Old thread:
>>626552
You know the drill, peeps.
still at it, found and applied a different texture.
>>634815
why does everything this dude draws look like creepy as fuck store mannequins?
Are there any stories dealing with being an abdl not by choice? Not being forced by others but forced by yourself to do abdl things at the same time not wanting to.
>>634837
i am now interested in this
>>634845
Because he draws from 3-D models as a reference instead actual humans. So they're not gonna have any good facial expressions and look like they've got character. Besides those wacky anime hair colors.
>>634864
How do you know he does? I was wondering how he seemed to improve and yet get worse
>>634845
i wouldn't be surprised if it was deliberate
>>634837
Where can I get this?
>>634766
That was from the leak, I'm the poster of it and got it out of the downloaded folder.
I would have posted the last piece as well but it was too big to post and I'm too lazy to shrink it below 5MB. (it's 9.99MB)
>>634866
Word through the grapevine.
>>634879
Alright well I've looked into a way to remove the new watermark that spans multiple bit planes. The old method is right out the window and there's no real way to make it work.
However due to the watermark still only occupying "unseeable" space it's perfect food for a very small amount of smart blur.
With smart blur we can save the hard edges of the images but remove the watermark as it's so close to the near regions in terms of hue number that it gets caught in the blur and removed entirely.
This leaves VERY MINOR damage to the original image's quality but completely removes the watermark.
I used this new method on the image I analyzed in the previous thread and here are the results.
My settings are 100 radius 12 threshold in photoshop's smart blur.
>>634881
I heard he was a huge diva prone to drama and shitfits but not a cheater. Does not surprise tho.
>>634902
Can you post a side-by-side of the full resolution images?
>>634973
Stellar work. If anything it looks better just because of how easy the watermark is to see (for anyone who can't see it, try tilting your screen back).
Also fuckin' A. There are tumblr noses and then there are CrinkleKen noses, that guy operates on a different plane of unappealing.
>>634876
I'd have to upload it, also it's modding a rather expensive costume, most likely you'd have to be active in the game to afford it.
>>634973
I actually like the new one better, the colors look brighter and it makes the characters seem to stand out more from the background.
>>634909
>using 3d models as a reference
>somehow cheating
not sure if bait
>>635125
>>635015
I already have a level capped elin, but i just dont play too often. Maybe now ill play more to save up for this costume
To the anon who was checking for watermarks, here's a rough example via photograph. I say rough because this isn't using my high grade camera (this is a shitty camera I had access to currently). The proper images would obviously not be as bad. If I understand correctly, using photographs should eliminate any sort of watermark that isn't visible to the human eye.
As I said, the final product will obviously be of better quality, and I'd be happy to throw up another test image once I can get access to my proper camera.
>>635279
Yeah, I saw that, but I'm a paranoid fucker when it comes to this stuff. I imagine that because there was one change, there's a VERY good chance there will be another change in regards to watermarks. After all, the speed at which the leaker got busted proves they're reading this thread right now (hi, Mifmaf), so who is to say they aren't changing the method as we speak.
I want a method that is 100% foolproof, which is why the photograph method should be safer, at least for me.
>>635282
Makes sense I guess if you're willing to do more work. Are you already a subscriber on the site?
I want to see more diapered art of Disgust from Inside Out. I already posted a suggestion in the Drawthread.
>>635291
I am unable to divulge that information, in order to maximize my ability to leak this stuff, but I can tell you what's going to happen:
At an undisclosed date in the future (let's just say a month from now as an example), you will begin seeing leaked images posted here. They will be posted as they are uploaded, as opposed to one big leak every 6-12 months. Assuming I can craft a fool-proof method in order to leak without being caught, this process will continue indefinitely.
By all means, for pure shits and giggles, if someone representing Cushypen wants to talk, they can go pick up a tripcode (with proof of identity) and talk to me here.
>>635306
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un8FAjXWOBY
>>635227
I'll tell you what, I'll see what happens if you apply it to the non dyable and cheaper version.
>>635306
Pffft. Hahaha.
Because this is going to happen. I reckon you get one, maybe two images before you get banned.
With as few leaks as there have been, something tells me that the water mark isn't the only method of detection they have.
There isn't a foolproof method because they're free to change up theirs at any point as well.
>>635356
You're absolutely right, which is why I'm being overly cautious about it. Until a good method comes about, I'm not taking any risks. However, I've been able to successfully leak far more important things than diaper porn in the past and not get caught, so the classic phrase "never say never" applies here.
>>635362
Slipshine doesn't count brah
>>635367
Never heard of it. Although looking it up, it seems to be some porn site. Are you confusing me for someone else who leaked that or something?
>>635306
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTe8uIaO-KE
>>635387
Be careful, you'll trigger their entitlement and an argument about the value of art in a capitalist society.
>>635387
>>635394
What if I just want free stuff? You do know all the porn on porn sites is "pirated" too right (aside from amateur videos, obviously)? I'm not going to lie about justice or morality to you; I just like getting things for free. Where I live, no one gives a fuck about piracy (not even my government cares).
>>635274
>>635282
I'm the guy who was checking watermarks and figured out the previous method of removing the watermark.
Smart blur is basically guaranteed to work in every case since it smooths out near color values while leaving large changes in value (it edge-detects basically).
Since the watermarks HAVE to be stored in a way that they only effect the output image in a way that isn't easily noticeable, they will always get eaten up by edge-detecting blur algorithms.
Taking pictures is like a nuclear option that isn't necessary, the only reason I didn't suggest blur before was because I thought the images would lose significant quality but they don't appear to. The blur method is guaranteed to work, and I'll show you how you can check.
Open up photoshop and add a brightness/contrast layer, mess with the values until the watermark is clearly visible and then apply a smart blur on the underlying layer with 100 radius and test it until you find the lowest threshold that kills the watermark. Then just remove the contrast layer and save.
>>635407
Not judging, but that does make you a literal, unabashed thief.
>/aco/ - Cybercriminality
>>635387
>>635394
Because hiding content people can't even properly gauge the worth of before subscribing behind a paywall is clearly the only and most user-friendly way to create content and get paid for it, right?
>>635418
Good to know. Although, how "future proof" is the method? Would TCP be able to come up with some other method of watermarking that would bypass this method? I'm ultimately looking for the safest method possible here, since I'm nutty like that.
Still, if you could check the photographed image (and post results), I'd appreciate it.
>>635423
Where I am, that wouldn't make me a "thief", just so you know. Maybe your country handles things differently though.
>>635435
Don't forget you need to subscribe for multiple months in a row to even access everything too.
>>635426
I don't get it...
>>635439
Photographed images are safe since they lose a lot of that intricate detail where the watermark lies.
You'd need a VERY good camera in order to pick up those watermarks. The picture you posted has no watermarks on it whatsoever.
However using edge-detecting blur should basically never fail. There's only so many ways to watermark an image and I'm pretty sure every single one would break by being blurred in that manner along with having all of its metadata destroyed (copy and paste the image into photoshop and resave).
