>2015 - 0.833
>still using jpeg for lossy images
http://bellard.org/bpg/
>>45494112
>over 100 bytes more
fucking dropped
That's pretty good.
>>45494141
Well a jpeg with quality close to the bpg is quite larger.
You don't even need browser support, there's a javascript decoder.
http://bellard.org/bpg/lena.html
fuck my tele systems professor showed me the same bloody picture
>decoding images using javascript
It's just another plot to make pictures completely unviewable for privacy conscious individuals who use NoScript. Oh you don't want to be spied on and tracked on every site you go to? Then you can't see our pictures, fucker! It's absolutely terrible and disgusting how the modern web has been perverted.
>>45494975
I want to pass my virginity to her.
>>45494988
She doesn't want you
>>45494975
check your privilege, it's also a lesbians club
>>45495049
Still does not deny the fact that I want to pass my virginity to her.
>>45494975
I suggest a better crop.
>>45494988
>>45494975
>picture celebrating the beauty of the female body
>"boys club"
and then there's this guy
>>45494910
This. That guy is a idiot.
>>45495095
>hairy ass
Fucking disgusting.
>>45495293
You don't know how human body works, do you?
>>45494112
How does this compare to h.265 or the like? I know its not video compression, but frame to frame video compression is 4th dimensional picture compression.
>>45494945
I'm glad you neckbeards dont reproduce so that one day this stupid anti-javascript mentality will die off.
>>45495356
google shill detected
>>45494945
Why would a NoScript user want to watch images anyway? He already ruined half of his web experience, he might as well ruin it entirely.
>>45494975
What's the problem with using pictures for pictures demo? Would an arrangement of pixels on the screen in any other way not be just as effective for the demoing? Then it doesn't matter if it stays with the same picture.
>>45494988
She's old now.
>>45495404
Are you serious? Using a pornographic photograph of a naked women is not an acceptable standard demo picture. How would you feel if computer science was dominated by women, and the standard image was some stud's dick?
>>45495340
It is a subset of h265 (the single key frame part, I assume)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Video_Coding
>>45495293
Have you ever seen another human being's body ever? Girls have hair too, however invisible. Nobody is smooth as fucking glass like in your Chinese porn cartoons.
>>45495457
>How would you feel if computer science was dominated by women, and the standard image was some stud's dick?
I'd giggle and move on. Why is people so concerned with human genitalia?
>>45495466
>>45495305
I know how bodies work, I don't think it's that much to expect a women to shave so they don't have a hairy man ass.
>>45495459
It is actually smaller than HEVC because it doesn't need as much headers.
And apparently hardware decoders are in their way, so javascript decoders won't be needed in the future. Browsers already support h.264 so h.265 won't be a problem, and with it, this codec.
feelsgood.bpg
>>45495095
>>45495520
Lower bytes mean more asses in the same harddrive space.
I can see the future, and it's full of asses.
>>45494975
>>45495095
the fuck did you do to the colors m8?
fix your color profile.
>>45495541
The same as in the "test picture".
>>45494112
>>45494120
>Fabrice Bellard
>JavaScript Loonix emulator
>QEMU
>a ton of other great shit
Why is he so based?
>>45494975
disgusting huge nipples/10
>>45495607
Autists don't have girlfriends so they have more time to waste on computer nerd shit.
>>45495623
nigga you gay
>>45494975
Maybe the test image should be something repulsive to everybody, so only the people interested in the technology stick with it, whereas people who would drop their whole course of study because of an image would be welcome to leave.
>>45495686
goatse?
>>45495686
dunno bro, her hairy pimply ass is pretty repulsive, and I'm a guy
>>45495675
Nah, I just stick to the objective superior alternative.
>>45494975
Nigga it's fucking lena.
We're not going back to baskets of fruits and other bird photos because she happened to work for playboy.
>>45495792
While the pic is superior, it is not in the context of demoing real life pictures.
It's too flat.
>>45495686
I propose gay furry porn.
Neat image format by the way. Wish I'd stick. Seems all the formats that are better than Jpeg (Jpeg2000, Jpeg XR, possibly this as well) can't penetrate the marked enough.
By the way, what does it use, besides DCT and arithmetic coding?
BPG may be the technically superior format, but it's patent encumbered.
I'd rather use webp or wait for Daala still images to get popular.
I think I'm gonna spam the guys at mozilla to ask them to give more money to Daala.
>>45495865
You could just, like, not base your business in a country with software patents.
>>45495921
Or I could just, like, use what furthers my interests and hope patent encumbered technologies die.
>>45495938
Or you could hope software patents die. Why hope superior technology dies, just because the US (and Japan) law is fucked up?
>>45495830
dohohoho
>>45494975
say you're a woman in science, and this is discouraging to you... then there's no place for you in science in the first place
if you want more women in science, you start with a good elementary school education, really, really good!
percentage of women in science highly positively correlates with elementary school knowledge of STEM basic subjects
>>45495960
Because software patents dying any time soon is only wishful thinking.
Patent encumbered technologies dying is practically the norm. I certainly haven't used a MP3 in a long time. FLAC or Opus, ogg maybe.
I'll just try to stay practical. If a superior technology dies, the idea will stay and people will reinvent it differently until the patent expires.
