What was the universe's start?

Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
What was the universe's start? 2016-01-17 23:09:17 Post No. 17233606
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: nightmare goggles.jpg (103 KB, 840x578) Image search: [Google]

What was the universe's start? Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:09:17 Post No. 17233606 [Report]

Assuming the Many Worlds Interpretation of the Universe is correct, we know that every universe branches into two more for every binary possibility, and all these universes keep expanding out, seemingly forever. But if that's true, then all the universes could eventually be traced back to a singular Happening that then split. So what could that have been?

Thinking about this is making me begin to think that this all being a computer simulation is actually plausible.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:10:30 Post No.17233609
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:10:30 Post No.17233609 [Report]

OP here forgot to mention I'm a girl.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:12:50 Post No.17233632
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:12:50 Post No.17233632 [Report]

Why would this make you think a computer simulation is possible?

Your complaint is that the theories of of existence all just shift the onus of the moment everything began onto something else. Then you say that it makes it seem plausible that we're in a simulation. So then what made the simulation?

You're making the exact same mistake you're complaining about.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:13:03 Post No.17233633
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:13:03 Post No.17233633 [Report]

Real op here God damnit /x. I am actually a girl but that doesn't help at all.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:13:58 Post No.17233640
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:13:58 Post No.17233640 [Report]

>>17233633
girls smell good, I think.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:14:15 Post No.17233642
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:14:15 Post No.17233642 [Report]

Actual op here. Yes, I am a girl, but that's irrelevant. But if enough people post in this thread I will prove I am a girl ;)

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:15:36 Post No.17233647
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:15:36 Post No.17233647 [Report]

>>17233609
What nation?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:15:57 Post No.17233651
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:15:57 Post No.17233651 [Report]

>>17233632
What made the simulation was beings that exist in an infinite universe.

>>17233633
Fuck off fegit, sorry if I'm not up to /x/ culture. Guess I should've posted on the science board.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:17:32 Post No.17233662
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:17:32 Post No.17233662 [Report]

>>17233651
> Guess I should've posted on the science board.
Anything is better than any of Hiro's new boards...

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:19:44 Post No.17233675
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:19:44 Post No.17233675 [Report]

>>17233651

>What made the simulation was beings that exist in an infinite universe.

So why is it possible for you to believe we are in a simulation created by beings in an infinite universe, but somehow it's not possible that we are in an infinite universe?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:21:11 Post No.17233687
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:21:11 Post No.17233687 [Report]

>>17233675
Because our simulated 'universes' run on different mechanics from theirs. Like, quantum shit exists in our simulation but not in their (the real) universe.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:24:35 Post No.17233705
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:24:35 Post No.17233705 [Report]

>>17233687

What reason do you have for believing that for some reason it's more plausible that we are NOT in an infinite univserse but are a simulation created by beings in an infin

actually forget it. I already know this conversation is going to be fucking annoying.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:27:24 Post No.17233729
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 23:27:24 Post No.17233729 [Report]

>>17233662
>being this new