Metadata would be something you would have to worry about in your photos if it's geolocated, though 4chan strips metadata afaik.
The reason edge-detecting blur should always work is that the watermarks are always hidden by basically changing the color value by small amounts to hide info. If you blur a section, those colors are now all sort of averaged depending on your blur radius. There is no case where a low color value change watermark can survive this.
But that does not mean it's safe forever, they could hide a watermark in the fourier or wavelet domains that could handle some blur, but I'm not sure. It would require more effort to test that and I'm not sure cushypen wants to invest oodles of capital into that.
>>635471
>Take's something
But nothing was stolen
Only copied
>>635473
Is there EXIF data embedded in PNG formats?
>>635473
>You'd need a VERY good camera in order to pick up those watermarks. The picture you posted has no watermarks on it whatsoever.
Good to know.
>Metadata would be something you would have to worry about in your photos if it's geolocated, though 4chan strips metadata afaik.
I'm aware of metadata like EXIF data, and I know how to strip it.
>But that does not mean it's safe forever, they could hide a watermark in the fourier or wavelet domains that could handle some blur
That's precisely my concern, and I want to keep this as safe as possible.
Thanks for the information. I suppose I'll see you folks soon, or eventually, or even never. I make no guarantees, blah blah blah.
>>635485
Sort of, it doesn't support exif but it does support having non-image related data loaded into it.
It's why it's always safer to just copy the image and paste it into photoshop so all you get is the image.
>>635482
Oh come on, I pirate all kinds of things and even I know that's a bullshit excuse. You're depriving someone of funds that they would have made otherwise.
And when you're explicitly doing so after they've asked you not to, it's stealing.
The only difference is that a large company can afford to lose some. Something tells me that none of these artists are rich.
>>635501
>You're depriving someone of funds that they would have made otherwise.
That's a logical fallacy. You are making the assumption that if an individual could not pirate something, they would go out and buy it. If I could not pirate TCP content, I would simply ignore it and stick to the free stuff.
Pirates are not always a lost sale (since they were never a sale to begin with), and this has been proven countless times.
>>635501
They say that Karma is a bitch.
>>635466
Did you not read the whole thread
>....
Lurk more, newfag.
>>635515
Okay, I get it now.
>>635508
Except then it's distributed everywhere, and even people who might have actually paid for it are given it for free. thus depriving sales. Your fallacy is assuming everyone who takes advantage of free material wouldn't have otherwise paid for it.
And that's still nothing to do with having a bit of decency and respecting the creator's wishes.
>>635521
Artists deserve respect, sure, but considering how they went about TCP, they have it coming.
>>635521
What thread were we in again? Oh! That's right, nevermind.
>>635535
who's the bitch?
>>635536
>>635533
And how is that? Literally every bad thing I hear about TCP on here they don't do any more.
Unless actually running the site for a profit is some kind of moral crime.
Because damn those dastardly fiends for taking the poor, unwilling artists and forcing them to slave away in a dungeon and make art, and for mind controlling several hundred people who would have never paid for it otherwise.
>>635339
Neat, thank you
>>635533
How? They made an optional paywall where you can either get the art sooner by paying or by having you wait for when they release shit free after a year. Don't preach at us. Either release what you get without trying to make yourself look superior or fuck off altogether.
>>635554
The key word being "Optional". You act like the artists would have done all the work anyway out of the goodness of their hearts, and it's TCP that's stopping that.
And it's true, they might enjoy doing it, but do you know why most of the artists there do the art for them in the first place? Because they get paid for it. Most of them have other jobs and use it as supplemental income. And I'm fine with that, because it means seeing more art than they would have done otherwise, because they actually have motivation in the form of money to do it.
>>635305
Everybody hates you.
Signed,
-the drawthreads on /co/ and /aco/
>>635588
What are you, the Lorax of 4chan? You speak for the threads?
>>635593
Naw, he's Horton. "A perthon ith a perthon, no matter how thmall."
>>635598
My dick's tiny. Why's he attacking me?
>>635588
Everyone hates diaperfags.
Signed, Everyone including some diaperfags
>>634973
God damn it people, post pictures.
Reminder not to reply to the TCP defense force, he threw a shitfit the last time there was a TCP leak, got BTFO, and now is back for more.
Posting flags
>extreme strawmanning
>extreme adhominem (none of you internet kids have ever done anything important)
>appeals to emotion (the poor starving fetish artists)
>arguments hinging on art leaks being detrimental to the people that leak them (LOL)
>inability to quote or reply to multiple people
>grandiose sense of worth in older diaper community (Yahoo, wetset, etc)
>arguing via greentext
Again, do not reply. Just report, and ignore.
Again, do not reply. Just report, and ignore
Links to previous TCP defense force shit fest threads:
http://archive.loveisover.me/d/thread/6360021
http://archive.loveisover.me/d/thread/6362054/
http://archive.loveisover.me/d/thread/6364369/
Remember his final words were a tip of the fedora and "You're just trying to get the challenging words to go away" and then he went away. Ignore, and he'll go away once again.
This post was even made in advance when the leaks were made, that is how predictable this was. Remember, the enemy is predictable, stupid, belligerent, self important, long winded, and operates on fallacies alone. Do not waist your time debating, trolling, or flaming. Simply report, and ignore.
>>635550
Here's how I see it: Cushypen is essentially a system in which multiple people are charged to see multiple commissions none of them had any part in. Most of which don't look any different to their usual art. It's like paying to see someone's DeviantArt or Furaffinity account. It's silly.
>>635554
What incentive is there to pay if the wait is only a year? Furthermore, if it's just going to get posted later for free, why does it matter if it gets posted sooner for for the same price?
>>635635
Not that anon, but I'll try to answer.
TCP is a ripoff, plain and simple. However, I would imagine the value comes from how you can make requests for artists who otherwise refuse commissions (such as RM), and assuming you get enough (like 1-3 requests/commissions per month), it's worthwhile. Short of that, if you don't like all the artists (AKA you don't like furry or males, etc) or if you don't make requests (or artists don't do your requests), it's shit.
As for waiting, it's just if you're impatient. Despite that, seeing as how this latest leak had bumfuck nothing really, I doubt it's worth rushing into and paying for.
>>635646
If I remember correctly, RFS quit/got kicked out because he wasn't making art often enough according to their standards (somewhat ironic, given how few images RM makes, judging by our latest leak).
>>635643
>seeing as how this latest leak had bumfuck nothing really
To be fair, the guy behind the leak said that he only nicked the stuff he liked. At least, that's what I think he said.
>>635626
>Implying that it's the same person
>Implying that everyone else isn't doing the same posting flags.
>Still haven't had any posts removed, so mods don't seem to care. which besides telling people to report basically negates it.
>>635635
And you're completely entitled to think it's silly and not pay for it and wait until it gets released for free. But respect the artists when they ask you to wait for that if you want to see it free.