>>45494975
Trolling aside, why does a naked woman invariably indicate oppression and sexism? Why are women unable to appreciate the female form? Isn't that internalized misogyny? Lol
>>45495340
The intra-frame compression of HEVC is the "god tier" algorithm for compression. Any other (until now) have best compression ratio of this. But, any browser have support for this yet...
>>45495998
>Because software patents dying any time soon is only wishful thinking.
Same with patented technology. As long as the law will permit a way to screw another human being, people will be screwing each other in said way.
>I certainly haven't used a MP3 in a long time. FLAC or Opus, ogg maybe.
Well the situation is quite different with video codecs. VP8 is much inferior to H.264 and theora is inferior to both. I haven't seen a comparison of VP9, H.265 and Daala, but I won't be surprised it'll be the same history again.
Also, wasn't there a case that VP8 actually uses some patented technology?
>I'll just try to stay practical.
The practical thing to me is to use H.264 and similar and laugh at MPEG-LA, the US government and their silly games.
to those talking about patents, jpeg is patent encumbered as well, isn't it?
it's not like we'd be going backwards replacing jpeg with this
>>45496054
>Also, wasn't there a case that VP8 actually uses some patented technology?
True, but it's more of a theoretical issue.
>The practical thing to me is to use H.264 and similar and laugh at MPEG-LA, the US government and their silly games.
That's pretty much what I do. I use H.264 as long as it doesn't help keep H.264 alive. Everywhere else I use VPX and wait for Daala.
The Daala work is very promising, they are trying to port the revolutionary ideas of constrained energy from Opus (Audio) to Video. They are very innovative and already achieve comparable efficiency with modern codecs.
>>45496093
Software patents are a theoretical issue. Has anyone been harassed by MPEG-LA for using MPEG codecs?
>The Daala work is very promising, they are trying to port the revolutionary ideas of constrained energy from Opus (Audio) to Video. They are very innovative and already achieve comparable efficiency with modern codecs.
Any code I can try?
>>45496123
>Any code I can try?
Sure. The repo is at : https://git.xiph.org/?p=daala.git
More info here : https://wiki.xiph.org/Daala_Quickstart
>>45495356
Do you know a that a .gif loaded with javascript can be used to do XSS attacks?
I experimented a few months ago and I developed a javascript gif spyware. The trick is using gif headers as function values.
>>45496081
Haven't the patents already gone out?
>>45496032
Women need go get the hell back into the kitchen. They need to serve their purpose in society and raise children correctly.
The entire feminist movement has just about single handedly caused this degradation of western society that we all see every day. While women are out being "independent" with their "careers", the children they are irresponsibly conceiving are being raised by a television playing Jersey Shore re-runs.
And we wonder why NASA doesent have a fucking space program anymore. Goddamn women being allowed to wear shoes.
>>45494975
Thanks /g/ I just got fired from work.
>>45496174
>Poe's Law
>>45496230
Then it was for a shitty company. We have a calendar with nude bitches in the office (programming company).
>>45496174
> trying this hard
>>45496230
It's a image compression standard test image, you pervert.
>>45496387
No, the whole cover of Playboy from 92 is not the standard image, a cropped version showing just the head is.
as an end-user i don't care.
maybe if i ran a popular website serving large amounts of images to end-users. maybe, but it'd have to be natively supported by web browsers.
>>45496421
cover of a 92 issue?
try the centerfold of a '72 issue
yea, this has been a standard test image for over 40 years
>>45494975
Checked my privilege. Still very privileged. Make me a sandwich bitch.
>>45496549
Right. My bad. I don't know what I mistook it with.
Anyway, if you don't like Lenna, there's the baboon and similar (see: http://homepages.cae.wisc.edu/~ece533/images/)
>>45494975
You seem familiar with those fags at The Verge. Your reasoning is in line
>>45496481
It doesn't have to be natively supported by browsers. You can send the data to the client as .bpg, decode it with javascript and render it as a an image with inline data.
>>45496964
Actually that's exactly how it's done at:
http://bellard.org/bpg/lena.html
>>45496996
But the .bpg data is not cached and is redownloaded every time a user visits/refreshes the page which makes this an inferior option since even though the .bpg format makes images 10 times smaller, the user will likely visit the page more than 10 times.
Thus browser support IS required.
>>45497042
Wait, can't you cache arbitrary data via local store?
I see a bigger problem with low power devices.
>>45497060
Looks like you can. I stand corrected.
.bpg might already be a viable option but further testing with a large amount of images on various devices would be required.
>>45495607
>Fabrice Bellard
>JavaScript Loonix emulator
>QEMU
>a ton of other great shit
AND FFMPEG AND TCC
>>45497115
Looking at his website right now. This nigga is truly based. Also no Web 2.0 bloat on the website.
>Tiny C compiler
>QEMU
>ffmpeg
>Bellard's Formula
>pi world calculation record
>How to broadcast Digital TV using only a VGA monitor: http://bellard.org/dvbt/
>booted up Linux inside a browser: http://bellard.org/jslinux/
...
>>45497115
>>45497300
>nonfree software
>patents
>paywalled research
Into the trash.
