Favorite SCP?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /x/ - Paranormal
You are currently reading a thread in /x/ - Paranormal
>>17385398
That one with the Tesla device that would "pop" reality if it breached containment.
>>17385398
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HURzsrZjTm8
This one.
1730 faggots
Can't remember the number. But it was the beast that lived on Everest. Shit gave me the... chills.
>>17385398
People tend to say the scariest scps are the "doom is inevitable" kinda ones. I disagree:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1733
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-701
these two made me shit my pants the night I read them for the first time. didn't help that I read them in a row
Out of the popular ones: Flesh That Hates and Red Sea Object are preddy gud.
Other neat ones include
>the teleporting chair that got woodchipped
>the shapeshifter who mimicked a researcher perfectly where both of them believe the other to be the fake
>the guy who randomly teleports to different places and then pops back
>the room expander
>the garden of eden abandoned by animals
Some of my favs
>the clockwork machine that can either deteriorate or greatly enhance items placed in it
>the distributor machine that'd give you a cup of whattever the fuck you want
>the tank catapult disguised as a rotary heavy vehicle transport device
>that old terminal room with the only message coming from another dimension where the guy explain why and how some parts of his universe is merging with another one, and why anomalous objects seem to pop up in our dimension
Some othe good ones are:
>the slime that behaves like a dog and managed to make SCP-682 laugh and play with it
>the chess board that works with the brains of two twin girls
>the sentient star that hates humanity and is on its way here
>>17386123
>that time 682 had a rap battle through morse code with the star
I always really liked the microwave and the quantum coffee machine. I can never think of "a cup of joe" the same way again.
Favourite of all time is a tie between the thing that changes itself so you give it away and then die, the ever descending stairwell and the black traffic box
>>17386137
I'd forgotten that one. Hilarious.
Also:
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-999-j
>>17385398
A chronicle of the Daevas.
Don't remember the number, but if I had to pick just one it'd be that one.
What exactly are SCP's anyway? I've read up on them, but never fully understood what they actually are.
>>17386085
>the distributor machine that'd give you a cup of whattever the fuck you want
I keked at the part where the guy asks for a "cup of joe" and it squirts out the blended up remains of some dude named joe.
Radical Larry
>>17386319
If I remember correctly, scps are like these weird anomalies / entities that exist in our realm (and others) that possess unique parameters and abilities that can help or (more often than not) kill us.
The scp foundation itself is pretty much trying to study and understand these entities scientifically.
TL;DR scps are terrifying in its own way.
>>17385883
>tfw someone posts a scip you wrote
hhnngghh
http://www.scp-wiki.net/duke-till-dawn
All time favorite tale from the SCP site.
The dog-like slime. I so want one.
>>17386137
Link please, sounds like cool shit
'Ronald Reagan gets cut up while talking' gave me the creeps
>>17386360
kek do you have the picture I lost it
>>17385883
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-701
srsly the poors people "king in yellow" niggas need to step up
>>17386404
hope its not 701
>>17386615
http://www.scp-wiki.net/incident-682-1548
actually pretty fucking hilarious lmao
>>17386735
You made my life considerably better anon
>>17385883
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1733
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-701
Crazy, you managed to nail one of my favorites and one of my least favorites! I love the evolving basketball game one. Imaginative, creepy, and a good "what if" scenario. Like, what would you do in that situation.
701 is simply out and out plagiarism, as I think a few others in this thread have alluded to. Literally nothing new or imaginative contributed, just someone else's story hijacked and stuffed into the SCP website. I honestly think they should delete it or at least force the author to make some significant, original changes to it.
I'm a big fan of ones like
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-087
or http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-432
Because of the atmosphere, although particularly in the case of 87 I think there's too much atmosphere for not enough reveal. It's a little too coy as an SCP.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-093
I also especially enjoy 93, there, although it has almost the opposite problem, too much reveal. I love the story but by the end, it's kind of lost me.
>>17386672
I wrote 1733. I'm glad people still enjoy it
I think 701 is a pretty damned cool one for what it is. I don't think "Chambers knockoff" is a valid complaint on a board full of Cthulhu mythos shit. There's enough to set it apart from TKIY to be worth a read.