>>635635
Because in the meantime they make a profit from it, and that encourages them to continue making more stuff, which benefits everyone.
Again, artists aren't benevolent gods who come to produce art just for the good of art, they're people who need money to keep the lights on, and if they can't do that, then they can't produce more art, even if they wanted to.
>>635643
1-3 requests per month. Do you realize what the artists charge for commissions? A finished, shaded pic is often easily 70-120 bucks. That's near a full year's subscription right there.
>>635643
TCP became obsolete the moment Patreon became a thing. Not bound by bullshit "no messy diap" rules and the quality seems to be better overall.
>>635663
Artists can still make money by doing commissions, can't they? The only difference is that only one person has to pay for a commission.
>>635611
Because his dick is tiny as well. Him attacking you gets it hair-width hard.
>>635624
Yes, sir! Posting sir!
>>635653
He dumped everything from the artists that he liked (that wasn't in previous leaks, that is). In other words, in a full year since the last leak, we got:
>4 images by KKBunny
>3 comic pages + 2 comic pages + 5 images by RM
>1 image by Zee
That's only counting the artists I care about, so your mileage will obviously vary. However, that averages out to less than 1 new image per month from each of the artists I like (even 0 images per month in some possible cases). There's no way in fuck I'd pay a subscription for that. I think it's safe to say that you'd only get 1 new image per artist per month.
If they want me to pay, I fully expect 1 or 2 images per artist, per week.
>>635670
>120 for a single picture
Last I checked I can get Piece of Soap or Merunyaa to do an image for $20 fully colored. RM definitely is the top of artists, but the others are really damn mediocre and nothing better than what Deviantart has to offer.
This threads gettin' heavy... Let's talk about somethin else.
>>635678
Well, strictly from a consumer sense, I can get the cheapest commission's available and spend 20 bucks on one pic, or I can spend 15 for like, 12, and the possibility of getting a commission anyway. That makes it worth it to me.
>>635681
And how often does Soap do commissions? And people have been bitching about Meru's "Tumblr nose and thighs" all the time. And those are the cheap ones, single character pics with little to no backround. For a fully colored and shaded pic with a couple characters and a full backround, you'd still be looking at 50+ And that's only if the artist is willing and has the time to do it.
>>635690
>And how often does Soap do commissions?
He was cranking them out like no other when he was active. I think he's taking a break now to deal with real life stuff.
>And people have been bitching about Meru's "Tumblr nose and thighs" all the time
And yet Crinkleken, Ah Bagels, Swabbs, Cricket, and Carnival Tricks all have the "Tumblr nose" too. It seems to be a recurring element in western artists for whatever reason (big, pronounced noses that are red).
>>635690
>or I can spend 15 for like, 12, and the possibility of getting a commission anyway
Except those 12 images could be complete shit (and given the fact that a lot of the art is furry or fugly, that's a distinct possibility) or things I don't like, and you use the key phrase "possibility". Now if I got a GURANTEED commission once per month from any artist in the TCP roster of my choosing, I would say it's worth paying for. However, since it's only the chance, and only a sketch/scribble, it's not worthwhile.
>>635688
welcome to diaper /biz/ hell
>>635552
Okay here it is.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8o_Atuli8hFNWgxbGlrbkNyVUk/view?usp=sharing
The costume "elin merry sunishine dress" will now be completely white with the diaper pattern under the dress. it's probably easiest to catch a glimpse of the diaper as a ninja while running.
I've included safe modding instructions within the readme.
>>635702
I wanna make it diaper /mu/ heaven.
This is the music I like to listen to while diapered (and in general, I suppose):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQxDM2K-hd0
>>635699
>
Except those 12 images could be complete shit (and given the fact that a lot of the art is furry or fugly, that's a distinct possibility) or things I don't like
So...Don't pay for it, get your commissions from artists you like, let people who DO think it's worth it pay for it, and if you want to see all the art for free just wait till the end of the year...
I honestly fail to see what the problem is.
You can consider TCP a swindle, fine, but it's my money and I spend it how I like, along with the several hundred other people who do the same.
>>635706
I do not play but that is cute
>>635706
Thanks! I really appreciate it!
>>635688
Weed and diapers
Best thing, or greatest thing?
>>635723
Oh. def the best.
>>635706
You mentioned there was a readme, i just see the .gpk file alone here.
>>635713
>but it's my money and I spend it how I like
Are you having buyers remorse? Is that why you're mad about people posting TCP stuff? Because YOU paid for it, and us schmucks are getting it for free?
>>635713
>and if you want to see all the art for free just wait till the end of the year...
Honestly, I just wait for the leaks. They always happen, and they will continue to happen.
>You can consider TCP a swindle, fine, but it's my money and I spend it how I like
I never once said you weren't allowed to spend your money as you wished. However, I'll say it's rather foolish to do so when leaks occur.
This is like people who still buy 3DS games. Only a bumbling idiot would do it, since any 3DS can be hacked at the moment, and all you have to do is go to https://3ds.titlekeys.com/. Find the game you want, click the QR button, scan it with your 3DS, and it'll instantly begin downloading the game for free straight from Nintendo's server. The best part is how it obscures your system's ID, IP, and all other identifying information (AKA they can't ever catch you).
TL;DR: stop spending money on things you can get for free.
>>635677
>the quality seems to be better overall.
oh yeah fat cummy loads by narcissistic hairy man babies like Jamjar featuring their self insert is definitely better quality
>>635729
I don't want to get banned for furry, but the shit Carnival Tricks draws is arguably worse. At least Jamjar doesn't have pictures of furries with used diapers in their mouths, all while being sealed in trashcans.
>>635727
No, not particularly. I've gotten enough free stuff done by the likes of RM and others to more than fully justify what I've spent.
I'm irritated because in the end, it's this kind of crap that makes artists less likely to make art, and more likely to up and leave the community. It hurts everyone.
>>635728
Do you not understand the concept of supporting the artists that you like and companies that you want to see succeed?
As much as I'm buying one thing, I'm also making an investment in the hopes that the company makes more things that I wanna see.
>>635731
Let me try breaking this down.....
Jamjar is telling people to pay them on patreon not to receive art everyone can enjoy, but so he can make a video game of his faggy roleplay self insert shitting himself and giggling about it. He thinks his self insert is so loved that he drew it on a computer at comicon and left it there for fans to find and see.
As for the other one, sure Carnival Tricks draws weird fucking shit but for commissions.
TipJar is bottom tier.
>>635710
Never expected other people to like Blank banshee around here
Hi5 man
>>635737
>Do you not understand the concept of supporting the artists that you like and companies that you want to see succeed?
They'll succeed with or without my support. If they sink and go under, I just go "oh well" and find something else to like. I could also argue that if artists truly love this fetish or art in general, they'll continue to produce it (even without pay). It's rather telling if an artist suddenly stops if they don't get money for it.
