Can someone split this into two 1920x1080 wallpapers for a dual screen setup?
That means making it 7 times it's size. It would look like drizzling shit. Please use your brain before asking us to turn a 743x156 image into a 3840x1080 one.
I have half a mind to do it just to laugh at how shitty it'll look...
Sorry :(
I don't care if not perfect. Can you get it to look as good as you can?
>>90580
Sorry, my initial reply came off WAY more rude than I intended, but yeah, the image is WAY too small to do this with. I'll blow it up for fun just for you to see, but again, it'll be blurry as hell.
I had a quick look for a larger version of the image online with no luck. If you had a bigger one I could do much more with it.
Let me have a play with them and see if I can make them look any better at all, but yeah...
If you had a larger version this would be much easier.
>>90582
Well, you can sharpen it and add a bit of grain. Some times that helps the brain think it's actually higher quality and not some blurred shit like this.
Thanks for being a good sport. This is 4chan... I have heard much worse. In fact, your apology is the only thing that seems odd in here :)
I will take a panoramic with my cell tomorrow and repost. I start work in about 5-hours. FML.
I guarantee my pic will be much easier to work with.
Wow... Already looks way better. I can only image what can be done with a higher res version.
Looking forward to it if I am luck to catch you.
>>90585
That's one of the things I'm doing now, but again it's a 156px being blown up to 1080p... You can only really do so much. I'm throwing a few things at it to see if I can draw attention away from the low quality.
I',m not a complete n00b. I understand the distortion of blowing up an image with the quality of an icon to wallpaper size.
I was curious to see if Anons out there (like yourself) had any "tricks" up their sleeves. Apparently they (you) did.
>>90586
Bookmark this thread and post the panoramic here rather than making a new one (if this thread is still alive).
Use this picture and just slap "Manufacturing and Technology Centre" on it.
Meanwhile, OP, I took a couple of pictures of my own.
What! Sweet!
I'll be sure to take a decent panorama when I get to work at 7:30AM. Hopefully there is a good amount of daylight and not too many employee cars in the lot.
Or maybe I can have my car in the middle where I usually park and use that as a focal point.
Oooh, I'm excited to go to work for a change.
LOL, I see that this pic is from Google Earth? Nice one. Did you enhance it or is GE just that good now?
>>90656
Google Earth Pro. No enhancing though, I just took screenshots. I think they might actually look decent if you messed with them in photoshop.
LOL, that's what I'm doing. Although I should be getting ready for work soon or actually doing work.
You keep making it better; nicely done.
But don't worry about these images, if you are planning to look at my panoramic shot. Heading into the office/factory now. \
Pretty cloudy at the moment but they are calling for big sun before noon!
Thanks again, stranger that yelled at me and then went above and beyond to assist.
Oh 4chan...
>>90697
I'm a different anon lol
>>90698
You do kind of look like me though... You're just not as fuckboxy.
Also: Bump.
FBox,
Still at work, couldn't take a picture this morning as the sun was directly in the background and my phone camera is not a SLR :P
Hopefully you are still around to take a look at the pano that I'll take around lunch.
If not, thanks for what you have posted throughout the thread.
>>90579
Should have put it though waifu2x a few times. Still looks shitty but far less shitty than any Photoshop resizing.
To many cars. Fuck. How weak...
>>91157
For photos I would normally agree, but for 2D drawn stuff waifu2x probably still works better.
In this case though waifu2x is better due to how low res the original image is so it is better to neuralnet additional information while scaling than expand using bicubic scaling.
Can see the big difference here
>>90871 vs >>90582 and >>90689
>>91068
Lets see if we can get rid of some of these cars... hold on.
>>91177
>probably still works better
>In this case though waifu2x is better
you haven't even tried it lol
>>91185
Go away Adobe shill. Here is your proof I use Photoshop with Bicubic scaling. Will post result after.
[spoiler]It looks remarkably like >>90689 if not slightly more blurry[/spoiler]
>>91185
With some filtering or sharpening it would look similar to the other attempts.
>>91193
Adobe shill? I don't even pay for it. That doesn't even look like the latest version.
>>91198
>That doesn't even look like the latest version.
It is CS6 and version differences aren't really going to make much difference in scaling with Bicubic bar looking at some super old version compared to a new version.
If you are not a shill then I am not sure why you are so adamant that Photoshop would be better at scaling when you have been proven wrong.
>>91198
>>91193
While you guys are arguing I'm over here using GIMP and slowly making progress...
I'm not done yet, still trying to clean up where I took away the cars, but at least I'm getting somewhere.
Do you think this has potential OP? If so I'll clean it up.
>>91202
>implying that software doesn't improve
>>91206
hey, more power to ya. i tried learning it, but didn't have the patience
>>91212
Post your image then for comparison. Can't tell anything with just a screesnshot. Though googling around it seems all it is is just a filter on top of Bicubic.
OP here.
You all are awesome.
I wanted to get a panoramic shot with less cars in the parking lot. And mine sitting somewhere in the middle and use it as a goal point.
The
>>91177
waifu2x has been down the whole evening, is this typical?
>>91387
Sometimes will go down if many people are using it or if there is an version upgrade.
You can do it yourself anyways.
https://github.com/nagadomi/waifu2x
Or if you are on windows
https://github.com/lltcggie/waifu2x-caffe/releases
Is more flexible doing it yourself since you can customise the scaling and go larger than the limits set on the website. It may take 5-10 min if you are using just the CPU instead of CUDA.
>>91526
why so many damn versions of waifu2x