>>17386778
If you like stories like
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-087
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-432
I highly recommend reading House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski. That is, if you haven't already.
either 201 or 169 or the gameshow one or the clown one fuck i dunno there's too many
SCP 17386859
>>17386821
I haven't yet, actually, and thank you for that comparison. That gives me a clearer picture of why I SHOULD be reading House of Leaves!
>>17386648
same here
there's a lot of really great oines
>>17386794
You're awesome.
>>17386890
Definitely a great read. A bit hard to follow at times, but worth the confusion.
>>17386319
>>17386385
An SCP is a Special Containment Procedure for an item that has anomalous properties or is inherently dangerous. The SCP foundation is a fictional foundation tasked with finding, containing, and assigning the items a procedure for containment, or a Special Containment Procedure.
>>17386404
The Heat/Celtics game one is one of my all time favorites. You're my hero if that's the one you wrote.
>>17387069
Yeah, the idea came to me after smoking a blunt to the head. I'm happy you enjoyed it. It's cool when highdeas work out. Sorry for being an attention whore
The guy who teloports to random other dimensions/whatever, the Red Sea object, Shy Guy, that one chair that made people who sat on it kill themselves, the talking spider, ect
>>17385398
this little fucker
>>17386085
Sounds like the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, especially the machine which fills your cup with whatever you want.
>>17387639
Can't remember the number but the page is very fun to read
Also the list of things the Dr.Bright isn't allowed to do
>>17386672
>>17386778
>People getting booty bothered that 701 is similar to The King in Yellow
Why? When I first read 701, as soon as I realized it was a play I said to myself "Oh, this is going to an SCPified version of The King in Yellow." It's not plagiarism, even the creator of 701 said he was inspired by The King in Yellow. I actually like it when people base SCPs on already existent horror shit. I feel like some stuff is obligatory, and in a way it's good for world building. Like the zombie virus SCP (008) or the Candlejack inspired SCP (2521). There's nothing uncreative about being inspired by something.
>>17387999
When I first read SCP 701 I was also listening to Here Comes the Indian by Animal Collective for the first time. It just added to the creepiness and surrealness.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAY-v5omWzs
>>17387624
I love 504.
>>17387999
>the Candlejack inspired SCP (2521).
I really liked that one. Kind of wish more pages tried to be unique like it did, though I'm not sure how they could do so.
2718 is the best/worst one.
666-J, 261, 1344-J, 4357-J
I like da funny ones
The colored discs one is the best
>>17387999
"Even the guy who blatantly ripped off the King in Yellow said he was inspired by the King in Yellow." Man, can I get away with that the next time I steal someone else's idea?
O Brother Where Art Thou was "inspired" by the Odyssey. Charles Manson was "inspired" by the White Album. SCP 701 was simply taken, boiled down into a kind of cliff notes version, renamed and pawned off as an "original" SCP.
Same with 008. Inspired means more than just "copied someone else's idea exactly."
Let me give you an example of what "inspired" and "Creative" mean.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-073
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-076
Cain and Able. These were "inspired" by the mythological characters. Notice how they don't just "recite" the mythology, like 701 or 008 do? In fact, overall they look very little like the mythology; just enough alike that you can see a loose connection (one that would probably be missed if they weren't given such blatant, telltale names.) That's being "inspired" by something.
>>17388158
Have you not read The King in Yellow? Or SCP-701? There are many major differences. Just because a story is similar to something else doesn't mean it's stolen. Chill out.
>Same with 008
1. you can't steal the concept of a zombie virus, same with vampires, werewolves, witches, demons and ghosts. 2. yeah, it's unoriginal but it adds something obligatory to the SCP lore.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-354
The exploratory mission and last document really bother me
>>17388200
I've read both the King and Yellow and SCP 701 and the reason hundreds, if not thousands of people have looked at 701 and said, "that's just the King in Yellow" is because it's just the King in Yellow. What the fuck, do you think I'm just GUESSING at it?
You most certainly can steal the concept of the zombie virus. Zombies of that take and tone can be credited to Lovecraft's Herbert West and Matheson's I am Legend inspiring and being merged formally into George Romero's Night of the Living Dead. While "zombies" existed in other myths and fictions, this viral sort popularized by Romero is also effectively his invention, enjoying only a handful of other, equally 20th century named influences as co-creators. While it might be an oft plagiarized idea in the past few decades, it's still plagiarized and I have absolutely no idea why its presence would be obligatory in the SCP. I certainly don't need or want it there. It doesn't add anything at all to the website or the idea.