Note that I'm not suggesting artists should do everything for free. I am however suggesting that you shouldn't expect diaper porn to be something you can live off of. I fully expect people to be getting REAL jobs and doing this as supplement income or a hobby. If you really get down to the nitty gritty, even RM is horribly mediocre when compared to non-fetish artists. The only reason RM is praised is because not many artists draw for this fetish.
>>635741
Yeah, Jamjar is definitely worse, but at the end of the day, I don't care about the artist's behavior. All I care about is the art (not how/why it exists), and both Jamjar and Carnival make some fucking ugly stuff.
>>635699
Where's the big red nose on Swabbs and Chricket?
>>635726
should be in there but i'll just paste it here.
How to install this tera mod safely.
Go to this filepath, note that your tera files may be on a different drive.
E:\Program Files (x86)\TERA\Client\S1Game\CookedPC\Art_Data\Packages\CH\
Make a folder named "_PC"
so when you're in
E:\Program Files (x86)\TERA\Client\S1Game\CookedPC\Art_Data\Packages\CH\_PC
place the file "PC_Event_29.gpk" into this directory.
Creating _(folder name) causes the game to read this directory first and will read all the files within this directory and will ignore all other iterations that it
may find. If the file is broken, it can just find the real version or you can delete the file and everything will be fine.
>>635749
Here's one, for example. Cricket also has large, defined noses, but he doesn't seem to smother them in red paint.
>>635742
Blank Banshee is arguably more mainstream than machintosh +. It's nu-vaporwave for plebs such as yourselves that cannot digest proper vaporwave.
>>635752
I did not say Bagels I asked about the other two
>>635746
>They'll succeed with or without my support.
You have to acknowledge what kind of back assward and contagious way of thinking that is, right? If you don't pay for a new game, how is a developer going to sustain itself? Sure, you could dismiss it by saying: "I'm just one person, my money doesn't matter", but if more and more people start thinking that, the money starts to add up, y'know? I agree with the rest of that though.
And I don't think I've seen a single decent piece by Jamjar.
>>635773
This is the end, my only friend, the end
Of our elaborate plans, the end
Of everything that stands, the end
No safety or surprise, the end
>>635746
>They'll succeed with or without my support
And if everyone had the same attitude, there wouldn't be half the amount of things out there.
> if artists truly love this fetish or art in general
The thing is, art takes a long time to get concomitant in, and a VERY long time to get good in. This is time spent aside from everything else in their life that they have to do.
They aren't saints, very very very few people produce anything if there's nothing to be gained by doing so, and we shouldn't expect anything less from artists
>I fully expect people to be getting REAL jobs
Again, do you have any idea how much time it takes to make a decent finished piece? Artists who work professionally are some of the hardest workers I know of, and this includes fet stuff. They sometimes work 50+ hours a week. If that isn't a "real job" I don't know what is, because I've worked in construction, paving floors and roads alike, and it's hard work, but I couldn't imagine working that shit.
>RM is horribly mediocre when compared to non-fetish artists
Arguable, the guy has as much technical talent as anyone I've seen, and he works for a major animation studio I believe. He does non fet art as well, and we have no way of knowing how good that is because it's most likely in a completely different style.
I started paying for things, because I got a job, and was tired of being a leech on society. I'm not judging anyone in that position, because god knows I have no right to, but the stifling feeling of just consuming the work of others without creating anything of my own, or even aiding in the creation of things I like, is what drove me into my own creative endeavors. I'm happier now than I was then, which is why it makes it worth it to me.
>>635756
>It's nu-vaporwave for plebs such as yourselves that cannot digest proper vaporwave.
Or maybe because it's a breath of fresh air (no pun intended) compared to the staleness of your so-called "proper" vaporwave.
What does everybody here own in the way of ABDL style bedding?
>>635801
>implying you've heard enough for it to have grown stale
Who do you think you're fooling?
isnt there a colored version of this
>>635815
Nothing, no crib no cradle, but I adore using a heating blanket when it's cold. It's been so hot lately though I'm going no blankets.
>>635820
If there is I don't have it in my collection
Missing you powerless anon ;_;7
>>635817
The concept alone is done to death. Slow a song down and re-arrange it? Hip-hop was doing that in the mid-two-thousands. That's why we call it "chopped and screwed."
>>635834
>I didn't bother listening too any depth of works because I assumed before hand that the """concept""" wasn't any good. But I still like BB because of the ebin memewave stuff guyz XD
Good to know ;^)
>>635356
t. butthurt Cushypen dev
Nobody's gonna pay for your shitty Tumblr nose furfag artists, get over it.
>>635841
Funny strawman, but a strawman nonetheless. I'm just sayin', it gets old fast.
Look, I wanted this to be a fun discussion for diaperfags. I just wanted to discover new music to listen to when vegging out in padding.
>serious discussion among grown men about the best method for stealing diaper porn
>>635855
This is what billions of years of evolution, numerous continent-spanning empires falling, and the immense luck in no recent extinction events occurring have led up to.
>>635860
An online forum about cute butts and Simponwave?
>>635855
One man's treasure is another man's garbage.
Other men see this as an opportunity to profit.
>>635746
>I could also argue that if artists truly love this fetish or art in general, they'll continue to produce it (even without pay).
>It's rather telling if an artist suddenly stops if they don't get money for it.
I would think most of them would continue to do it, but they would only do it for themselves. If they made their living off their art, or it supplemented their income, and then they stopped getting paid to do it, what incentive is there for them to continue to produce art for anyone but themselves?
If people just stopped going to see or buy movies, would you expect film companies to continue to make and release them free of charge? Of course you wouldn't, to even think so would be crazy. It's the same principle as artists who do commissions.
>>635849
A few hundred paying users say otherwise.
>>635746
You're just jealous no one likes your shitty writing Nazoc
"They outrageous, them rules. Who live in this cider house? Who grindin' up those apples, pressin' that cider, cleanin' up all this mess? Who just plain live here, just breathin' in that vinegar? Well, someone who don't live here made those rules. Those rules ain't for us. We are supposed to make our own rules. And we do. Every single day."
>>635780
>I'm not judging anyone in that position,
Don't be so disingenuous. You absolutely are.
>>635968
How so? Did I ever call anyone who pirates things bad people?
I explained my personal reasons for doing certain things. Not everyone is me, and obviously not everyone feels the same way.
And that's fine.
>>635992
4chan is a hateful and vitriolic place. It is the internet hate machine. It's assumed that if you bothered typing more than a sentence or two, you did so because u mad bro.
It's what 4chan is like. Accept it, take it into yourself, and shitpost with the rest.
>>636001
Could you try to fit in any harder?
>>635987
self inserts with canon characters are the fucking worst
>>636006
Just telling it like it is, man.
>>636010
>straight edge
You have to be 18 to post here
>>636001
North
South
East and West
4Chan's shitpost is the best!
Waaaay Doggies!
>>636016
>proclaiming to not drink alcohol, smoke, or take any substance means under their own will means you're underage
Go fuck yourself, tripfag.
>>636018
>tripfag
You're not helping your case.
