>Marvel is owned by Disney
>they're animated films are shit outside of Big Hero 6
>DC has made better animated films than the company owned by DISNEY
Why is this allowed?
>>82530083
While DC is at the mercy of WB/Snyder regarding live action movies. They atleast attain some sort of control in the animation department.
Most of the recent DC animated movies have been shit.
I doubt we'll get another Under the Red Hood.
>>82523846
>they're animated films are shit outside of Big Hero 6
That's what when you leave animated films in charge.
Also Big Hero 6 was shit.
>>82530415
>what when
what *happens when
Also meant to quote OP.
Zootopia has hauled in 933 million dollars and it's still in theaters. I don't think Disney's too concerned with DC's direct-to-DVD features.
>>82530083
Disney has always been shit compared to WB.
>>82532048
That's apples and oranges. Looney Tunes never had feature films apart from short compilations and the shitty SpaceJam. Meanwhile Disney's individually released shorts were shit but their feature films (and short segments inside features) were amazing.
>>82532048
Is that why Loony Tunes is becoming less and less relevant and Micky and co. steals their thunder?
>>82530314
Batman vs Robin and the Aquaman movies were meh, but I liked the rest. And even those were leagues ahead of most of the Marvel movies.
>>82530083
Because DC has actual good adaptable stories. There's a reason why DC has all the legendary Elsewords/trades.