>>17388234
That one's a classic. It reminds me in some ways of this one, http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1983
although for the opposite reason; it was a rare SCP with a pseudo happy "ending" so-to-speak. D-class for the win!
049
Shy Guy, that unstoppable motherfucker.
I haven't kept up much with the SCPs lately, is there any new fanfiction with this dude?
>>17388237
No one is arguing that 701 isn't The King in Yellow as an SCP. It just isn't plagiarism. The author isn't trying to convince people he wrote The King in Yellow, he merely wrote a story based off of it. Learn what the word "plagiarism" means.
What, do you work for Hollywood or something? The concept of a zombie virus is fair use. Anyone can make a movie, write a story ect. about a zombie virus. It's not plagiarism. If I make a zombie movie tomorrow no one is going to think I invented zombies and zombie viruses. Romero doesn't deserve a cut of what my zombie movie makes, because it would be MY creative work, even if it is based off of his.
You are going straight up Chris-chan OC do not steal autistic over something you didn't even create.
>>17388295
>No one is arguing that 701 isn't The King in Yellow as an SCP. It just isn't plagiarism. The author isn't trying to convince people he wrote The King in Yellow, he merely wrote a story based off of it. Learn what the word "plagiarism" means.
Plagiarism does not mean "the author is trying to convince people he wrote the King in Yellow."
We're also not talking about fair use. We're talking about taking someone else's idea and claiming you came up with any part of it. I don't even know why you're bothering to argue with me, you don't appear to know what these very common terms actually mean and after me you've got everyone else who also notes that 701 was plagiarized.
It was plagiarized. The discussion's over. Sorry words like plagiarized and inspired apparently give you headaches or something but that's just the way it is.
>>17388315
>Plagiarism does not mean "the author is trying to convince people he wrote the King in Yellow."
So, you don't know what the word "plagiarism" means.
>We're talking about taking someone else's idea and claiming you came up with any part of it.
The author of 701 isn't trying to do that either.
The scp that is a cup that fuses itself to you and rapidly dehydrates you unless you drink the contents of the cup. Which is your own bodily fluids.
I like the vending machine that dispenses random shit, as well as the coffee machine that gives you whatever is "in range" for it to collect.
>>17388518
Good ol' Cup of Joe.
>>17388526
Or the machine that changes items into lesser, similar but different, or "upgraded" versions of themselves. The testing records for that are great!
SCP-239
>>17388315
From what I'm hearing, it sounds like a lot of SCP wiki users didn't know the source of the content so it got called plagiarism because the author didn't explicitly tell anyone where it came from. Whether the author thought that anyone would get the joke or not is a question only the author can answer. It isn't up to community consensus.
>>17388857
No, it got called plagiarism because he simply copied the idea, adding nothing to it. Anyone who's read the King in Yellow, and actually knows what words like inspiration and plagiarism mean, or what it's like to be creative or inventive, reads that thing and instantly says, "holy shit this guy just copied the King in Yellow."
There's another one that's also, sadly, among the top votes that's just a very bad rip off of Jorge Borges. Same thing, the author claims it was "inspired" by Borges when in fact it was simply, "repeated from" Borges.
>>17386206
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-999-j
okay, that made me kek pretty good.
>>17388888
Pentuple eights
:^]
This doesn't have to do with scp, but I just thought I might ask. I remember a gif floating around a while ago. It was like a monster crab walking across a street at night and a car drives past or something. It was apparently form some movie.
freakiest scp I read was the one that turns you into wood or something and you are still alive.
>>17388870
>another one that's also, sadly, among the top votes
So it sounds like you didn't process what I said, because you just confirmed what I said.
>"repeated from"
Oh cry me river. Everything I've ever said has been stolen to the ends of the Earth and back 20 times over by now. It's only plagiarism when someone's made an earnest effort to claim it as their own. If they made a pop culture reference style SCP and people like it then it's obvious your problem is the fact that people liked it, not that the author tried to pass it off as their own creative work.