>>635815
I've got that 90s pokemon bedding, the rest of my blanket are fuzzy and i sleep in a onesie does that count?
>>636006
Man, diapers fit Tao so well. It's because she's retarded, isn't it?
>>636018
No, you dont have to partake but then again not wanting a buzz yourself doesnt mean you have to kill the buzz of others. Straightedge is an obnoxious label especially when alcohol is ingrained in culture. just saying. dont take it harshly.
>>636026
Out of all the tripfags who have posted in these threads, Leftism is the worst. Even Owlcan is better than him.
>>635891
>source: my ass
>>636042
>pothead trying to call anyone else obnoxious
You're all so fussy today. I think it's about time we all had a nap.
>>636056
I dont smoke weed. It doesnt agree with me. makes me a paranoid mess. besides, people I know are very functional weed smokers and lead accomplished lives.
>>636050
Source: Am TCP member and they hold polls most months with the number of user votes tallied.
Never less than a few hundred,
>>635815
Id like one of those zippy sacks they sell on tv.
plus, i have a daybed that is sorta like a crib
http://www.wayfair.com/South-Shore-Summer-Breeze-Twin-Daybed-with-Storage-39-Chocolate-10079-TH4217.html
maybe a weighed blanket would be interesting just for the snuggle factor. i have add too so it might have a double benefit
>>636045
No one is worse than Owlcunt.
Is it me or does tipjars card game idea make literally no sense?
>>636145
Are there even any rules yet?
>>636145
That and I'm sure it'll be a poorly coded, RPGmaker game where every other action will involve Tipjar's self-insert shitting themselves. The other times they'll piss.
>>636145
>a diaper fetish artist and a diaper fetish writer aren't game designers
shocker
>>635362
they obviously can tap into who saves a assload of pictures at once also. So even if the watermark blurs, they will still know I'm sure. Unless they stay a couple of months and save up image
>>635306
There's more security measures in place then just a watermark. It would be cool to see this done but I've known too many that have tried and failed. And if you plan on keeping your account at all, it'd be important to know for sure that all things are set.
>>635501
None of us are rich. The money helps of course and it's a huge motivator in spending so much time drawing the more high quality stuff. (Yes, there are some artists that are debatable) But some of us take it very seriously. It's not even that we are mad about leaks. It just makes it hard to feel motivated without that payment. I doubt anyone here, that doesn't have parents to live with, can survive without a job. Let alone find time to draw 1 or two HQ images every month. It sucks that so many people hate the site based on "They have something I want but won't give it for free". I know this will just be a ongoing battle with the community though.
2 cents
>>635626
shut up
>>635681
>I don't know how to draw and have no concept of how long a drawing can actually take
>>636050
https://gyazo.com/77eb27c67e892a68effaa0b50ec83f39
>>636324
You know what would resolve all the fighting? Timed free releases. After X time, the content becomes free. A lot of artists do it with Patreon, where everyone eventually gets the art, but in order to get it when it's brand new, you have to pay.
For example, it could be something like 6 months. Once the image is 6+ months old, you can view it without an account. Of course, TCP would obviously have to offer more incentives to get people to pay. Perhaps a guaranteed sketch or some nice discount on getting a commission from the TCP artists.
The way I see it, old art is already paid for, so releasing it for free after some time acts as advertising to say "yeah this is the quality of art we offer, and joining can get you it faster AND get you top tier commissions".
That's just my opinion though. I just feel that hiding the art permanently is like dangling meat in from of a starving dog. You technically have every right to do so, but it's just asking to get bitten (or in this case, have your art leaked).
>>636333
We do this now. After a year though. All content is allowed to be released as long as it's been given a year. Honestly a 6 month wait would be better. We know you all want to be able to see it too. I personally appreciate it when anyone can enjoy what I create. I'm sure the other artists agree. It's something to bring up at least. And an actual helpful response is nice.
>>636333
There is also already discounted commissions for members, 4-5 free requests in monthly livestreams, and its definitely priority for us to engage fully with everyone. The expectation of free everything while we work however many hours to put content out just ins't worth it though. I, myself put in nearly 40 hours each month to create 2 fleshed out images and maybbbe a sketch. Unrealistic expectation is the problem here though.
>>636336
A year seems a tad too long, and I've never even heard of this to begin with. Maybe some advertising is in order. Looking at the site now, all I see is an icon for stuff from 2013. Maybe I'm probably just missing it.
Either way, the fact that leaks are happening shows there is something (partially) wrong with the system.
Also, I find it humorous that TCP's tumblr started posting the leaked content only moments after the leak.
>>636338
The thing is, you literally put yourself in a high castle by locking the content behind a big gate. People expect A LOT as a result of that. I mean there are other porn sites for example that offer a shitton more for less per month. Of course that goes into the discussion of a niche market, but at the end of the day, the customer is still paying a lot for your content versus paying for another porn site which offers far more.
>>636333
Honestly it just seems like no matter what TCP does, there will be people there to "justify" why what they are doing, is fine. And why TCP is just full of monsters and meanies. It's basically come down to nick picking and complaining that it isn't all free.
>>636342
The site underlines what we offer under the about section. Our tumblr states is as well. I think the problem here is again, unreasonable expectation.The amount of wait time though and the quality of the work I definitely agree on. I'm unsure how that is managed though.
It's probably the fact that our baring in this community is full if negative images instead of providing more useful information and just connecting with all the ones that feel so defensive and mad at us.
You have to admit though, it's hard to connect with people who hate you. But also, the ones that are very unreasonable and are just there to troll.
![tumblr_o7bqg8hkLr1r5jxbso1_1280[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/0SvIYYQ.png "tumblr_o7bqg8hkLr1r5jxbso1_1280[1].png")
>>636338
I don't mean to sound like I'm ragging on you, but is TCP something you do on the side? No judgement either way (because a day job doesn't always make ends meet), but 40 hours / month only makes sense if you're doing that in your off-time.
But it's worth noting I think there are going to be -some- number of leaks no matter what, although I think it's fair to say that cutting down the wait time would mitigate it somewhat.
>>636347
I'm going to be blunt here and say I personally think that TCP is a bad deal. I only like a select few artists, and I only like some of their art. Also, I have no interest in streams, as I don't really want to interact with people when all I want to do is fap.
I would definitely join TCP if:
1.) I could pay less to see less (e.g. I only like 1 in 10 artists, so I only pay 1/10th of the cost to only see that artist)
2.) I could pay less to only see specific content (e.g. pay less per month, but don't get access to furry art, male focused art, etc)
3.) Some alternative to streams (AKA get to request stuff, but don't have to interact with others)
If you haven't noticed yet, I'm basically asking for a way to support a single artist and only support specific content they create (like Patreon, really). I don't want to support furry art, Carnival's bizarre images, and so on. If i could pay like $5 per month just to access RM's art, I would do it instantly.
>>636347
I honestly think the heart of your problem is the paywall model. Even in other businesses outside of fetish porn such as online newspapers, software (fuck you Adobe,) and video games, having a paywall tends to generate a strong negative reaction from consumers. This holds especially true if there are alternative business models currently operating in the market.
