
>>46720867
How can 3d be real if our eyes aren't real?
>>46720682
recent video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNoOiXkXmYQ
>>46720543
It's not different from any science department website, I'm glad they used css at least.
It's an impractical technology that will only be used in the most niche markets.
It literally burns the air around it to create the visual effect. It is highly dangerous and not suited for 99% of use cases we think of when we think holograms.
>>46720711
Fucker. Caught me off guard.
>>46721824
The first train models released a lot of pollution in the air, but were still used for many decades, with all the technological improvements we had in last century, trains became almost harmless for the environment.
Think of this like the first train on rails model ever made, this project is just the beginning, when more companies start spending resources on this technology, I'm sure we're gonna see many improvements in both quality and safety.
>>46720867
It's true though, we only use 2 eyes to give us depth, we can't actually see in 3d, we see a 2d image with depth info overlaid.
2x 2d images are just as good as 3d for all we can tell anon.
Pretty sure this is that loud as shit technology that makes a very loud snapping sound every second
>>46722644
It makes a flickering noise, they're basically micro lightnings.
Fuck yes! We have crude hoverboards, crude holograms, crude self-driving cars!
All we need is to perfect this shit and the future will be bright once again.
The previous version worked in water but it was more an optical illusion than a hologram, it was very blurry too.
I can see this new screenless version being used for advertising very easily, on a car's roof or even on buildings.
>>46723816
There is no future.
>>46720363
Haha no, have you ever seen one of these in person?
The crackles are so loud they make your ears pop!
>>46723816
this post gave me hope
>>46724130
Abandon all hope, you who entered here.
>>46724110
What if it were to be projected inside a air-deprived container? Like replacing the air with some very low density gas, could it reduce the noise?
>>46722567
3 eyes when?
>>46720363
>wmv
thats fucking why. get that shit out of here.
>>46724215
good question, but pressure of the plasma (making the pops) would decimate any container made of conventional materials
>>46724385
Is it really that strong of a pressure? PMMA could be used easily, in a cubic container the low density gas would cause a pressure towards the center, the poping pressure should balance this factor, though the small vibrations of the panels might become an issue, on the long run.
>>46725124
(continuing) how do you like this? We could start with small size projectors in PMMA bubbles like this with a layer large enough to nullify any pressure issue, I would buy one asap if they decide to sell something like this, mini holograms are still cool stuff.