>>17388912
found it. from movie xtro.
>>17386226
That one's so fuggin cool. I could see that making a decent movie or TV show.
>>17386342
Joe asked for a "cup of Joe". He did not get coffee.
The machine poured out 12 oz of Joe's bodily materials, but apparently evenly enough in distribution that he did not die. It apparently was quite unpleasant, but he recovered.
>>17388922
>Oh cry me river. Everything I've ever said has been stolen to the ends of the Earth and back 20 times over by now.
Shhh shhh shhh there contrarian. I know you like fighting with everyone over everything, but nobody's trying to "Cry you nothin'." They were plagiarized. 'Nuff said.
>>17388870
>Anyone who knows what words like inspiration and plagiarism mean
Not you
>>17388535
That's scp 914
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1802
It's almost a joke SCP but I love this one for its simple yet enduring homage. I also tend to like AWCY skips.
>>17389015
>plagiarized
That word doesn't mean, what you think it means.
>>17389015
Unless you're the author and can speak about his intent, or unless you saw the author claim that the work was originally theirs, your say means little.
Dare not to impugn another's word unless the die cast out your favor.
>>17389053
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1802
AWCY? is pretty cool desu
>>17389061
The author of SCP-701 has stated that it is indeed based off of The King in Yellow.
>>17389101
And? That doesn't mean it's plagiarized.
Which was the SCP about the killer teddy bear?
>>17389215
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1048
This one?
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1128
I am not hydrophobic, but I think this is the kind of fear someone with hydrophobia has.
>>17389177
>"I wrote a story based off an idea from this book"
>"Stop trying to claim that you came up with an idea that came from that book!"
>>17389228
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1048
Yeah that's it. The picture strikes Goosebumps down my spine alone.
>>17389271
It's so spookily cute!
Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
>>17389037
Take a Zepplin riff
And you alter it a bit
And make lots of money
It's called plagiarism
Does anyone know what SCP is the one where a guy is stuck in a certain time anomaly, where another version of him will somehow track him down, non-lethally incapacitate everyone and then kill the original copy and take his place and act as if nothing happened
>>17389324
Someone should sue Puff Daddy then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxuodY-c0yU
>>17385398
Tower of Babble. I don't know why but I find it very unsettling and interesting. Partly because so much is left to the imagination
>>17389324
wow someone talking about plagiarizing zepplin that's rich
>>17389400
Well that's a collab with Jimmy Page, so...
>>17390646
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WmoC5cj8sw4
If you children want to see "plagiarism", go find any page on Tv-tropes. Retard mouthbreathers, there isn't a single piece of fiction that isn't "plagiarized" from somewhere else.
>>17385398
Forget his number, but God. Definitely God. Guy seems like such a bro.
>>17390993
343, I think. I don't think he's really God, or if he is he's putting on a front. The God of the SCP universe wouldn't be such a bro. Of the other religious/spiritual stuff I've read (like the Guardian at the Gate) even the angelic stuff is scary.
can someone explain me what exactly what is SCP 231-7?
>>17391143
Pretty sure she's a succubus.
110-Montauk is - well, you know...*ahem*
I could be wrong though.
>>17391195
Is Rape?
>>17391222
The word 'Rape' is triggering for some.
The SCP Foundation approves the terms 'Surprise Sex', 'Romantic Rough-housing', 'Forcy Fun-Time' or 'Struggle-Snuggle' in preference.
Thank you for your co-operation.
>You could have worked on Procedure 110-Montauk and don't remember it
>>17386085
>the clockwork machine that can either deteriorate or greatly enhance items placed in it
SCP-914 "The Clockworks"
>the distributor machine that'd give you a cup of whatever the fuck you want
SCP-294 "The Coffee Machine"
>the tank catapult disguised as a rotary heavy vehicle transport device
SCP-2041-J "The Tankapult"
All favorites of mine.
>>17387164
999 a cute
>>17387624
SCP-504 "Critical Tomatoes"
A brief list of other favorites of mine;
>043 "The Beatle"
>537 "Singing Gramophone"
>2112 "And The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth"
>315 "The Recorded Man"
>073 "Cain"
>529 "Josie the Half-Cat"
>335 "One Hundred and Fifty 3.5" Floppy Disks"
>1987-J "Bitchin' Solo"
>>17386648
Same. That and SCP-666 (Hallucination yurt) are my favorites.