Patreon feels like the bastard hybrid that makes the model work. One time payments or monthly, artist can set whatever benefits and access levels they want, highly individual (not a collection of artists, most of whom I don't care about at all.) Dunno what to tell you when it comes to adjusting how TCP is run. If you guys are satisfied with the numbers you're getting, stick with what works I suppose. You're not likely going to get a site of people like us to sign up for a paywall, no matter what's on the other side of it.
For what it's worth, the only diaper art I've paid for aside from the odd commission is PieceOfSoap's art packs. It was super cheap for a nice handful of works, you got to see a little before you bought, and he appeared to be set to release them once a month (before he vanished.) It felt fun to buy, and I didn't regret it. The art from those packs didn't get leaked for nearly a year.
>>636355
this is a side job, for most artists, this is a side job. I can't speak for everyone there but for me, it's a way to draw what I love and connect with others, but also make the extra $ for living. Some artists work full time as artists though. It comes down to basic economics. All that time would put a lot of people in a state of depression for working so much with nothing to show for it. Payment is necessary basically.
I will breakdown an idea of how much an artist actually gets paid there.
The top ranking artist with the highest views. Gets around 1200 every 3 months. These are the artists that post at least 2 HQ images a month and maybe a few sketches in addition. This also includes the artists that have most likely reserved a livestream slot and are doing 4 sketch requests in addition.
For livestreams, some funds are saved for the ones that do livestreams, as extra incentive pay. That is an extra $100 for whoever does a livestream with at least 4 free request sketches, finished and posted by a certain date.
Do the math.
That's around $400 a month. So $100 a week. Divide that by some if not the majority of artists that work 40 hours or so.
That is $2.50/hr.
Say someone works only half of that and cuts quality by a ton.
So 20 hours a week
that is $5.00/hr.
And for the ones where quality is just bare minimal. Maybe 10 hours a week?
$10.00/hr.
Keep in mind, that is just for the top ranking artist. Out of 14 artists.
>>636369
>before he disappeared
In the longrun, what is expected of artists, just isn't worth it. Be it , the money, the nick picking, the justified flaming and trolling.
The service that is being paid for is not just the product, but the amount of work hours put in. Some artists might be able to do more then others. But everyone is different. I think Patreon is a wonderful model and it is why most artists are moving there. Most likely it's why a lot of the tcp quality is dropping even more. (Since a few tcp artist also run
patreons)
But it's also the amount of people too. Prices get lower when demand rises. Most people are unwilling to support though. So there is the standstill.
>>636370
You're making the mistake of trying to equate commission work to wage work. You simply can't do that (I mean hell, the Department of Labor says you can't do that either). Artists, at least the ones I know, always work on a commission basis. You're paid for a final product, not the hours put into it.
>>636369
>PieceOfSoap's art packs
I like that too. If RM or any of the TCP artists did packs (e.g. pack of all art from May, RM's comics, etc), I'd buy that too. Fuck monthly fees though.
>>636376
>The service that is being paid for is not just the product, but the amount of work hours put in.
Again, artists work on a commission basis, not a wage basis. You're not a wage/salary worker unless you're working for a major firm where you're paid on a wage/salary basis, and even then, a lot of big names like Marvel pay artists by the comic page, not by the hour.
>>636361
Streams aren't required for you to attend. Most artists take the requests ahead of time in threads and even offer private messaging to discuss requests for the more shy members. In which the request is usually labeled as Anon.
However, paying less to see less is a good idea. The model now is based on views. But most that do livestreams are given a higher boost of views just because some of the members are curious and click to read it and bam that is a view. The same with sketches. Sketches do not come with a preview so all you see is a name unless you go to the artists individual page to view it. But it is not announced that an artist has posted a sketch. It just announces the name of a sketch that is posted. It's a bit wonky.
All sketches are later posted in a monthly sketch round up of sorts though so everyone can get a chance to have their image seen by whoever is interested.
There is a tag system to be able to tag out of things that you do not like too.
I think it would be more worth it if by default people we able to support the ones they like and not everyone as a whole.
But the site is a team effort and the product being sold is what the site creates, not what the individual artists create.
Basically we all have different styles and different tastes. But we all use that same watermark. We all are representatives of TCP. Patreons are basically the only way to support an individual artist without a site name or team aspect.
That's just how that works.
>>636376
Soap took a hiatus because he needed to focus on life, not because the community beat him down. He's already back now for summer commissions, which filled up instantly.
>The service that is being paid for is not just the product, but the amount of work hours put in
Lemme tell you, the product/service is everything to the consumer. They don't give a shit how many hours you put in, just weather the art is good or not. That's the major downside of turning an internet into a business; business is very often not fun at all. The most profitable way of doing something will likely involve working in ways you're not comfortable with.
>Most people are unwilling to support though
This is bullshit. There is plenty of support that can be seen spread across Patreons and DA commissions, let alone what little slice of the market you guys manage to hold. Just because a lot of /aco/ isn't subscribing to TCP doesn't make us "lost sales." We don't want what you're offering, leaks notwithstanding. Leak or no leak, I wouldn't put up money for a paywall.
The fact that you all banded together into some kind of fucked artist consortium still blows my mind. As someone said earlier, if RM decided to open a Patreon tomorrow, he would likely be making triple what he is at TCP (provided that his art offering was at least somewhat good. Regular comic pages, please!)
>>636382
If we were all paid by commission basis, it would be a different model for everyone involved. It's very much based on views and ranking though in a team environment. I just put it in a hourly sense so you guys can see just how many hours of work it takes to get a certain amount. Also pointing out that that pay scale is only for the top tier artist. So the ones with considerably less views get paid way less.
>>636382
Commission work is for an artist individual effort. Different pay scales are needed for groups though. So it's "fair".
Our commission price is based on how many views our works get. Not our regular commission pricing. Which again. The work hours put in is still a heavy inpact on the artists involved. It isn't considered in this type of pay of course. It's just another way of looking at it and hopefully a better way of explaining how difficult it is to provide so much for so little.
>>636384
I remember when consumers asked the cable companies for "a la carte" channels. The cable companies said that the business model would be unsustainable. Shortly thereafter, people started to cancel their subscriptions and moved to streaming.
What the consumer wants: To pay for channels they watch.
What the consumer gets: A shitload of channels that they don't want and a few premium ones.
>>636384
That's the problem though. I don't care about furries, I don't care about Carvinal's hideous stuff, and I certainly don't care about the bulk of artists who are drawing big noses and pointy chins. I certainly don't care about the "team aspect" either. You're making the mistake that I want to "support" the artists or something; I just want content to fap to. I know that sounds rude and mean, but I'm being completely honest here.
