last thread: >>915689
>>946883
>>946919
>>947336
What a fucking asshole. Unless the guys down there were dicks to him.
>>946888
what is this?
>>947399
A webm
>>947399
Source Code
its an action flick, not some Freaky Friday knock off if thats what youre looking for
>>946883
>Bernie elected president
>>947394
im at a loss, im not sure wether i should go to bed and tryna forget this shit, or perhaps watch it again and cringe some more cuz gawd damn thats not funny
>>946888
>that aint me
>source code starts playing
>>947761
It's a satire. During the 90s there was this huge push for amateur journalism, leading to insanely stupid shit like this.
>>947505
Damn you tell us what this is from.
>>947758
>its an action flick, not some Freaky Friday knock off if thats what youre looking for
There are not really many action scenes to speak of.. it's actually more like some kind of a whodunit mashup of Groundhog Day and Vanilla Sky.
>>946883
the televangelist in this scene is Ken Foree, the same actor who played Peter in the original Dawn of the Dead (he also played Kenan's dad in Kenan & Kel).
Dawn of the Dead 2004 is actually my all-time favorite zombie movie, and my favorite Zack Snyder movie by a longshot
>>947401
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA oh anon you slay me
>>947318
I like how this is one of the only times you see Carl Weathers in the film
>>947371
Watch the movie its Day of the Dead, the third in the Living Dead series by Romero. Its not great a film, but to answer your question, yeah they kinda deserved it.
>>946883
>>947505
Its called Mis-drop...
>>950288
cams are fucking atrocious
>>946883
See this is why I watch all movies with subtitles. I can't hear like half the fucking words this guy is saying.
>>948746
I'm so glad for Ewan Mcgregor's sake that that toilet is merely painted like that.
>>948758
God, fuck the 1980s. Holy shit.
>>948758
>elisabeth shue will never spoon you playing minigolf
>>948758
>>950613
>>950621
;_;
>>950603
>I can't hear like half the fucking words this guy is saying
So uh... I guess you quoted the wrong webm here? Because that guy is enunciating and speaking very clearly.
>>950627
>>948758
>>950621
Some people complained she looked too old in that movie to be playing a teenager (and to be dating a very young looking teenager). She was actually 20 years old during filming in 1983. It looks fine to me; she just doesn't have a babyface.
Here she is in Link (1986), a (kinda shitty) horror movie about a chimpanzee that she filmed 2 years after Karate Kid. The full movie is on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTKkR3ObT54
>>948746
he should have just shat on the ground somewhere outside, it would honestly have been less disgusting than what he ended up doing and he wouldve found the suppositories way easier
>>950692
got any shue in leaving law vegas?
>>950814
las*
>>950692
>So uh... I guess you quoted the wrong webm here? Because that guy is enunciating and speaking very clearly.
I'm not that guy, but he's completely correct. Enunciating? Yes. Speaking clearly? No. The volume varies dramatically between each word, so that about a quarter of the lines are drowned out by the background music.
>>950603
>>950823
Fine, here's your subtitled version. I was unhappy with the original webm anyway because his voice was delayed by like 0.2 seconds (since the televangelist is not on-screen when he says the first word, "Hell," in the actual movie; instead it's someone from the last scene).
The only words that are hard to understand at all are, "How do you think your god will judge you?" and maybe "Well friends, now we know." And that's only because he says that part really softly. The rest is perfectly clear, even on my mono phone speaker. To say "the volume varies dramatically between each word" is an exaggeration that is blatantly false and it pisses me off that you would even spout such bullshit.
>>947643
source?
>>951112
Sum of all fears
>>947506
That was actually impressive.
>>950692
Thanks for the link to link (No pun intended)
>>947394
kek, i laughed
>>947501
wait, what the guy did to him exactly? Just pulled his pants down?
>>951558
>Thanks for the link to link (No pun intended)
no prob, bob. there might even be another version out there that doesn't have those obnoxious yellow Polish subtitles. I don't remember seeing them the last time I saw the full version of Link on YT, meaning I was looking at a different video.
The part from the webm is at 50:33 by the way, if you wanna see the controversial woman x chimp love scene immediately after
Someone do the opening to last nights X-files episode. Seems perfect for /wsg/
>>948746
>>932442
Why does Trainspotting compress down so efficiently? I can get in 3 and a half minutes w/ audio inside a 4MB webm not-for-ants, and the video is like VHS quality.
This is the ACTUAL audio.
>>951753
>line about stainless steel as they cut to colossus
kino
demolition man could not have been more perfectly cast
>>951945
>Hux remembers why he's in the first order
>>952001
lel
>>947336
Is that the guy from Planet Of The Apes?
>>951701
To be fair, even something as seemingly trivial as that can be pretty traumatizing if you're just a kid. It sucks to feel completely physically at someone's mercy.
>>947501
what a faggot. He got dacked that's all.