If anyone remembers this, does anybody have the page that had things like SCPs being merged together at the beginning to help solve problems but only making things worse? I haven't seen that one in so long. It had I think it was a funnel SCP being used with another to create cures for diseases at the start.
>>17390868
Looks like we found a pissed off author of SCP-701. It's fucking plagiarized you fucking fraud. Stop making up excuses.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-902
What's that plagiarized from? Hint : nothing. You're an ass.
>>17391663
See:
>>17388338
Please learn what words mean before you use them.
>>17391740
That says if you take someone else's idea and try to pass it off as your own, that's plagiarism. That's exactly what the SCP-701 guy (you, probably,) did. He tried to pass off his work as in someway original and creatively distinct from the story which "inspired" it, which it isn't in any way. It's just copying. It's plagiarism. You're an idiot.
>>17391885
Yeah, retard. The author (you) lied. It's not "Based on" its just a copy. You're a fucking idiot.
>>17385883
Me too, the best ones are unsettling because of their subtlety.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1981
what do you guys think that happened when they put the chimp in SCP-914 and set (fine)
>>17388912
>freakiest scp I read was the one that turns you into wood or something and you are still alive.
Was it wasps that did that and then made a nest inside you? I don't know what the number is but that is one I found entertainingly spoopy.
>>17391025
I remember reading a Tale where 343 was just a reality bender from 1930s Poland or some such.
>>17391663
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-902
You know, I definitely remember seeing that very same exact concept in some piece of fiction before, but for the life of me I can't recall what it is.
>>17392199
[DATA EXPUNGED], obviously.
>>17392056
What the hell are you on about? Are you saying the author didn't say it was based off of The King in Yellow? He did, it's in the discussion. Are you saying he copied it word for word? He obviously didn't.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-445
>Folded Into: A paper boat/hat - When placed in water, became self-propelling at speeds of up to 60 km/h. When inverted and placed on head, subject's physical attractiveness was greatly increased in the eyes of viewers. When both were performed simultaneously, both effects were achieved, with subject reported as looking 'dead sexy' while scooting around the water upside-down.
>>17392272
>>17392828
How HYPER-REALISTIC of you.
>>17392199
Probably created a super human/the next evolutionary step of man, far too advanced for the world to understand.
Or more realistically, events that a lazy writer never got around successfully developing.
>>17391143
Reading bedtime stories to a little girl.
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/fear-alone
>>17388158
you sound like a butthurt jealous faggot.
faggot.
>>17388315
You have a tiny penis.
Step aside suckers
Best SCP coming through!
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-8900-ex
>>17389324
Lol, melodies have been getting reused for centuries.
>>17391281
Fuck triggers, get over it or fuck the fuck off.
>>17389324
>NB4 Robert Johnson
>>17388315
You're a fucking idiot. I'm filtering you.
>>17389015
Jesus you even pissed off fairy queen. Your a real piece of dumbshit garbage lmao
>>17394308
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-8900-ex
wut
>>17394308
That one's stupid as hell.
Before photos were paintings. In color.
>>17385398
Pic related.
Couldn't find a good one that didn't have -B in it.
>>17394748
2nd favorite.
>>17386778
>the dark stairs one
NOPE
>>17385398
>ITT: faggots share such scary story
do you guys have anything better to do? or are SCPs the only horror(if it can be even called that) you can stand
>>17385398
trying to remember the name of the robot that looks like it's from the 90s and speaks of the "laws of physics" and how they shouldn't exist and how they are oppressing people
as well as continually asks to speak to earths leader
>>17394925
>>17395005
Oh. I haven't seen that bait picture. Saved.
>>17394925
>SCPs
>Horror
Have you even read SCPs?
>>17394698
Exactly, because the paintings are made from pigments. Which were affected by 8900-EX.
Anything involving AWCY.
>>17385398
There are loads I really do enjoy. However, the elitism that's endemic there is tiresome. They don't enjoy outsiders contributing to 'their collection', and regularly downvote entries that haven't been approved by their masters.