I want something like the following:
>$5 base price gets you access to 1 artist's work
>add $1 for each additional artist you want to view (so 2 artists is $6 per month, 3 is $7 per month)
>this means it's less of a "deal" than $15 per month to see all 14 artists, but it saves money if you're only interested in a select few
>offer "previews" (random images or sketches) from artists you didn't pay for as a sort of "look at this stuff you're missing out on" to advertise or entice people to pay for more artists
>>636389
>>636392
I hate to be rude, but as I said before, I just don't care how much work you put in. I don't care if the product has your blood, sweat, and tears in it; I just want to fap. And frankly, even RFS's stuff for example gets the job done just fine. That's actually one of my biggest complaints about TCP: the scenarios are fucking boring. Unless all the leaks have missed something spectacular, the bulk of the art is "person is standing there in a diaper with nothing else going on". Even RM's work is horribly bland and lacking in scenario.
>>636397
That's exactly my point. On the note of cable companies, it was specifically the sports channels that threw a hissy fit and threatened to sue the cable companies if they tried to offer the "pick what you want" system. Sports channels are the biggest money eaters when it comes for cable companies to split up the profits, and if a lot of people ignored them (let's face it, not everyone likes watching sports), then their profits would plummet.
can somebody edit this so her diaper's stained from messing? and preferably make the text green
>>636397
Which is why Patreon is picking up service. The standstill is that some of the artists that people want, aren't on Patreon. So it's the exclusivity of it as well. People are paying for artists that post nowhere else.
Just like how Xbox banks heavily for their Halo fans.
I totally agree that it would be better if people could just pay for what they wanted. But if it isn't provided anywhere else, can't do anything about that.
I'm starting to believe that this is the reason so many people hate TCP and how exclusive it seems with artists and such.
That is another of the products being sold with the package deal though. Artists that post just there.
>>636406
>I'm starting to believe that this is the reason so many people hate TCP and how exclusive it seems with artists and such.
You just hit the nail on the head. I (and many others) feel TCP is a crap deal because many of us don't want to support all the artists, and instead only want to support one specific artist. I'd be lying if I said the main draw of TCP wasn't RM's art. Without him, TCP would likely fail (or have a notably smaller amount of customers).
If they at least split furry and human art into 2 separate categories more would be willing
>>636401
No no, I understand completely. The honestly is important in all of this I think. The major fault seems to be that people are unsatisfied with the product for certain reasons. It's very helpful that a few of you are taking the time to give pointers too.
If anything , it would be two types of consumers. Ones that pay the $15 a month for all the artist but maybe extra perks. And those that just want a few artists.
It's a very great suggestion honestly.
I think the amount of hours argument might've been me venting more then just explanation. You are right. As an artist that draws it and is also into it, it's focused on the need to "get off" more then anything else.
I'm sure a lot of people feel cockblocked more then anything.
I'm going to write this down for now though and see what we could come up with in the future though, thank you for that.
>>636408
I'm getting a better picture of it. I think the criticism here is definitely helpful if anything.
That being said, if TCP were to add the option of aL la carte and do their best to maintain a system of perks for those that spend the $15 a month, would you personally feel better about the service being given as a consumer?
Out of curiosity and strictly hypothetical for now of course.
>>636410
That is a helpful suggestion as well. The category system could always use more work of course.
>>636414
>That being said, if TCP were to add the option of aL la carte and do their best to maintain a system of perks for those that spend the $15 a month, would you personally feel better about the service being given as a consumer?
Some notes:
1.) Base price is $3-$5 per month for access to 1 artist, with $1 extra per added artist
2.) $15 gets you access to all artists, as currently
3.) NO ADDED PERKS FOR SPENDING $15 BESIDES ACCESS TO ALL ARTISTS (unless you want to make another fucking wall to piss more people off)
4.) That means even if I pay the base price of $3-$5 for a single artist, I still get access to streams and requests from that artist (but obviously no access to streams/requests from artists I didn't pay for)
5.) Drop the dumb "you have to subscribe for months on end to access everything" system. I don't appreciate being roped into money sucking nonsense in order to get access to everything.
>>636417
You are right, it would make another wall. Business wise I cannot see a site maintaining a level of quality and being able to pay the artists that they have now a decent amount though. Unless there is some advertising for those that pay that little bit extra.
It would heavily be a compromise though I think. A la carte available for those that want just the artists that they feel like supporting directly. However, to be able to fund the price cut from the subscribers we have now, moving over to the new al la carte feature. There would need to be incentive to stay.
Overall the individual support of certain artists seems very doable in theory with some switches to the current model though.
It's helpful if anything, just needs to be balanced well on both sides.
>>636426
>to be able to fund the price cut from the subscribers we have now, moving over to the new al la carte feature.
So you admit/realize there's a lot of people who don't want to see certain artists, and only want to pay for 1 artist then.
>There would need to be incentive to stay.
And you just killed my interest again. I want to be able to pop in once a year, see what I missed, and leave afterwards. I don't want to be chained by the neck in order to see everything. Why should I be paying you guys when you're so slow to crank out art? RM does maybe 1 picture a month and some sketches (according to the leak, that is), and I really don't feel 1 picture per month per artist is worth it.
>>636436
Oh of course, I agree that TCP has a very broad range of different artists and not everybody enjoys everything that is offered.
The idea of a "A la carte" features is very helpful and offers the ones that just want to see certain art and stream, just that.
It's also completely understandable that some wont agree with any changes completely. It is frustrating to be denied certain things and I think that is why most think negatively on it.
It is heavily value based and nothing personal though I hope you realize.
More content costs more, less content costs less.
That was the argument and it was a very good one.
I think that the ones paying less for less artwork, the ones they like, is completely reasonable.
The ones paying more, the entire majority of artists, get more as a result.
It would be entirely possible to pop in once in awhile, see the artist you wish and also attend the streams that they do. But what I see is the suggestion that you pay less to see less, but also get more.
>>636452
A good way to look at it from a business perspective is that you're trying to drive revenue up. By lowering your prices and creating individual offerings, you will (in theory) have more people using your service. Since digital art doesn't need to be physically produced aside from the original, this means that the more people you have using your service, the more value you get from it even if your profit margin is technically lower.
Lowering prices does not mean "I am making less money." It's a risk though, no doubt about it. I'm interested to see what you guys do going forward. (Also tell your artists that comics are hella popular. Regular comic page releases would probably sell artist subs like hotcakes.)
>>636467
Comics are always well loved. What's your favorite character to see diapered by the way?
>>636495
Not sure I can answer that specifically; there are a ton of characters I'd like to see in diapers, mostly from anime. The two best archetypes for it though are characters who are already childish, with the transition to diapers seeming natural, and strong-willed characters where the fun comes from breaking them down to get them back into diapers.
Fanart comics in general seem to really be lacking. I've mostly just seen artist OCs, with the most complex being RM's stuff since he has some kinda diaper world going on.
>>636511
If you had to choose an anime character which would you pick then? I know some anime characters get diaper art but a lot don't get nearly as much. RM definitely has his own thing going for him, it works though. I'm wondering if fanart is just harder to market for profit and that is why not many do it.