>>946883
>>952048
He's not wrong. Great movie.
>>946883
>>947374
Ah, fuck, this is good. Prolly' gonna start watching this.
>>955330
Harrenhal? That's a big tower.
>>956890
OMG I SHART MY PANTS
MY SIDES
>>947503
Bunch of pansies.
>>957292
>>957307
>Scr
>>956090
life and times of tim is GOAT
>>950682
Name of film?
>>959064
'71
>>959428
What language is that?
>>959581
french
>>950692
damn that's some great sideboob
>>959681
G.I Joe: Dickless
Somebody posted this webm a long time ago, but I didn't save it at the time, and I was just watching Possession today, and I was like, THAT'S IT, THAT'S THE SCENE, so I webmified it again, and now I'm posting it instead of requesting it like a faggot. Enjoy.
And no, the crazy guy is not Anthony Hopkins, but the young guy is indeed Sam Neill.
I love tuco
>>959715
Every single scene between these two guys is fucking golden.
>>959764
HAAAAM FIIIIIIIIIIGHT
>>959744
Actually I lied. I want to make a couple more webms from Possession, because holy shit this movie.
>>959812
Or, you know, I would, but my computer takes like a million fucking years just to chug out one fucking webm.
>>959812
it's a pretty good flick
>>959853
The scene I wanted to webmify (the freakout scene in the subway tunnel) is too long for me to be able to make with a good bitrate, and I don't want to split it into two scenes, so I'll just do that scene instead.
I seriously spent the last hour trying to make a single webm. I even tried playing around with "-threads", but that only seemed to make things worse. How the fuck do I make a webm in a timely fashion?
I been making a webm for the last fifteen minutes and it's only just finished the first pass. Jesus mother of fuck there has got to be a faster way of doing this.
>>959867
>what's your CPU?
I-3. Bad?
>Also 2-pass encoding is unnecessary.
That's a relief. This will be the last two pass webm I ever make then, I guess.
>>959856
what timecode was it and ill try it
>>959881
>why the fuck are you not using webm for retards
Why the fuck would I?
>2 pass and variable bitrate always.
What's it like being a monstrous cuntbag?
>>959883
Eh, don't bother. It's like a three minute scene. You could make it, I'm sure, but you'd have to either use a bitrate in the low 100s or else split it into two parts, and it really needs to be watched in full definition and all together.
>>959890
>Why the fuck would I?
because you asked
>How the fuck do I make a webm in a timely fashion?
>What's it like being a monstrous cuntbag?
>helping people make better webms is being a monstrous cuntbag
ok
>three minute scene
yeah that's not gonna work with 4MB limit. What scene was it anyway? I'm curious
>>959908
Fine, I'm sorry for calling you a cuntbag. I was just pissed off because of the encoding times. I'm not going to use WFR though, because I'm on Linux, and it's a Linux sin not to use the command line when you have the option to do so.
Anyway, I suspect that my uncharacteristicly long encoding times may be because I'm not deleting the ffmpeg log file after each webm, because every time I make a new webm from the same movie it seems to take a longer and longer time, but then when I switch to a different movie it takes a much shorter time. Next time I'll try deleting that file after each one, and see if it makes a difference.
>What scene was it anyway? I'm curious
Like I said, Anna walks down a subway tunnel and has some kind of psychotic freakout. It ends with her spewing liquids from every orifice and straining like she's giving birth.
>>959873
i3 can be bad if it's really old and budget. But newer i3's (from like 2011 on) should be able to do the job fine.
>>959881
2-pass encoding isn't really necessary. I have encoded hundreds of webms using both techniques and, for the most part, I can't tell much of a difference in quality. It actually seems like one-pass CBR tends to show its low-bitrate-blurring (not sure what the term is) mostly just when changing to new iframes/different angles. 2-pass VBR, however, seems to have lesser blur-effects happening constantly and for no real reason. Look at the wallpaper at the end of the webm in >>959873 's post and how it keeps blurring & refocusing every 0.5 seconds even though the image isn't changing.
there are advantages and disadvantages to both:
http://www.webmproject.org/docs/encoder-parameters/#3-rate-control
>>959944
>But newer i3's (from like 2011 on) should be able to do the job fine.
Mine's newer, yeah. I got the machine in 2013.
What do you think of my theory that it's the log file? Do your webms start taking longer and longer to make if you make multiple ones from video files in the same folder, without deleting the log file between each one? (I won't be making any webms today – too much homework to do – so I won't be able to test this theory out.)
>>960117
Actually, there is just one webm I want to make before I head off to school, just to round off my collection of hammy Neil/Heinz dialogue scenes. (I'll even use two pass encoding, just to be consistent with the previous ones.)
Have any of you guys seen Repulsion, the film Possession is inspired by / paying homage to? It's really, really good, though slightly slower paced and with slightly less blood and murder. I can't think of any particularly webmifiable scenes from it, other than maybe a couple two or three second shots that I really loved, but it's definitely a classic.