So are these things basically creepy pastas for grown ups
>>17396670
>>17396670
I guess? Creepypastas aren't really just for young people so I'm not sure where you getting that from.
>>17396339
>They don't enjoy outsiders contributing to 'their collection'
>Elitism
Can you be more specific? What do you mean? Don't you need your entry to be reviewed by SCP Foundation anyway before it can be put on there?
>>17396339
>>17396753
I ask this because I am thinking of posting a SCP but I didn't know it was that.. troublesome. Are you just exaggerating?
>>17396758
It's not terrible, but don't necessarily expect "constructive" feedback from the core group anymore. And whatever you do, don't provide your own tags! Oh man that crazy girl they've got doing that will go absolutely ape shit on you!
On the plus side, the worst that can happen is you get down voted, appear for a bit on the "worst of" list, and it disappears, you try again. Also, I will say this, if you go to the irc, or at least the last time I was there (which was a while back, admittedly,) you can ask for help improving your ideas and your formatting and you'll get some good feedback from the larger body of chatters there.
>>17396768
>Oh man that crazy girl they've got doing that will go absolutely ape shit on you!
>Don't necessarily expect "constructive" feedback from the core group anymore.
Well. That's a real shame. After reading some SCP entries, I was under the impression that it was mature individuals who owned the page. I guess I was wrong.
>>17391663
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-902
A mixture of the mimic from DnD, and that ghost story about the ghost of the little girl who died during a game of hide and seek hiding inside of a trunk that locked closed. Now her ghost scratches at the inside of the box, trying to lure people to come towards it, but when they open it, there's no one in there.
>>17396794
Perhaps I'm painting them too negatively, I didn't mean they were THAT awful. I just found it easier to work independent of them than try to work with them. They're people with all their normal people flaws.
>>17396808
I understand.
>>17396753
>>17396758
>Are you just exaggerating?
Yes they are.
>Don't you need your entry to be reviewed by SCP Foundation anyway before it can be put on there?
No. Although they recommend you post a draft in a forum specifically set aside for drafts before posting to the main site, and get irked if you don't do that.
That said, the admins retain the right to delete your article, albeit with a few caveats.
They can only exercise that right if your article is at least 24 hours old AND has at least ten downvotes, OR the time requirement is removed if the article has at least 25 downvotes. Also, if I recall, at least three admins have to agree before it can be deleted.
Also, they have a list of annoying cliches somewhere (in the required reading I think) and the entire community will come down on you like a sack of bricks if you include anything from that list.
>>17385398
I love the incredibly difficult to destroy reptile, I even made a fakemon based on it
>>17388158
Sounds like SOMEONE wrote 073 and 076 and aren't getting enough love.
Your stories are very good Billy.
I forget what the number is, somewhere in the 2000s, I think, but there's one that's just a bowl of mashed potatoes that people mistake for other people
>>17388888
H O L Y S H I T
O
L
Y
S
H
I
T
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-956
What the fuck man, it can affect kids FUCKING MILES AWAY.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-066
It's just so "off", in every sense of the word. It's scary not because it's some world ebding threat or because it's an enigmatic predator, but because it is *something*. Not anything in particular, at least nothing we know about, but it's just something.
>>17397198
That's actually really neat.
>>17397210
2981 "Mashed potatoes can be your friend"
I know this stuff is based on submissions, but Jesus Christ. That belongs in the joke files, not a legit scp
>>17386319
OC donut steel ayy lmaos.
I am pretty sure there was one about a... negotiating entity? It was semi-benevolent, I think, but it just got people in and made bargains with them. At the end, the Foundation sent in a legal aide who sat down and negotiated for a while, and they both left having enjoyed the experience.
>>17397198
So...
the same one in OP's pic?
>>17397459
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-066
Thinks like this and the basketball tape get me the hardest. World-ending angels are cool but this little reality-eroding things get to me just like you described.
>>17397978
Yes
>>17397779
This?
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-100
Is there one about insects that plant eggs in my skin?
>>17398269
no, thats just botflies
>>17398269
Probably.
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-914
This one has always captured my imagination more than any other. And seeing as how the settings have a stacking effect it literally has the potential to create God.
>>17398575
>http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-914
The potential, but it seems like past a certain point a level of aggressive lethality kicks in. Like, pretty much at a certain point or area of advancement, humans can no longer endure what's going to be created in that region, before a godhead appears.