>>636521
Not many do it likely because they'd rather do their own characters, everyone cares more about "muh style" than drawing the characters accurately, and also many just haven't seen a lot of anime outside the normal mainstream.
>>636521
Diapered Touhous are always good. I've seen some Japanese artists do Reimu/Yukari doujins with Yukari being the mother figure but of course, paper-thin Japanese diapers always ruin things. Cirno and Sawako are both good for naturally childish, and even have some western fanart I believe.
For shows...this is gonna sound really odd and specific, but Shirobako was something really good that aired about a year ago, and had a lot of cute girls working crazy hours in anime production to meet deadlines. Maybe one of them (probably Emma, the rookie artist) could start forgetting to go to the bathroom due to the pressure, and be required by the studio to wear diapers so that they don't have to clean the carpet every time. Her first all-night shift wearing one, she has an accident, discovering the convenience and safety her diapers provide, as she starts to get comfortable with her situation.
...probably sounds ridiculous, and it's not like somebody would ever make it. Just seems like a fun, low page count scenario with lots of embarrassment and diaper-acceptance.
>>636344
I would LOVE a fic based off of this!
>>636045
If you want to see the worst human being on 4chan go to /dsg/ on /vg/ and ask for Lucifer.
I want Lapis to blow air into her hand to make a fart sound while sticking her diapered butt at me.
I'have made a diaper edit. Comments plz.
>>636640
It's not a diaper.
>>636640
Honestly, it's almost a decent pantypoop pic.
Diaper farts?
>>636521
One major issue that makes people reluctant to request diaper art of anime characters is that to put it bluntly, most western artists are absolutely shit at drawing cute faces, which is pretty much the most important part of the anime style. Anyone remember those horrid pics where PinkDiapers tried to draw AB-related anime/manga characters?
>>636775
PinkDiapers just draws in a way that should only be their own style because its so... weird
>>636775
That's probably just because it's PinkDiapers, who maybe has one or two remotely passable images that don't look awful. It wouldn't matter what the subject matter was, it'd turn out uncanny.
>>636775
>Anyone remember those horrid pics where PinkDiapers tried to draw AB-related anime/manga characters?
Please don't remind me. Also, on the note of faces, you seem to be right. Looking at the TCP leak we just got, all the faces have sharp jaws, big noses, and hard features like cheekbones, jawbones, and so on. Only RM seems to have "soft" or "anime" looking faces (and even then, his adult characters have goofy pointed chins).
I believe it was Miyazaki that said if you can get away without drawing a nose, do it, because noses are fucking ugly.
>>636753
that is Cushypens poll
>>636815
>assblasted westacuck
Ayyyy, how's wanking to diapered capeshit going?
>>636824
Better than jerking it to the panties you call diapers, u depends loving fuck
>>636834
>tfw no scans/translations of the new Lunette doujins
>tfw Cushy Pen comics are bland and lack messing, sex, etc
Suffering.
My problem with tcp isn't their bussiness model but their people, all the artists are narcissistic assholes who look down at those outside their clique.
Why should I have any sympathy for people I know think shit about me?
>>636848
I aint no artist but even I look down on you for posting that piece of shit art.
>>634851
Sketchman made one sorta similar. An abdl girl who is super nervous about it is visited by a diaper fairy who gives her all the diapers she wants, but they're cursed and don't come off, so she gets caught. It's a bit of a downer though.
>diapers come in today
>been holding it all afternoon in anticipation
>>636897
Which ones ya got Anon? Is this your first time with ABDL diapers?
Any specific plans, or are you just gearing up for some soggy chill time?
>>636897
Your bladder must be screaming. Just be sure to let it out slowly instead of flooding it. You'll get more out of the absorbency that way.
>>636834
>m-muh white balloon diaper BLART hypermessing!
>>636804
I'm sure it is to you.
>>636948
I would ask you why you're here if that's what you think but honestly given how slow /d/'s diaper threads have gotten I'd look around, too.
>>636948
>I'll point out one shit extreme to negate my shit extreme! That'll prove how right I am!
Don't you have a month old thread to be posting in? You cucks always bring up hypermessing, but that shit almost never gets posted, because it's shit
>>636994
>that shit almost never gets posted, because it's shit
I think we all know that never stops you guys.
>>637052
"Hey Rocky! Watch me pull a rabbit out of my pants."
"Aw, Bullwinkle. That shit never works."
"Yeah, I know but it feels good."
>>634815
why does no one links the archives of aco ... it makes following up all the drawings more challenging and my masturbation harder.
i'm talking about desustorage and archived.moe
>>636848
How can you even confirm that? What proof do you have of that?
I'm not kidding with that, or trying to bait you. I legitimately want to know how it is you think that to be fact.
>>637096
Why? If people want to look at the archives, let them look for it.
>>637096
What do you mean? Desustorage does archive /aco/. If you mean you want people link desustorage archives (which not even generals do btw), maybe try getting 4chan-x, which will automatically redirect you to desustorage for archived threads.
>>637125
>which not even generals do btw
In the old days on most boards everyone used to link to the archives... i'll just get 4chanX
>>637129
>In the old days on most boards
Holy shit who do you think you're fooling? By, "in the old days" do you mean last summer? Because "in the old days" there weren't any reliable 4chan archives you posturing faggot redditor.
>>637143
no reliable archives?
fgts.jp, desustorage, 4plebs, archived.moe (and his ancestors like archive.moe and foolz), nyafuu and more are online since 2013 or even older times.
At least i've been using them for a long time.
If you mean /aco/ only, well duh, /aco/ is like an year old or so
>>636924
Certainly not my first time with abdl diapers! Got myself a package of tykeables and ATN's, I wanted something thin and squishy, as well as something nice and thick. Just not sure which I want first...Then it's time for a nice relaxing soggy evening
>>634837
What server are you on? I got back into Tera recently and it would be cool to have someone to talk to/play with (if you're interested).
>>637206
I'd be down to start a secret abdl guild in tera, isn't that kind of our defacto official game?
>>637191
Well that sounds just lovely. I've got some Tykables as well, I just haven't had much time to wear lately between work and other stuff. A soggy evening sounds like the perfect way to relax, right after I get back from lifting things.
>>637218
Yeah, or at least a network of /aco/-peeps that are on Tera.
>>637105
well, before tcp there are accounts of RM being an asshole, he got really mad when his artwork was posted here saying it was "stolen"
I think that tcp wasn't made to make money but to filter people they don't like, sure you can interact with the artists but you have to pay, what kind of asshole charges you for their attention? even if that is not the case is still quiet elitist to separate yourself from the rest like that.
>>637139
>all artists r bullies boohoo
>has extreme autism
You don't say.
>>637232
If we pick a server I'd be down to hop on and fool around. Would be fun.
>>637232
>おしまい
More like... おしめ.
>>637312
I'm on Mount Tyrannus (though I'm interested in making a character on the RP server as well). Got a bunch of characters on Mount Tyrannus, but I'd be down to make a new character on either server~
