You're not going to find a decent DSLR for 250$ unless it's a used body with no lens kit.

>>45213235
op pic is $200 with lens, used of course.
where's your god now?

>>45213273
Oh, you mean old shit that was mediocre when it was new and has drastically depreciated in value? Yeah, then I guess that does fit.

>sony
>can't use f-mount lenses
>proprietary hot shoe
>proprietary lenses
>ever buying sonyshit

Get a Nikon D-series or a Canon EOD, otherwise buy a point-and-shoot and don't waste your money.

OP, quickly get a pentax, they're the AK-47 of dslr, you can even have focus confirmation+stabilization while shooting with a jar.

You can get a D5000 with an 18-55 for that much dosh.

>2014
>not buying mirrorless

>>45214005
This nigga knows what's up

>>45214005
>digital viewfinder
>being taken seriously ever

kek

>>45213986
>D5000
>implying that's a good choice in any yeat

>>45212796
>DSLR
>less than $250

Pick one.

>>45212796
Get a used Sony, get yourself the standard kit lens 18-55 and either another zoom or a prime like the 35 1.8, you can also use some old minolta maxxum lenses, MD with adapter

a t2i is all you need. $250.00

now LENSES. that under $250? lmao don't kid yourself you may as well just get a lumia.

Get a used one with kit lens.
Sony or pentax if you don't want to add more stuff later, nikon or canon if you do.

Or just get a decent compact, it'll probably be better.

you are not getting a good DSLR for $250 dollars. If that is your budget go for something like:

http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-ZS25-Compact-Digital-Intelligent/dp/B00ATE7W7G/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1416279393&sr=8-6&keywords=lumix