>>17398269
yeah, theres one where they turn your whole body into a living hive for themselves
>>17385398
Vending machine or coffee maker.
Sasquatch, End of the World and the one where we share a portal with another dimension that gets angry with us.
>>17398666
Hey Satan. I think I found your latest creations.
Fabulous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OjVzRpoWU4
>>17397198
This one if my fave too
>>17385398
i haven't read about SCP for about a 8-9 months. maybe they have cooler ones now but my favourite was the "dream man"
>>17389321
Was?
>>17391143
Somebody's fetish.
106 is badass
>>17400156
I can guarantee you that no matter what, you name a thing, it is the fetish of someone somewhere.
>>17400440
Ill let you know one thing.
There's porn of 682 and 049.
Some people, right?
>>17400440
A rape factory isn't even trying not to be a fetish.
>>17400475
furries
plus the scp "fanbase" is underaged and atrocious
>>17385819
sauce pls
>>17400554
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1529
You mean 1529? Pretty spooky.
That one about Jupiter on yt.
17 replies
>>17388234
>http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-354
My absolute favorite SCP right here
I love the logging style and the final expedition segment, do any other SCP's do it as well as this?
i just really love dr bright and dr clef.
the ones i can remember at the moment are the Fingers of God and, shit i forgot the other one
I'd say probably this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfrHCP8EttY
>>17400833
people watch this stuff?
>>17400810
>it's growing
>>17400810
Here you go; http://www.scp-wiki.net/incident-096-1-a
Haven't read the whole thing, but I think it's what you're looking for.
Here's a few more that I consider nearly the same style; (I highly recommend reading scp-087 first)
http://www.scp-wiki.net/document-087-i
http://www.scp-wiki.net/document-087-ii
http://www.scp-wiki.net/document-087-iii
>>17391281
STRUGGLE-SNUGGLE
New favorite term adopted
>>17385398
I can't remember which one it was, but there was this SCP that was a couple of colored circles (coins? things with words on them?) which would attach themselves to mirrors if placed on them and thereby create a portal to another world.
There were like 5 or 6 documents regarding the excursions into that world. It was post-apocalyptics, with some sort of plague having descending on cities (people outside being insane or zombies, possibly; or just dead).
The last civilizations appeared as futuristic cities ruled by some weird Paganistic + Worst-Interpretations-of-Catholicism dictatorship, and the people going in saw these massive, fleshy monsters going around.
It just created a really amazing feel for this world while remaining somewhat subtle; it gave out information on it without the whole picture being understood, or focusing on some LOOK AT THIS SCARY THING.
If anyone knows what I'm talking about, please post. Shit was fucking dynamite.
>>17389246
Oh look it's Thom Yorke on /x/ instead of /mu/ or /b/
>>17402515
It was linked in this thread but I'm not sure which one
>>17388128
Never read 2718 until just now.
That was actually really fuckin great, and pretty well put together, right up until the very end. That was just a disappointing way to end it, but still probably one of my favorite SCPs now.
>>17385398
that hole to alternate universes
>>17394316
Some people's inability to detect sarcasm is astonishing
>>17402666
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-093
>>17385883
>SCP-1733
MY NIGGA.
>>17385398
Have you guys seen this guy making an SCP calendar?
Would you order one?
>>17404095
Whoops, here's a link
http://overlordcrown.tumblr.com/tagged/scp
>>17404095
>>17404096
There's really no need for wall calendars anymore considering everything has a built-in calendar these days. Still, I'd be down for an art book. This is some good shit.
butt ghost
SCP-610
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-610
2030, aka JUST A PRANK BRO
I like the little cat which is actually a tiger :3
I like the Absence Of Shark one. Does anyone know what I'm talking about?
>>17391222
>>17391222
>>17391281
If I recall correctly, the writer said that 110-Montauk is not rape. Its something worse.
SCP-2238
>Special Containment Procedures: If SCP-2238 becomes angry, give it any kind of candy or sweet and it will return to its living quarters.