>>951753
Why would you use a terrible screener/cam copy to make a webm of a scene that's in the HD trailers?
>>947519
Sauce?
>>947336
CHOKE ON IT!
CHOOOOOOOOKE ON IIIIIIIIIIIIIIT
>>956888
4 u, lord baelish
>>959944
>2-pass encoding isn't really necessary.
>>960978
would have been more obviously with more movement but whatever we were talking about Possession earlier.
this one is same setting only 2pass encoding
>>960983
and just for comparison:
2pass
variable bitrate
>>960990
>implying anyone but massive autists would ever attempt variable bitrate on anything but the shortest of clips
Bro, ain't nobody got time for that shit. Resizing and extrapolating and shit. Fuck that.
>>960995
Whatever, it's better and works really well on webms with lots of movement. If there isn't much movement then it doesn't matter as much and you can use the time saved to make more shitty webms
>>946913
Why has no one commented on this?
>>963822
probably because we've all seen it before
>>959734
I always wondered why Tuco ran like a little girl..
>>951945
Fuck, I really need to get around to watching this soon.
>>956886
What a rascal
>>964017
Adults acting like 12yr olds. Hilarious.
Everyone really was fucked up on something all the time during the 70s.
>>964017
Adults acting like 12yr olds. Everyone really was fucked up on something all the time during the 70s.
>>947336
This is from Day of the Dead right?
>>964838
>What is fun
I would say you're the highlight of any party but we both know you're never invited to any.
>>946883
>>966863
Is that the movie with the roaches?
>>966957
Yep.
>>959428
>posting non-lewd wakfu wembms
>>966952
Roon Roon?
>>946883
>>967049
Think you can do one of her saying piss off, and then putting the sunglasses on?
Both with and without sound.
In fact, maybe just without sound only.
>>967053
Do it yourself you lazy cunt.
>>967058
Oi fuck you ya fucking ballsack licking faggot. You got the source material already YOU do it.
>>967061
>>966976
Loon Loon
>>964206
>/pol/ directs a vampire movie.
>>967312
whats this from?
>>967337
Terminator 3
>>964838
This shit still happens on gameshows to this day, anon. Do I need to go find stuff from the Chase?
>>963822
I haven't seen it before. It almost seems fucking surreal. This guy is a legend in my book now
>>948713
what's the movie
>>950692
That's an orangutan
>>959525
>it's all relative
>>966234
lame. the audio doesn't even match up with that bullshit.
>>965879
It's an honor to not be invited to parties.
>>959525
This is how Donald Trump is going to make deals in the future
>>966802
Funniest thing ever.
>>968728
>>968416
The Losers
>>959681
G.I Joe Retaliation
>>959527
i never noticed the good job done by the translator on this movie: check at 52sec on the webm, they labelled the switchs on the french nuke box. they say "verouillage" wich is ok, "avorter" wich means abort like in abort a pregnancy, "prêt" meaning ready and my favorite of all "bras" which means "an arm" as in a part of the body, i guess they wanted to translate "arm" as in arm a weapon. Good job.
>>946883
>>968885
Even knowing that those ships are actually really detailed miniatures, filmed in close up, it still looks absolutely stunning.
>>967065
amazing
>>967769
>that explosion
top kek
>>970544
I don't get it. What happened?
>>970556
The ship they're in is getting shot at by enemy ships.
>>967769
>ISIS Blooper reel
>>970613
Yeah
>>947336
This movie will always give me the fucking creeps, but I love watching it every time.
>>948740
God-tier intro
>>964012
this was one of his most badass moments
>>970900
Why would you shoot for 3mb with sound?
>>970913
i didnt make it m8
>>971150
that morricone makes me go from six to midnight real quick
>>971178
>Movavi Video Converter Trial Version
Jesus Christ
>>946904
Movie had so much damned potential...
...And somehow turned into Jason hunts down the retarded teens in wonderland...
If they ever make that sequel, they'd better come up with something like a fault in the suspension process causing massive brain damage...
>>963822
Because /pol/ is the new normal.
>>948045
Spooooooooooooooon!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yLPpBtGnGo
>>950692
>Some people complained she looked too old in that movie to be playing a teenager
This was a bit before we had people nearing their 30's playing teens in 90210.
...and somehow going to the beach every day straight after school from Beverly Hills, and still managing to get back before midnight.
There was somes serious capeshit going on in that show.
>>971260
>>951726
Great films. Characters unexpectedly finding their kids dead like that always gets to me..
>>951977
Can't say I liked it better when it was Woody Allen and Diane Keaton.
>>967065
quality responses like these are why I show up
>>956890
really good, thx for the kek
america
>>971877
>>951726
Trainspotting the GOAT film and book about addiction desu senpai
>>970648
dam, Mr Sands looks so young.