>Description: SCP-2238 is a piece of wax that can float around, it can grow hands when given a item it wants. When angry it will plop itself onto someones head and wait there until the subject suffocates or it gets a candy or sweet. It will never be given a vault, as that makes it angry. Always put it in a standard staff living quarters. Do not give it pudding, it will throw it on the ground and stay on the persons head until they suffocate no matter what.
>>17405191
That sounds really fucking lame.
It's made of wax. Melt the little shit with a blow torch.
>>17405191
SCPs like these need to be deleted. It ruins the whole immersion.
>>17405235
>>17405282
Samefag. And this is a thread for FAVORITE SCP, not scariest or realistic SCP.
>>17405235
It's special CONTAINMENT procedures, not special DESTRUCTION procedures, numb nuts.
The creepy radio voice that is into Miles Davis
>>17385883
*yawn*
>not exactly an scp but is a story about paranormal defense force from the scp website, takes place in south america, had lots of fun reading it
>project motakh or whatever, i don't even remember how its called anymore but its probably one of the most popular scp's
>the one where you get send a card that have a menu and you called and they sent you food and charged you, no one could trace back the food company
Ball of sharp
>>17386735
guise, that faggot star 1548 should have arrived to earth years ago. I did some rough calculations and, according to the information given, came to the conclusion that the star should have arrived at earth in 1982 at worst. This thing travels at .85c! The crab nebula is 3.2 ly away! wtf man, this hurts my autism please tell me I'm wrong and missed something.
>>17405752
nasa keep tracks of things like this
try to contact some hobbyist and ask him
scp-2317
I like the way it works, with the iterations. It also mentions The Scarlet King, like 231, which also had a strange meta thing. Are there more like that?
>>17394444
Basically, it was an scp that changed all the worlds color to horrible, disgusting new ones. They couldn't contain it, so they just altered everyone's memory to believe that the new colors were the norm. That's the real reason why old photos are in black and white.
>>17405399
The Foundation has destroyed SCPs before, numb nuts.
Usually the terribly written ones.
That aside, I always like 914 and that one video tape of Ronald Reagan.
This one
>>17397779
>negotiating
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-738
>>17398719
>portal
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1322
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1933
Some of these SCPs are really bizarre. This guy only survives on the ingredients to Irish cream and all his bodily fluids are Irish cream. What even
>>17406062
They destroyed 096, and that one was amazingly well-written.
who's the most murrican scp?
>>17405399
Isn't that a thing in universe? I forgot which group had Special destruction procedures
>>17405382
Sure. But that specific SCP is still lame.
>>17406892
SCP-50-AE-J
>>17406858
Termination has been authorized, but not confirmed.
>>17407083
The GOC, I think. I haven't looked at the site for a few years now, so I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure they're the ones who clash with the Foundation over handling of anomalous materials.
>>17407250
http://www.scp-wiki.net/incident-096-1-a
Last lines: "That is horrible, doctor. How could you knowingly-”
“It worked. There was only a matter of time until that happened in a major population center, and its face spread over the world news. I can kill 096, but I’ve killed myself in the process.”
I thought the reset button one was pretty funny. Its a little too long though
>>17385883
1733 reminds me of that "creepypasta" i think where some dude tried to make Quake play itself but after like 2000 times the AI learned that it's better to not even move
>>17385398 (OP)
>>17405752
faggot got btfo he won't come cuz he a biatch
The Living Gun SCP is probably the best one.
>>17407348
Did they end up terminating it?
>>17407887
That wasn't pasta.
I think scp-2000 is the coolest, but I also like the one including an entry log of a task force entering a house, and it's all foggy and shit. Also, I think there's a family or book "tied" to the house. Does anyone know what I'm talking about?
>>17409124
What do you think?
>>17385398
Scp-166 Teenage Succubus.
It's a 16 year that needs 1cc of human sperm to live and walks around naked all the time.
>>17409526
>Description:SCP-133 are a set of six hundred and thirteen (613) black, circular pieces of a waxy, paper-like material 5cm in diameter. When placed against a solid surface and rubbed, SCP-133 will instantaneously "transfer" to the surface and create a circular hole.
niggawhut.jpg
>>17409536
>133
Fucking idiot. Read the post again. Even if he is lying, you checked the wrong document.
>>17409544
oh.
>tfw
>>17409589
It's alright. Pic related.
>>17386778
087 is in my top 5
